PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Kam

Publications and source records attributed to I Kam.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Liver transplantation using sirolimus and minimal corticosteroids (3-day taper).

At our center, we have performed liver transplantation since 1995 with a rapid-taper steroid protocol (weaning steroids by day 14 posttransplantation). Beginning in 2000, we further reduced the use of corticosteroids to 3 days and added sirolimus to our immunosuppressive regimen. We report our experience with 39 patients who underwent liver transplantation with either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A (Neoral; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Summit, NJ) and sirolimus, with a 3-day tapered dose of corticosteroids. Thirty-two patients received a cadaveric graft and 7 patients received a right hepatic lobe from a living donor. All patients initially were administered either tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/d) or cyclosporin A (10 mg/kg/d) and sirolimus (6 mg/d for 1 day, followed by 2 mg/d), in addition to methylprednisolone on the first 3 days (1, 0.5, and 0.5 g/d) after transplantation. Patients were administered corticosteroids for presumptive or biopsy-proven evidence of acute cellular rejection (methylprednisolone, 1, 0.5, and 0.5 g on 3 successive days). Seventeen patients were administered tacrolimus and 22 patients were administered cyclosporin A. Six patients were excluded from analysis because they were administered sirolimus for less than 2 weeks. Mean duration of follow-up was 124 days. Patient survival was 36 of 39 patients (92%), and graft survival was 35 of 39 grafts (89%). Ten of 33 patients (30%) experienced 12 episodes of rejection (7 biopsy proven, 5 presumptive) compared with 70% in historical controls (P <.01). OKT3 was required in 1 of 33 patients (3%) compared with 37% in controls (P <.01). Twenty-six of 33 patients (79%) were not administered prednisone, and 7 of 33 patients (21%) were administered prednisone for reasons other than rejection. Posttransplantation, there was no significant change in values for creatinine, glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, cholesterol, and white blood cell counts. Platelet counts were significantly reduced, and hematocrits were significantly elevated (P <.05). Liver transplantation may be successfully performed with minimal use of corticosteroids by using sirolimus and either tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. Despite the absence of prednisone from our immunosuppressive protocol, the incidence of rejection and OKT3 use was lower than in historical controls. Patient and graft survival rates were identical to those of historical controls. The findings in this report will serve as the basis for a formal trial evaluating the efficacy of sirolimus in liver transplantation.

Cyclosporine↗
PubMed2001

Dyslipidemia during sirolimus therapy in liver transplant recipients occurs with concomitant cyclosporine but not tacrolimus.

Since its approval as an immunosuppressive agent in renal transplantation, sirolimus (RAPA) recently has been used in the primary immunosuppression regimen at several liver transplant centers. One of the major side effects of RAPA is hypercholesterolemia, which is reported in up to 44% of patients. We describe our experience in 57 primary liver transplant recipients treated with RAPA and either cyclosporine A (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC). We report the incidence and severity of hypercholesterolemia using a prednisone-free immunosuppressive regimen. Between January 2000 and September 2000, a total of 57 patients underwent transplantation at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver, CO) with RAPA and either CSA or TAC. The initial 10 patients who underwent transplantation under this protocol were not administered corticosteroids, and the subsequent 47 patients were administered only 3 doses of methylprednisolone days 0, 1, and 2 postoperatively (1, 0.5, and 0.5 g, respectively). Total fasting cholesterol, high-density cholesterol, low-density cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured at monthly intervals. Mean serum cholesterol level was significantly greater in CSA patients (200 mg/dL) compared with TAC patients (158 mg/dL; P =.0003). Serum triglyceride levels were more than 2-fold greater with CSA (292 mg/dL) compared with TAC (134 mg/dL; P =.002). Hypercholesterolemia (cholesterol > 240 mg/dL) was present in 10 of 57 patients (18%) and was significantly more common in CSA-treated patients (8 of 27 patients; 30%) compared with TAC-treated patients (2 of 30 patients; 6%; P <.05). Hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride > 300 mg/dL) was present in 10 of 57 patients (18%) and was significantly more common in CSA-treated patients (9 of 27 patients; 33%) compared with TAC-treated patients (1 of 30 patients; 3%; P <.05). We conclude that (1) concomitant use of TAC with RAPA reduces the prevalence and severity of posttransplantation dyslipidemia, and (2) these findings have important implications in the prevention of complications of hypercholesterolemia in liver transplant recipients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Right hepatic lobe donation for living donor liver transplantation: impact on donor quality of life.

