Biomedical subjects

I Toni

Publications and source records attributed to I Toni.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1999

A functional anatomy of anticipatory anxiety.

Anticipatory anxiety is a complex combination of a future-oriented cognitive state, negative affect, and autonomic arousal. A dual-task paradigm of anticipation of electric shocks and a motor-learning task was used to examine the changes in neural patterns of activation associated with modulation of the cognitive state in anxiety by a distracting motor task. We used positron emission tomography (PET) and 15O-water to measure regional cerebral blood flow (rcbf) in 10 healthy male volunteers. A 2x2 factorial design-(shock vs no shock) x (low vs high distraction) was used with three scans per condition. Twelve PET scans were performed on each subject. In six of these scans, subjects were given electric shocks. In all scans, subjects also simultaneously performed a motor repetition (low distraction) or learning (high distraction) task. Galvanic skin conductance (GSR), Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and self-report data were also collected. In comparisons between the shock and no-shock conditions, the main finding was of increased rcbf in the left insula (-38,8,8) (z = 4.85, P<0.05 corrected) and a homologous area in the right insula at a lower threshold (z =3.20, P = 0.001 uncorrected). Other areas activated were the right superior temporal sulcus, left fusiform, and left anterior cingulate. Using the STAI-state scores as a covariate of interest, significant correlations with rCBF were seen in the left orbitofrontal cortex, left insula, and left anterior cingulate cortex. There was no significant distraction effect as measured by the STAI, self-report, GSR response or interactional analysis of the PET data. These findings support the role of paralimbic structures as neural substrates of anticipatory anxiety. The failure to demonstrate behavioral and neurophysiological changes with the distractor task may reflect the modest increases in anxiety with the shock, the relatively simple distractor task, and small sample size.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

How do visual instructions influence the motor system?

The paper distinguishes the use of visual cues to guide reaching and grasping, and the ability to learn to associate arbitrary sensory cues with movements. Using positron emission tomography (PET), we have shown that the arbitrary association of visual cues and movements involves the ventral visual system (prestriate, inferotemporal and ventral prefrontal cortex), the basal ganglia and the dorsal premotor cortex. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we have shown that the evoked haemodynamic responses in the ventral visual system are time-locked to the presentation of the visual cues, that the response in the motor cortex is locked to the time of response, and that the response in the dorsal premotor cortex shows cuerelated, movement-related and set-related components. Using PET we have shown that there are learning-related changes in activation in both the ventral prestriate cortex and the basal ganglia (globus pallidus) when subjects learn a visuomotor associative task. We argue that the basal ganglia may act as a flexible system for learning the association of sensory cues and movements.

Humans↗

PubMed1998

The time course of changes during motor sequence learning: a whole-brain fMRI study.

There is a discrepancy between the results of imaging studies in which subjects learn motor sequences. Some experiments have shown decreases in the activation of some areas as learning increased, whereas others have reported learning-related increases as learning progressed. We have exploited fMRI to measure changes in blood oxygen leve-dependent (BOLD) signal throughout the course of learning. T2*-weighted echo-planar images were acquired over the whole brain for 40 min while the subjects learned a sequence eight moves long by trial and error. The movements were visually paced every 3.2 s and visual feedback was provided to the subjects. A baseline period followed each activation period. The effect due to the experimental conditions was modeled using a square-wave function, time locked to their occurrence. Changes over time in the difference between activation and baseline signal were modeled using a set of polynomial basis functions. This allowed us to take into account linear as well as nonlinear changes over time. Low-frequency changes over time common to both activation and baseline conditions (and thus not learning related) were modeled and removed. Linear and nonlinear changes of BOLD signal over time were found in prefrontal, premotor, and parietal cortex and in neostriatal and cerebellar areas. Single-unit recordings in nonhuman primates during the learning of motor tasks have clearly shown increased activity early in learning, followed by a decrease as learning progressed. Both phenomena can be observed at the population level in the present study.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements.

