PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I M Longini

Publications and source records attributed to I M Longini.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Using validation sets for outcomes and exposure to infection in vaccine field studies.

Methods of adjusting for bias in estimates due to mismeasured or missing covariates and outcomes through the use of validation sets have been developed in many types of health studies. These methods can be employed for the efficient design and analysis of vaccine studies as well. On the one hand, nonspecific case definitions can lead to attenuated efficacy and effectiveness estimates, but confirmation by culture or a quick test of the infectious agent is also expensive and difficult. On the other hand, data on exposure to infection can influence estimates of vaccine efficacy, but good data on exposure are difficult to obtain. In this paper, the authors show how use of small validation sets can correct the bias of the estimates obtained from a large main study while maintaining efficiency. They illustrate the approach for outcomes using the example of influenza vaccine efficacy and effectiveness trials and illustrate the approach for exposure to infection using the example of a human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial. The authors discuss challenges posed by infectious diseases in the use of currently available methods. Development of these efficient designs and methods of analysis for vaccine field studies will improve estimation of vaccine efficacy for both susceptibility and infectiousness, as well as estimation of indirect and overall effects of vaccination in community trials.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed2001

Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for competing risks survival data subject to interval censoring and truncation.

We derive the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate (NPMLE) of the cumulative incidence functions for competing risks survival data subject to interval censoring and truncation. Since the cumulative incidence function NPMLEs give rise to an estimate of the survival distribution which can be undefined over a potentially larger set of regions than the NPMLE of the survival function obtained ignoring failure type, we consider an alternative pseudolikelihood estimator. The methods are then applied to data from a cohort of injecting drug users in Thailand susceptible to infection from HIV-1 subtypes B and E.

Biometry↗
PubMed2000

Estimation of the efficacy of live, attenuated influenza vaccine from a two-year, multi-center vaccine trial: implications for influenza epidemic control.

The authors provide an analysis of data from a two-year (1996-1998), multicenter (ten US cities), double-blinded, placebo-controlled influenza vaccine trial in children. The vaccine was the trivalent cold-adapted influenza vaccine. Estimates are made of the vaccine efficacy for susceptibility to culture-confirmed influenza (VE(S)) while taking inter-center variability in the risk of infection into account. Our overall estimate of VE(S) against influenza is 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-0.94). In addition, for the second year, although the vaccine contained antigen for A/Wuhan-like (H3N2), the estimated VE(S) for epidemic variant A/Sydney-like (H3N2) was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.94). Thus, the vaccine showed a high degree of protection against a variant not closely matched to the vaccine antigen. With regard to natural immunity, an influenza A infection in the first year reduces the estimated risk of an influenza A infection in the second year by a factor of 0.88 (95% CI 0.21-0.98). When comparing year 1 to year 2, there is a negative correlation of -0.50 in the center-specific attack rates in the placebo groups. This is consistent with the theory that natural immunity provides overall community protection to children. The authors argue that mass vaccination of 70% of the children with the cold-adapted influenza vaccine could provide substantial protection to the community at large.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed2000

Modeling markers of disease progression by a hidden Markov process: application to characterizing CD4 cell decline.

Multistate models have been increasingly used to model natural history of many diseases as well as to characterize the follow-up of patients under varied clinical protocols. This modeling allows describing disease evolution, estimating the transition rates, and evaluating the therapy effects on progression. In many cases, the staging is defined on the basis of a discretization of the values of continuous markers (CD4 cell count for HIV application) that are subject to great variability due mainly to short time-scale noise (intraindividual variability) and measurement errors. This led us to formulate a Bayesian hierarchical model where, at a first level, a disease process (Markov model on the true states, which are unobserved) is introduced and, at a second level, the measurement process making the link between the true states and the observed marker values is modeled. This hierarchical formulation allows joint estimation of the parameters of both processes. Estimation of the quantities of interest is performed via stochastic algorithms of the family of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The flexibility of this approach is illustrated by analyzing the CD4 data on HIV patients of the Concorde clinical trial.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1999

A Markov model for measuring vaccine efficacy for both susceptibility to infection and reduction in infectiousness for prophylactic HIV vaccines.