Adult right hepatic lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has rapidly gained widespread acceptance as an effective procedure for selected patients with end-stage liver disease. However, there are currently no published data on the effect of this procedure on the quality of life of donors. We report the results of a survey of our living liver transplant donors to determine the effect of right hepatic lobe donation on quality of life. We have performed 30 LDLTs since 1997; 24 of these have a follow-up of 4 months or longer. In August 2000, these patients were sent a questionnaire (including a Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Survey) regarding psychosocial outcomes and symptoms after surgery. Major complications occurred in 4 of 24 patients (16%), and minor complications, in 4 of 24 patients (16%). Complete recovery occurred in 75% of patients at a mean time of 3.4 months. Ninety-six percent of patients returned to the same predonation job after a mean time of 2.4 months, and 66% of patients required a period of light-duty work for a mean of 2.8 months before returning to full-duty work. A change in body image was reported in 42% of patients, and 71% reported mild ongoing symptoms (primarily abdominal discomfort) that they related to the donor surgery for which 29% sought evaluation by a physician. The donor's relationship with the recipient was the same or better in 96% of donors, and the relationship with the donor's significant other was the same or better in 88% of donors. Mean out-of-pocket expenses incurred by donors were $3,660. Sixty-three percent of donors reported experiencing more pain than anticipated. All patients would donate again if necessary, and 96% benefited from the donor experience. In conclusion, (1) all our donors are alive and well after donation; (2) almost all donors were able to return to predonation employment status within a few months; (3) most donors have mild persistent abdominal symptoms, and some donors had a change in body image that they attribute to the donor surgery; and (4) this information should be provided to potential donors so they may better understand the impact of donor surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right-lobe grafts: results and lessons learned from a single-center experience.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for adults is now a practical alternative to cadaveric liver transplantation. Use of right-lobe grafts has become the preferred donor procedure. Because of the complexity of this operation, a learning curve is to be expected. We report the outcome of our first 41 LDLTs at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver, CO). We also discuss the lessons learned and the resultant modifications in the procedure that evolved during our series. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed between August 1997 and February 2001 for the following end points: recipient survival, graft survival, and donor and recipient complications. Thirty-eight of 41 living donor liver transplant recipients (93%) are alive and well postoperatively with a mean follow-up of 9.6 months. Four patients required retransplantation secondary to technical problems (9.8%); all 4 patients were in our initial 11 cases. Modification of the donor liver plane of transection resulted in venous outflow improvement. Also, biliary management was modified during the series. Donor complications are listed; all 41 donors have returned to normal pretransplantation activity. Our results indicate that LDLT can be performed safely with excellent donor and recipient outcomes. Dissemination of our experience can help shorten the learning curve for other institutions.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Fatal transfer of malignant melanoma from multiorgan donor to four allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: In this report we describe the transfer of malignant melanoma from a single donor to four solid organ transplant recipients, all of whom died from metastatic melanoma. METHODS AND CASE HISTORIES: The donor of a heart, liver, and two kidneys to four separate recipients died of intracerebral hemorrhage. The donor had no history or clinical evidence of melanoma. All four recipients, treated with standard immunosuppression protocols, developed metastatic malignant melanoma within 1 year after transplantation Three patients died within 14 months after transplantation, although the fourth, whose immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued, died of metastatic melanoma 30 months after renal transplantation. FINDINGS: Tumors from all recipients were histologically identical. Donor origin of tumor cells was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA analysis for polymorphic short tandem tetrameric repeats (Geneprint STR, Promega Corp., Madison, WI). DNAs from nontumorous donor tissue and tumor tissue available from three recipients tested positive for CSF1P0 alleles 10 and 12 and for TH01 alleles 6 and 7, although DNAs from nonneoplastic recipient tissues all exhibited different allelotypes. INTERPRETATION: Transmission of fatal or potentially fatal malignant tumors, notably malignant melanoma, from donor to recipient is an uncommon complication of solid organ transplantation. PCR-based genetic analysis permits definitive assignment of the source of posttransplant tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of 100 patients for living donor liver transplantation.

