PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Howard Sandler

Publications and source records attributed to Howard Sandler.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Trade-off to low-grade toxicity with conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9406.

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the rates of grade 2 or worse late effects in patients treated for prostate cancer on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9406. The authors previously have reported the results of patients treated on the first 2 dose levels of this study with respect to grade 3 or greater late toxicity. This analysis examines the incidence of grade 2 toxicity in this study. From August 1994 to September 1999, 424 patients were entered on this dose escalation trial of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate at doses of 68.4 Gy (level I) and 73.8 Gy (level II). All radiation prescriptions were a minimum dose to a planning target volume. Patients were stratified according to clinical stage and risk of seminal vesicle invasion based on Gleason score and presenting prostate-specific antigen. Average time at risk after completion of therapy ranged from 33.1 to 40.1 months for patients treated at dose level I and 15.6 to 34.2 months for patients at dose level II. The frequency of late effects > or = grade 2 was compared with a similar group of patients treated on RTOG studies 7506 and 7706 with adjustments made for the interval from completion of therapy. The RTOG toxicity scoring scales for late effects were used. The rate of grade 3 or greater late toxicity continues to be low compared with RTOG historical controls. No grade 4 or 5 late complications were reported in any of the 406 evaluable patients during the period of observation. Interestingly, the incidence of grade 2 late toxicity was increased relative to historical controls in all groups and dose levels. In group 1, level I and group 3, level II, the increase in grade 2 complications was statistically significant; 16 complications were observed in group 1, level I when 9.2 were expected (P =.026) and 22 were observed in group 3, level II when 7.6 were expected (P <.0001). When examining all late effects > or = grade 2, there were no significant differences in the rate of late effects in both groups and both dose levels with the exception of group 1, level II. This, in combination with the statistically significant decrease in late effects > or = grade 3, suggests that in most circumstances there has been a shift of grade 3 complications to grade 2. In group 1, dose level II there was a statistically significant reduction in > or = grade 2 late effects, suggesting there was no shift from grade 3 to grade 2 in these patients. In this circumstance there may have been a global reduction in all complications or a shift to late effects less severe than grade 2. In group 2, dose level II there is a trend (P =.085) toward this same result. It is important to continue to examine late effects closely in patients treated on RTOG 9406. The primary objective of dose escalation without an increase rate of > or = grade 3 complications has been achieved. However, the reduction in grade 3 complications may have resulted in a higher incidence of grade 2 late effects. Because grade 2 late effects may have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, it is important to reduce these complications as much as possible. Improved conformal treatment delivery with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or the use of radioprotective agents could be considered. Clinical trials should use quality-of-life measures to determine that trade-offs between severity and rates of toxicity are acceptable to patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗

The joint modeling of a longitudinal disease progression marker and the failure time process in the presence of cure.

In this paper we present an extension of cure models: to incorporate a longitudinal disease progression marker. The model is motivated by studies of patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiation therapy. The patients are followed until recurrence of the prostate cancer or censoring, with the PSA marker measured intermittently. Some patients are cured by the treatment and are immune from recurrence. A joint-cure model is developed for this type of data, in which the longitudinal marker and the failure time process are modeled jointly, with a fraction of patients assumed to be immune from the endpoint. A hierarchical nonlinear mixed-effects model is assumed for the marker and a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model is used to model the time to endpoint. The probability of cure is modeled by a logistic link. The parameters are estimated using a Monte Carlo EM algorithm. Importance sampling with an adaptively chosen t-distribution and variable Monte Carlo sample size is used. We apply the method to data from prostate cancer and perform a simulation study. We show that by incorporating the longitudinal disease progression marker into the cure model, we obtain parameter estimates with better statistical properties. The classification of the censored patients into the cure group and the susceptible group based on the estimated conditional recurrence probability from the joint-cure model has a higher sensitivity and specificity, and a lower misclassification probability compared with the standard cure model. The addition of the longitudinal data has the effect of reducing the impact of the identifiability problems in a standard cure model and can help overcome biases due to informative censoring.

Journal Article↗

Survey of radiation oncologists: practice patterns of the management of stage I seminoma of testis in Canada and a selected group in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate practice patterns of the management of stage I seminoma of testis in Canada and a selected group in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survey among radiation oncologists treating genitourinary (GU) tumors in Canada and the RTOG GU committee members in the United States between January and March 2001. RESULTS: Response rate was 78% (73/93) in Canada and 67% (24/36) in the United States. Eighty-four percent described their clinical practice as a university affiliated teaching center, and 16% as community-based or private practice. Sixty-two percent, 31% and 7% would manage 1-5, 6-10 and > oe = 11 cases per year respectively. Almost all would perform chest x-ray (99%) and CT scan of abdomen and pelvis (100%) as staging investigation following radical inguinal orchiectomy. Forty percent also arranged CT scan of chest, while only 18% routinely obtained lymphangiogram. Seventy-eight percent offered surveillance as a management option and estimated that 20% (median) of patients would choose surveillance in their practice. Among four management options: (1. surveillance, 2. radiotherapy (RT) to the para-aortic region, 3. RT to the para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvis ('dog-leg'), 4. single-agent chemotherapy), the order of first preference was option 1 (44%), 2 (42%), and 3 (14%) for patients who wish to preserve fertility. When fertility was not a major concern, it was option 2 (43%), 3 (39%), and 1 (17%). The commonest dose-fractionation schedule was 25 Gy/20 fractions (68%). Others included 25 Gy/15 f (15%), and 25.5 Gy/17 f (4%). Forty-five percent chose the para-aortic region, while 53% used the 'dog-leg' as RT volume. Twenty-nine percent reduced RT volume from the 'dog-leg' to the para-aortic region as the result of MRC Phase III study published in 1999. CONCLUSION: There are significant variations in the practice pattern of the management of stage I seminoma of testis among radiation oncologists in Canada and a selected group in the United States.

Canada↗

A descriptive analysis of postimplant dosimetric parameters from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group P0019.

BACKGROUND: To date, there are few descriptive analyses of postimplant dosimetry from multi-institutional clinical trials. The purpose of this report is to describe the postimplant dosimetry achieved in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0019. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) followed by a prostate implant (I-125, prescription dose 108 Gy). Postimplant dosimetric assessment was accomplished by obtaining a CT scan of the prostate 1 month after the date of the implant procedure. Prostate volume was outlined by the first author. Dose-volume histograms were calculated by the Radiologic Physics Center. Four dosimetric quantifiers (DQs) were examined: D90 is the dose (reported as percentage of the prescription dose) received by 90% of the prostate; V100, V150, V200 is the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescription dose, respectively. For the purposes of analysis, institutions were divided into three groups according to accrual (<5, 6-9, 10-12). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients from 27 institutions were registered in the study. Nineteen patients were excluded from this analysis; 14 who had no data and 5 who were ineligible, leaving 119 for analysis. The mean, median, and range of the four DQs are as follows: D90 105.6%, 106.0%, 57.6-174.8%; V100 89.8%, 92.6%, 11.2-100%; V150 58.4%, 59.6%, 0.9-93.7%; and V200 27.9%, 25.1%, 0.3-85.2%. Statistically significant differences according to institutional accrual were observed for D90 (p = 0.0283) and V200 (p = 0.0075), but not for V100 (p = 0.1534) and V150 (p = 0.0509). CONCLUSIONS: The DQ observed in this multi-institutional prospective study are roughly comparable to series from single institutions with considerable brachytherapy experience. Differences in DQs were observed according to institutional accrual. These data could be used to determine a community standard with respect to postimplant dosimetry.

Brachytherapy↗