Subjects were required to point to the distant vertex of the closed and the open configurations of the Müller-Lyer illusion using either their right hand (experiment 1) or their left hand (experiment 2). In both experiments the Müller-Lyer figures were horizontally presented either in the left or in the right hemispace and movements were executed using either foveal or peripheral vision of the target. According to the illusion effect, subjects undershot and overshot the vertex location of the closed and the open configuration, respectively. The illusion effect decreased when the target was fixated and when the stimulus was positioned in the right hemispace. These results confirm the hypothesis that both egocentric and allocentric information are combined in order to encode target position in space. When movements are directed to foveal targets, decreasing effects of allocentric cues, as shown by decreasing the illusion effect, could be due to enhanced efficiency of the egocentric system. That is, information on eye position when target is fixated can be used to precisely establish its spatial relations with the body. In addition, a more accurate analysis of allocentric information is hypothesized when the target is positioned in the left hemispace. In other words, our data confirm the notion that the right cerebral hemisphere is involved in space representation.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Tactile input of the hand and the control of reaching to grasp movements.

The role of tactile information of the hand in the control of reaching to grasp movements was investigated. The kinematics of both reaching (or transport) and grasp components were studied in healthy subjects in two experimental conditions. In one condition (control condition) subjects were required to reach and grasp an object that could have two sizes and that could be located at two distances from the viewer. In the other condition (anaesthesia condition) the same movements were executed, but anaesthesia was provided to the subjects' fingertips. In both conditions vision of the hand was prevented during movement. Anaesthesia affected mainly the kinematics of the first phase of grasping, that is, the finger-opening phase. This phase was lengthened and maximal finger aperture increased. In contrast, the duration of the successive phase (finger-closure) was poorly modified. The reaching component was also impaired by anaesthesia. Although the total extent of hand path and the spatial relations between the finger aperture and closure phases did not change between the two conditions, hand path variability increased. This occurred during transport deceleration phase and after the increase in variability of finger path. In addition, the whole movement was slowed down. The results of the present experiment suggest that tactile signals at the beginning and at the end of movement can be used to compute grasp time and to optimise grasp temporal parameters. Alternatively, signals from tactile receptors can be involved in encoding the position sense of the fingers. When this input is lacking, the control of grasp and in particular that of finger-opening phase can be impaired. Finally, the effect of the grasp impairment on the reaching component supports the notion that the coordination between reaching and grasping involves the whole temporal course of the two components.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements.

Prehension movements of the right hand were recorded in normal subjects using a computerized motion analyzer. The kinematics and the spatial paths of markers placed at the wrist and at the tips of the index finger and thumb were measured. Cylindrical objects of different diameters (3, 6, 9 cm) were used as targets. They were placed at six different positions in the workspace along a circle centered on subject's head axis. The positions were spaced by 10 degrees starting from 10 degrees on the left of the sagittal axis, up to 40 degrees on the right. Both the transport and the grasp components of prehension were influenced by the distance between the resting hand position and the object position. Movement time, time to peak velocity of the wrist and time to maximum grip aperture varied as a function of distance from the object, irrespective of its size. The variability of the spatial paths of wrist and fingers sharply decreased during the phase of the movement prior to contact with the object. This indicates that the final position of the thumb and the index finger is a controlled parameter of visuomotor transformation during prehension. The orientation of the opposition axis (defined as the line connecting the tips of the thumb and the index finger at the end of the movement) was measured. Several different frames of reference were used. When an object-centered frame was used, the orientation of the opposition axis was found to change by about 10 degrees from one object position to the next. By contrast, when a body-centered frame was used (with the head or the forearm as a reference), this orientation was found to remain relatively invariant for different object positions and sizes. The degree of wrist flexion was little affected by the position of the object. This result, together with the invariant orientation of the opposition axis, shows that prehension movements aimed at cylindrical objects are organized so as to minimize changes in posture of the lower arm.

Arm↗

PubMed1996

On orienting the hand to reach and grasp an object.

Subjects were required to reach and grasp a parallelepiped, the position, orientation and size of which were varied. The kinematics of reaching and grasping movements was studied in full vision and in no vision conditions. Both direction and movement amplitude of reaching were affected by object orientation. Conversely, both the time course of finger axis orientation and the angular displacement of the hand at wrist were influenced by object position. These results were not modified by the absence of visual control. Finger aperture during grasping was affected by both object size and orientation. This latter result was not due to a distorted size perception, as shown by a control matching experiment. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest the integration between distal and proximal components during reaching and grasping.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Differential influence of the visual framework on end point accuracy and trajectory specification of arm movements.

