PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Ianakiev

Publications and source records attributed to I Ianakiev.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

[The information value of the clinical data related to the vital prognosis in severe combined trauma].

Data are reported on a study of the informative value of ten clinical and laboratory parameters, which have a bearing on the vital prognosis of severe combined trauma. The presentation is part of a more comprehensive study, aimed at creating an expert system for prognosticating this type of pathology. Case material from the Clinic of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Treatment at the "Pirogov" Emergency Hospital in Sofia was used (1986-1988). Included in the study were 455 patients with severe combined traumatic injuries, of whom 210 died and 245 survived. The following methods were used for quantitative assessment of the informative value: for determining the descriptive informative value--informative criterion by Mel'nikov and informative criterion by Bykhovskiĭ [correction of Bihovski]; for the distributing informative value--the method of Kulback and modification of this method, as described by Genkin-Gubler. Simultaneous use of all four methods allowed to precise the values being obtained and to perform with maximal exactness the intervals relevant to the prognosis. This furnished the opportunity to distribute the individual parameters in highly informative groups, designated for entrance to the projected expert system.

Acute Disease↗

[An information model of the resuscitation activities in treating severe combined trauma].

An informative model developed by the authors for treatment of severe combined trauma is presented. Central place occupy the intellectual activities of the anesthesiologist-resuscitator, while those of the surgeon are only outlined. The construction of the informative model (presented as algorithm) takes into account the fundamental requirements for treatment of severe combined trauma. Analyzing the nature of the informative processes in the model, the authors admit that prognostication is the factor that occupies central place in the treatment of severe combined trauma. The emphasized relative value of prognosis does not underrate the importance of the other intellectual processes in the model: diagnosis, reaching a decision, choice of approach. It is considered that this informative model might be used as auxiliary means in the teaching work in postgraduate qualification courses. At the same time, it furnishes the opportunity to determine the priority in the automation of definite activities in resuscitology.

Acute Disease↗