PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I G Smith

Publications and source records attributed to I G Smith.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Is a calculated total hip BMD of clinical use?

The diagnosis of osteoporosis is based on bone mass measurement. To avoid the errors associated with the measurement of spinal bone density the total hip has been accepted as the standard measurement site. This information is not available for many early measurements. We have assessed whether it is possible to derive clinically useful information about total hip bone mineral density (BMD) from measurements at other hip sites. The bone mass measurements of 46 patients participating in a current trial of therapy for osteoporosis were reviewed. The total hip BMD as directly measured was compared with that obtained from the formula: Total hip BMD = 0.48 x Neck BMD + 0.62 x Trochanteric BMD + 0.03. In 30 patients with follow-up data the rate of change in hip BMD over a year was also determined by both methods. In the pretreatment state there was good agreement between the two measures (r2 = 0.96, SEE 0.012 g/cm2). If the formula was used to compute a change in total hip BMD, the agreement between both methods remained good. However, the standard error of the estimate of the change represented 59% of the observed change. This indicates that the error associated with this estimate is too great to allow clinically meaningful conclusions to be drawn from calculated total hip BMD. We conclude that, whilst it may be possible to obtain reasonable point estimates of total hip BMD from other measures in the hip, these estimates are too imprecise to allow conclusions about change in BMD to be made.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1999

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry and morphometric radiography of the spine: a comparison of analysis precision in normal and osteoporotic subjects.

Morphometric techniques, which use conventional lateral spine radiographs to quantify vertebral body shape (morphometric radiography, MRX), have proved a useful tool in the identification and evaluation of osteoporotic vertebral deformities. Recently a new method of acquiring the images required for vertebral morphometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners (morphometric X-ray absorptiometry, MXA) has been developed. In this study we compare repeat analysis precision of vertebral height measurement using MXA and MRX. Twenty-four postmenopausal women were recruited (mean age 67 +/- 5.8 years): 12 normal subjects and 12 with osteoporosis and vertebral deformities. Each subject had a MXA scan and lateral thoracic and lumbar radiographs at a single appointment, which were each analyzed quantitatively in a masked fashion, using a standard 6-point method, twice by one observer and once by a second observer. Anterior (Ha), mid (Hm) and posterior (Hp) vertebral heights were measured and wedge (Ha/Hp) and mid-wedge (Hm/Hp) ratios calculated for each vertebral body. Intra- and interobserver precision were consistently poorer in MXA compared with MRX in both normal subjects and those with vertebral deformities, with MXA CV% generally at least 50% higher than corresponding values for MRX. For both MXA and MRX interobserver precision was clearly poorer than intraobserver precision, a problem associated with any morphometric technique. MXA intra- and interobserver precision were significantly poorer for subjects with vertebral deformities compared with those without, with a CV% for deformity subjects up to twice that of normal subjects. Conversely, MRX showed little or no obvious worsening of intra- or interobserver precision for deformity subjects. Comparison of MXA precision in the normal and deformed vertebrae of the deformity subjects demonstrated that the poorer precision in these subjects compared with normal subjects was the result of increased variability in point placement on the deformed vertebrae themselves. However, the precision for normal vertebrae in these subjects was also somewhat poorer than the precision in normal subjects. We conclude that MXA precision is generally poorer than that of MRX and that the presence of vertebral deformities has a more pronounced effect on MXA precision than on MRX precision.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1998

Morphometric X-ray absorptiometry: reference data for vertebral dimensions.

Vertebral fractures are a common and important consequence of osteoporosis and are often identified via morphometric analysis of conventional lateral spine radiographs (morphometric radiography or MRX). A new method of performing vertebral morphometry using images acquired on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners (morphometric X-ray absorptiometry or MXA) has recently been developed. In this study, we derive reference data for vertebral heights and height ratios using MXA scans as the data source and compare the results with previously published MRX studies. One thousand and nineteen Caucasian women (mean age 63 years, range 33-86) were recruited. An MXA scan, covering 13 vertebrae from L4 to T4, was acquired for each subject on one of four DXA systems located at three centers in the U.K. Analysis of variance found statistically significant but relatively small differences among centers, machines, and scan modes, and therefore data were pooled for reference range calculations. Three vertebral heights (anterior, mid, and posterior) were measured and four ratios (wedge, mid-wedge, and two crush) calculated. These data sets were trimmed using an iterative algorithm to remove extreme values assumed to represent deformed vertebrae, then mean and SD values were calculated using the remaining data. When the data were split by age, a small but statistically significant decrease in vertebral height between the sixth and eighth decades was found, but this was not replicated for the vertebral height ratios. Marked differences were observed between MXA data and MRX, but were comparable to those between different MRX studies. These may result from differences in image quality and point placement protocols, population differences, differences in radiographic technique, and differences in the derivation of a group of "normal" vertebrae. This study suggests that reference data of vertebral dimensions should be specific to the technique which uses those data as a reference, i.e., MXA.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