Biomedical subjects

I Piper

Publications and source records attributed to I Piper.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

BrainIT: a trans-national head injury monitoring research network.

BACKGROUND: Studies of therapeutic interventions and management strategies on head injured patients are difficult to undertake. BrainIT provides validated data for analysis available to centers that contribute data to allow post-hoc analysis and hypothesis testing. METHODS: Both physiological and intensive care management data are collected. Patient identification is eliminated prior to transfer of data to a central database in Glasgow. Requests for missing/ ambiguous data are sent back to the local center. Country coordinating centers provide advice, training, and assistance to centers and manage the data validation process. RESULTS: Currently 30 centers participate in the group. Data collection started in January 2004 and 242 patients have been recruited. Data validation tools were developed to ensure data accuracy and all analysis must be undertaken on validated data. CONCLUSION: BrainIT is an open, collaborative network that has been established with primary objectives of i) creating a core data set of information, ii) standardizing the collection methodology, iii) providing data collection tools, iv) creating and populating a data base for future analysis, and v) establishing data validation methodologies. Improved standards for multi-center data collection should permit the more accurate analysis of monitoring and management studies in head injured patients.

Biomedical Research↗

PubMed2005

Continuous cerebral compliance monitoring in severe head injury: its relationship with intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral compliance expresses the capability to buffer an intracranial volume increase while avoiding a rise in intracranial pressure (ICP). The autoregulatory response to Cerebral Perfusion Pressure (CPP) variation influences cerebral blood volume which is an important determinant of compliance. The direction of compliance change in relation to CPP variation is still under debate. The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between CPP and compliance in traumatic brain injured (TBI) patients by a new method for continuous monitoring of intracranial compliance as used in neuro-intensive care (NICU). METHOD: Three European NICU's standardised collection of CPP, compliance and ICP data to a joint database. Data were analyzed using an unpaired student t-test and a multi-level statistical model. RESULTS: For each variable 108,263 minutes of data were recorded from 21 TBI patients (19 patients GCS</=8; 90% male; age 10-77 y). The average value for the following parameters were: ICP 15.1+/-8.9 mmHg, CPP 74.3+/-14 mmHg and compliance 0.68+/-0.3 ml/mmHg. ICP was >/=20 mmHg in 20% and CPP<60 mmHg for 10.7% of the time. Compliance was lower (0.51+/-0.34 ml/mmHg) at ICP>/=20 than at ICP<20 mmHg (0.73+/-0.37 ml/mmHg) (p<0.0001). Compliance was significantly lower at CPP<60 than at CPP>/=60 mmHg: 0.56+/-0.36 and 0.70+/-0.37 ml/mmHg respectively (p<0.0001). The CPP - compliance relationship was different when ICP was above 20 mmHg compared with below 20 mmHg. At ICP<20 mmHg compliance rose as CPP rose. At ICP>/=20 mmHg, the relation curve was convexly shaped. At low CPP, the compliance was between 0.20 and 0.30 ml/mmHg. As the CPP reach 80 mmHg average compliance was 0.55 ml/mmHg., but compliance fell to 0.40 ml/mmHg when CPP was 100 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Low CPP levels are confirmed to be detrimental for intracranial compliance. Moreover, when ICP was pathological, indicating unstable intracranial equilibrium, a high CPP level was also associated with a low volume-buffering capacity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Survey of traumatic brain injury management in European Brain-IT centres year 2001.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to obtain basic knowledge about the current local conditions and neurointensive care of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the new multi-centre collaborative BrainIT group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey comprised a background part on local policies (Part A), and a case study section (Part B). The information was gathered by questionnaire followed by telephone interviews. Twenty-three BrainIT centres participated in the survey and answers from two respondents were available from 18 of the sites. RESULTS: The average proportion of agreement between duplicate respondents was 0.778 (range 0.415-1.00). All BrainIT centres monitored ICP. The treatment protocols seem to have a pattern concerning escalation of treatment of intracranial hypertension: 1/ evacuation of mass lesions and head elevation; 2/ increased sedation and mannitol; 3/ hyperventilation; 4/ ventricular drainage; 5/ craniectomy and barbituates. CONCLUSIONS: There seemed to be an agreement on neurointensive care policies within the BrainIT group. The suggested order of treatment was generally in accordance with published guidelines although the suggested order and combinations of different treatments varied. Variation of treatment within the range of prescribed standards provides optimal conditions for an interesting future analysis of treatment and monitoring data in reality using the BrainIT database.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed2005

The BrainIT Group: concept and current status 2004.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed2005

Accurate data collection for head injury monitoring studies: a data validation methodology.