We use a discrete-time non-homogeneous Markov chain to model data from augmented human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine trials. For this design, the study population consists of primary participants some of whom have steady sexual partners who are also enrolled to augment the trial. The state space consists of the infection status of primary participants without steady partners and the infection status of both persons in the steady partnerships. The transition probabilities are functions of the two parameters: vaccine efficacy for susceptibility (VES) and infectiousness (VEI). We use likelihood methods to estimate VES and VEI from time-to-event data. We then use stochastic simulations to explore the bias and precision of the estimators under various plausible conditions for HIV vaccine trials. We show that both the VES and VEI are estimable with reasonable precision for the conditions that may exist for planned HIV vaccine trials. We show that exams conducted every six months will likely provide sufficient information to estimate the VE parameters accurately, and that there is little gain in precision for more frequent exams. Finally, we show that joint estimation of the VES and VEI will likely be feasible in a currently planned HIV vaccine trial among injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand, if one augments the information about the primary participants in the trial with information about their steady sexual partners.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1999

Design and interpretation of vaccine field studies.

There are many different effects to consider when evaluating vaccines in the field. In this review, we have covered some of the various measures and issues related to study design and interpretation of the different measures. We emphasize that in designing and understanding vaccine studies, it is necessary to be specific about what the effect of interest is and about the assumptions underlying the interpretation of the results. Halloran et al. (81) present design, analysis, and interpretation of vaccine studies in more detail.

Disease Transmission, Infectious↗
PubMed1999

Semiparametric methods for multiple exposure mismeasurement and a bivariate outcome in HIV vaccine trials.

Exposure to infection information is important for estimating vaccine efficacy, but it is difficult to collect and prone to missingness and mismeasurement. We discuss study designs that collect detailed exposure information from only a small subset of participants while collecting crude exposure information from all participants and treat estimation of vaccine efficacy in the missing data/measurement error framework. We extend the discordant partner design for HIV vaccine trials of Golm, Halloran, and Longini (1998, Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2335-2352.) to the more complex augmented trial design of Longini, Datta, and Halloran (1996, Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 13, 440-447) and Datta, Halloran, and Longini (1998, Statistics in Medicine 17, 185-200). The model for this design includes three exposure covariates and both univariate and bivariate outcomes. We adapt recently developed semiparametric missing data methods of Reilly and Pepe (1995, Biometrika 82, 299 314), Carroll and Wand (1991, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 53, 573-585), and Pepe and Fleming (1991, Journal of the American Statistical Association 86, 108-113) to the augmented vaccine trial design. We demonstrate with simulated HIV vaccine trial data the improvements in bias and efficiency when combining the different levels of exposure information to estimate vaccine efficacy for reducing both susceptibility and infectiousness. We show that the semiparametric methods estimate both efficacy parameters without bias when the good exposure information is either missing completely at random or missing at random. The pseudolikelihood method of Carroll and Wand (1991) and Pepe and Fleming (1991) was the more efficient of the two semiparametric methods.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1999

Efficiency of estimating vaccine efficacy for susceptibility and infectiousness: randomization by individual versus household.

In designing vaccine efficacy studies based on the secondary attack rate (SAR) or transmission probability in which both vaccine efficacy for susceptibility, VE(S), and vaccine efficacy for infectiousness, VE(I), are estimated, the allocation of vaccine and placebo within transmission units has an important influence on the efficiency of the study. We compared the following randomization schemes that result in different allocations of vaccine and placebo within two-member households: (1) randomization by individual for a mixed allocation, (2) randomization by transmission unit for concordant allocation, and (3) randomization of only one individual in each transmission unit to either vaccine or placebo. There is a complex interaction among the VE(S), VE(I), and the SAR that determines which allocation of vaccine and placebo within households provides the most information. In general, individual randomization with a mixed allocation of vaccine and placebo is better for estimating both VE(S) and VE(I) than is randomizing by household. However, for estimation of VE(I), at very low SARs and low VE(S), randomization by household is slightly more efficient than randomization by individual.

Biometry↗
PubMed1998

Semi-parametric models for mismeasured exposure information in vaccine trials.

Exposure to infection information is important for estimating vaccine efficacy, but it is difficult to collect and inherently prone to missingness and mismeasurement. It is, therefore, generally not feasible to collect good exposure information on all participants in a large vaccine trial. We discuss study designs that collect detailed exposure information for only a small subset of trial participants, while collecting crude exposure information on all participants, and treat estimation of vaccine efficacy in the missing data/measurement error framework. We demonstrate with the example of an HIV vaccine trial the improvements in bias and efficiency when we combine the different levels of exposure information to estimate vaccine efficacy for reducing both susceptibility and infectiousness. We compare the performance of recently developed semi-parametric missing data methods of Pepe and Fleming and Carroll and Wand, Robins, Hsieh and Newey, and Reilly and Pepe.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1998

Optimal vaccine trial design when estimating vaccine efficacy for susceptibility and infectiousness from multiple populations.

