PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I S McGregor

Publications and source records attributed to I S McGregor.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Repeated exposure to Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol alters heroin-induced locomotor sensitisation and Fos-immunoreactivity.

The present study examined the effect of chronic exposure to Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) on heroin-induced locomotor sensitisation and Fos-immunoreactivity (Fos-IR). Adult male albino Wistar rats (n=60) were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) 21 times with vehicle, 0.05, 0.5, or 5.0mg/kg THC (once every 48 h for 41 days). Locomotor activity was assessed for 180 min on pre-exposure days 1, 21, and 41. Following a 2-week washout period, rats were divided into five equal groups (n=12) and injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with vehicle or heroin (0.5mg/kg). Locomotor activity was recorded for 240 min. In drug-naïve rats, heroin significantly increased locomotor activity. THC pre-exposure further increased heroin-induced locomotion. After an interval of 2 weeks, rats pre-exposed to vehicle and 5.0mg/kg THC in the first part of the experiment were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups (n=6) and injected s.c. with vehicle or 0.5mg/kg heroin and perfused 2h later. Fos-IR was examined in several brain regions. Acute heroin increased Fos-IR in drug-naïve rats in the caudate-putamen (CPu; central, medial and dorsomedial regions), nucleus accumbens (NAC; core and shell regions), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), lateral septum, central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA), periaqueductal grey (PAG; dorsolateral, dorsomedial, and lateral), and the Edinger-Westphal nucleus. Pre-exposure to THC significantly increased heroin-induced Fos-IR in the dorsomedial CPu and the NAC (core). Conversely, THC pre-exposure reduced heroin-induced Fos-IR in the BNST, CEA, and the PAG (dorsolateral and lateral). The present study demonstrates that THC pre-exposure increases the locomotor stimulating effects of heroin and provides new evidence for the neural correlates that may underlie cannabinoid and opioid cross-sensitisation.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

A cannabinoid receptor antagonist attenuates conditioned place preference but not behavioural sensitization to morphine.

The present study compared the effects of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 on morphine-induced locomotor sensitization (Experiment 1) and conditioned place preference (CPP, Experiment 2) in male albino Wistar rats. In Experiment 1, rats received seven consecutive daily treatments with morphine (10 mg/kg, SC) in combination with either SR 141716 (0, 0.1, 0.5 or 3.0 mg/kg, IP), or naloxone (10 mg/kg, IP). Three days later, all rats were challenged with a lower dose of morphine (5 mg/kg, SC). Rats pre-treated with morphine showed significantly elevated locomotor activity during the challenge session compared to vehicle-pre-treated animals indicating behavioural sensitization. Prior naloxone, but not SR 141716, co-administration with morphine, significantly attenuated the locomotor sensitization observed. In Experiment 2A, SR 141716 (0.1 mg/kg, IP), co-administered during conditioning, significantly attenuated the place preference produced by morphine (4 mg/kg, SC) in a standard unbiased two compartment place conditioning task. In Experiment 2B, the timing of drug administration and drug doses used were altered to be similar to Experiment 1, such that a comparison between the sensitization and CPP paradigms could be made. Thus, rats were conditioned with morphine (10 mg/kg, SC) combined with SR 141716 (0, 0.1, 0.5 or 3.0 mg/kg, IP) and tested for place preference under the influence of morphine (5 mg/kg, SC). SR 141716 attenuated morphine place preference at a dose (3.0 mg/kg) that did not itself affect place conditioning. Morphine also induced locomotor sensitization in the drug-paired compartment in Experiment 2B which was not blocked by any dose of SR 141716. We conclude that CB1 receptor antagonism modulates the rewarding value of opioids, but not the behavioural sensitization induced by chronic opioid administration.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2004

Evidence for an interaction between CB1 cannabinoid and melanocortin MCR-4 receptors in regulating food intake.

