Biomedical subjects

Hui Quan

Publications and source records attributed to Hui Quan.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Estimate of standard deviation for a log-transformed variable using arithmetic means and standard deviations.

Analyses of study variables are frequently based on log transformations. To calculate the power for detecting the between-treatment difference in the log scale, we need an estimate of the standard deviation of the log-transformed variable. However, in many situations a literature search only provides the arithmetic means and the corresponding standard deviations. Without individual log-transformed data to directly calculate the sample standard deviation, we need alternative methods to estimate it. This paper presents methods for estimating and constructing confidence intervals for the standard deviation of a log-transformed variable given the mean and standard deviation of the untransformed variable. It also presents methods for estimating the standard deviation of change from baseline in the log scale given the means and standard deviations of the untransformed baseline value, on-treatment value and change from baseline. Simulations and examples are provided to assess the performance of these estimates.

Confidence Intervals↗

PubMed2003

Controlling type I error rate for fast track drug development programmes.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Modernization Act of 1997 has a Section (No. 112) entitled 'Expediting Study and Approval of Fast Track Drugs' (the Act). In 1998, the FDA issued a 'Guidance for Industry: the Fast Track Drug Development Programs' (the FTDD programmes) to meet the requirement of the Act. The purpose of FTDD programmes is to 'facilitate the development and expedite the review of new drugs that are intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs'. Since then many health products have reached patients who suffered from AIDS, cancer, osteoporosis, and many other diseases, sooner by utilizing the Fast Track Act and the FTDD programmes. In the meantime several scientific issues have also surfaced when following the FTDD programmes. In this paper we will discuss the concept of two kinds of type I errors, namely, the 'conditional approval' and the 'final approval' type I errors, and propose statistical methods for controlling them in a new drug submission process.

Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic↗

PubMed2003

The gastrointestinal safety of the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib assessed by both endoscopy and analysis of upper gastrointestinal events.

OBJECTIVES: Etoricoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor that in clinical studies has improved the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and reduced the potential for GI injury. The incidence of endoscopically detected ulcers and of clinically important upper GI events (perforations, ulcers, and bleeding episodes) was compared in patients taking etoricoxib or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Upper GI endoscopy was performed at intervals over 12 wk in 680 patients taking etoricoxib 120 mg once daily, ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily, or placebo in a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study. Survival analysis was used to analyze time-to-event data for the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers (> or =3 mm and > or =5 mm), and the log rank test was used to compare the cumulative incidence between treatment groups. A combined analysis of upper GI events in all 10 Phase II/III clinical trials of etoricoxib (60, 90, or 120 mg) versus nonselective NSAIDs (naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac) for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic low back pain was conducted. Investigators reported potential events for adjudication by an external, blinded committee, using prespecified criteria to confirm events. All events that occurred during active treatment periods (maximum 792 days) or within 14 days of stopping treatment were included in the analysis. Time to first event was evaluated using survival analysis; the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the cumulative incidence, and relative risk was estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the endoscopy study, the cumulative incidence of ulcers >/=3 mm at 12 wk in the ibuprofen group (17%) was significantly higher than in the etoricoxib group (8.1%, p < 0.001); similar results were seen for ulcers >/=5 mm. In the placebo group, the rate of ulcers >/=3 mm was 1.86%. Of 3142 patients treated with once-daily etoricoxib and 1828 patients treated with a nonselective NSAID (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac), 82 patients with investigator-reported upper GI events (71 confirmed) were eligible for the combined analysis. For etoricoxib versus NSAIDs, the rate per 100 patient-yr for confirmed events was 1.16 versus 3.05 (relative risk = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.27-0.72, p < 0.001), whereas that for investigator-reported events was 1.35 versus 3.42 (relative risk = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30-0.74, p = 0.001). Results were driven primarily by studies with naproxen as the comparator. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of endoscopically detected ulcers was significantly lower with etoricoxib 120 mg than with ibuprofen 2400 mg. Treatment with etoricoxib reduced the incidence of investigator-reported and confirmed adverse upper GI events by approximately 50% compared with treatment with nonselective NSAIDs.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

The upper GI safety and tolerability of oral alendronate at a dose of 70 milligrams once weekly: a placebo-controlled endoscopy study.

OBJECTIVE: Alendronate (10 mg daily) has been shown in long term clinical trials to be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis. A weekly dosing regimen of alendronate is preferred by both patients and physicians, as it has the potential to provide greater convenience and enhance compliance. In a 1-yr clinical trial, alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was equally efficacious and at least as well tolerated as the 10-mg daily dose in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, despite the higher unit dosage required. We conducted a randomized, double blind, placebo- and active-controlled endoscopy study to confirm the results of this clinical trial. We hypothesized that mean endoscopic gastric erosion scores would be similar in subjects receiving alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those receiving a placebo. METHODS: Two hundred seventy-seven subjects (90 men and 187 women) were randomized to one of three treatment groups: 1) alendronate (70 mg once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), 2) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk (N = 126), or 3) placebo (once weekly) for 10 wk followed by aspirin (650 mg q.i.d.) for the last week as the positive control (N = 25). Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed 5 to 7 days after the last dose of alendronate or matching placebo. RESULTS: The mean gastric erosion scores (Lanza scale) were similar in subjects given alendronate (70 mg once weekly) and those given a placebo (0.32 vs 0.35, respectively; 95% CI for difference = -0.22-0.16, p = 0.75), whereas scores in both groups were significantly lower than in those given aspirin (3.09; p < 0.001). Endoscopic gastroduodenal ulcers occurred in no alendronate (0%), two placebo (1.7%), and five aspirin (23.8%) subjects. The mean erosion scores in the esophagus and duodenum of alendronate and placebo subjects were also similar. The incidences of upper GI symptoms were similar in the alendronate and placebo subjects and did not suggest a relationship with endoscopic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Alendronate (70 mg once weekly) was not associated with any increase in endoscopic lesions in the upper GI tract relative to a placebo.

Administration, Oral↗