BACKGROUND: BrainIT is a multi centre, European project, to collect high quality continuous data from severely head injured patients using a previously defined [6] core data set. This includes minute-by-minute physiological data and simultaneous treatment and management information. It is crucial that the data is correctly collected and validated. METHODS: Minute-by-minute physiological monitoring data is collected from the bedside monitors. Demographic and clinical information, intensive care management and secondary insult management data, are collected using a handheld computer. Data is transferred from the handheld device to a local computer where it is reviewed and anonymised before being sent electronically, with the physiological data, to the central database in Glasgow. Automated computer tools highlight missing or ambiguous data. A request is then sent to the contributing centre where the data is amended and returned to Glasgow. Of the required data elements 20% are randomly selected for validation against original documentation along with the actual number of specific episodic events during a known period. This will determine accuracy and the percentage of missing data for each record. CONCLUSION: Advances in patient care require an improved evidence base. For accurate, consistent and repeatable data collection, robust mechanisms are required which should enhance the reliability of clinical trials, assessment of management protocols and equipment evaluations.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed2005

Age-related prevalence of sonographicaly confirmed uterine myomas.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Bench test assessment of the new Raumedic Neurovent-P ICP sensor: a technical report by the BrainIT group.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, fiberberoptic and piezo-electric ICP probes are often used for measuring intracranial pressure (ICP). A number of similar technologies, although performing well in bench test studies, have been shown to exhibit unacceptable zero drift, fragility or both during trials conducted under clinical conditions. Recently, a new technology has become available, the Neurovent-P (Raumedic AG + CO, Raumedic, Germany). As a pre-requisite for a clinical trial, we have conducted and report on bench test studies to confirm the manufacturer's long term zero-drift performance for this technology. METHOD: In a test rig static tests (recording of 20 mmHg pressure) and dynamic tests, ranging from 5 to 50 mmHg have been performed. FINDINGS: 10 ICP probes have been tested for a total of 60 days. All the catheters, after the connection with the ICU monitor displayed a static pressure of 0 +/- 1 mmHg and did not required pre-insertion alteration. At five days, mean zero drift was 0.6 +/- 0.9 mmHg. Overall, zero drift ranged from 0 to 2 mmHg. At a fixed static pressure of 20 mmHg, the mean recorded value was 20.6 +/- 0.8 mmHg, ranging from 19 to 23 mmHg. A regression analysis of the relationship between the applied pressure and the recorded pressure during the dynamic tests of the 10 catheters yielded a correlation coefficient R2 of 0.997. Applying the Altman and Bland method to assess the bias and confidence limits for the Raumedic catheter responses during the dynamic tests against the applied gold-standard hydrostatic column pressures, the average bias of -0.66 +/- 0.85 mmHg, with 95% CLs of -2 mmHg and 1 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Mean zero drift, after five days, was very small and long-term continuous recording of a stable pressure was very precise. The response at dynamic tests, i.e. the changes of pressure in a wide range, was excellent. The average bias of the Raumedic catheter compared with the hydrostatic column is very small. After this bench test, the next and most critical step will be to conduct a trial of this promising technology under more demanding clinical environment.

Calibration↗

PubMed2004

R3-survey of traumatic brain injury management in European Brain IT centres year 2001.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain knowledge about the conditions and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in a collaborative network of Brain Information Technology centres. DESIGN: The Brain IT (Brain monitoring with Information Technology) survey comprised two parts: local conditions and policies (part A), and a case study part (part B). The information was gathered by written questionnaires followed by telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four Brain IT centres participated (two respondents from 18 sites). RESULTS: The average proportion of agreement between duplicate respondents was 0.79 (range 0.44-1.00). All Brain IT centres monitored ICP. The reported order of treatment for intracranial hypertension was: evacuation of mass-lesions and head elevation (1), increase of sedation and Mannitol scheme (2), hyperventilation (3), ventricular drainage (4), craniectomy and pentothal coma (5), and decompressive lobectomy (6). The respondents were less prone to evacuate expansive contusions in relation to extra cerebral hematomas. The most common suggested interventions (alone or in combination) for treatment of intracranial hypertension without mass lesions was the Mannitol scheme (included in 71% of the suggestions), CSF drainage (included in 56%), hyperventilation (included in 32%), and pentothal coma (included in 22%). CONCLUSIONS: The suggested management of TBI was mainly in accordance with published guidelines, although a minor proportion of the answers deviated to some extent. The suggested order and combinations of different treatment interventions varied. Variation of treatment within the range of prescribed standards provides optimal conditions for an interesting future analysis of treatment and monitoring data as collected prospectively in a Brain IT database.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A model for studies of intracranial volume pressure dynamics in traumatic brain injury.