Melanocortin receptor 4 (MCR4) and CB(1) cannabinoid receptors independently modulate food intake. Although an interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems has been found in recovery from hemorrhagic shock, the interaction between these systems in modulating food intake has not yet been examined. The present study had two primary purposes: 1) to examine whether the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems act independently or synergistically in suppressing food intake; and 2) to determine the relative position of the CB(1) receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the melanocortin system. Rats were habituated to the test environment and injection procedure and then received intracerebroventicular injections of various combinations of the MCR4 receptor antagonist JKC-363, the CB(1) receptor agonist Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, the MCR4 receptor agonist alpha-MSH, or the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716. Food intake and locomotor activity were then recorded for 120 min. When administrated alone, SR 141716 and alpha-MSH dose-dependently attenuated baseline feeding, whereas sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and alpha-MSH synergistically attenuated baseline feeding when combined. Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol-induced feeding was not blocked by alpha-MSH, whereas SR 141716 dose-dependently attenuated JKC-363-induced feeding. Locomotor activity was not significantly affected by any drug treatment, suggesting that the observed effects on feeding were not due to a nonspecific reduction in motivated behavior. These findings revealed a synergistic interaction between the cannabinoid and melanocortin systems in feeding behavior. These results further suggested that CB(1) receptors are located downstream from melanocortin receptors and CB(1) receptor signaling is necessary to prevent the melanocortin system from altering food intake.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Evidence for an interaction between CB1 cannabinoid and oxytocin receptors in food and water intake.

Oxytocin and CB(1) cannabinoid receptors independently modulate food intake. Although an interaction between oxytocin and cannabinoid systems has been demonstrated with respect to the cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome, the interaction between these systems in modulating food intake has not yet been examined. The present study had three primary purposes: (1) to determine whether oxytocin and a CB(1) receptor antagonist block food and fluid intake in a supra-additive manner, (2) to determine the relative position of the CB(1) receptors in the chain of control of food intake in relation to the oxytocin system, and (3) to determine whether the increase in fluid intake induced by an oxytocin antagonist is mediated via cannabinoid receptors. Rats were habituated to the test environment and injection procedure, and then received intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of various combinations of the oxytocin receptor antagonist tocinoic acid, the cannabionid receptor agonist delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), oxytocin, or the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716. Food and water intake and locomotor activity were then measured for 120 min. When administrated alone, SR 141716 and oxytocin dose-dependently attenuated baseline food intake, while oxytocin but not SR 141716 reduced water intake. Sub-anorectic doses of SR 141716 and oxytocin attenuated baseline feeding beyond what would be expected by the sum of the individual drug effects without affecting baseline water intake. THC stimulated feeding but not water intake. THC-induced feeding was not blocked by oxytocin, however, the oxytocin did attenuate water intake during such feeding. SR 141716 dose-dependently reduced tocinoic-acid-stimulated food intake and partially attenuated water intake. Locomotor activity was not significantly affected by any drug treatments, suggesting that effects on feeding were not due to a non-specific reduction in motivated behaviour. These findings reveal an interaction between cannabinoid and oxytocin systems in food intake. Results further reveal that the oxytocin system effects on water intake are partially mediated via CB(1) receptors, CB(1) receptors are located downstream from oxytocin receptors, and CB(1) receptor signalling is necessary to prevent oxytocin from altering food intake.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Modulation of morphine-induced Fos-immunoreactivity by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716.

A growing body of evidence suggests the existence of a functional interaction between opioid and cannabinoid systems. The present study further investigated this functional interaction by examining the combined effects of morphine and the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 on Fos-immunoreactivity (Fos-IR), a marker for neural activation. Male albino Wistar rats were treated with SR 141716 (3 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), morphine HCl (10 mg/kg, subcutaneously), vehicle, or SR 141716 and morphine combined (n = 6 per group). Rats were injected with morphine or its vehicle 30-min after administration of SR 141716 or its vehicle and perfused 3 h later. Locomotor activity and body temperature were both increased in the morphine-treated group and SR 141716 significantly inhibited these effects. Morphine increased Fos-IR in several brain regions including the caudate-putamen (CPu), cortex (cingulate, insular and piriform), nucleus accumbens (NAS) shell, lateral septum (LS), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), medial preoptic nucleus (MPO), hypothalamus (paraventricular, dorsomedial and ventromedial), paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PV), amygdala (central and basolateral nuclei), dorsolateral periaqueductal gray, ventral tegmental area (VTA), and Edinger-Westphal nucleus. SR 141716 alone increased Fos-IR in the cortex (cingulate, insular and piriform), NAS (shell), LS, BNST, hypothalamus (paraventricular, dorsomedial and ventromedial), PV, amygdala (central, basolateral and medial nuclei), VTA, and Edinger-Westphal nucleus. SR 141716 attenuated morphine-induced Fos-IR in several regions including the CPu, cortex, NAS (shell), LS, MnPO, MPO, paraventricular and dorsomedial hypothalamus, PV, basolateral amygdala, VTA, and Edinger-Westphal nucleus (EW). These results provide further support for functional interplay between the cannabinoid and opioid systems. Possible behavioural and physiological implications of the interactive effects of SR 141716 on morphine-induced Fos-IR are discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Regional differences in naloxone modulation of Delta(9)-THC induced Fos expression in rat brain.

