PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Howard R Gordon

Publications and source records attributed to Howard R Gordon.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Backscattering of light from disklike particles: is fine-scale structure or gross morphology more important?

The backscattering of light from disklike objects possessing periodic structures (e.g., resembling a wheel with spokes, hereafter called a pinwheel) or an object with a wavelength-sized deviation from a flat disk (e.g., a spherical cap) has been computed by using the discrete dipole approximation. The disks ranged in diameter from 1.5 to 2.7 microm with thicknesses from 0.04 to 0.15 microm. The goal of the study was to obtain some understanding of the differences between the backscattering of a collection of such objects in random orientation and a collection of randomly oriented homogeneous disks of the same size, i.e., the conditions under which the gross morphology (e.g., disklikeness) of these objects determines their backscattering. The computations for pinwheels showed that their backscattering cross sections were nearly identical to those of homogeneous disks of similar size (but with reduced effective refractive indices that are easily estimated) as long as the maximum separations between the spokes was less than one quarter of the wavelength. In this regime the backscattering is totally governed by the particle's gross morphology and effective index. For larger spoke separation, departures from a homogeneous disk are observed and manifest as significant increases (many times) in backscattering. In the case of spherical caps with the same projected area as the associated disk, the computations again show a complete similarity in their backscattering, and when the disks are sufficiently thin (with thickness divided by wavelength<0.15 to 0.25) there is very little difference between the backscattering of a cap and the associated disk.

Journal Article↗

Normalized water-leaving radiance: revisiting the influence of surface roughness.

Many spaceborne sensors have been deployed to image the ocean in the visible portion of the spectrum. Information regarding the concentration of water constituents is contained in the water-leaving radiance-the radiance that is backscattered out of the water and subsequently propagates to the top of the atmosphere. Recognizing that it depends on the viewing and Sun geometry, ways have been sought to normalize this radiance to a single Sun-viewing geometry--forming the normalized water-leaving radiance. This requires understanding both the bidirectional nature of the upwelling radiance just beneath the surface and the interaction of this radiance with the air-water interface. I believe that the latter has been incorrectly computed in the past when a water surface roughened by the wind is considered. The presented computation suggests that, for wind speeds as high as 20 m/s, the influence of surface roughness is small for a wide range of Sun-viewing geometries, i.e., the transmittance of the (whitecap-free) air-water interface is nearly identical (within 0.01) to that for a flat interface.

Journal Article↗

Pitfalls in atmospheric correction of ocean color imagery: how should aerosol optical properties be computed?: Comment.

The Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor (SeaWiFS) experience suggests that in most situations the aerosol models presently in use for atmospheric correction of ocean color imagery are sufficient for this task. It has been shown [Appl. Opt. 41, 412 (2002)] that the top-of-atmosphere reflectances computed for more realistic aerosol models differ from those computed for presently used models but have not shown that they will yield a better atmospheric correction, e.g., through direct application to ocean color imagery. Thus they provide no evidence that the presently used aerosol models are inadequate, or that their use is a pitfall in atmospheric correction.

Comment↗

Irradiance inversion algorithm for absorption and backscattering profiles in natural waters: improvement for clear waters.

Our iterative inversion algorithm for retrieving absorption a(z) and backscattering b(b)(z) from profiles of upwelling and downwelling irradiance, on the basis of assuming a depth-independent phase function for the medium, was found to have unsatisfactory accuracy for b(b)(z) in clear waters. We modified the algorithm here by assuming a depth-independent phase function for the particles and then performing an additional iteration over the fraction of total scattering that is due to the water itself. The modified algorithm's accuracy is considerably improved over the original in clear waters and reduces to the original in waters for which the particle contribution to b(b)(z) is dominant.

Journal Article↗