Vaccination can have important indirect effects on the spread of an infectious agent by reducing the level of infectiousness of vaccinees who become infected. To estimate the effect of vaccination on infectiousness, one typically requires data on the contacts between susceptible and infected vaccinated and unvaccinated people. As an alternative, we propose a trial design that involves multiple independent and interchangeable populations. By varying the fraction of susceptible people vaccinated across populations, we obtain an estimate of the reduction infectiousness that depends only on incidence data from the vaccine and control groups of the multiple populations. One can also obtain from these data an estimate of the reduction of susceptibility to infection. We propose a vaccination strategy that is a trade-off between optimal estimation of vaccine efficacy for susceptibility and of vaccine efficacy for infectiousness. We show that the optimal choice depends on the anticipated efficacy of the vaccine as well as the basic reproduction number of the underlying infectious disease process. Smaller vaccination fractions appear desirable when vaccine efficacy is likely high and the basic reproduction number is not large. This strategy avoids the potential for too few infections to occur to estimate vaccine efficacy parameters reliably.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1998

Estimation of vaccine efficacy in the presence of waning: application to cholera vaccines.

The authors present a nonparametric method for estimating vaccine efficacy as a smooth function of time from vaccine trials. Use of the method requires a minimum of assumptions. Estimation is based on the smoothed case hazard rate ratio comparing the vaccinated with the unvaccinated. The estimation procedure allows investigators to assess time-varying changes in vaccine-induced protection, such as those produced by waning and boosting. The authors use the method to reanalyze data from a vaccine trial of two cholera vaccines in rural Bangladesh. This analysis reveals the differential protection and waning effects for the vaccines as a function of biotype and age.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Augmented HIV vaccine trial design for estimating reduction in infectiousness and protective efficacy.

It is important to design HIV vaccine trials to estimate the efficacy of a vaccine in reducing infectiousness in addition to the protective efficacy. Currently planned phase III HIV vaccine field trials in which at-risk individuals are randomized and followed over time do not permit estimation or testing of the vaccine's effect on reducing infectiousness of vaccinees who become infected. We suggest an augmentation of these field trials that recruits steady sexual partners of the primary participants into the trial as far as they are willing to participate. This study design would allow estimation of the efficacy of the vaccine on reducing infectiousness as well as the protective efficacy. We compare the classical design that does not include partners to two different types of augmented design. In the first type of augmentation, called the non-randomized partner design, the steady sexual partners are not randomized to vaccine or placebo. In the second type of augmentation, called the randomized partner design, the steady sexual partners are also randomized to vaccine or placebo. We present a probability model based on infection status at the end of the trial that provides maximum likelihood estimates of the protective efficacy of the vaccine, VES, and the efficacy of the vaccine on reducing infectiousness, VEI. Wald statistics are used for one degree of freedom tests on VES and VEI. With the augmented design, a likelihood ratio test is used to test whether the vaccine has any effect at all. The randomized partner design has more power and provides narrower confidence intervals than does the non-randomized partner design.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1997

Study designs for evaluating different efficacy and effectiveness aspects of vaccines.

Vaccine efficacy and effectiveness (VE) are generally measured as 1 minus some measure of relative risk (RR) in the vaccinated group compared with the unvaccinated group (VE = 1 - RR). In designing a study to evaluate vaccination, the type of effect and the question of interest determine the appropriate choice of comparison population and parameter. Possible questions of interest include that of the biologic effect of vaccination on susceptibility, on infectiousness, or on progression to disease in individuals. The indirect effects, total effects, and overall public health benefits of widespread vaccination of individuals within the context of a vaccination program might also be of primary concern. The change in behavior induced by belief in the protective effects of vaccination might influence the estimates of these effects or might itself be of interest. In this paper, the authors present a framework of study designs that relates the scientific question of interest to the choice of comparison groups, the unit of observation, the level of information available for analysis, and the parameter of effect.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1996

Measuring vaccine efficacy for both susceptibility to infection and reduction in infectiousness for prophylactic HIV-1 vaccines.

Current Phase III trials are designed to assess only a vaccine candidate's ability to reduce susceptibility to infection or disease, that is, vaccine efficacy for susceptibility (VES). Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccination, however, may reduce the level of infectiousness of vaccinees who become infected, producing an important indirect reduction in HIV transmission even if the vaccine confers only modest protection against infection. We propose two approaches for augmenting the information of a classic trial for estimating protective efficacy that enable the additional estimation of the vaccine's effect on infectiousness, that is, vaccine efficacy for infectiousness (VEI). In the first augmentation, steady sexual partners of trial participants are recruited but not randomized to vaccine or placebo. Their infection status is monitored throughout the trial. In the second augmentation, the sexual partners are randomized. Through computer simulations and analytic methods, we investigate the feasibility and statistical properties of the augmented designs. Phase III prophylactic HIV-1 vaccines trials are currently being planned. Employment of the augmented designs described in this paper would not only provide estimation of VEI but also increase the precision of the VES estimator and the power to reject the null hypothesis of no vaccine effect.

