PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Kennedy

Publications and source records attributed to I Kennedy.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Pamidronate reduces skeletal morbidity in women with advanced breast cancer and lytic bone lesions: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Protocol 18 Aredia Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE: To assess whether pamidronate can reduce the frequency of skeletal morbidity in women with lytic bone metastases from breast cancer treated with hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-two women with breast cancer who had at least one lytic bone lesion and who were receiving hormonal therapy were randomized to receive 90 mg of pamidronate or placebo as a 2-hour intravenous infusion given in double-blind fashion every 4 weeks for 24 cycles. Patients were evaluated for skeletal complications: pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, irradiation of or surgery on bone, or hypercalcemia. The skeletal morbidity rate (the ratio of the number of skeletal complications to the time on trial) was the primary efficacy variable. Bone pain, use of analgesics, quality of life, performance status, bone tumor response, and biochemical parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two patients who received pamidronate and 189 who received placebo were assessable. The skeletal morbidity rate was significantly reduced at 12, 18, and 24 cycles in patients treated with 90 mg of pamidronate (P = .028, .023, and .008, respectively). At 24 cycles, the proportion of patients having had any skeletal complication was 56% in the pamidronate group and 67% in the placebo group (P = .027). The time to the first skeletal complication was longer for patients receiving pamidronate than for those given placebo (P = .049). There was no statistical difference in survival or in objective bone response rate. Pamidronate was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 90 mg of pamidronate as a 2-hour intravenous infusion every 4 weeks in addition to hormonal therapy significantly reduces skeletal morbidity from osteolytic metastases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

ATP is released from rabbit urinary bladder epithelial cells by hydrostatic pressure changes--a possible sensory mechanism?

1. The responses of rabbit urinary bladder to hydrostatic pressure changes and to electrical stimulation have been investigated using both the Ussing chamber and a superfusion apparatus. These experiments enabled us to monitor changes in both ionic transport across the tissue and cellular ATP release from it. 2. The urinary bladder of the rabbit maintains an electrical potential difference across its wall as a result largely of active sodium transport from the urinary (mucosal) to the serosal surface. 3. Small hydrostatic pressure differences produced by removal of bathing fluid from one side of the tissue caused reproducible changes in both potential difference and short-circuit current. The magnitude of these changes increases as the volume of fluid removed increases. 3. Amiloride on the mucosal (urinary), but not the serosal, surface of the membrane reduces the transepithelial potential difference and short-circuit current with an IC50 of 300 nM. Amiloride reduces the size of, but does not abolish, transepithelial potential changes caused by alterations in hydrostatic pressure. 4. Field electrical stimulation of strips of bladder tissue produces a reproducible release of ATP. Such release was demonstrated to occur largely from urothelial cells and is apparently non-vesicular as it increases in the absence of calcium and is not abolished by tetrodotoxin. 5. It is proposed that ATP is released from the urothelium as a sensory mediator for the degree of distension of the rabbit urinary bladder and other sensory modalities.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1997

Paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The Taxol Investigational Trials Group, Australia and New Zealand.

When administered as a single agent in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, paclitaxel (Taxol) exhibits remarkable antitumor activity. This trial was undertaken to compare paclitaxel with standard chemotherapy as front-line therapy for this disease. Patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were randomized to receive paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours for eight cycles (6 months) or standard treatment with oral cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) 100 mg/m2/d days 1 through 14, intravenous methotrexate 40 mg/ m2 days 1 and 8, intravenous 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, and oral prednisolone 40 mg/m2/d (CMFP) days 1 through 14 for six cycles (6 months). Patients whose disease progressed or relapsed were recommended to receive second-line epirubicin. Accrual has been completed with 208 patients randomized, but a preplanned interim analysis of the first 100 patients is reported here. Analysis of quality of life, assessed by a linear analogue scale and overall quality of life indices, is ongoing. Objective response occurred in 31% (confidence interval, 19% to 45%) with paclitaxel and 35% (confidence interval, 22% to 51%) with CMFP with stable disease in an additional 33% and 29%, respectively. Median time to progression was 5.5 months for paclitaxel-treated patients and 6.4 months for those given CMFP, with median survival durations of 17.3 and 11.3 months, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 64% of patients treated with paclitaxel and in 63% treated with CMFP. However, febrile neutropenia was the primary reason for hospitalization in 1% of paclitaxel courses, compared with 8% of CMFP courses. Nine percent of the patients had major infections with CMFP, but none were seen with paclitaxel. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 13% of paclitaxel-treated and 27% of CMFP-treated patients. Alopecia and peripheral neuropathy were more common with paclitaxel. Quality of life assessments in the first 100 patients suggest better overall results on paclitaxel treatment as compared with CMFP. Preliminary analyses suggest that single-agent paclitaxel is well tolerated and provides comparable control of metastatic cancer to CMFP combination therapy when used as front-line treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

