PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I L Burney

Publications and source records attributed to I L Burney.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Medicare and Medicaid physician payment incentives.

The incentives in the Medicare and Medicaid physician payment systems and their effects on six interrelated aspects of health care costs and beneficiary access to care were analyzed. Research results and data presented indicate that Medicare and Medicaid physician payment incentives are inconsistent with current public policy goals of (1) containing inflation in fees and expenditures, (2) encouraging physician participation in public programs, (3) improving the geographic and specialty distributions of physicians, (4) encouraging primary care instead of surgery, and also outpatient rather than inpatient treatment.

Ambulatory Care↗

Geographic variation in physicians' fees. Payments to physicians under Medicare and Medicaid.

To study geographic differences in physician fees recognized by the Medicare and Medicaid programs, we analyzed physician reimbursement rates at the national, regional, state, and county levels. The results indicate that nationally, Medicaid specialist fees are 77% of Medicare specialist fees. Meidcare specialist fees in metropolitan areas are 23% higher than those in nonmetropolitan areas, but there are no differences under Medicaid. State Medicare specialist fees varied from 73% to 132% of the national Medicare average, while Medicaid specialist fees ranged from 49% to 179% of the national Medicaid average. State Medicaid fees for specialists ranged from 39% to 100% of Medicare specialist fees. These results indicate that under national health insurance, fees set at national or statewide levels could have notable effects on physician remuneration in some localities.

Fee Schedules↗

Physician fee patterns under medicare: a descriptive analysis.

To describe physician fee patterns under a national program, we analyzed physician reimbursement rates for 39 medical procedures for 292 local Medicare reimbursement areas. The results indicate that the maximum prevailing charge for each procedure generally ranged from three to 10 times the minimum charge. Prevailing charges, however, clustered around the mean (coefficient of variation less than 0.50) in 37 of the 39 fee distributions for general practitioners and specialists. Although differences (P less than 0.05) existed between mean general practitioner and specialist charges for 27 of the 39 procedures, these differences were generally less than 10%.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