AIDS Vaccines↗
PubMed1996

Estimability and interpretation of vaccine efficacy using frailty mixing models.

The authors consider estimability and interpretation of vaccine efficacy based on time to event data, allowing that some of the population might have a very low probability of acquiring disease, and the rest have partial, possibly continuously distributed, susceptibility. The efficacy parameters of interest in the frailty mixing model include the fraction highly unlikely to acquire the infection or disease due to the vaccine, the degree of partial protection in those still susceptible, and the average protection or summary measure of efficacy under heterogeneity. The efficacy estimates can still be usefully interpreted when the heterogeneity results from heterogeneity in contact patterns, contact rates, or infectiousness of the contacts, as long as these are equal in the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. A likelihood-based method allows estimation of the efficacy parameters of interest from grouped time to event data. Simulated vaccine studies assuming different levels and distributions of efficacy demonstrate that ignoring heterogeneity in susceptibility or exposure to infection generally results in underestimation of vaccine efficacy as well as incorrect interpretation of the estimates. The approach is also applicable to other covariates affecting susceptibility or exposure to infection in infectious diseases. Exploitation of the dependent happening structure of infectious diseases to obtain a shape for the baseline hazard may help identifiability. The authors recommend fitting several models to time to event data in vaccine studies.

Effect Modifier, Epidemiologic↗
PubMed1996

Use of immunological markers and continuous-time Markov models to estimate progression of HIV infection in homosexual men.

OBJECTIVES: We used continuous-time Markov models based on CD4 cell counts and anti-CD3 reactivity (i.e., measure for T-cell quality) to study the progression of HIV infection in a cohort study of homosexual men in Amsterdam. We also compared the effectiveness of anti-CD3 reactivity as a marker for disease progression with that of CD4 cell counts. METHODS: We used data from 467 men (6905 visits) with visits at 3-month intervals between October 1984 and March 1993. To account for measurement error and short time-scale variability, the immunological stage at each visit was determined using a kernel smoother on log-transformed data from each individual. The Markov model had six marker-defined stages and a seventh stage for clinical AIDS. The initial stage-occupation probabilities for seroconverters were used to estimate the incubation time from infection to AIDS. Confidence intervals were calculated using the bootstrap method to account for the effect of smoothing on the variability of our estimates. RESULTS: The CD4 staging scheme estimated the median time from seroconversion to AIDS at 8.3 years [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.1-8.6], and a similar estimate was obtained with the anti-CD3 staging model. The CD4 model predicts that 10.2% (95% CI, 9.9-13.1) will remain AIDS-free 15 years after seroconversion. The mean number of stages visited before AIDS is lower with the CD4 model (7.4; 95% CI, 7.2-7.7) than with the anti-CD3 model (11.3; 95% CI, 10.8-12.0), implying that anti-CD3 predicts progression less well than CD4 cell count. CONCLUSIONS: CD4 lymphocyte counts and anti-CD3 reactivity are each associated with an increased hazard for progression to AIDS. Therefore, men in different CD4-stages (anti-CD3 stages) follow different incubation period distributions to AIDS. However, anti-CD3 predicts progression less well than CD4 cell count. Staged time-continuous Markov models are useful to study immunological markers for HIV disease progression.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The effect of disease prior to an outbreak on estimates of vaccine efficacy following the outbreak.

A common source of bias in evaluating vaccine efficacy following a disease outbreak is the presence of persons who had the disease prior to the outbreak. This paper examines the effects of including and excluding pre-outbreak disease cases from the calculation of vaccine efficacy based on the cumulative incidence at the end of an outbreak. Using a five-stage model, the effects of the following factors on the bias of vaccine efficacy estimates are examined: the true protective efficacy of the vaccine, the prevaccination infection rate, differences in vaccine uptake among the previously diseased and nondiseased, differences in pre-outbreak exposure to infection between vaccinees and nonvaccinees, and differences in exposure during the outbreak between vaccinees and nonvaccinees. Numerical calculations of the bias are performed for a hypothetical outbreak of measles in a developing country. Exclusion of pre-outbreak disease cases requires accurate data on disease rates prior to the outbreak, and such data are often unreliable or nonexistent. Inclusion of pre-outbreak cases contributes to the bias of the estimated vaccine efficacy, especially when there is a high prevaccination infection rate and vaccine uptake among the previously diseased is considerably lower than that among the nondiseased. In most practical cases, however, this bias is not very large.

Disease Outbreaks↗