PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I M Salloum

Publications and source records attributed to I M Salloum.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Predictive validity of the physical disorders axis of the DSM multiaxial diagnostic system.

This paper reports on the predictive validity of the physical disorders axis (axis III) of the DSM multiaxial diagnostic system at 3-year follow-up. A total of 515 general psychiatric patients were assessed with a semistructured procedure that covers all DSM-III diagnoses and axes, and were subsequently followed up for 3 years. Outcome was assessed with several measures of adaptive functioning. Baseline axis III was analyzed according to a) presence of any physical disorder, b) the number of these, c) presence of major chronic physical disorders (MCPD), and d) the number of these. Prediction of impairment in functioning (Strauss-Carpenter Scale), derived from baseline axis III, ranged from a correlation coefficient of .18 when expressed as the presence of any physical disorder to .35 when represented by the number of MCPD. Furthermore, within patients with specific psychiatric disorders, it was found that number of MCPD reached a predictive validity of .55 for patients with dysthymic disorders, .44 for those with anxiety disorders, and .41 for those with major depression. Comparative multiple regression analyses, controlling for demographic and clinical variables, showed that the number of MCPD at baseline was the most important predictor of functioning outcome among patients with dysthymic disorders and major depression. The number of MCPD experienced by general psychiatric patients seems to be an important predictor of future functioning, particularly for patients with certain psychiatric disorders. This points out the importance of considering the relationship between psychiatric and MCPD when conducting systematic clinical assessments towards the prediction of course and outcome.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Treating the substance-abusing suicidal patient.

Studies concerning the treatment of substance-abusing suicidal patients are scarce despite the frequent presence of suicidal behavior among this population. Indeed, suicidality (ideation or behavior) is generally an exclusion criterion for participation in treatment studies of subjects with alcohol or drug abuse. Consequently, to date, little is known about the optimal treatment of this population. The first study involving substance-abusing suicidal patients was an open-label trial conducted in the early 1990s. This study involved 12 patients, all of whom demonstrated recent suicidal ideations and had made a lifetime suicide attempt. The results of that open-label study demonstrated significant within-group improvement in both depressive symptoms (including suicidal ideations) and level of drinking. However, substantial residual depressive symptoms and drinking persisted at the end of the trial. Also, because no placebo control group was utilized, the authors of that study could not rule out the possibility that the apparent therapeutic effect from fluoxetine was the result of the placebo effect. To date, only one double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects with alcohol or substance abuse has included substantial numbers of suicidal patients. The study involved 51 subjects, of whom 20 (39%) had made a suicide attempt in the current depressive episode, 31 (61%) had made a suicide attempt in their lifetime, and 46 (90%) had reported suicidal ideations in the week before hospitalization. The results of that double-blind, placebo-controlled study suggest that fluoxetine was effective in decreasing but not eliminating both the depressive symptoms (including suicidal ideations) and the level of alcohol consumption among a study group of subjects with comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence, many of whom displayed suicidal ideations. A secondary data analysis from that study suggested that cigarette smoking is also significantly decreased by fluoxetine, but the magnitude of the decrease is limited and few of these patients totally quit smoking with fluoxetine treatment alone. Another secondary data analysis from that study suggested that marijuana smoking was also significantly decreased in a subgroup of subjects who demonstrated cannabis abuse and that the magnitude of this improvement was robust. A third secondary data analysis from that study suggested that cocaine abuse acts as a predictor of poor outcome for both depressive symptoms (including suicidality) and level of alcohol use in this population. The results of a 1-year naturalistic follow-up study involving the patients from that study suggest that the benefits of fluoxetine in decreasing depressive symptoms and level of drinking persist 1 year after entering the treatment program. To date, no other double-blind, placebo-controlled studies involving substantial numbers of substance-abusing suicidal patients have been reported to either confirm or refute these findings. Further studies are clearly warranted to evaluate the efficacy of various pharmacotherapeutic agents and various psychotherapies in the treatment of substance-abusing suicidal patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Comorbid alcoholism and depression: treatment issues.

Unless there is decisive professional intervention, people who suffer from both a depressive disorder and alcoholism are at great risk of chronic impairment, both at home and in the workplace; persistent symptomatic misery; and premature death. Untreated alcoholism intensifies depressive states, decreases responsiveness to conventional therapeutics, and increases the likelihood of suicide, suicide attempts, and other self-destructive behavior. During the past decade, evidence has emerged from placebo-controlled studies supporting the utility of tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for treatment of depressed alcoholics. The superior safety and tolerability of SSRIs provide strong justification for their first-line use despite higher drug acquisition costs. Evidence has similarly emerged concerning the use of several novel pharmacotherapies and focused psychotherapies for people with alcoholism. These newer therapeutic options complement more traditional intervention such as chemical dependence counseling, disulfiram, and Alcoholics Anonymous so that it is now possible for a majority of depressed alcoholics to be treated effectively. The availability of effective treatments provides further impetus for health care professionals to improve recognition of comorbid alcoholism and depressive disorders. Improved recognition and treatment will save lives, and the benefits are likely to extend across generations.