A randomized study of paclitaxel versus cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil/prednisone in previously untreated patients with advanced breast cancer: preliminary results. Taxol Investigational Trials Group, Australia/New Zealand.

When administered as a single agent to previously treated patients with advanced breast cancer, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has good activity. This trial was undertaken to compare paclitaxel with standard chemotherapy as front-line treatment for this disease. Patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours for eight cycles over 24 weeks or standard treatment with oral cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/d days 1 to 14, intravenous methotrexate 40 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, intravenous 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, and oral prednisone 40 mg/m2 daily days 1 to 14 (CMFP) for six cycles over 24 weeks. Patients whose disease progressed or relapsed were recommended for second-line therapy with epirubicin. Accrual has been completed with 209 patients randomized, and an interim analysis of the first 100 patients is reported here. Analysis of quality of life, assessed by the linear analogue scale and overall quality of life indices, is ongoing. Objective response occurred in 31% (confidence interval, 19% to 45%) with paclitaxel and 35% (confidence interval, 22% to 51%) with CMFP, with stable disease in an additional 33% and 29%, respectively. Median time to progression was 5.5 months with paclitaxel and 6.4 months with CMFP, with a median survival of 17.3 months for patients treated with paclitaxel and 11.3 months for those given CMFP. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 64% of patients with paclitaxel and 63% with CMFP. However, febrile neutropenia was the primary reason for hospitalization in 1% of paclitaxel courses, compared with 8% with CMFP. Major infections (World Health Organization grade 4) were seen in 7% of patients treated with CMFP, but in none of those given paclitaxel. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 13% of paclitaxel and 27% of CMFP patients. Alopecia and peripheral neuropathy were more common with paclitaxel. Quality of life assessments in the first 100 patients suggest better overall results for those treated with paclitaxel compared with CMFP. Preliminary analyses suggest that single-agent paclitaxel is well tolerated and provides control of metastatic cancer comparable to that of CMFP combination therapy when used as front-line therapy in an outpatient setting.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1996

Nodes in the neck.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1995

New insights on P2X purinoceptors.

Significant advances in understanding of P2X purinoceptor pharmacology have been made in the last few years. The limitations of nucleotide agonists as drug tools have now been amply demonstrated. Fortunately, inhibitors of the degrading ecto-ATPase enzymes are becoming available and it has become apparent that the complete removal of all divalent cations can be used experimentally in some systems to prevent nucleotide breakdown. Despite these issues, convincing evidence for P2X receptor heterogeneity, from data with agonists, has recently been reported. A number of new antagonists at P2X purinoceptors have also recently been described which to some degree appear to be more specific and useful than earlier antagonists like suramin. It is now apparent that suramin is a poor antagonist of ATP in many tissues because it potently inhibits ATPase activity at similar concentrations to those at which it blocks the P2X purinoceptor. Advances in the use of radiolabelled nucleotides as radioligands for binding studies has allowed the demonstration of P2X purinoceptors in a variety of tissues throughout the body including the brain. These studies have also provided evidence for receptor heterogeneity. Excitingly, two P2X purinoceptor genes have been cloned but operational studies suggest that more than two types exist. The cloning studies have also demonstrated a unique structure for the P2X purinoceptor which differentiates it from all other ligand-gated ion channel receptors. Further studies on P2X purinoceptor operation and structure are needed to help resolve controversies alluded to regarding the characterization and classification of nucleotide receptors. Hopefully such studies will also lead to a better understanding of the physiological and pathological importance of ATP and its activation of P2X purinoceptors. This will require the identification of better drug tools, in particular antagonists which may also provide the basis for novel therapeutic agents.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