The initial success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States has resulted in a growing interest in this procedure. The impact of LDLT on liver transplantation will depend in part on the proportion of patients considered medically suitable for LDLT and the identification of suitable donors. We report the outcome of our evaluation of the first 100 potential transplant recipients for LDLT at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Denver, CO). All patients considered for LDLT had first been approved for conventional liver transplantation by the Liver Transplant Selection Committee and met the listing criteria of United Network for Organ Sharing status 1, 2A, or 2B. Once listed, those patients deemed suitable for LDLT were given the option to consider LDLT and approach potential donors. Donors were evaluated with a preliminary screening questionnaire, followed by formal evaluation. Of the 100 potential transplant recipients evaluated, 51 were initially rejected based on recipient characteristics that included imminent cadaveric transplantation (8 patients), refusal of evaluation (4 patients), lack of financial approval (6 patients), and medical, psychosocial, or surgical problems (33 patients). Of the remaining 49 patients, considered ideal candidates for LDLT, 24 patients were unable to identify a suitable donor for evaluation. Twenty-six donors were evaluated for the remaining 25 potential transplant recipients. Eleven donors were rejected: 9 donors for medical reasons and 2 donors who refused donation after being medically approved. The remaining 15 donor-recipient pairs underwent LDLT. Using our criteria for the selection of recipients and donors for LDLT gave the following results: (1) 51 of 100 potential transplant recipients (51%) were rejected for recipient issues, (2) only 15 of the remaining 49 potential transplant recipients (30%) were able to identify an acceptable donor, and (3) 15 of 100 potential living donor transplant recipients (15%) were able to identify a suitable donor and undergo LDLT. Recipient characteristics and donor availability may limit the widespread use of LDLT. However, careful application of LDLT to patients at greatest risk for dying on the waiting list may significantly reduce waiting list mortality.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Successful withdrawal of prednisone after adult liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis.

Corticosteroid withdrawal after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) represents an attractive therapeutic option for ameliorating post-OLT metabolic complications, although several reports suggest patients who undergo transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may have a greater incidence of acute and chronic rejection when withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of corticosteroid withdrawal in patients with AIH after OLT. Twenty-six patients underwent successful OLT for AIH. In 21 of these patients, stable maintenance immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (CSA) and prednisone (n = 20) or tacrolimus (TAC) and prednisone (n = 1). In this group, a trial of prednisone withdrawal was initiated when patients were 6 months or more post-OLT, with normal liver function, and receiving an average prednisone dosage of 10 mg/d. Five additional patients treated with either TAC (n = 4) or CSA (n = 1) plus mycophenolate mofetil underwent a 14-day taper of prednisone. Overall, 17 of 25 patients (68%) were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids, with a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 34 months). Of the remaining 8 patients, 5 patients received a lower dosage of prednisone or required prednisone to control inflammatory bowel disease. Only 3 patients remained dependent on prednisone to maintain stable liver allograft function. Withdrawal from 10 to 5 mg of prednisone (n = 21) resulted in four episodes of steroid-responsive and two episodes of steroid-resistant rejection in 3 patients, and 18 of 21 patients (86%) were rejection free. Withdrawal from 5 to 0 mg prednisone (n = 17) resulted in eight episodes of steroid-responsive and no episodes of steroid-resistant rejection in 4 patients; 13 of 17 patients (76%) were rejection free. Of the 5 patients in the 14-day prednisone-taper group, 3 patients had steroid-responsive rejection and 1 patient required OKT3. Seventeen of 21 patients (81%) with AIH were successfully withdrawn from corticosteroids. It is notable that corticosteroid withdrawal was associated with a reduction in serum cholesterol levels, decreased use of antihypertensive agents, and reduced need for insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents. We propose corticosteroid withdrawal should be attempted in patients with underlying AIH who undergo OLT because most will benefit without significantly jeopardizing the liver allograft.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Role of TIPS as a bridge to hepatic transplantation in Budd-Chiari syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a bridge to transplantation for patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients (five women, three men) with a mean age of 49.8 years (range, 20-61 years) were diagnosed with BCS by means of computed tomography, hepatic venography, and liver biopsy. One patient had acute liver failure, with subacute or chronic failure in seven. TIPS placement was attempted in all eight patients. Clinical follow-up and portograms were obtained in all patients until death or transplantation. RESULTS: TIPS placement was completed in seven of eight patients (87.5%). During the follow-up period, TIPS occlusion occurred in four patients. TIPS revision in this patient, although successful, was complicated by hemorrhage and multiorgan failure, and the patient died. Assisted patency rate, excluding the technical failure, was 100%. Mean follow-up in the six survivors with TIPS was 342 days (range, 19-660 days). All six survivors had complete resolution of their ascites. Albumin levels improved an average of 0.43 g/dL (range, 0.3-1.4 g/dL). Bilirubin levels improved in five of six patients (83%), decreasing by an average of 5.6 mg/dL (range, 3.0-15.2 mg/dL). Of the six survivors, three underwent elective liver transplantation, one is awaiting transplantation, and one has been removed from the transplantation list because of clinical improvement. One patient was a candidate for transplantation but declined to be put on the list. CONCLUSION: Hepatic synthetic dysfunction improves markedly after TIPS placement in patients with BCS. Significant improvement in ascites can also occur. TIPS can be an effective bridge to transplantation for patients with BCS.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Early steroid withdrawal in liver transplantation is safe and beneficial.