Alcohol Deterrents↗
PubMed2000

Impact of substance abuse on the course and treatment of bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this article are to review the prevalence, natural history, pathophysiology, and treatment of comorbid bipolar disorder with alcoholism and other psychoactive substance use disorders (PSUDs). METHODS: All identified bibliographies through a literature search of all Medline files and bibliographies of selected articles focusing on the prevalence, natural history, course, prognosis, inter-relationship, and treatment of bipolar disorder with comorbid alcoholism and other PSUDs were reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity of bipolar disorder and alcoholism and other PSUDs is highly prevalent. The presence of this so called 'dual diagnoses' creates a serious challenge in terms of establishing an accurate diagnosis and providing appropriate treatment interventions. The inter-relationship between these disorders appears to be mutually detrimental. The course, manifestation, and treatment of each condition are significantly compounded by the presence of the other condition. Substance abuse and alcoholism appear to significantly complicate the course and prognosis of bipolar disorder resulting in increased suffering, disability, and costs. On the other hand, bipolar disorder may be a risk factor for developing PSUDs. Although, there are a number of hypotheses explaining the pathophysiological mechanism involved in such comorbidities, our understanding of the exact nature of such neurobiological mechanisms is still limited. While the antikindling agents and targeted psychotherapeutic techniques may be useful intervention strategies, there is still a significant lack of empirically based treatment options for these patients.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed1998

Increasing treatment adherence among outpatients with depression and cocaine dependence: results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: This pilot study examined the effect of a modified motivational therapy intervention on outpatient treatment adherence and completion for patients with comorbid depressive disorder and cocaine dependence. METHOD: Depressed cocaine patients, stabilized with antidepressant medications on an inpatient psychiatric unit, were consecutively assigned on discharge to motivational therapy (N = 11) or treatment-as-usual (N = 12) during the first month of outpatient care. Patients were compared on treatment adherence and completion and on 1-year rehospitalization rates. RESULTS: Motivational therapy patients attended significantly more treatment sessions during month 1, completed 30 and 90 days of outpatient care at higher rates, and experienced fewer psychiatric rehospitalizations and days in the hospital during the first year from entry into outpatient treatment. CONCLUSIONS: An outpatient program combining individual and group motivational therapy sessions holds promise for improving treatment adherence and completion among depressed patients with cocaine dependence.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Drug use problem awareness and treatment readiness in dual-diagnosis patients.

Problem awareness and treatment readiness are factors that influence treatment-seeking behavior, and thus, morbidity and outcome. The authors elucidated patterns of problem awareness and treatment readiness among hospitalized dually diagnosed patients by administering the Problem Awareness and Readiness for Treatment subscales of the Alcohol Use Inventory to 67 psychiatric inpatients with comorbid substance-related disorders and using a multivariate model approach to data analysis. The results suggested differential and interactive effects of gender, ethnicity, voluntary admission status, and a diagnosis of major depression (MDD) on drug abuse problem awareness and treatment readiness. Female gender, voluntary admission status, and a comorbid diagnosis of MDD were associated with increased awareness and readiness for treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Naltrexone utility in depressed alcoholics.

The aim of this open-label pilot study was to evaluate the utility of naltrexone (50 mg per day) in decreasing alcohol use and to examine its impact on depressive symptoms among depressed alcoholics who have failed to abstain from alcohol use despite treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Fourteen ambulatory care patients, aged 18 to 65 years, with DSM-III-R comorbid diagnoses of alcohol dependence and major depressive disorder, who failed to abstain despite treatment with an antidepressant medication were enrolled in the study. Patients were followed for 12 weeks with weekly assessment of drinking behavior, depressive symptoms, functioning, alcohol craving, and side effects. The results of this study indicated a significant decrease in alcohol use and in urges to drink alcohol in the presence of the usual triggers. There was also a trend suggesting improvement in depressive symptoms and overall functioning. Naltrexone was well tolerated, with mild side effects reported at the onset of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Fluoxetine versus placebo in depressed alcoholic cocaine abusers.

