PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Deckwer

Publications and source records attributed to I Deckwer.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Endoscopically controlled sinus floor augmentation. A preliminary report.

Sinus augmentation has been advocated to be a surgical technique with predictable results in peri-implant surgery. Endoscopic surgery of the maxillary sinus so far has been used as diagnostic procedure. In this paper, the use of endoscopy is described as a low invasive adjunctive technique in sinus floor augmentation. After preparation of the mucoperiosteum, bone grafts can be placed under endoscopic control between sinus floor and mucoperiosteum. A laterobasal approach via a small osteotomy and a transalveolar approach are possible for mucosal elevation and graft placement. First clinical results are reported. Endoscopic sinus lift may contribute to a reduction of perioperative morbidity, reduction of oroantral fistulae and control of graft position. The less invasive technique may allow to extend the indication for sinus augmentation.

Adult↗

Alveolar reconstruction with splitting osteotomy and microfixation of implants.

This report describes a surgical technique for reconstruction of the buccolingually reduced alveolar process. The technique involves the preparation of an artificial socket with immediate implant placement, which reduces total treatment time compared with two-stage procedures. Alveolar preparation comprises lamellar cortical splitting of the alveolus, interlamellar implant placement, and primary stabilization based on a microfixation technique. It was used for a wide range of indications involving single and multiple alveoli related to the partially dentate and the edentulous alveolar process. The results of 24 Branemark standard implants and 97 ITI implants with 44 consecutively treated patients have been reviewed with a mean observation time of 34.3 months (range 6 to 68 months). The main indicator for alveolar reconstruction was the narrow anterior maxillary arch. The 5-year cumulated success rate was 86.2%. Twelve implants failed during the observation period. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.7 mm (range 0 to 7.5 mm). There was a low infection rate compared with membrane-based GTR techniques. Treatment costs were low as a result of shorter treatment time.

Adolescent↗