This report reviews the literature and discusses steroid withdrawal after hepatic transplantation. Our experience with steroid withdrawal is highlighted. The hypothesis is that steroid withdrawal from liver transplant recipients is safe and beneficial. A review of the English literature yielded 16 reports with a total of 901 patients (749 adults and 152 children). Most reports were nonrandomized and uncontrolled. Only two reports were randomized, controlled trials; three reports featured early steroid withdrawal (</= 3 months); and one report featured very early steroid withdrawal (14 days). Steroid withdrawal was achieved in approximately 85% of the patients. Acute rejection was not significantly increased by steroid withdrawal; rates were 5% to 14% in uncontrolled trials and 7% versus 7% (late steroid withdrawal v control; P = not significant [NS]) and 4% versus 8% (early steroid withdrawal v control; P = NS) in controlled trials. Acute rejection rates after very early steroid withdrawal (14 days posttransplantation) were 42% to 46%, similar to or less than the 40% to 70% reported for steroid-containing regimens. Chronic rejection was not increased by steroid withdrawal; the rate was 3.9% in one uncontrolled trial and 0% versus 3% (early steroid withdrawal v control; P = NS) in one controlled trial. Patient and graft survival were not adversely affected. Steroid withdrawal was associated with reduced rates and better control of hypertension, reduced total cholesterol levels, reduced rate of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, improved control of diabetes, and reduced rate of obesity. The aggregate experience with steroid withdrawal suggests it is safe, associated with improvement in several posttransplantation complications, and deserves broader clinical application.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1998

Adult living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation has gained wide acceptance as an alternative for children with end-stage liver disease. The standard left lateral segment used in this operation does not provide adequate parenchymal mass to broaden its application to larger children or adults. METHODS: We report two cases of adult to adult living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe in patients with chronic liver disease. RESULTS: Both recipients experienced excellent initial graft function and have normal liver function 4 and 9 months postoperatively. Both donors are alive and well and returned to normal life 4 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience suggests that this technique is a safe and reliable option for adults with chronic end-stage liver disease. A conservative application of this procedure in the adult population could significantly reduce the mortality on the adult waiting list.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Percutaneous mesenteric venous thrombectomy and thrombolysis: successful treatment followed by liver transplantation.

