Biomedical subjects

Honghui Zhou

Publications and source records attributed to Honghui Zhou.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Population-based assessments of clinical drug-drug interactions: qualitative indices or quantitative measures?

Population-based assessments of drug-drug interactions have become more common since the introduction and acceptance of the population pharmacokinetic approach. Unlike traditional methods, population-based studies provide clinically relevant results that can be applied directly to a target patient population. Furthermore, population-based studies do not demand the traditional requirements of intensive pharmacokinetic sampling, rigorous inpatient stays, or stringent assessment schedules. As such, the population-based approach can effectively be used to confirm known drug-drug interactions and further characterize anticipated interactions. A prospectively designed analysis can also reveal drug-drug interactions that might otherwise have gone undetected with traditional methods. Ultimately, these results could help to alleviate clinicians' concerns about using widely marketed drugs in combination therapies and also reduce patients' risk of experiencing unacceptable side effects. This article intends to provide a balanced overview of the population-based approach and its merits, drawbacks, and potential utility in the assessment of drug-drug interactions during clinical drug development.

Drug Interactions↗

PubMed2005

Titin and diaphragm dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

RATIONALE: Recently, we have shown that Ca2+-activated force generation in diaphragm single fibers is impaired in patients with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For optimal active-force generation, the passive elasticity provided by titin is indispensable. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we determined the passive-tension-length relations of single fibers of patients with mild to moderate COPD, hypothesizing that passive-elastic properties of diaphragm fibers are compromised. METHODS: Passive-tension-length relations were determined in diaphragm fibers from patients with and without COPD (predicted mean FEV1, 76 and 102%, respectively). In diaphragm homogenates titin expression was studied at the protein level by gel electrophoresis and at the transcript level by using a novel titin exon microarray. RESULTS: Diaphragm fibers from patients with COPD generate less passive tension on stretch. Titin content in the diaphragm did not differ between patients with and without COPD. However, titin exon transcript studies revealed up-regulation of seven exons, which code for spring elements in the elastic segment rich in proline, glutamate, valine, and lysine. Immunofluorescence analysis indicated elevated protein expression of the up-regulated splice variant in the COPD diaphragm. Simulation studies on titin molecules including the amino acids encoded by the seven up-regulated exons predicted reduced passive-tension generation on molecule stretch. CONCLUSIONS: Passive-tension generation of diaphragm single fibers is reduced in patients with COPD. Our results suggest that alternative splicing of the titin gene, resulting in increased length of the elastic segment rich in proline, glutamate, valine, and lysine, is involved. Interestingly, these changes occur already in patients with mild to moderate COPD.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Evidence of effectiveness: how much can we extrapolate from existing studies?

Drug development can be a science of extrapolation if the use of a drug exposure-response relationship is embraced and implemented through mechanistically oriented pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling analysis and clinical trial simulation. The traditional requirement of at least 2 adequate and well-controlled phase III studies by the US Food and Drug Administration for drug approval can be waived in certain situations, substantially reducing the resources and time. In this article, the authors introduce a real drug development case where the chance for this exemption was maximized by actively using PK-PD modeling followed by clinical trial simulation, resulting in faster and more economical introduction of a new dosage regimen to patients.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and simulation of the time-concentration profile of etanercept in pediatric patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

This study was performed to estimate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of etanercept in pediatric juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) patients and to compare the steady-state time-concentration profiles between etanercept 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly subcutaneous (SC) regimens by clinical trial simulation. To this end, mixed-effect analysis (NONMEM, Version 5.1) was performed using the etanercept PK database consisting of 69 JRA patients (4-17 years). Based on the population PK parameters obtained herein, a Monte Carlo clinical trial simulation experiment was conducted to compare the PK profiles in 200 virtual JRA patients who randomly received either etanercept 0.4 mg/kg SC twice weekly or 0.8 mg/kg once weekly for 12 weeks. The following population PK model could adequately describe etanercept PK profiles for twice-weekly SC dosing of 0.4 mg/kg: CL/F (L/h)=0.0576 (female) or 0.0772 (male) x (body surface area in m2/1.071)1.41, V/F(L)=7.88 x (body weight in kg/30.8). The means +/- standard deviations of simulated trough concentrations for 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly dosing regimens were 1.58 +/- 1.07 mg/L and 1.92 +/- 1.09 mg/L, respectively. Peaks during 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly dosing (2.92 +/- 1.41 mg/L) were only 11% higher than during 0.4 mg/kg twice-weekly dosing (2.62 +/- 1.23 mg/L). In conclusion, the clinical trial simulation confirmed that 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly and 0.4-mg/kg twice-weekly SC regimens of etanercept are expected to yield overlapping steady-state time-concentration profiles, leading to equivalent clinical outcomes. This has been the basis of the recent Food and Drug Administration approval of the 0.8-mg/kg once-weekly regimen in pediatric patients with JRA.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Clinical pharmacokinetics of etanercept: a fully humanized soluble recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein.

