PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Holly Grason

Publications and source records attributed to Holly Grason.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

The FIMR evaluation: objectives, concepts, frameworks, and methods.

FIMR is now a widespread strategy that has been adopted by more than 200 communities nationwide. Examining the impact of FIMR programs in a rigorous fashion presented a formidable challenge. A complex multiphase study design and innovative outcome measures were developed for the nationwide evaluation of FIMR. Data were collected from multiple respondents in nearly 200 communities across the United States. The results of this evaluation are an important contribution to the literature on the value of FIMR. However, while our study represents a substantial improvement over past research, limitations persist. Future work in this area will need to creatively address these limitations in order to better understand the effect of FIMR programs in communities.

Child Health Services↗

The nationwide evaluation of fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs: development and implementation of recommendations and conduct of essential maternal and child health services by FIMR programs.

OBJECTIVE: An evaluation of fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs nationwide was conducted to characterize their unique role in improving the system of perinatal health care. The aim of this paper is to examine intermediate outcomes of the FIMR, in particular the development and implementation of recommendations produced by the FIMRs and the conduct of essential MCH services by the FIMRs. METHODS: We report on 74 FIMRs whose communities were selected for the nationwide evaluation and for whom we had data from the FIMR director or comparable respondent. We focus on the recommendations of the FIMRs and the essential maternal and child health (MCH) services conducted by the FIMRs as intermediate outcomes (or outputs) and then examine how selected characteristics of the FIMR may influence these. RESULTS: FIMRs developed recommendations on a broad range of topics but there were some areas for which nearly all programs had developed recommendations. The FIMRs relied primarily on strategies related to programs and practices, with few FIMRs reporting attention to policy-oriented approaches. Implementation of recommendations was high. Factors that influenced likelihood of implementing recommendations and conduct of essential MCH services included structure of the FIMR and training received by FIMR directors and staff. CONCLUSIONS: The focus of FIMR recommendations and the likelihood of implementation vary across FIMRs as does the conduct of essential MCH services. FIMR team structure and training of the director and staff are important areas to consider in efforts to maximize the impact of FIMR.

Child Health Services↗

Comparison of FIMR programs with other perinatal systems initiatives.

OBJECTIVES: While the goals of fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs and other perinatal systems initiatives (PSI) are similar, our knowledge of the processes they use to meet their goals is limited. This article compares a nationwide sample of FIMR programs and PSIs with regard to their roles and involvement in performance of eight essential maternal and child health services (EMCHS) as part of a national evaluation of FIMR. METHODS: The evaluation was a cross-sectional observational study in which geographic units were sampled based on the presence or absence of a FIMR or other PSI using FIMRs as the sampling frame of reference. Telephone interviews were conducted with 74 FIMR and 62 PSI directors in the sampled communities. RESULTS: Both programs performed several of the essential MCH services. FIMRs were significantly more likely to be located in a local health department than were PSIs. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses indicate that the performance of the essential MCH services by the programs was increased when both a FIMR and a PSI were in the community. FIMR programs alone had reduced odds of performing several essential MCH services than did PSIs alone. The findings also indicate that performance of some essential MCH services was reduced for FIMR programs and PSIs located in a local health department. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons between FIMR and other PSIs suggest that both programs are currently engaged in diverse efforts to attain their goal of improving the health and health care delivery system for pregnant women, infants, and their families. FIMR programs appear to be more circumscribed in their activities than PSIs, but the presence of both programs in a community appears to enhance the programs' performance of the essential MCH services.