Mesenteric vein thrombosis (MVT) is a rare cause of intestinal ischemia. Because of its nonspecific symptoms, diagnosis is often delayed. We describe a patient with liver cirrhosis who developed acute MVT while waiting for liver transplantation. Surgical intervention carried a high risk because of her underlying cirrhosis. Mesenteric venous thrombectomy and thrombolysis were performed with an AngioJet (Possis Medical, Minneapolis, MN) thrombectomy device and streptokinase infusion through transjugular route. The patient subsequently received an orthotopic liver transplant. We also present a review of the literature about the occurrence and treatment options for MVT.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Limitations of pediatric donor kidneys for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of grafts for kidney transplantation (Tx) has resulted in an expansion of criteria for pediatric donors. However, the limitations of pediatric donors for kidney Tx are not yet clearly established. We investigated the outcomes of recipients with pediatric kidney grafts from Colorado to elucidate the state of pediatric kidney grafts distributed in the nation and to clarify the limitations of pediatric donor kidneys for Tx. METHODS: Between January 1989 and July 1997, 675 organ donors in Colorado were utilized for Tx. Fifty-seven of these (8.4%) were 10 yr old or younger. Thirty-two of the 57 pediatric donors provided kidneys for 50 recipients both inside and outside Colorado. Forty-four of the 50 recipients were followed and are available for this study. RESULTS: Graft survival rates were 85.6, 77.3, 71.3 and 65.4% for 1, 2, 3 to 5, and 6 yr of follow-up, respectively. Thirteen recipients lost the grafts, including three graft losses within 2 wk, due to primary nonfunction, venous and arterial thrombosis. The mean serum creatinine value in 31 recipients with functioning grafts was 1.3 +/- 0.4 mg/dL at the time with follow-up of 45.9 +/- 28.3 months (5-96 months). Six grafts from 13-month to 3-yr-old donors were transplanted en-bloc and 5 of these have survived. Four of the 5 single grafts from 3 to 5-yr-old donors have functioned. Of the 33 grafts from donors aged 6-10 yr, including 30 single and 3 en-bloc grafts, 22 were still functioning. With respect to donor weight, 4 of the 5 en-bloc grafts from donors weighting 9-15 kg, and 6 of the 7 single and the 1 en-bloc grafts from donors weighing 15-20 kg were still functioning. Cold ischemic time (CIT) within 37.5 h was not associated with early graft outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The kidneys from donors 1-3 yr old and/or weighing 9-15 kg could be successfully transplanted en-bloc and those from donors more than 3 yr old and/or weighing 15 kg were best transplanted by single grafts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Mycophenolate mofetil decreases rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation when combined with tacrolimus or cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND: Historically, the acute rejection rates in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) recipients have been extremely high (50-80%), with many second and third rejection episodes despite the use of quadruple immunosuppression (antibody induction and cyclosporine [CsA]-azathioprine [AZA]-based maintenance immunosuppression). Although this acute rejection has rarely led to graft loss, it has been a great cause of morbidity and of significantly increased cost. In an attempt to decrease the acute rejection rate and related morbidity in SPK transplant recipients, we compared two "state-of-the-art" immunosuppression regimens in a prospective, randomized, single-center study. METHODS: Patients who received SPK transplants were randomized to receive either tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n=18) or CsA (Neoral formulation) and MMF (n=18). All patients received OKT3 induction and prednisone, which was tapered to 5 mg/day by 6 months after transplantation. All rejection episodes were biopsy proven. In addition, metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, serum cholesterol), drug toxicity, and infection also were measured. Data were compared with that of a historical group (n=18) who received conventional CsA (Sandimmune formulation) and AZA-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11% in both the TAC-MMF and CsA-MMF groups with only two patients in each group experiencing a rejection episode. This rejection rate was significantly decreased from that of the CsA-AZA historical group (77%, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in infection rates, including cytomegalovirus, or in metabolic control (HgbA1C, hypertension, and cholesterol levels). All patients remained on their initial immunosuppression regimen for the first 3 months after transplantation. Between 3 and 6 months after transplantation, three patients were switched from TAC to CsA for recurrent migraine headaches, posttransplant diabetes, and chronic cytomegalovirus infection. Two patients in the CsA-MMF group died of nonimmunologic causes (aspiration pneumonia and arrhythmia) between 3 and 6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The data from this study show that MMF treatment significantly decreases the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection in SPK transplant recipients compared with AZA-treated historical controls. In addition, we conclude that TAC and CsA (Neoral), when combined with MMF, yield similar, low acute rejection rates with similar graft function and metabolic control.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: The long-term complications of immunosuppressive therapy such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are a major source of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study we completely withdrew prednisone (PRED) 14 days after liver transplantation in an effort to decrease these metabolic complications. Patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral formulation) or tacrolimus (TAC). Thus, we also were able to compare CsA to TAC in patients not receiving PRED with respect to efficacy, toxicity, and effect on posttransplant metabolic complications. METHODS: A total of 71 patients were randomized to receive either TAC-MMF (n=35) or CsA-MMF (n=36) after liver transplantation and were analyzed for patient and graft survival. Fifty-eight patients continued the immunosuppressive protocol for at least 6 months after transplantation and were analyzed for the incidence of acute rejection and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. RESULTS: The 6-month patient survival rates were 94.4% for CsA-MMF and 88.6% for TAC-MMF. Corresponding 6-month graft survival rates were 88.7% and 85.71% with no immunologic graft losses in either group. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 46% for CsA-MMF and 42.3% for TAC-MMF. Six patients were converted from CsA to TAC (four for recurrent rejection) and seven patients were converted from TAC to CsA (four for neurotoxicity). Only one patient (in the TAC-MMF group) developed new-onset posttransplant diabetes. In contrast, four of eight patients in the CsA-MMF group who were diabetic before transplant became nondiabetic in the first 3 months after transplant. The mean serum cholesterol level was significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (145.2+/-41.8 mg/dl and 190.3+/-62.2, respectively; P<0.001) and the incidence of hypertension was lower in the TAC-MMF group (12% vs. 30.3% in the CsA-MMF group, P<0.01). Both groups had a lower incidence of metabolic complications compared with a historical group (n=100) maintained on CsA and PRED (10 mg/day at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: MMF in combination with either TAC or CsA allows withdrawal of PRED 14 days after liver transplantation with a moderate rejection rate and no immunologic graft losses. Early PRED withdrawal decreases posttransplant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, but patients maintained on TAC have lower serum cholesterol levels and a lower incidence of hypertension than CsA-treated patients.

Acute Disease↗