Recent behavioral and pharmacological research shows extensive interplay between cannabinoid and opioid neurochemical systems. Here we examined the neuroanatomical basis of this interaction using c-fos immunohistochemistry. We compared Fos immunoreactivity in groups of male albino Wistar rats treated with vehicle, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 10 mg/kg, i.p.), naloxone (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or THC and naloxone in combination. Locomotor activity was depressed in both THC treatment groups and moderately inhibited in rats given naloxone alone. Results showed that naloxone inhibited THC-induced Fos immunoreactivity in several key brain regions including the ventral tegmental area, ventromedial and dorsomedial hypothalamus, central caudate-putamen and ventrolateral periaqueductal grey. Conversely, naloxone and THC had an additive effect on Fos immunoreactivity in the central nucleus of the amygdala, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (lateral division), the insular cortex, and the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus. These findings complement earlier pharmacological results showing potent modulation of cannabinoid-induced analgesia, appetite and reward by opioids. The inhibitory effects of naloxone on THC-induced ventral tegmentum, hypothalamic and periaqueductal grey Fos expression point to these structures as key sites involved in cannabinoid-opioid interactions.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Increased anxiety and impaired memory in rats 3 months after administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy").

Male Wistar rats were administered either (a) a high dose regime of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (4 x 5 mg/kg, i.p. over 4 h on each of 2 consecutive days), (b) a moderate dose regime of MDMA (1 x 5 mg/kg on each of 2 consecutive days), (c) D-amphetamine (4 x 1 mg/kg over 4 h on each of 2 days), or (d) vehicle injections. The high MDMA dose regime and the amphetamine treatment both produced acute hyperactivity and hyperthermia. Twelve weeks later, all rats were tested in the drug-free state on a battery of anxiety tests (elevated plus maze, emergence and social interaction tests). A further 2 weeks later they were tested on a novel object recognition memory task. Rats previously given the neurotoxic dose of MDMA showed greater anxiety-like behaviour on all three anxiety tests relative to both controls and D-amphetamine-treated rats. Rats given the moderate MDMA dose regime also showed increased anxiety-like behaviour on all three tests, although to a lesser extent than rats in the high dose group. In the object recognition task, rats given the high MDMA dose regime showed impaired memory relative to all other groups when tested at a 15-min delay but not at a 60-min delay. Rats previously exposed to amphetamine did not differ from saline controls in the anxiety or memory tests. These data suggest that moderate to heavy MDMA exposure over 48 h may lead to increased anxiety and memory impairment 3 months later, possibly through a neurotoxic effect on brain serotonin systems.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The distribution of cannabinoid-induced Fos expression in rat brain: differences between the Lewis and Wistar strain.

Previous studies have suggested that cannabis-like drugs produce mainly aversive and anxiogenic effects in Wistar strain rats, but rewarding effects in Lewis strain rats. In the present study we compared Fos expression, body temperature effects and behavioral effects elicited by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist CP 55,940 in Lewis and Wistar rats. Both a moderate (50 microg/kg) and a high (250 microg/kg) dose level were used. The 250 microg/kg dose caused locomotor suppression, hypothermia and catalepsy in both strains, but with a significantly greater effect in Wistar rats. The 50 microg/kg dose provoked moderate hypothermia and locomotor suppression but in Wistar rats only. CP 55,940 caused significant Fos immunoreactivity in 24 out of 33 brain regions examined. The most dense expression was seen in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the islands of Calleja, the lateral septum (ventral), the central nucleus of the amygdala, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (lateral division) and the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Despite having a similar distribution of CP 55,940-induced Fos expression, Lewis rats showed less overall Fos expression than Wistars in nearly every brain region counted. This held equally true for anxiety-related brain structures (e.g. central nucleus of the amygdala, periaqueductal gray and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus) and reward-related sites (nucleus accumbens and pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus). In a further experiment, Wistar rats and Lewis rats did not differ in the amount of Fos immunoreactivity produced by cocaine (15 mg/kg). These results indicate that Lewis rats are less sensitive to the behavioral, physiological and neural effects of cannabinoids. The exact mechanism underlying this subsensitivity requires further investigation.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

Effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940 and the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 on intracranial self-stimulation in Lewis rats.