In this study the influence of visual scene on both arm end point accuracy and spatial path kinematics was evaluated. Eight subjects, immersed in a virtual environment, were required to point to one of ten targets located at two distances and in five directions. Targets were presented in frameworks of different complexity. The simplest framework was constituted by a uniform background, the most complex framework was constituted by a perspective-arranged grid. In the other two conditions it consisted of lines having a direction parallel to either the subject's sagittal or frontal body axis. Movements were executed without vision of both target and framework. The results showed that pointing movements were hypometric in all conditions. No difference in end point localization was observed between movements executed after presentation of the simplest and the most complex scenes. However, hypometria significantly increased when the scene was formed by lines parallel to the subject's sagittal axis. Visual information on the scene was also used to specify hand path parameters. Trajectory curvature increased with decreasing complexity of the framework. Correspondingly, the pointing kinematics varied. Taken together, these results suggest that visual analysis of cues surrounding the target can influence both target localisation and hand path planning. However, scene complexity is directly related only to determining trajectory curvature. We conclude that planning an arm movement consists of at least two processes: target localisation and hand path specification. Environmental visual cues forming the scene are taken into account differently during the two processes.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Visual illusion and action.

The role of allocentric cues on movement control was investigated in the present study. Pointing movements directed to the more distant vertex of closed and open configurations of the Muller-Lyer illusion, as well as to the vertex of control lines, were studied in four experimental conditions. In the first (full-vision condition) subjects saw both stimulus and their hand before and during movement, in the second (non-visual feedback condition) they saw the stimulus, but not their hand during movement. In the two remaining conditions (no-vision conditions) vision of the scene and the hand was precluded. Pointing was executed 0 sec (no vision 0 sec delay condition) or 5 sec (no-vision 5 sec delay condition) after the light was switched off. The Muller-Lyer illusion affected pointing kinematics with respect to the control lines. Subjects undershot and overshot the vertex location, respectively, of the closed and open configuration. Correspondingly, the entire kinematics were changed. The main result was, however, a gradually increasing effect of the perceptual illusion when pointing was executed from memory compared to the full-vision condition. These data are discussed according to the hypothesis that the system underlying visual perception in the allocentric frame of reference and that involved in motor action can functionally interact. The strength of this interaction depends upon the efficiency of the egocentric frame of reference by which motor actions are constructed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Unconscious updating of grasp motor program.

Grasp modification during prehension movements was studied in response to slight variations of somesthetic information about object size. Three experiments were carried out. In experiment 1 eight subjects were required to reach and grasp an object whose size could either increase or decrease, whereas its visual image remained unmodified. The object size was changed during the experiment with uninformed subjects after a block of trials during which visual and somesthetic information were congruent. At the end of the experiment subjects were required to reproduce the size of the object with their fingers (matching test). Results showed that maximal grip aperture during prehension as well as finger aperture in the matching test were modified according to variation in object size, although no subject realized that the object had changed during the experiment. Grasp time was also altered by object size change. Greater and earlier adaptation in maximal grip aperture, as well as perturbation of grasp time, were observed for decrease than for increase in object size. However, complete compensation was never reached for both parameters. Constant confidence in vision could have prevented both complete compensation and conscious detection of object change. This was investigated in two additional experiments. In experiment 2 visual information was made unreliable by informing subjects about variation in grasped object size. This led to greater and earlier modification in maximal grip aperture than in experiment 1. Grasp time was kept almost constant regardless of size variation. In experiment 3 vision of the stimulus was prevented and no information on change in object size was given to subjects. The results of experiment 3 were similar to those of experiment 1, although modification in maximal grip aperture was larger for increase in object size. Correspondingly, grasp time was more affected by increase than by decrease in object size. The results of the three experiments suggest that kinematic parameters usually considered as dependent on object properties, such as maximal grip aperture, were modified in order to compensate perturbation of temporal parameters. This modification induced a "pragmatic" knowledge of object size (as showed by the results of the matching test), although awareness was not reached.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

The role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements: a kinematic study in a peripherally deafferented patient and in normal subjects.