The present study was undertaken to establish an experimental trauma model where it was possible to alter intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics without raising intracranial pressure to abnormal levels and monitor metabolic disturbances with microdialysis. Thirty rats were intubated and mechanically ventilated before and after trauma. ICP was measured in the left ventricle. A weight-drop technique (21 g from 35 cm) with a brain compression of 1.5 mm was used to produce the injury. Intracranial compensatory volume was decreased 20 or 60 microL by placement of rubber film between the dura mater and bone. A bolus injection technique was used for the pressure volume response. ICP remained within normal limits for 2 h after trauma irrespective of the reduction in compensatory intracranial volume. Pressure-volume index decreased from 0.0825 +/- 0.009 to 0.0779 +/- 0.011 mL in the sham trauma and from 0.0871 +/- 0.018 to 0.0748 +/- 0.017 mL in the trauma groups (p < 0.015) when the intracranial volume was reduced by 60 microL. Intracranial compliance was not affected significantly. The present study shows that it is possible to vary ICP dynamics in a traumatic brain injury model without causing pathological increases in baseline ICP. This model may be used to study the effects of secondary insults (i.e., hypotension, hypoxia, hypercarbia, and hyperthermia) on the injured brain when ICP is normal but intracranial compensatory volume is impaired.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The BrainIT group: concept and core dataset definition.

INTRODUCTION: An open collaborative international network has been established which aims to improve inter-centre standards for collection of high-resolution, neurointensive care data on patients with traumatic brain injury. The group is also working towards the creation of an open access, detailed and validated database that will be useful for post-hoc hypothesis testing. In Part A, the underlying concept, the group coordination structure, membership guidelines and database access and publication criteria are described. Secondly, in part B, we describe a set of meetings funded by the EEC that allowed us to define a "Core Dataset" and we present the results of a feasibility exercise for collection of this core dataset. METHODS: Four group meetings funded by the EEC have enabled definition of a "Core Dataset" to be collected from all centres regardless of specific project aim. A paper based pilot collection of data was conducted to determine the feasibility for collection of the core dataset. Specially designed forms to collect the core dataset demographic and clinical information as well as sample the time-series data elements were distributed by both email and standard mail to 22 BrainIT centres. A deadline of two months was set to receive completed forms back from centres. A pilot data collection of minute by minute physiological monitoring data was also performed. FINDINGS: A core-dataset was defined and can be downloaded from the BrainIT web-site (go to "Core dataset" link at: www.brainit.org). Eighteen centres (82%) returned completed forms by the set deadline. Overall the feasibility for collection of the core data elements was high with only 10 of the 64 questions (16%) showing missing data. Of those 10 fields with missing data, the average number of centres not responding was 12% and the median 6%. An SQL database to hold the data has been designed and is being tested. Software tools for collection of the core dataset have been developed. Ethics approval has been granted for collection of multi-centre data as part of a pilot data collection study. INTERPRETATION: The BrainIT network provides a more standardised and higher resolution data collection mechanism for research groups, organisations and the device industry to conduct multi-centre trials of new health care technology in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Brain Injuries↗

PubMed2003

Is antibody screening in Rh (D)-positive pregnant women necessary?

OBJECTIVE: Hemolytic disease of the fetus and of the newborn can be caused by incompatibility of maternal and fetal erythrocytes for Rh (D) or other blood type antigens. Routine antibody screening is advocated in all pregnant women, irrespective of whether they are Rh (D)-positive or Rh (D)-negative, to look for clinically significant alloantibodies other than Rh (D) that might cause hemolytic disease of the newborn. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of blood type antibodies other than Rh (D) in pregnant women attending for prenatal care in a typical urban population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of the charts of all pregnant women followed throughout their entire pregnancy at our Women's Health Center from 1 January 1999 to 30 April 2002. RESULTS: There were 1265 pregnant women included in the study: 465 had blood type A (36.7%), 269 type B (21.3%), 424 type O (33.5%) and 107 type AB (8.5%). A total of 1156 were Rh (D)-positive (91.4%) and 109 were Rh (D)-negative (8.6%). Of the Rh (D)-positive women, 522 (41.3%) underwent routine antibody screening in the first trimester. Only one woman (0.2%) had a positive antibody screen. Of the 109 Rh (D)-negative women, one (0.9%) had a positive third trimester screen with a negative first trimester screen. CONCLUSION: Routine antibody screening of Rh (D)-positive women is probably not warranted from a clinical cost-benefit perspective.