Child Health Services↗

The relation of FIMR programs and other perinatal systems initiatives with maternal and child health activities in the community.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of the presence of a fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) program, other perinatal systems initiative (PSI), or both in a community with the performance of essential maternal and child health (MCH) services by local health departments (LHDs). METHODS: Data were obtained from telephone interviews with professionals from LHDs across the United States. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of a LHD conducting each essential MCH service in communities with and without FIMR programs or with and without PSIs, adjusted for geographic area. RESULTS: Of the 193 communities in the sample, 41 had only a FIMR program, 36 had only a PSI, 47 had both programs, and 69 had neither. The presence of a FIMR was related to greater performance of essential MCH services in LHDs in six areas: data assessment and analysis; client services and access; quality assurance and improvement; community partnerships and mobilization; policy development; and enhancement of capacity of the health care work force. Similar findings were noted for the same broad essential services for PSIs. The comparisons of LHDs in FIMR and non-FIMR communities, however, showed greater involvement of communities with a FIMR program in essential MCH services related to data collection and quality assurance than were found for comparisons of LHDs in communities with and without a PSI. The presence of a PSI was uniquely associated with conducting needs assessments for pregnant women and infants, participation in coalitions for infants, promoting access for uninsured women to private providers and involving local officials and agencies in health plans for both populations. When both programs were present, LHDs had a greater odds of engaging in essential MCH services related to assessment and monitoring of the health of the population, reporting on progress in meeting the health needs of pregnant women and infants, and presenting data to local political officials than when either program alone was in the community. CONCLUSIONS: Local health departments in communities with FIMR programs or PSIs appear to be more likely to conduct essential MCH services in the community. Some of these relations are unique to FIMR, particularly for data collection and quality assurance services, and some are unique to PSIs, for example those that involve interaction with other community agencies or groups. Performance of the essential MCH services also appears to be enhanced when both a FIMR program and a PSI are present in the community.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Perspectives on state Title V programs' involvement in FIMR programs.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to explore the involvement of state Title V programs in fetal and infant mortality review (FIMR) programs. METHODS: On the basis of information from four data sources, this article explores interactions among state Title V and FIMR programs, and considers recommendations regarding how these connections can be fostered for their mutual benefit. RESULTS: A brief history of state Title V engagement with FIMR programs is reviewed. Examples of state Title V-FIMR interactions are provided as suggestions for consideration by other states. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal and infant mortality review programs are, by design, local interventions, but there are many instances in which state Title V agencies can play roles in individual local, regional, or statewide FIMRs.

Child Health Services↗

FIMR and other mortality reviews as public health tools for strengthening maternal and child health systems in communities: where do we need to go next?

This article examines FIMR in relationship to two other maternal and child health mortality reviews--child fatality review (CFR) and maternal mortality review (MMR), and explores how their approaches to reviewing deaths can complement one another. Identifying opportunities for collaboration among these case review methodologies may lead to greater efficiencies at the local and state levels and strengthen the case review approach as a public health tool for improving maternal and child health outcomes. To enable comparative analysis, a table was constructed that identifies the purpose, structure, and process features of each case review approach. This was followed by an examination of two possible ways to improve maternal and child mortality review processes in states: 1) better coordination; and 2) improving each individual process through adapting and adopting promising practices from the others. A discussion is also provided of the state Title V role in facilitating both the coordination of reviews and the process of sharing best practices. Given the similarities that exist among the three MCH mortality reviews, it is important to view each review as one component of a larger system of maternal and child health death reviews. Implementing widely the recommendations generated by these reviews may increase the likelihood of improvements in services and systems on behalf of women and children.

Child Health Services↗

Educating the next generation of pediatricians in urban health care: the Anne E. Dyson Community Pediatrics Training Initiative.

To improve the health of children who are exposed to urban health risks, there has been a national recognition of the need for better models of training pediatricians. In 2000, in response to this need, the Dyson Foundation launched a new residents-training model that focuses on community health and advocacy, The Anne E. Dyson Community Pediatrics Training Initiative (the Initiative). The Initiative is made up of 12 programs at ten sites, which are working in their communities to improve the health of the children. At its core are five objectives: to equip residents with tools and knowledge to provide community-based health care, to make use of community resources so that residents learn to practice as medical home providers, to engage residents in the communities in which they work, to develop meaningful partnerships between departments of pediatrics and their communities, and to enhance pediatrics training through interdisciplinary collaborations among schools and departments. Curricular approaches at the participating sites differ slightly, but all have explicitly incorporated teaching community pediatrics into their standard rotations and continuity clinics. The authors showcase the programs of the Initiative and explore how the programs have sought buy-in from their parent institutions, faculty, residents, and communities.