Lewis rats were trained to self-stimulate the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) using a rate-frequency paradigm. They were then tested for the effects of the cannabinoid receptor agonist CP 55,940, the selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 and the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390. CP 55,940 (0, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg i.p.) had no effect on MFB self-stimulation behaviour as assessed by the M50, the stimulation frequency at which half-maximal response rates were obtained. With SR 141716, only a very high dose (20 mg/kg i.p.) caused a significant inhibition of the rewarding efficacy of the stimulation. This was seen as an increase in the M50. All other doses of SR 141716 (0, 1, 3, 10 mg/kg i.p.) were ineffective in modulating the M50. By comparison, a relatively low dose (0.06 mg/kg i.p.) of SCH 23390 caused a large increase in M50. These results indicate a relatively modest influence, if any at all, of exogenous or endogenous cannabinoids on reward-relevant neurotransmission.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

The cardiovascular and behavioral response to cat odor in rats: unconditioned and conditioned effects.

Cardiovascular and behavioral responses were recorded in rats during exposure to cat odor. Rats were habituated to an open rectangular arena that contained a small enclosed wooden box in which they could hide. On day 1 of the experiment, after 30 min in the apparatus, rats were presented with a piece of fabric collar for 60 min. On day 2, rats were presented with an identical piece of fabric collar, except that it had been worn by a cat and therefore exuded cat odor. On day 3, rats were again presented with an unworn cat collar, to determine any conditioned responses to the environment or stimulus (collar) previously associated with cat odor. Results showed significantly increased blood pressure and decreased activity during exposure to cat odor as well as avoidance of the odor stimulus and an increase in vigilance and risk-assessment measures. No significant change in heart rate was found during cat odor exposure. On day 3, a transient increase in blood pressure was seen as well as reduced activity and a range of defensive behaviors. This suggests some conditioning of fear to a context in which cat odor had previously been experienced. Heart rate was also significantly decreased on day 3. A transient rise in blood pressure was also seen when the unworn cat collar was placed into the apparatus on day 3, suggesting a conditioned response to a stimulus that has been previously associated with cat odor. This study demonstrates that a natural stressful stimulus can induce both unconditioned and conditioned autonomic and behavioral responses.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Defensive behavior in rats towards predatory odors: a review.

Studies of the response of rodents to predatory odors (mainly cat) have provided useful insights into the nature of defensive behavior. This article reviews work in this area with a focus on a behavioral paradigm recently developed in our laboratory in which we present rats with a piece of fabric collar that has been previously worn by a cat. Rats presented with this stimulus spent most of their time engaged in a behavior we call 'head out' in which the rat pokes its head out from a hide box and scans the environment. Periodic 'flat back approaches' and 'vigilant rearing' towards the cat odor source are seen as well as inhibition of non-defensive behaviors such as locomotor activity and grooming. Cat odor causes a sustained increase in blood pressure (> 15mm Hg) without greatly affecting heart beat rate. Rats will develop conditioned fear to both contexts and cues that have been paired with cat odor. C-fos immunohistochemistry indicates that cat odor selectively activates a defensive behavior circuit involving the medial amygdala, ventromedial and dorsomedial hypothalamus, dorsal premammillary nucleus and the periaqueductal gray. The defensive response to cat odor is attenuated by acute administration of the benzodiazepine midazolam (0.375 mg/kg), with chronically administered SSRI antidepressants and acute alcohol exerting more modest anxiolytic effects. The behavioral response to cat odor is very different to that seen to trimethylthiazoline (TMT: fox odor) which has effects more like those seen to an aversive putrid odor. It is concluded that cat odor is a useful tool for elucidating behavioral, neural, pharmacological and autonomic aspects of defensive behavior and anxiety.