To date, few double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant in pure cocaine abusers or in cocaine abusers with comorbid disorders have been reported. In this study, 17 patients with DSM-III-R diagnoses of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence, and cocaine abuse were included along with 34 non-cocaine-abusing depressed alcoholics in a pharmacotherapy trial involving the SSRI antidepressant fluoxetine. All 51 patients participated in a double-blind, parallel group study of fluoxetine versus placebo in depressed alcoholics. The principal focus of this article is the one-third of the depressed alcoholics who also abused cocaine and how the treatment response of those 17 patients compared with that of the 34 depressed alcoholics who did not abuse cocaine. During the study, no significant difference in treatment outcome was noted between the fluoxetine group (N = 8) and the placebo group (N = 9) for cocaine use, alcohol use, or depressive symptoms. In addition, no significant within-group improvement was noted for any of these outcome variables in either of the two treatment groups. Indeed, across the combined sample of 17 depressed alcoholic cocaine abusers, the mean Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score worsened slightly from 19 to 21 during the course of the study, and 71 percent of the patients continued to complain of suicidal ideations at the end of the study. The 17 cocaine-abusing depressed alcoholics showed a significantly worse outcome than the 34 non-cocaine abusing depressed alcoholics on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and BDI depression scales and on multiple measures of alcohol consumption. These findings suggest that comorbid cocaine abuse acts as a robust predictor of poor outcome for the drinking and the depressive symptoms of depressed alcoholics.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The selective serotonergic medication fluoxetine has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of major depression and has suggested efficacy in the treatment of alcoholism. However, no completed trials with any selective serotonergic medication have been reported in patients who display both major depression and alcoholism, despite previous observations that both depression and alcoholism are associated with low serotonergic functioning. METHODS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed as having comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence were randomized to receive fluoxetine (n = 25) or placebo (n = 26) in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Weekly ratings of depression and alcohol consumption were obtained throughout the 12-week course of the study. RESULTS: The improvement in depressive symptoms during the medication trial was significantly greater in the fluoxetine group than in the placebo group. Total alcohol consumption during the trial was significantly lower in the fluoxetine group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine is effective in reducing the depressive symptoms and the alcohol consumption of patients with comorbid major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence. It is unknown whether these results generalize to the treatment of less depressed and less suicidal alcoholics.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Double-blind fluoxetine in depressed alcoholic smokers.

Treatment trials involving smoking in alcoholics with major depression are scarce, despite the common co-occurrence of these disorders. In this study, 25 smokers with DSM-III-R diagnoses of both major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence were randomized to fluoxetine or placebo in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel group trial. Almost half (48%) of the patients had made a suicide attempt in the week before hospitalization (where recruitment was performed), and 84 percent reported suicidal ideations during that week. Those in the fluoxetine group demonstrated a significant within-group decrease in smoking during the course of the study, whereas those in the placebo group did not. Those in the fluoxetine group smoked 27 percent fewer cigarettes than those in the placebo group, although this difference was not statistically significant. Cumulative alcohol consumption during the 12 weeks of the pharmacotherapy trial was four times as high in the placebo group as in the fluoxetine group, though this difference was not statistically significant in this limited-sized sample. The change in smoking was significantly associated with a change in drinking. These preliminary findings suggest that fluoxetine has the potential for treating the smoking and drinking behaviors of depressed alcoholic smokers.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Patterns of suicidality and alcohol use in alcoholics with major depression.

The aims of this study were (1) to comprehensively characterize a population of alcoholics with major depression in a psychiatric hospital, (2) to determine the prevalence of suicidal behavior in this sample, and (3) to determine whether quantity of alcohol ingested was associated with level of suicidality. Ratings of drinking, depression, and suicidality were obtained using both self-rated and observer-rated instruments. The prevalence of suicide attempts in the week before hospitalization was remarkably high, approaching 40%, whereas 70% had made a suicide attempt at some point in their lifetime. These suicide attempts were typically impulsive in nature, involving little if any premeditation. Most subjects reported drinking more heavily than usual on the day of their suicide attempt. Recent suicidal behavior was significantly associated with recent very heavy drinking (< or = 70 drinks per week) and with number of drinks per drinking day. Quantity of drinking per drinking day was also significantly higher in those making a recent suicide attempt. However, no association was found between quantity of alcohol consumption and suicidal ideation. These findings suggest that recent heavy alcohol use primarily affects suicidality by increasing the likelihood of acting on suicidal ideation rather than by inducing suicidal ideation.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Disproportionate lethality in psychiatric patients with concurrent alcohol and cocaine abuse.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between active, concomitant cocaine and alcohol abuse and the prevalence and severity of current suicidal and homicidal behavior among hospitalized psychiatric patients. METHOD: Three groups of patients--with cocaine and alcohol abuse (N = 38), alcohol abuse only (N = 38), and cocaine abuse only (N = 25)--consecutively admitted to a psychiatric and substance abuse dual-diagnosis unit were comparatively examined for the presence of current suicidal and homicidal behavior. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Logistic regression analysis revealed that the alcohol and cocaine abuse group had a higher likelihood of associated current homicidal behavior than the alcohol-only and the cocaine-only groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Impact of DSM-III axis III on the diagnosis of physical disorders in ambulatory psychiatric patients.