Academic Medical Centers↗

A practice-based intervention to enhance quality of care in the first 3 years of life: the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program.

CONTEXT: There is growing concern regarding the quality of health care available in the United States for young children, and specific limitations have been noted in developmental and behavioral services provided for children in the first 3 years of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program on quality of early childhood health care and parenting practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective controlled clinical trial enrolling participants between September 1996 and November 1998 at 6 randomization and 9 quasi-experimental sites across the United States. Participants were 5565 children enrolled at birth and followed up through age 3 years. INTERVENTION: Incorporation of developmental specialists and enhanced developmental services into pediatric care in participants' first 3 years of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of care was operationalized across 4 domains: effectiveness (eg, families received > or =4 Healthy Steps-related services or discussed >6 anticipatory guidance topics), patient-centeredness (eg, families were satisfied with care provided), timeliness (eg, children received timely well-child visits and vaccinations), and efficiency (eg, families remained at the practice for > or =20 months). Parenting outcomes included response to child misbehavior (eg, use of severe discipline) and practices to promote child development and safety (eg, mothers at risk for depression discussed their sadness with someone at the practice). RESULTS: Of the 5565 enrolled families, 3737 (67.2%) responded to an interview at 30 to 33 months (usual care, 1716 families; Healthy Steps, 2021 families). Families who participated in the Healthy Steps Program had greater odds of receiving 4 or more Healthy Steps-related services (for randomization and quasi-experimental sites, respectively: odds ratio [OR], 16.90 [95% confidence interval [CI], 12.78 to 22.34] and OR, 23.05 [95% CI, 17.38 to 30.58]), of discussing more than 6 anticipatory guidance topics (OR, 8.56 [95% CI, 6.47 to 11.32] and OR, 12.31 [95% CI, 9.35 to 16.19]), of being highly satisfied with care provided (eg, someone in the practice went out of the way for them) (OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.64 to 2.58] and OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.72 to 2.59]), of receiving timely well-child visits and vaccinations (eg, age-appropriate 1-month visit) (OR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.08 to 3.62] and OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.16 to 3.85]), and of remaining at the practice for 20 months or longer (OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.61 to 2.55] and OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.15]). They also had reduced odds of using severe discipline (eg, slapping in face or spanking with object) (OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26] and OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97]). Among mothers considered at risk for depression, those who participated in the Healthy Steps Program had greater odds of discussing their sadness with someone at the practice (OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.63] and OR, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.57 to 5.08]). CONCLUSION: Universal, practice-based interventions can enhance quality of care for families of young children and can improve selected parenting practices.

Child Development↗

Charting a course for the future of women's health in the United States: concepts, findings and recommendations.

The JHU Women's and Children's Health Policy Center, with the federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau, undertook a review of the health of women in the United States and invited experts to develop recommendations on health policy, programs, practices and research. The review included published research, program reviews, and policy reports on women's physical health, mental health, and health behaviors, and on the effects of health services, systems and financing on their health. Based on trends in age, ethnic background, education, labor-force participation, marriage and childbearing among women, the results of the reviews, and the experts' consultation, several recommendations were made for a forward looking agenda. They included the need: (1) to focus broadly on women's health, not just during pregnancy; (2) for comprehensive, integrated programs and services addressing women's unique needs; (3) for integrated programs and services across the lifespan; (4) for better provider training about women's unique health needs, the differential effects of particular problems on them, and the consequences of chronic health problems heretofore considered primarily male problems; (5) to eliminate social policies that single out women, particularly pregnant women, for punitive actions; (6) to promote social policies that ensure economic security for women; and (7) for vigorous public health leadership to shape the women's health agenda, recognizing the social and economic context of their lives. The social and economic trends among women in the US and the recommendations for a women's health agenda have relevance to other developed countries as well.

