Biomedical subjects

Howard S Hock

Publications and source records attributed to Howard S Hock.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Linking dynamical perceptual decisions at different levels of description in motion pattern formation: psychophysics.

The relationship between local-level motion detection and higher level pattern-forming mechanisms was investigated with the motion quartet, a bistable stimulus for which either horizontal or vertical motion patterns are perceived. Local-level perturbations in luminance contrast affected the stability of the perceived patterns and, thereby, the size of the pattern-level hysteresis obtained by gradually changing the motion quartet's aspect ratio. Briefly eliminating luminance contrast (so nonmotion was perceived during the perturbation) eliminated pattern-level hysteresis, and briefly increasing luminance contrast (so motion was perceived during the perturbation) increased pattern-level hysteresis. Partially reducing luminance contrast resulted in bistability during the perturbation; pattern-level hysteresis was maintained when motion was perceived, and eliminated when nonmotion was perceived. The results were attributed to local motion/nonmotion perceptual decisions in area V1 affecting the magnitude of the activation feeding forward to motion detectors in area MT, where the stability of pattern-level perceptual decisions is determined by activation-dependent, future-shaping interactions that inhibit soon-to-be-stimulated detectors responsive to competing motion directions.

Decision Making↗

PubMed2006

Linking dynamical perceptual decisions at different levels of description in motion pattern formation: computational simulations.

A two-level dynamical model of motion pattern formation is developed in which local motion/ nonmotion perceptual decisions are based on inhibitory competition between area V1 detectors responsive to motion-specifying versus motion-independent stimulus information, and pattern-level perceptual decisions are based on inhibitory competition between area MT motion detectors with orthogonal directional selectivity. The model accounts for the effects of luminance perturbations on the relative size of the pattern-level hysteresis effects reported by Hock and Ploeger (2006) and also accounts for related experimental results reported by Hock, Kelso, and Schöner (1993). Single-trial simulations demonstrated the crucial role of local motion/nonmotion bistability and activation-dependent future-shaping interactions in stabilizing perceived global motion patterns. Such interactions maintain currently perceived motion patterns by inhibiting the soon-to-be-stimulated motion detectors that otherwise would be the basis for the perception of an alternative pattern.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2005

A common mechanism for the perception of first-order and second-order apparent motion.

A common mechanism for perceiving first-order, luminance-defined, and second-order, texture-contrast defined apparent motion between two element locations is indicated by: (1) transitivity--whether or not motion is perceived is inter-changeably affected by activationally equivalent luminance and contrast changes at each location, (2) local integration--whether or not motion is perceived depends on the net activation change resulting from simultaneous background-relative luminance and background-relative contrast changes at the same element location, and (3) inseparability--apparent motion is not perceived through independent first- or second-order mechanisms when luminance and contrast co-vary at the same location. These results, which are predicted by the response characteristics of directionally selective cells in areas V1, MT, and MST, are not instead attributable to changes in the location of the most salient element (third-order motion), attentive feature tracking, or artifactual first-order motion. Their inconsistency with Lu and Sperling's [Lu, Z., Sperling, G. (1995a). Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature 377, 237, Lu, Z., Sperling, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 18, 2331] model, which specifies independent first- and second-order mechanisms, may be due to computational requirements particular to the motion of discrete objects with distinct boundaries defined by spatial differences in luminance, texture contrast, or both.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

PubMed2005

Dynamical vs. judgmental comparison: hysteresis effects in motion perception.

Perceptual comparison was investigated by gradually varying the relative length of two apparent motion paths, and independently determining when an initial percept was lost during the course of attribute change and when an alternative percept emerged. Dynamical comparison was indicated by a range of attribute values for which perception was bistable. Within this range, a percept that lost stability was immediately replaced by an alternative percept. Judgmental comparison was indicated by a range of attribute values for which perception was uncertain. When an initial percept was lost, an alternative percept did not immediately emerge because the alternatives being compared could not be distinguished. Differences in the effects of random noise on dynamical vs. judgmental comparison were demonstrated with computational simulations, and implications are discussed for motion energy models and solutions to the motion correspondence problem.

Attention↗

PubMed2004

Multiplicative nonlinearity in the perception of apparent motion.

