PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Figura

Publications and source records attributed to I Figura.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1987

Prognostic value of the changes in the mode of ventricular tachycardia induction during therapy with amiodarone or amiodarone and a class 1A antiarrhythmic agent.

The prognostic value of 3 previously reported programmed stimulation efficacy criteria was studied in 70 patients taking amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). At baseline all patients had VT inducible by programmed stimulation. After amiodarone loading (935 +/- 271 mg/day for 16 +/- 7 days), efficacy of amiodarone was determined by 3 programmed stimulation criteria (criterion I = VT not inducible or 15 beats or less; criterion II = VT not inducible or harder to induce; criterion III = VT not easier to induce). Amiodarone was effective in 12, 25 and 49 of 70 patients by criteria I, II and III, respectively. There were 16 recurrences or cardiac arrest during the follow-up period (19 +/- 19 months). Actuarial arrhythmia-free survival rates at 1 and 2 years were: 90% and 90% in patients with efficacy by criterion I and 78% and 78% in patients with inefficacy, respectively; 84% and 84% in patients with efficacy by criterion II and 78% and 78% in patients with inefficacy, respectively; and 80% and 80% in patients with efficacy by criterion III and 79% and 79% in patients with inefficacy, respectively (difference not significant for all). From the results of follow-up at 2 years, sensitivities of criteria I, II and III were 92%, 75% and 33%, respectively. Specificities were 17%, 26% and 70%, respectively, and predictive accuracies were 43%, 43% and 67%, respectively. Thus, patients with efficacy by criterion I appear to have a better prognosis when compared with patients with inefficacy. However, many patients with inefficacy by criterion I had a good outcome (nonspecificity).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Value of Holter monitoring in predicting long-term efficacy and inefficacy of amiodarone used alone and in combination with class 1A antiarrhythmic agents in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

The value of two reported and two new ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) criteria was studied in 80 patients taking amiodarone for refractory recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia. In the 80 patients, the four Holter criteria were as follows: I-85% or greater reduction of ventricular premature complexes and abolition of couplets and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 74 patients who had 10 or more ventricular premature complexes/h, or any couplets or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia/24 hours at baseline; II-abolition of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 51 patients who had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia at baseline; III-85% or greater reduction of ventricular premature complexes and abolition of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 64 patients who had 30 or more ventricular premature complexes/h at baseline; and IV-85% or greater reduction of ventricular premature complexes and abolition of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 73 patients who had 10 or more ventricular premature complexes/h at baseline. Amiodarone was judged effective in, respectively, 51 of 74, 44 of 51, 51 of 64 and 61 of 73 patients by criterion I, II, III or IV. During the follow-up period (19 +/- 20 months), there were 19 instances of recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia or sudden death. Actuarial arrhythmia-free survival rate at 24 months was 84, 74, 86 and 85%, respectively, in patients with efficacy by criterion I, II, III or IV and 61, 43, 48 and 39%, respectively, in patients with inefficacy (p less than 0.015 for all). Many patients with efficacy by Holter criteria, however, had a recurrence of arrhythmia, suggesting insensitivity of these Holter criteria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1987

Comparison of programmed stimulation and Holter monitoring for predicting long-term efficacy and inefficacy of amiodarone used alone or in combination with a class 1A antiarrhythmic agent in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

The values of two Holter ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring criteria and one programmed stimulation efficacy criterion reported to be predictive of the efficacy of amiodarone were compared in 70 patients taking amiodarone for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. At baseline, all patients had ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed stimulation. After amiodarone loading (935 +/- 271 mg for 16 +/- 7 days), efficacy was determined by a programmed stimulation criterion (ventricular tachycardia no longer inducible or less than or equal to 15 beats) and two Holter monitoring criteria (Holter I = greater than or equal to 85% reduction of ventricular premature complexes and abolition of couplets and triplets in 64 patients who had greater than or equal to 10 ventricular premature complexes/h or couplets or triplets or both before therapy; Holter II = abolition of triplets in 41 patients who had triplets before therapy). Amiodarone was effective in 12 of 70 patients by the programmed stimulation criterion, in 49 of 64 patients by Holter criterion I and in 37 of 41 patients by Holter criterion II. In assessing efficacy of amiodarone, programmed stimulation and Holter criteria were discordant in 69% of patients or more (p less than 0.001). There were 16 recurrences or sudden deaths during the entire follow-up period (19 +/- 19 months). Arrhythmia-free survival rates at 24 months of patients with efficacy and inefficacy by each criterion, respectively, were 90 and 78% by programmed stimulation, 84 and 62% by Holter criterion I (p less than 0.05) and 73 and 50% by Holter criterion II (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