Developed Countries↗

Assessing capacity and measuring performance in maternal and child health.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the similarities, differences, and relationships between three tools for performance and capacity assessment currently available for Maternal and Child Health (MCH) programs and for state and local health agencies. METHODS: Three tools for performance and capacity assessment currently available for Maternal and Child Health (MCH) programs and for state and local health agencies, the Title V MCH Block Grant Performance and Outcome Measures (Title V "24"), CAST-5, and the National Public Health Performance Standards Program (NPHPSP) were compared using two metrics, a conceptual model of the public health system, and a set of attributes related to the use of the instruments. RESULTS: Both CAST-5 and the NPHPSP are focused on the capacity and key processes (10 Essential Public Health Services) of the public health system, although CAST-5 is intended for capacity assessment and the NPHPSP is intended for performance measurement. The Title V "24" tool is also intended for performance measurement; however, its focus is on the outputs and outcomes of the health system. The Title V "24" tool is the only one of the three that is mandatory, and the only one whose results at the current time can be used to compare across entities. In addition, both the Title V "24" and the NPHPSP include explicit standards, while CAST-5 does not specify explicit standards against which to compare findings. CONCLUSIONS: While there are various tools available to MCH practitioners for capacity assessment and performance measurement, knowing how the tools relate to each other, and their defining characteristics, should lead to more effective and productive use.

Child↗

Public health workforce development: keeping population health goals in mind.

In the public health field, there is an identified need to develop the public health workforce strategically to meet the needs of a changing public health landscape. The "core competencies" that support the implementation of the core functions of public health must be tied to the mission and goals of the agency or program, and examined in light of the specific population health concerns they are meant to address. CAST-5 is offered as an example of a tool fulfilling this role for state Maternal and Child Health programs.

Child↗

Achieving safe motherhood: applying a life course and multiple determinants perinatal health framework in public health.

Safe motherhood has begun to be identified as a priority for the health of American women. We argue that safe motherhood can be achieved through application of a life course and multiple determinants framework. This framework, with its focus on the preconception period, poses a dilemma in that it links together periods of life and domains of activities that have traditionally not been linked with maternal health. The interests of women and children have often been juxtaposed in the making of policy. Further, the domains of women's health, maternal and child health, and family planning have often clashed over policy priorities and funds. This framework shows that the research literature now links them inextricably to better health outcomes, albeit indirectly; there are no intervention studies that have demonstrated the empirical efficacy of this approach. Thus, although this framework creates a strong rationale for the linkages described, it also demands attention to a set of implementation strategies that will overcome existing barriers. Through a focus on one maternal factor, obesity, we discuss how a range of strategies grounded in the framework can be undertaken to address maternal morbidity and mortality. We then examine selected strategies at each level of the multiple determinants life course framework and emphasize how public policies and public and private sector professional practice can be reexamined to improve outcomes for women in all time periods and aspects of reproductive potential, which in turn might enhance outcomes for their offspring, both at birth and beyond. Our intent is to influence how policy makers, public health professionals, clinicians, and researchers approach safe motherhood.

Female↗

Are two doctors better than one? Women's physician use and appropriate care.

This study examines nonelderly women's concurrent use of two types of physicians (generalists and obstetrician-gynecologists) for regular health care and associations with receipt of preventive care, including a range of recommended screening, counseling, and heart disease prevention services. Data are from the 1999 Women's Health Care Experiences Survey conducted in Baltimore, Maryland, using random digit dialing (N = 509 women ages 18 to 64). Key findings are: 58% of women report using two physicians (a generalist and an ob/gyn) for regular care; seeing both a generalist and an ob/gyn, compared with seeing a generalist alone, is consistently associated with receiving more clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling, and preventive services related to heart disease. Because seeing an ob/gyn in addition to a generalist physician is associated with receiving recommended preventive services (even for heart disease), the findings suggest that non-elderly women who rely on a generalist alone may receive substandard preventive care. The implications for women's access to ob/gyns and for appropriate design of women's primary care are discussed.

Adolescent↗