In this study we investigated the role of proprioception in the control of prehension movements, with particular reference to the grasp component. Grasp and transport kinematics were studied in a peripherally deafferented patient and in five healthy subjects. Two experiments were carried out: the prehension experiment and the grasp perturbation experiment. In the prehension experiment both the patient and the control subjects were required to reach and grasp three objects of different size, located at three different distances, both with and without visual feedback. In the grasp perturbation experiment a mechanical perturbation was applied to the fingers during prehension movements, again executed with and without visual feedback. In the prehension experiment temporal parameters of the patient's movements were generally slowed, with greater variability on some measures. However, over the first phase of the movement the pattern of the patient's hand opening and transport acceleration, scaled to object size and distance, was the same as that of controls, both with and without visual feedback. On the contrary, during the final phase of the movement (the finger closure phase and deceleration) the patient's performance differed significantly from the controls. These phases were abnormally lengthened and frequent movement adjustments were observed. In the grasp perturbation experiment the patient was not able to compensate for the perturbations applied to the fingers, even with visual feedback. The data allowed us to investigate also the respective contribution of proprioception and of vision of the hand in the control of prehension. We compared prehension kinematics in two conditions: (a) with visual but no proprioceptive feedback (in the patient) and (b) with proprioceptive but no visual feedback (in the controls). In both experiments proprioceptive control was more efficient than visual control. The results of this study are interpreted in favour of the strict dependence of prehension control on proprioception. The first phase of the movement, however, can be appropriately planned and executed without the necessity of either proprioceptive or visual information about the hand.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Visual pathways for object-oriented action and object recognition: functional anatomy with PET.

The purpose of this study was to identify the functional anatomy of the mechanisms involved in visually guided prehension and in object recognition in humans. The cerebral blood flow of seven subjects was investigated by positron emission tomography. Three conditions were performed using the same set of stimuli. In the 'grasping' condition, subjects were instructed to accurately grasp the objects. In the 'matching' condition, subjects were requested to compare the shape of the presented object with that of the previous one. In the 'pointing' condition (control), subjects pointed towards the objects. The comparison between grasping and pointing showed a regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) increase in the anterior part of the inferior parietal cortex and part of the posterior parietal cortex. The comparison between grasping and matching showed an rCBF increase in the cerebellum, the left frontal cortex around the central sulcus, the mesial frontal cortex and the left inferior parietal cortex. Finally, the comparison between matching and pointing showed an rCBF increase in the right temporal cortex and the right posterior parietal cortex. Thus object-oriented action and object recognition activate a common posterior parietal area, suggesting that some kind of within-object spatial analysis was processed by this area whatever the goal of the task.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Signal-, set- and movement-related activity in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study.

Electrophysiological studies on monkeys have been able to distinguish sensory and motor signals close in time by pseudorandomly delaying the cue that instructs the movement from the stimulus that triggers the movement. We have used a similar experimental design in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), scanning subjects while they performed a visuomotor conditional task with instructed delays. One of four shapes was presented briefly. Two shapes instructed the subjects to flex the index finger; the other two shapes coded the flexion of the middle finger. The subjects were told to perform the movement after a tone. We have exploited a novel use of event-related fMRI. By systematically varying the interval between the visual and acoustic stimuli, it has been possible to estimate the significance of the evoked haemodynamic response (EHR) to each of the stimuli, despite their temporal proximity in relation to the time constant of the EHR. Furthermore, by varying the phase between events and image acquisition, we have been able to achieve high temporal resolution while scanning the whole brain. We dissociated sensory and motor components of the sensorimotor transformations elicited by the task, and assessed sustained activity during the instructed delays. In calcarine and occipitotemporal cortex, the responses were exclusively associated with the visual instruction cues. In temporal auditory cortex and in primary motor cortex, they were exclusively associated with the auditory trigger stimulus. In ventral prefrontal cortex there were movement-related responses preceded by preparatory activity and by signal-related activity. Finally, responses associated with the instruction cue and with sustained activity during the delay period were observed in the dorsal premotor cortex and in the dorsal posterior parietal cortex. Where the association between a visual cue and the appropriate movement is arbitrary, the underlying visuomotor transformations are not achieved exclusively through frontoparietal interactions. Rather, these processes seem to rely on the ventral visual stream, the ventral prefrontal cortex and the anterior part of the dorsal premotor cortex.

Adult↗