Antibodies↗

PubMed2002

Use of resistance-area product derived from Doppler MCA velocity to estimate the range of active cerebrovascular regulation.

The purpose of the present study was to explore the development of a method to estimate the range of active cerebrovascular regulation using resistance-area product (RAP) derived from transcranial Doppler ultrasound recordings of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAV) obtained before and after physiologic challenge. Intracranial pressure (ICP), arterial blood pressure (ABP), and MCAV were monitored on 9 patients before and after challenges with either Noradrenlin or CO2 inhalation. One patient was monitored at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hrs. For each cardiac cycle a value of RAP was computed from the inverse of the slope of the regression line of paired values of aligned MCAV and ABP recordings. Mean values of percent change of difference of RAP (% delta RAP) versus change of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were computed. Theoretical values of % delta RAP were derived from reported lab values of percent change diameter of arterioles versus ABP. Of the nine patients, 22% (2/9) demonstrated either impaired dilation and/or constriction. Furthermore, the correlation between theoretical and experimental values of % delta RAP and CPP (n = 34) was strong (r = .86, p < .005). The serially-monitored patient failed to dilate during all CO2 challenges and to fully constrict to the Noradrenlin challenge at 72 hrs. % delta RAP associated with corresponding changes of CPP may have value as a clinical method to estimate the range of active cerebrovascular regulation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Multi-centre assessment of the Spiegelberg compliance monitor: interim results.

Analyses of a multi-centre database of 71 patients at risk of raised ICP showed that in head injured patients (n = 19) and tumour patients (n = 13) clear inverse relationships of ICP vs compliance exist. SAH patients (n = 5) appear to exhibit a biphasic relationship between ICP and compliance, however greater numbers of patients need to be recruited to this group. Patients with hydrocephalus (n = 34) show an initial decrease in compliance while ICP is less than 20 mmHg, thereafter compliance does not show a dependence upon ICP. A power analysis confirmed that sufficient numbers of patients have been recruited in the hydrocephalus group and a ROC analysis determined that a mean compliance value of 0.809 (lower and upper 95% CL = 0.725 & 0.894 resp.) was a critical threshold for raised ICP greater than 10 mmHg. Preliminary time-series analyses of the ICP and compliance data is revealing evidence that the cumulative time compliance is in a low compliance state (< 0.5 ml/mmHg), as a proportion of total monitoring time, increases more rapidly than the cumulative time ICP is greater than 25 mmHg. Before trials testing compliance thresholds can be designed, we need to consider not just the absolute threshold, but the duration of time spent below threshold. A survey may be required to identify a consensus of what is the minimum duration of raised ICP above 25 mmHg needed to instigate treatment.

Automation↗

PubMed2001

The Camino intracranial pressure sensor: is it optimal technology? An internal audit with a review of current intracranial pressure monitoring technologies.

OBJECTIVE: To audit the reliability of the Camino intracranial pressure (ICP) sensor (Camino Laboratories, San Diego, CA) in our clinical practice as part of a continuing quality assurance program, and to assess its relative usefulness as compared with currently available ICP monitoring technologies that we reviewed. DESIGN: Prospective audit of ICP device reliability and function in 50 patients with head injuries. METHODS: Zero drift was recorded immediately after the ICP device was removed from the patient. Dynamic frequency response bench testing of each functioning catheter from 0 to 30 Hz and static calibration testing from 0 to 100 mmHg during environmental temperature variation from 22 to 40 degrees C were carried out. RESULTS: Zero drift (range, -13 to 22 mmHg; median, -1 mmHg) was recorded immediately after the devices were removed from patients. Seventeen (50%) of the devices tested for zero drift had absolute drifts of at least 3 mmHg. There was no correlation between recorded zero drift and duration of monitoring (r = 0.154, P = 0.207). Five sensors (10% of those tested) failed during patient monitoring and were replaced. Static and dynamic calibration tests of the functioning sensors were within the manufacturer's specifications. However, the sensitivity of the devices to environmental temperature remains a problem. CONCLUSION: The Camino ICP sensor remains one of the most popular ICP monitoring devices for use in patients with traumatic brain injuries. However, our recent in-house assessment demonstrated the robustness of the device to be less than adequate during routine practice. In this study, more than 50% exhibited zero drift greater than 3 mmHg, which is unacceptable in a catheter tip ICP monitoring device in which zero drift and calibration cannot be checked in vivo. A review of the literature revealed that other available ICP monitoring devices may prove to be more reliable and thus more appropriate for routine clinical measurement of ICP.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2000

Multi-centre assessment of the Spiegelberg compliance monitor: preliminary results.