Etanercept, a fully humanized soluble recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor fusion protein, is an approved treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriasis. Etanercept is absorbed slowly from the site of subcutaneous injection, with time to peak concentration at approximately 48 to 60 hours, and is cleared slowly from the body with a t(1/2) of 70 to 100 hours. The absolute bioavailability of etanercept was 58% in healthy subjects following subcutaneous administration. The 25-mg twice-weekly dosage regimen generates systemic exposures comparable to 50 mg once weekly, as predicted by pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation and later confirmed by clinical studies. The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are comparable to those in healthy individuals and patients with ankylosing spondylitis, congestive heart failure, and psoriasis. In children with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, after subcutaneous doses of 0.4 mg/kg twice weekly, the clearance of etanercept may be slightly reduced in children aged 4 to 8 years. Pharmacokinetic simulation predicts that a dose of 0.8 mg/kg once weekly generates comparable systemic exposure as 0.4 mg/kg twice weekly. No requirement for etanercept dosage adjustment is needed when etanercept is coadministered with warfarin, digoxin, or methotrexate.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

"Cocktail" approaches and strategies in drug development: valuable tool or flawed science?

There is an increasing interest in the simultaneous administration of several probe substrates to characterize the activity of multiple drug-metabolizing enzymes, the so-called "cocktail" approach. However, this method remains controversial and is being investigated more extensively. No general consensus has emerged on the applicability of this approach in clinical investigation and during drug development. The objective of the article is to review this important yet specialized technique, as well as its merits, drawbacks, and potential application in drug development. Among the two-, three-, four-, five-, and six-drug in vivo cocktails previously evaluated in humans, a variety of substrate probe combinations have been studied. Some probe combinations have been validated not to interact in vivo and have been useful in characterizing drug-drug interaction potential and metabolic enzyme induction in humans. For drug candidates that affect two or more in vitro pathways or are potential gene inducers, the use of a cocktail approach may facilitate the rapid delineation of the drug candidate's drug interaction potential. It may also offer the potential of providing clear guidance on safely conducting larger clinical studies and limiting comedication restrictions to only those likely to be clinically relevant.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between etanercept and warfarin.

Etanercept, a soluble recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFr) fusion protein, is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The primary objective of this study was to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between a single dose of R- and S-enantiomers of warfarin and multiple doses of etanercept after administration of warfarin and etanercept alone and together. In a nonrandomized, three-period study, 12 healthy male subjects received a single oral 25-mg dose of warfarin after an overnight fast, followed by twice-weekly 25-mg subcutaneous doses of etanercept for seven doses. The last dose of etanercept was administered concurrently with a second dose of warfarin. Serial blood samples for plasma warfarin concentration measurement and international normalized ratio (INR) assessment were collected before and up to 144 hours after dose administration. Serial blood samples for serum etanercept concentration measurement were collected before and up to 60 hours after the sixth dose and 264 hours after the seventh dose. Etanercept did not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin. All ratios of maximum serum concentration (C(max)) and area under the serum concentration versus time curve (AUC) for pharmacokinetics (R- and S-enantiomers of warfarin) and INR fell within the confidence interval of 0.8 to 1.25. Warfarin also did not cause a clinically significant alteration in the pharmacokinetics of etanercept. In conclusion, coadministration of etanercept and warfarin would not be expected to change the pharmacokinetics of either medication; therefore, no dosage adjustment is needed in cases in which warfarin and etanercept are coadministered.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2004

