PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Hiroyuki Kanda

Publications and source records attributed to Hiroyuki Kanda.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

RIKEN structural genomics beamlines at the SPring-8; high throughput protein crystallography with automated beamline operation.

RIKEN Structural Genomics Beamlines, BL26B1 & BL26B2 at the SPring-8, have been constructed for the structural genomics research. The main feature of the beamline is full automation of the successive data collections to maximize the beam-time efficiency. The beamline optics adopted a standard design commonly used for the SPring-8 bending magnet beamlines. Beamline instruments are operated by centralized control system through the computer network to achieve the automatic operation. The core part of the beamline development is a sample management system composed of sample changer robots for laboratory and beamline, and a networked sample database. BL26B1 has started user operation, and the automatic operation with the sample management system has been implemented at BL26B2.

Crystallography, X-Ray↗
PubMed2005

Beamline Scheduling Software: administration software for automatic operation of the RIKEN structural genomics beamlines at SPring-8.

Beamline Scheduling Software (BSS) has been developed for the schedule management and equipment control of the RIKEN Structural Genomics Beamlines I and II (BL26B1 and BL26B2 at SPring-8). The beamline operation is automated with a sample-changer robot and a database system. The experimental schedule is registered to BSS as a list of diffraction measurements for numbers of protein crystals. BSS implements the beamline operation communicating with beamline instruments through the computer network. The RIKEN Structural Genomics Beamline I (BL26B1) opened for users using BSS in October 2002, and the automatic operation was implemented at BL26B2 in October 2003.

Automation↗
PubMed2004

Transretinal electrical stimulation by an intrascleral multichannel electrode array in rabbit eyes.

BACKGROUND: A new method of stimulating the retina electrically, called suprachoroidal transretinal stimulation (STS), was shown to be effective in eliciting electrically evoked cortical potentials (EEPs) in Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats. Before extending this technique to patients, it is important to determine its safety and feasibility in eliciting EEPs from medium-size animal (rabbits). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the surgical procedures used to implant an multichannel electrode array into a scleral pocket, and to determine whether the implanted electrodes can stimulate the retina effectively. METHODS: These acute experiments were conducted on six rabbits. An array of eight gold microelectrodes, embedded in polyimide, was implanted into a scleral pocket over the visual streak area. The size of the microarray was 2 x 4 x 0.180 mm. The reference electrode was implanted into the vitreous. The electrode array and reference electrodes were connected to a stimulator to deliver monophasic current pulses. Cortical responses were recorded with a stainless steel electrode implanted into each rabbit's skull over the visual cortex. After the experiment, the eyes and electrodes were examined histologically. RESULTS: The surgical procedures for electrode implantation were accomplished without serious complications. EEPs were recorded after monophasic electrical pulse stimulation from each electrode. The mean threshold for EEPs was 55.0+/-10.0 microA with a 0.5-ms duration inward current pulse. The charge delivered at threshold was about 27.5 nC, and the charge density was about 56.0 microC/cm2. Histopathological examination of the retinal tissue around the area of stimulation did not show damage at the light microscope level with the electrical parameters used. CONCLUSIONS: Our technique for STS with an intrascleral microelectrode array is safe in rabbit eyes, and EEPs were elicited by current densities that did not induce tissue damage. These results suggest that STS via intrascleral multichannel electrodes is a feasible method for stimulating the retina.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Direct stimulation of optic nerve by electrodes implanted in optic disc of rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether wire microelectrodes implanted in the optic disc can be used to elicit cortical potentials. METHODS: Two or four platinum wire electrodes of two types, viz., the cut-end type and the exposed-tip type, were inserted through the vitreous and fixed in the optic disc of 16 rabbit eyes. Electrically evoked potentials (EEPs) were recorded after bipolar electrical stimulation with the two wire electrodes and by different combinations of the four-electrode system. The optic discs were examined histologically after the experiment. RESULTS: The wire electrodes were successfully implanted and fixed into different positions of the optic disc without serious complications in all 16 eyes. EEPs could be elicited after bipolar electrical stimulation of the optic nerve using either the two-electrode system or different pairs of the four-electrode system. Threshold charge densities to elicit EEPs were 0.32-0.64 mC/cm(2) in eyes using the cut-end type of electrodes and 0.93-6.21 muC/cm(2) in eyes using the exposed-tip type. The amplitude of the EEPs increased with increasing electrical stimulus intensities. Histological evaluation revealed limited damage to the neural tissue adjacent to the electrode track. CONCLUSIONS: The visual cortex can be activated by direct microelectrical stimulation of the optic nerve. The acute implantation of the wire microelectrodes into the optic disc by a transvitreal approach is feasible and results in only limited damage to the optic nerve.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Electrophysiological studies of the feasibility of suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation for artificial vision in normal and RCS rats.

