Biomedical subjects

Hirotaka S Shibata

Publications and source records attributed to Hirotaka S Shibata.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Substrate recognition ability differs among various prokaryotic tRNase Zs.

There exists a significant difference in pre-tRNA preference among prokaryotic tRNase Zs. This is an enigma, because pre-tRNAs should form the common L-shaped structure and tRNase Zs should form the common structure based on the alphabeta/betaalpha-fold. To address this issue, we examined six different eubacterial and archaeal tRNase Zs including two newly isolated tRNase Zs for cleavage of 18 different pre-tRNA substrates. Two Thermotoga maritima, one Thermus thermophilus, one Bacillus subtilis, one Thermoplasma acidophilum, and one Pyrobaculum aerophilum enzymes were tested. To our surprise, the newly isolated proteins T. maritima and T. thermophilus showed the weak tRNase Z activity, even though their primary amino acid sequences are, on the whole, quite different from those of the typical tRNase Zs. We confirmed that substrate recognition ability is quite different among those tRNase Zs. In addition, we found that the optimal conditions as a whole differ significantly among the enzymes. From these results, we provided several clues to solve the enigma by showing the potential importance of the 74th-76th nucleotide sequence of pre-tRNA, the flexible arm length of tRNase Z, the divalent metal ion species, and the histidine corresponding His222 in T. maritima tRNase Z.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

Unstructured RNA is a substrate for tRNase Z.

tRNase Z, which exists in almost all cells, is believed to be working primarily for tRNA 3' maturation. In Escherichia coli, however, the tRNase Z gene appears to be dispensable under normal growth conditions, and its physiological role is not clear. Here, to investigate a possibility that E. coli tRNase Z cleaves RNAs other than pre-tRNAs, we tested several unstructured RNAs for cleavage. Surprisingly, all these substrates were cleaved very efficiently at multiple sites by a recombinant E. coli enzyme in vitro. tRNase Zs from Bacillus subtilis and Thermotoga maritima also cleaved various unstructured RNAs. The E. coli and B. subtilis enzymes seem to have a tendency to cleave after cytidine or before uridine, while cleavage by the T. maritima enzyme inevitably occurred after CCA in addition to the other cleavages. Assays to determine optimal conditions indicated that metal ion requirements differ between B. subtilis and T. maritima tRNase Zs. There was no significant difference in the observed rate constant between unstructured RNA and pre-tRNA substrates, while the K(d) value of a tRNase Z/unstructured RNA complex was much higher than that of an enzyme/pre-tRNA complex. Furthermore, eukaryotic tRNase Zs from yeast, pig, and human cleaved unstructured RNA at multiple sites, but an archaeal tRNase Z from Pyrobaculum aerophilum did not.

Bacillus subtilis↗

PubMed2005

The T loop structure is dispensable for substrate recognition by tRNase ZL.

tRNA 3'-processing endoribonucleases (tRNase Z, or 3'-tRNase; EC 3.1.26.11) are enzymes that remove 3'-trailers from pre-tRNAs. An about 12-base-pair stem, a T loop-like structure, and a 3'-trailer were considered to be the minimum requirements for recognition by the long form (tRNase ZL) of tRNase Z; tRNase ZL can recognize and cleave a micro-pre-tRNA or a hooker/target RNA complex that resembles a micro-pre-tRNA. We examined four hook RNAs containing systematically weakened T stems for directing target RNA cleavage by tRNase ZL. As expected, the cleavage efficiency decreased with the decrease in T stem stability, and to our surprise, even the hook RNA that forms no T stem-loop-directed slight cleavage of the target RNA, suggesting that the T stem-loop structure is important but dispensable for substrate recognition by tRNase ZL. To analyze the effect of the T loop on substrate recognition, we compared the cleavage reaction for a micro-pre-tRNA with that for a 12-base-pair double-stranded RNA, which is the same as the micro-pre-tRNA except for the lack of the T loop structure. The observed rate constant value for the double-stranded RNA was comparable with that for the micro-pre-tRNA, whereas the K(d) value for the complex with the double-stranded RNA was much higher than that for the complex with the micro-pre-tRNA. These results suggest that the T loop structure is not indispensable for the recognition, although the interaction between the T loop and the enzyme exists. Cleavage assays for such double-stranded RNA substrates of various lengths suggested that tRNase ZL can recognize and cleave double-stranded RNA substrates that are longer than 5 base pairs and shorter than 20 base pairs. We also showed that double-stranded RNA is not a substrate for the short form of tRNase Z.

Animals↗