Aggression↗
PubMed2001

"When a rat smells a cat": the distribution of Fos immunoreactivity in rat brain following exposure to a predatory odor.

Wistar rats were exposed to a fabric collar that had been worn by a domestic cat. Exposure took place in an open rectangular arena containing a small wooden "hide box". Rats exposed to cat odor spent more than 87% of their time in the hide box during a single 20-min exposure session, whereas rats exposed to a control odor (an unworn collar) spent less than 20% of their time hiding. One hour following this session, rats were killed and Fos immunoreactivity was compared between cat odor-exposed rats, control odor-exposed rats and an additional group that had remained in their home cages. Cat odor-exposed rats showed greater Fos expression than controls in many brain regions, particularly in the medial amygdala, medial hypothalamus and periaqueductal gray. Significant findings included strong and selective induction of Fos in the posteroventral medial amygdaloid nucleus, the premamillary nucleus (dorsal part), ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (dorsomedial part), dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus, periaqueductal gray (dorsomedial, dorsolateral and ventrolateral parts) and the cuneiform nucleus. Robust Fos expression in the ventromedial hypothalamus, premamillary nucleus and periaqueductal gray confirms previous suggestions of a role for these areas in predator-induced defensive behavior. Fos immunoreactivity in the medial, but not central or basolateral amygdala is a novel finding and draws attention to this subregion as a possible interface between olfactory input and emotional output.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

(+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'Ecstasy') increases social interaction in rats.

A series of experiments administered a low dose range (0, 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg) of (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, 'Ecstasy') to rats and assessed them in a variety of standard tests of anxiety. These tests included the emergence and elevated plus-maze tests, social interaction, cat odor avoidance and footshock-induced ultrasonic vocalizations. MDMA increased anxiety-related behaviours in the emergence and elevated plus-maze tests at all dose levels. A 5 mg/kg dose of MDMA also significantly reduced the time spent in close proximity to an anxiogenic cat odor stimulus. The 5 mg/kg dose also significantly reduced footshock-induced ultrasonic vocalizations. In the social interaction test, MDMA decreased aggressive behaviours at all doses tested, while the highest dose (5 mg/kg) also significantly increased the duration of social interaction. These results indicate that MDMA has both anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects depending upon the test situation employed. The facilitation of social interaction produced by MDMA in rats concurs with human experience of MDMA as a uniquely prosocial drug.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Dopaminergic modulation of rat pup ultrasonic vocalizations.

The dopamine D(1) receptor agonist, R(+)-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide (SKF 81297), the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, trans-(-)-4aR-4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-1H-pyrazolo[3, 4-g]quinoline hydrochloride (quinpirole), and the dopamine D(3) receptor agonist, (+/-)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin hydrobromide (7-OH-DPAT) all reduced the frequency of isolation-induced infant rat ultrasonic vocalizations and lowered body temperature when compared to saline-injected controls. Ultrasonic vocalization rate was not affected by either the dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist, R(+)-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-8-iodo-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrochloride (SCH 23390) or the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist, S(-)-raclopride-L-tartrate (raclopride) when given alone, nor did these antagonists block the ultrasonic vocalization reductions caused by the dopamine D(1) receptor agonist or the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist. The dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist but not the dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist blocked the dopamine D(3) receptor agonist's ultrasonic vocalization reduction. SKF 81297 reduced general activity while quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT increased activity. Raclopride reversed quinpirole's reduction in body temperature, as well as 7-OH-DPAT's effects on body temperature, ultrasonic vocalizations, and activity. These results indicate that dopamine D(1), D(2)/D(3), and D(3) receptor agonists all reduce ultrasonic vocalizations by as yet undetermined mechanisms.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Increased motivation for beer in rats following administration of a cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist.