PURPOSE: Assessment of a novel method of retinal stimulation, known as suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS), which was designed to minimize insult to the retina by implantation of stimulating electrodes for artificial vision. METHODS: In 17 normal hooded rats and 12 Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rats, a small area of the retina was focally stimulated with electric currents through an anode placed on the fenestrated sclera and a cathode inserted into the vitreous chamber. Evoked potentials (EPs) in response to STS were recorded from the surface of the superior colliculus (SC) with a silver-ball electrode, and their physiological properties and localization were studied. RESULTS: In both normal and RCS rats, STS elicited triphasic EPs that were vastly diminished by changing polarity of stimulating electrodes and abolished by transecting the optic nerve. The threshold intensity (C) of the EP response to STS was approximately 7.2 +/- 2.8 nC in normal and 12.9 +/- 7.7 nC in RCS rats. The responses to minimal STS were localized in an area on the SC surface measuring 0.12 +/- 0.07 mm(2) in normal rats and 0.24 +/- 0.12 mm(2) in RCS rats. The responsive area corresponded retinotopically to the retinal region immediately beneath the anodic stimulating electrode. CONCLUSIONS: STS is less invasive in the retina than stimulation through epiretinal or subretinal implants. STS can generate focal excitation in retinal ganglion cells in normal animals and in those with degenerated photoreceptors, which suggests that this method of retinal stimulation is suitable for artificial vision.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Transretinal electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal multichannel electrode in rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: Several approaches for placing an electrode device for visual prosthesis have been previously proposed. In this study, we investigated if transretinal stimulation from the suprachoroidal space can elicit an electrical evoked potential (EEP) in albino rabbits. METHODS: A flat electrode array (polyimide plate, platinum electrode) was developed and used for this study. After performing a scleral incision at 2-2.5 mm from the limbus and placing an anchoring suture, the array was inserted into the suprachoroidal space in the posterior portion of the eye by direct observation under a microscope. A platinum wire was implanted into the vitreous space as a reference electrode. For electrical stimulation, a biphasic pulse was used. When the electrode was stimulated, the EEP was recorded. RESULTS: When the electrical stimulation from the suprachoroidal space was applied, the EEP could be recorded with an epidural electrode, and the threshold was 66.0 +/- 32.1 micro A (420 micro C/cm(2)) [corrected]. placement of the array and the electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Transretinal electrical stimulation from the suprachoroidal space could elicit EEP, suggesting that this approach may be useful for a retinal prosthesis system.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Electrical stimulation with a needle-type electrode inserted into the optic nerve in rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether electrical stimulation of the optic nerve can elicit an electrical evoked potential (EEP) in rabbits and to determine whether such stimulation is a useful approach for the placement of a visual prosthesis. METHODS: Two needle-type electrodes were inserted into the optic nerve using a transvitreal approach. For electrical stimulation, monophasic and biphasic pulses were used. By stimulating the optic nerve, the EEP was elicited. After evaluation of the EEP, a histological study was carried out. RESULTS: When electrical stimulation was applied, the EEP could be recorded. The threshold with monophasic and biphasic stimulation was 10 +/- 0 microA and 20 +/- 8.2 microA, respectively. Histological examination revealed no major complications, such as bleeding or degeneration, which might have resulted from the insertion of electrodes or the electrical stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical stimulation of the optic nerve can elicit an EEP, suggesting that this approach may be useful for a visual prosthesis system.

Animals↗