PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Anttinen

Publications and source records attributed to I Anttinen.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Double reading of mammography screening films--one radiologist or two?

The effect of double reading on the number of breast cancers detected and the number of women recalled was examined in 15,457 women aged 50-59 years attending for mammographic breast screening. All the screening mammograms were interpreted independently by two radiologists without knowledge of each other's findings. All the cases selected by either radiologist were then reviewed by both radiologists and a consensus decision made on whom to recall for further studies. This method of double reading increased the number of breast cancers detected by 9% (P < 0.05) and decreased the number of women recalled by 45% (P < 0.001). Double reading of mammography screening films together with consensus decisions on the selected cases is recommended.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1992

Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma.

A rare case of benign retroperitoneal schwannoma in a 76-year-old man is reported. Ultrasound and computerized tomography disclosed two cystic retroperitoneal tumors sized 12 cm and 7 cm. The larger tumor was located anterior to psoas muscle and the smaller one was within the muscle. The larger tumor was excised via laparotomy. After 3.5 years follow-up the intramuscular tumor has remained unchanged and the patient has no symptoms.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

Ultrasonography of breast lesions detected in mammography screening.

Mammography screening was carried out in 18,012 women (aged 50-59) of whom 579 (3.21%) had to be recalled for clinical mammography. After completion of the clinical mammography each woman also had ultrasonography (US) with a hand-held real-time apparatus using a 7.5 MHz probe. There were 79 verified breast cancers; 32 of these were palpable and were also depicted at US, but only 29 (61.7%) of non-palpable breast cancers (n = 47) were found at US. Twenty-two of the non-palpable breast cancers were seen at US as a tumor-like lesion, 2 because of local echo-architecture distortion, and 5 only because of acoustic shadowing. The US image did not help to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1990

Mammography screening--reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall in the Finnish system.

The reasons for recall and the influence of experience on recall were studied in 579 women (3.21%) recalled from mammography screening. The proportion of recalls for further studies was the greatest (6.30%) at the onset of screening. With increased experience, the proportion decreased by stages and in the second screening round it was only 2.04%. The proportion of cases referred for surgical biopsy in the first screening round was 0.7% and the proportion of screening-detected breast cancers was 0.52%. These change little with increasing experience. In the second screening round, however, the proportion of referrals for surgical biopsy (0.43% of those screened) and of screening-detected breast cancers, (0.30%) were both low. A tumour-like density was the commonest finding resulting in recall for further studies, and the number caused by superimposition of normal parenchymal structures decreased with experience, while the proportion of breast cancers and benign tumours increased. The proportion of cases with parenchymal distortion resulting in recall for further studies was similar in both screening rounds but the number of those referred for biopsy fell dramatically in the second screening round. The number of recalls for microcalcification also fell with experience and the proportion of breast cancers in this group increased over the two screening rounds. A high ratio of malignancies in surgical biopsies can be expected when the radiologists undertaking primary screening also perform all further studies.

Biopsy↗
PubMed1989

Mammography screening for breast cancer: first year results from Helsinki and surroundings.

11,789 women aged 50-59 years were invited for screening by the mammography screening centre of the Cancer Society of Finland in Helsinki. 9829 women (83.37%) attended and 3.85% of those were recalled for further studies. After complete examination seventy-one women (0.72%) were referred for surgical biopsy and breast cancer was histologically detected in 44 (0.45%) of those screened. The proportion of Stage I + TIS breast cancers detected was 75%, and of Stage II or more advanced, 25%. With modern mammography techniques and proper training of technicians and radiologists, with double reading of all the films, it is possible to minimise both the recall rate and the number of women who are referred for surgical biopsy, and still find cancers in their early stages.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1989

Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views.

Two-view baseline screening mammograms (oblique and cranial views) of 303 women recalled for further studies from among 7,245 women screened were reviewed by four experienced radiologists separately to evaluate the importance of the number of views taken for screening. As compared with the oblique view only, two views, increased the number of cancers detected and decreased the number of false-positive cancer diagnoses of two radiologists, but increased that of the other two.

Breast Neoplasms↗