Unaltered etanercept pharmacokinetics with concurrent methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential impact of concurrent weekly oral methotrexate administration on the pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a phase 3B trial. As part of a double-blind randomized trial of 682 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly), methotrexate (weekly oral dose, median weekly dose: 20 mg), or etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly) plus methotrexate (weekly oral dose, median weekly dose: 20 mg), serum etanercept concentrations were measured in a subset of patients. Serum samples for 98 randomly selected patients (48 receiving etanercept-alone treatment, 50 receiving etanercept plus methotrexate combination treatment) were analyzed to assess the pharmacokinetics of etanercept. A single blood sample was drawn from each patient at baseline and at the week 24 visit. Given the variable sampling time for patients in both groups, a population pharmacokinetic analysis using NONMEM was conducted for etanercept. A final covariate population pharmacokinetic model was constructed based on previously obtained etanercept data from both healthy subjects (n = 53) and patients with RA (n = 212) in 10 prior clinical trials. The predictive performance of the final model was assessed by both bootstrap and data-splitting validation approaches. The final model was then used to estimate Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters for the patients in both treatments in the current trial. The potential effect of the concurrent administration of methotrexate on the pharmacokinetics of etanercept was examined by comparing the clearance values between 2 treatments using statistical criteria. A population 2-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment and with either zero-order (intravenous administration) or first-order (subcutaneous administration) input was selected based on the data from the prior 10 etanercept clinical studies. The following pharmacokinetic parameters (typical value +/- standard error) were estimated: clearance (CL: 0.072 +/- 0.005 L/h), volume of distribution in the central compartment (V(c): 5.97 +/- 0.45 L), volume of distribution in the peripheral compartment (V(p): 2.05 +/- 0.32 L), intercompartment clearance (Q: 0.0645 +/- 0.0093 L/h), first-order absorption rate constant (k(a): 0.0282 +/- 0.0039 1/h), and absolute bioavailability for subcutaneous administration (F: 0.626 +/- 0.056). Interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters was quantified for CL (25.1%), V(c) (41.7%), k(a) (53.1%), and F (24.2%). Residual variability consisted of combined additive (11.4 ng/mL) and proportional error (49.9%). Both age (< 17 years) and body weight (< 60 kg) were found to be important covariates on CL. The results of both validation tests indicated the adequate predictive performance of the population model. Based on the bioequivalence criteria, the Bayesian-estimated clearance for patients receiving etanercept alone (mean: 0.070 L/h) was comparable to that for patients receiving a combination of etanercept and methotrexate (mean = 0.066 L/h). The pharmacokinetics of etanercept were not altered by the concurrent administration of methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, no etanercept dose adjustment is needed for patients taking concurrent methotrexate.

Antirheumatic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Absence of a clinically relevant interaction between etanercept and digoxin.

Etanercept, a soluble recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFr), is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriasis. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between digoxin and etanercept at steady state. In a crossover, open-label, nonrandomized, 3-period study, 12 healthy male subjects received loading oral doses of digoxin 0.5 mg every 12 hours on day 1 and 0.25 mg every 12 hours on day 2, followed by a daily maintenance dose of 0.25 mg for a total of 27 days. Etanercept was administered as a twice-weekly 25-mg subcutaneous dose beginning on day 9 and continuing up to day 37 for a total of 9 doses. All ratios of maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) for pharmacokinetics of digoxin fell within the confidence interval of 0.8 to 1.25. Although not considered clinically relevant, the mean C(max) and AUC of etanercept were 4.2% and 12.5% lower, respectively, when etanercept was given with digoxin than when administered alone. There were no clinically relevant changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, and adverse events did not increase when both drugs were combined. In conclusion, there is no clinically relevant interaction between etanercept and digoxin, and both drugs can be safely coadministered without the need for a dosage adjustment.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetic strategies in deciphering atypical drug absorption profiles.

Drug absorption is a very complex process that manifests itself through potential interaction with a host of physicochemical and physiological variables. Some factors that may affect the absorption processes include presystemic metabolism/efflux, the "absorption window" along the gastrointestinal tract, disease states, demographics (gender, age, ethnicity), and biopharmaceutical classification of solid dosage forms. Despite the complexity of the absorption processes, the analysis of the absorption kinetic data is mostly empirical, and the assumption of first-order absorption is axiomatic. Nevertheless, we often encounter irregular drug absorption profiles (such as double-peak, absorption window-type absorption profiles, etc.) that cannot be satisfactorily described by a simple first-order absorption process. The selection of an inappropriate absorption model would result in the misspecification of the pharmacokinetic model and subsequent erroneous prediction of the dosing regimen. This article presents several pharmacokinetic strategies in analyzing typical and atypical absorption profiles. The atypical absorption profiles discussed in this article include parallel first-order absorption, mixed zero-order and first-order absorption, Weibull-type absorption, absorption window with or without Michaelis-Menton absorption, time-dependent absorption, and inverse Gaussian density absorption. In any event, intravenous drug concentration-time data are generally needed to avoid the ambiguousness in the absorption analyses.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Tegaserod pharmacokinetics are similar in patients with severe renal insufficiency and in healthy subjects.

Tegaserod (HTF 919), a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist with promotile activity throughout the gastrointestinal tract, is in development for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. In an open-label, parallel-group study, the pharmacokinetics of a single 12-mg oral dose of tegaserod in patients with severe renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis were compared with data obtained from healthy subjects matched for age, weight, height, and gender (n = 10, both). The pharmacokinetics of tegaserod were similar in both groups (AUC(0h-tz), ng.h/ml: 14.6 +/- 8.5 vs. 14.3 +/- 7.1; Cmax, ng/ml: 4.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 5.1 +/- 2.2; tmax, h: 1.0, for both). Tegaserod had similar tolerability in renally impaired patients and healthy volunteers, with adverse events largely related to the gastrointestinal pharmacological actions of the drug. Therefore, no dose adjustment of tegaserod is necessary for patients with renal insufficiency.

Administration, Oral↗