A series of experiments examined the effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist CP 55,940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hyd roxypropyl)cyclohexanol) on the motivation to consume beer, near-beer (a beer-like beverage containing <0.5% ethanol) and sucrose solutions in rats. The experiments employed a 'lick-based progressive ratio paradigm' in which an ever increasing number of licks had to be emitted at a tube for each successive fixed unit of beverage delivered. Break point, the lick requirement at which responding ceased, was used as an index of motivation. In the first experiment, CP 55,940 (10, 30 or 50 microg/kg) caused a dose-dependent increase in break points for beer (containing 4.5% ethanol v/v) and for near-beer. The highest (50 microg/kg) dose of CP 55,940 also significantly decreased locomotor activity. In the second experiment, CP 55,940 (10 or 30 microg/kg) dose-dependently increased break points in rats licking for 'light' beer (containing 2.7% ethanol v/v) or for a sucrose solution (8.6% w/v) containing the same number of calories as the beer. In the third experiment, the facilitatory effects of CP 55,940 (30 microg/kg) on responding for beer and near-beer were reversed by both the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-me thyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride) (1.5 mg/kg) and the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (2.5 mg/kg). Naloxone had a proportionally greater effect on rats licking for beer compared to near-beer, consistent with previous reports of opioid receptor mediation of alcohol craving. These results show that cannabinoids modulate the motivation for beer via both cannabinoid CB1 receptors and opioid receptors. The similar effect of CP 55,940 on the motivation for beer, near-beer and sucrose suggests that the drug effect may reflect a general stimulatory effect on appetite for palatable beverages, although a more specific effect on the desire for alcohol cannot be ruled out.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

The motivation for beer in rats: effects of ritanserin, naloxone and SR 141716.

Rats were given two weeks of home cage access to either "near-beer" (a beverage that tastes like beer but contains <0.5% ethanol v/v) or near-beer with added ethanol (4.5% v/v), which is simply referred to as "beer". The two groups of rats (near-beer and beer) were then trained on a "lick-based progressive ratio paradigm" in operant chambers in which an ever increasing number of licks had to be emitted for each successive fixed unit of near-beer or beer delivered. Break points (the ratio at which responding ceased) for near-beer and beer were approximately equal under baseline conditions. Rats were then tested for the effects of the 5HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin (0.625, 2.5 or 10 mg/kg), the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (0.625, 2.5 or 10 mg/kg) or the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 (0.3, 1 or 3 mg/kg). All three drugs caused a dose-dependent reduction of break-points and locomotor activity in both the beer and near-beer groups. However, the effects of SR 141716 and naloxone, but not ritanserin, on breakpoints were significantly more pronounced on rats drinking beer compared to those drinking near-beer. There were no such differential effects of any of the drugs on locomotor activity across the two groups. These results suggest that both SR 141716 and naloxone differentially affect the motivation to consume alcoholic beverages and may thus have potential as drugs for the treatment of alcohol craving.

Alcohol Drinking↗
PubMed1999

Differential anxiolytic efficacy of a benzodiazepine on first versus second exposure to a predatory odor in rats.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Rodents tested in the elevated plus maze model of anxiety only show an anxiolytic response to benzodiazepines on their first exposure to the maze. The present study investigated whether a similar phenomenon occurs with benzodiazepines in a different model of anxiety that involves exposing rats to the odor of a predator. METHODS: Testing took place in a rectangular arena containing a cat odor-exuding collar at one end and a small "hide box" at the opposite end. Rats were initially familiarized with the odor-free apparatus for 20 min and then placed back in the apparatus 24 and 48 h later in the presence of cat odor. RESULTS: Vehicle-treated rats displayed marked avoidance of the cat odor on both first and second exposures, spending most of the session in the hide box and very little time near the odor source. In contrast, rats given a low dose of midazolam (0.375 mg/kg) during first exposure spent considerable time in close proximity to the odor source and much less time in the hide box. Rats given midazolam (0. 375 mg/kg) on their second exposure to cat odor displayed no such anxiolytic effect of the drug. Rats given midazolam (0.375 mg/kg) on both exposures showed a potent anxiolytic effect of the drug on each occasion. This pattern of results was replicated with a higher dose of midazolam (0.75 mg/kg). A further experiment showed that rats previously exposed to cat odor showed high levels of hiding in the test environment 24 h later even when the cat odor was no longer present. This conditioned fear was blocked by midazolam (0.75 mg/kg) suggesting that the ineffectiveness of midazolam on second exposure to cat odor is not due to a failure of the drug to affect conditioned fear. CONCLUSIONS: The ineffectiveness of midazolam in odor-experienced rats parallels the results obtained with benzodiazepines in the elevated plus maze. Such results may help illuminate the comparative lack of efficacy of benzodiazepines in treating certain types of anxiety disorders in humans.

Animals↗