PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Hope S Rugo

Publications and source records attributed to Hope S Rugo.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Netupitant versus aprepitant: model-predicted neurokinin-1 receptor occupancy and implications for long-delayed nausea and vomiting prevention.

PURPOSE: Nausea and vomiting beyond 5&#xa0;days after emetogenic chemotherapy or antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy are common, yet the role of neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists in this setting remains underrecognized. We used pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling to estimate the NK1 receptor occupancy (RO), a proxy for clinical efficacy, for up to 20&#xa0;days after a single 300&#xa0;mg dose of oral netupitant, 3-day oral aprepitant (125&#xa0;mg on day 1; 80&#xa0;mg on days 2-3), or a single 165&#xa0;mg dose of oral aprepitant. METHODS: Data from previous PK studies were analyzed by compartmental modeling. Positron emission tomography studies assessing striatal NK1 RO were used to develop maximum drug effect PD models, which were fitted to NK1 RO data as a function of plasma concentrations. RESULTS: Model predicted NK1 RO exceeded 90% at 3&#xa0;h for all treatments. Thereafter, RO declined more gradually with netupitant (76%, 70%, 60%, and 21% on days 5, 7, 10, and 20, respectively) than with 3-day aprepitant (81%, 39%, 3%, and negligible) or single-dose aprepitant (45%, 10%, <&#x2009;1%, and negligible). The half-life of netupitant was ~&#x2009;6.1 times longer than aprepitant's. Netupitant plasma concentration remained above the effective concentration for 50% NK1 RO (EC50) through day 10, whereas aprepitant concentrations fell below the EC50 by ~&#x2009;days 7 and 5 after repeated and single dosing, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose netupitant maintained NK1 RO substantially longer than repeated- and single-dose aprepitant, suggesting greater potential for prolonged prevention of nausea and vomiting in ADC-treated patients. Prospective clinical validation of these model predictions would be beneficial.

Aprepitant

Clinical and Molecular Evaluation of HER2-Low and HER2-Ultralow Breast Cancer in the Penelope-B Clinical Trial Cohort.

The DestinyBreast (DB)04 and DB06 trials have shown clinical activity of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer. The identification of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer is therefore essential for personalized therapy with T-DXd. We evaluated 723 residual tumors from the Penelope-B trial (NCT01864746) and correlated different levels of HER2 protein expression with prognosis and messenger RNA (mRNA) profiles, including HER2 transcripts. In Penelope-B, 57.68% (n = 417) of 723 residual tumors were HER2 low. The HER2-ultralow category was assigned to 109 (15.08%) tumors, and 197 (27.25%) tumors were completely HER2 negative (HER2 0). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no survival differences among these 3 subgroups. There was no significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-0 and HER2-ultralow tumors (P = .08). In contrast, there was a highly significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-ultralow and HER2-low tumors (P < .0001) and between HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors (P < .0001). The extracellular protease cathepsin L, which has been suggested as a biomarker for extracellular cleavage of T-DXd, was detectable in all HER2-related subgroups and was a negative prognostic factor for invasive disease-free survival and overall survival (P = .0001) in preneoadjuvant core biopsies. In our study, we were able to characterize HER2 low as a clinically relevant and molecular defined tumor group with significantly increased HER2 expression. In contrast, for HER2 ultralow, we did not observe a defined molecular phenotype, despite the clinically relevant regulatory approval of T-DXd also in the ultralow subgroup. Additional investigations are needed to identify biomarkers beyond HER2 for T-DXd response as a basis for refined criteria for treatment eligibility.

Adult