Evidence is reported indicating that the perception of apparent motion is better predicted by the multiplicative combination of luminance changes at two element locations than by the sum or squared-sum of the luminance changes, or by the motion energy in the stimulus. Because the results were obtained with a stimulus for which motion was specified by simultaneous luminance changes, they support a Reichardt-style motion detector model, but without the asymmetrical delay specified by current versions. Motion direction in the modified model relies on asymmetrical stimulus information rather than asymmetrical delay. That is, one subunit of the detector responds to changes in luminance toward the background luminance (the start of the motion path), and the other to changes in luminance away from the background luminance (the end of the motion path).

Fourier Analysis↗

PubMed2004

Detection of counter-changing contrast: second-order apparent motion without postrectification motion-energy analysis or salience mapping/feature tracking.

The perception of 2nd-order, texture-contrast-defined motion was studied for apparent-motion stimuli composed of a pair of spatially displaced, simultaneously visible checkerboards. It was found that background-relative, counter-changing contrast provided the informational basis for the perception of 2nd-order apparent motion; motion began where contrast changed toward the contrast value of the background checkerboard and ended where contrast changed away from the background value. The perceived apparent motion was not attributable to either postrectification motion-energy analysis or salience-mapping/feature-tracking mechanisms. Parallel results for 1st-order, luminance-defined motion (H. S. Hock, L. A. Gilroy, & G. Harnett, 2002) suggest that counter-changing activation provides a common basis for the perception of both luminance- and texture-contrast-defined apparent motion.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

When motion is not perceived: evidence from adaptation and dynamical stability.

Adaptation was used to probe the perceiver's activation state when either motion or nonmotion percepts are formed for bistable, single-element apparent motion stimuli. Although adaptation was not observed in every instance, when it was observed its effect was to increase the probability of both motion-to-nonmotion and nonmotion-to-motion switches, the time scale of adaptation corresponding to neurophysiological observations for directionally selective cortical cells (Giaschi et al. 1993). This susceptibility to de-stabilizing adaptation effects indicated that the nonmotion percept was not the result of inadequate stimulation producing subthreshold levels of motion detector activation; if that were the case, activation-dependent adaptation would have decreased the nonmotion-to-motion switching rate by reducing activation further below threshold. Above-threshold activation levels are therefore associated with both nonmotion and motion perceptual states, and the failure to perceive motion despite the presence of adequate motion detector stimulation can be attributed to inhibitory competition between detectors activated by motion-specifying stimulus information and detectors activated to similar levels by motion-independent stimulus information, consistent with the dynamical quality of single-element apparent motion.

Adaptation, Ocular↗

PubMed2003

The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity.

A dynamical model is used to show that global motion pattern formation for several different apparent motion stimuli can be embodied in the stable distribution of activation over a population of concurrently activated, directionally selective motion detectors. The model, which is based on motion detectors being interactive, noisy, and self-stabilizing, accounts for such phenomena as bistability, spontaneous switching, hysteresis, and selective adaptation. Simulations show that dynamical solutions to the motion correspondence problem for a bistable stimulus (two qualitatively different patterns are formed) apply as well to the solution for a monostable stimulus (only one pattern is formed) and highlight the role of interactions among sequentially stimulated detectors in establishing the state dependence and, thereby, the temporal persistence of percepts.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2002

Self-organized pattern formation: experimental dissection of motion detection and motion integration by variation of attentional spread.

The formation of global motion patterns depends on the stimulus activation of local motion detectors as well as integrative excitatory and/or inhibitory interactions among the activated detectors. The counterphase row-of-elements [Vis. Res. 34 (1994) 1843] is an ideal stimulus for examining the relationship between the activational/energizing effect of the stimulus and interaction among the activated detectors. This is because the formation of the alternative unidirectional and oscillatory motion patterns for this stimulus requires the stimulation of local motion detectors, but there is no information in the stimulus that specifies either of the patterns. Their formation depends instead on the relative contributions of excitatory and inhibitory interactions to detector activation; the temporal patterns are self-organized. Broadly spread attention affects motion integration by changing the balance of excitatory versus inhibitory interactions, increasing the perception of unidirectional compared with oscillatory motion. (It likewise increases the perception of group compared with element motion for the Ternus stimulus.) There is, however, little if any effect of attentional spread on the luminance contrast required for the perception of single-element motion. The results indicate that the balance of integrative excitatory and/or inhibitory detector interactions can be modified by the perceiver's spread of attention, and further, that such changes need not be mediated by changes in the local, stimulus activation of the detectors.

Adult↗