Acute brain injury states (e.g. head injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage) show clear inverse relationships of ICP vs compliance, with ICP instability at times of lower compliance states. Variance in compliance values is large in hydrocephalus where ICP is relatively lower and compliance higher. Nonetheless, early experience shows that compliance data influence decisions on CSF diversion treatments. Future work will focus on the ability of intracranial compliance to predict ensuing ICP instability and methodological refinement for monitoring patients who have higher compliance states.

Brain↗

PubMed2000

Assessment of the variation in cerebrovascular reactivity in head injured patients.

Several indices have been reported which correlate with autoregulatory function [2, 3]. However, before critical thresholds for targeting therapy can be defined, a better understanding of the inherent variability of cerebrovascular reactivity as measured by these indices is required. In this study, patients had BP, ICP and bilateral MCA TCD velocity monitored before, during and after BP and CO2 challenges, applied in a random order, with measurements taken within 48 hours of injury. Four indices of reactivity were calculated: the PRx, the CORRx and the FVreact & ICPreact. At 48 hours post-injury inter-patient variation in cerebrovascular reactivity, as measured by these indices, is large and injury specific factors remain important determinants of the variance. Within patient analysis has identified instances where the combined monitoring of the PRx and the CORRx may provide information about the function of pressure autoregulation and further study of the combined use of these two indices of reactivity is warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Monitoring of intracranial compliance: correction for a change in body position.

The objectives of our study were 1. to investigate whether the intracranial compliance changes with body position; 2. to test if the pressure-volume index (PVI) calculation is affected by different body positions; 3. to define the optimal parameter to correct PVI for changes in body position and 4. to investigate the physiological meaning of the constant term (P0) in the model of the intracranial volume-pressure relationship. Thirteen patients were included in this study. All patients were subjected to 2 to 3 different body positions. In each position, either classic bolus injection was performed for measurement of intracranial compliance and calculation of PVI or the new Spiegelberg compliance monitor was used to calculate PVI continuously. Four different models were used for calculating the constant pressure term P0 and the P0 corrected PVI values. Pressure volume index not corrected for the constant term P0 significantly decreased with elevating the patients head (r = 0.70, p < 0.0001). In contrast, volume-pressure response and ICP pulse amplitude did not change with position. Using the constant term P0 to correct the PVI we found no changes between the different body positions. Our results suggest that during the variation in body position there is no change in intracranial compliance but a change in hydrostatic offset pressure which causes a shifting of the volume-pressure curve along the pressure axis without its shape being affected. PVI measurements should either be performed only with the patient in the 0 degree recumbent position or that the PVI calculation should be corrected for the hydrostatic difference between the level of the ICP transducer and the hydrostatic indifference point of the craniospinal system close to the third thoracic vertebra.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A comparative study of the Spiegelberg compliance device with a manual volume-injection method: a clinical evaluation in patients with hydrocephalus.

A new automated method of compliance measurement has been developed which may overcome some of the problems of the manual method. Measurement of craniospinal compliance in brain-injured patients offers the potential for early detection of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) before it rises to levels that may damage brain parenchyma. However, limitations of the existing manual volume pressure techniques have meant few centres routinely perform compliance testing. We report on the results of testing this new method against a manual volume pressure response method (VPR) in 10 patients with hydrocephalus. In this comparison study, 19 pairs of compliance measurements were obtained from 10 patients. The compliance values obtained ranged from 0.141 to 1.407 ml/mmHg. There was a good correlation between the two methods (r2 = 0.8508). The average bias in compliance between the two methods was 0.111 ml/mmHg (95% CL for the bias = 0.0438, 0.1788) with the new method reading higher compliance than the manual method. These results indicate that the new automatic method of compliance measurement correlates well with an independent and classical measurement of compliance, and defines the bias and limits of agreement by which the new method measures craniospinal compliance in patients with hydrocephalus. Further work is needed to validate this device over a wider compliance range, especially at the lower compliance range often found in head injured patients. Studies are also required to determine the normal range of compliance values in the patient populations who undergo ICP monitoring. Research into determining which patient populations may benefit from continuous compliance measurement is warranted.

Brain Injuries↗