In the present study, the effectiveness and utility of DSM-III axis III in terms of adequate identification of physical disorders in psychiatric outpatients is appraised empirically. To this effect, the presence of physical disorders in diagnostic statements recorded in clinical charts is compared in a large medical center for two psychiatric outpatient samples, one from the nonmultiaxial DSM-II era and one after the implementation of the multiaxial DSM-III. In the earlier sample, 11% of the patients were diagnosed as having physical disorders. In the DSM-III sample, 42% of the patients were so diagnosed. The latter figure is consistent with the 40% average prevalence of physical disorders reported in careful studies of the physical condition of ambulatory psychiatric patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Disproportionate suicidality in patients with comorbid major depression and alcoholism.

OBJECTIVE: The two purposes of this study were to provide a comprehensive description of the clinical features of patients who presented to an intake psychiatric setting with major depression and alcohol dependence and to determine which clinical features distinguished this dual-diagnosis group from patients with the two relevant single diagnoses. METHOD: During a recent 5-year period, a total of 107 patients who came to a psychiatric facility for initial evaluation were diagnosed as having both major depression and alcohol dependence. The clinical profile of this dual-diagnosis group was compared to that of nondepressed alcoholics (N = 497) and nonalcoholic patients with major depression (N = 5,625), assessed at the same facility, on the basis of information from the Initial Evaluation Form, a semistructured instrument containing a standardized symptom inventory that includes ratings of severity. RESULTS: The psychiatric symptom that most strongly distinguished the depressed alcoholics from the two comparison groups was the level of suicidality. The depressed alcoholics differed significantly from the nonalcoholic depressed patients on only two depressive symptoms, suicidality (59% higher) and low self-esteem (22% higher); they were also significantly distinguished from the nonalcoholic depressed patients by factors such as greater impulsivity, functional impairment, and abnormal personal and social history markers. CONCLUSIONS: Suicidality was disproportionately greater than other psychiatric symptoms in the depressed alcoholics. The clinical profile of depressed alcoholics suggests that they suffer an additive or synergistic effect of two separate disorders, resulting in a disproportionately high level of acute suicidality upon initial psychiatric evaluation.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Preliminary report: double-blind, placebo-controlled study of fluoxetine in depressed alcoholics.

The selective serotonergic agonist fluoxetine has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression and has possible efficacy in the treatment of nondepressed and depressed alcoholics. However, no double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with any selective serotonergic medication have been reported in patients who have both major depression and alcoholism. In this study, 21 patients with DSM-III-R diagnoses of both major depressive disorder and alcohol dependence were randomized to fluoxetine or placebo in a 12-week, double-blind, parallel group trial. The patients reported a high level of current episode (52.4%), prior episode (61.9%), and lifetime (76.2%) suicidal behavior. Total alcohol consumption during the 12-week treatment course was significantly lower in the fluoxetine group than the placebo group, after controlling for baseline differences in consumption. The fluoxetine group demonstrated a four-fold greater improvement in depressive symptoms, but this difference did not reach statistical significance in this small sample. These preliminary findings suggest that fluoxetine has potential for treating the excessive alcohol ingestion of depressed alcoholics and may have potential for treating the depressive symptoms of these patients as well.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

The utility of diazepam loading in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal among psychiatric inpatients.

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of an objective rating scale (the modified Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol [CIWA-A]) and a diazepam loading dose (20 mg) in the management of alcohol withdrawal among hospitalized psychiatric patients. The sample consisted of 152 adult, hospitalized, psychiatric patients with comorbid alcohol dependence. Of the 152 subjects, 115 (75.7%) completed detoxification with supportive therapy only. Among the 37 patients who required pharmacotherapy (24%), 15 (40.5%) required only one 20-mg dose of diazepam, 14 (38%) required 40 mg to 100 mg, and 8 (21.6%) required doses ranging from 120 mg to 220 mg. There were no complications related to this treatment. The results suggest that the use of the objective rating scale and the diazepam loading dose appears to be safe and effective, and is a useful method for the management of alcohol withdrawal among psychiatric patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Usefulness of DSM-III axis III in psychiatric inpatients: an actuarial comparison with the DSM-II period.

This study is a retrospective evaluation of the usefulness of DSM-III axis III (physical disorders) and its ability to enhance clinical case description in general psychiatric patients. The subjects of this study consisted of two samples of 75 inpatients; each was randomly selected and age-matched to represent DSM-II (1975-1979) and DSM-III (1981-1985) periods, respectively. The results indicated a substantial and statistically significant difference in the frequency of physical disorders recorded at intake before (9.3%) and after (46.7%) the implementation of DSM-III. DSM-III axis III may significantly enhance the recording of physical disorders in psychiatric inpatients.

Adult↗