PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Wiklund

Publications and source records attributed to I Wiklund.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Health-related quality of life in elderly patients with heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) in elderly patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and correlate these to clinical and demographic variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HRQL was evaluated in 191 patients with CHF, aged 65-84 years, using a self-administered questionnaire including the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Quality of Life Questionnaire in Heart Failure and Patients' Global Self-Assessment. RESULTS: HRQL was more impaired in women than to men (p < 0.05), New York Heart Association functional class correlated to HRQL (p < 0.01) and HRQL, as assessed by NHP, was impaired in CHF patients compared to a previously evaluated, age and sex matched, normal reference population. CONCLUSION: Measurement of HRQL in heart failure patients provides important information in addition to a clinical evaluation, and inclusion of HRQL assessments in clinical practice is feasible and warranted. Specific intervention should be aimed at improving HRQL in those most severely affected.

Aged↗

Quality of life in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis: effects of treatment with omeprazole.

OBJECTIVE: Because improvement in quality of life (QoL) is an important therapeutic goal in patients with heartburn but without esophagitis, the aim of the present study was to compare the impact of omeprazole 20 mg or 10 mg daily with that of placebo on QoL in patients with heartburn as the predominant symptom. METHODS: QoL was measured at baseline and after 4 wk using two validated questionnaires, the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. RESULTS: The two questionnaires were completed by 163 patients in the omeprazole 20 mg group, 163 in the omeprazole 10 mg group, and 82 in the placebo group. The reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale showed a significant improvement in terms of reflux symptoms on omeprazole 20 mg versus omeprazole 10 mg and placebo, and on omeprazole 10 mg compared with placebo. The total score of the PGWB index improved significantly more on both doses of omeprazole than on placebo. The mean scores rose from 96.8 to 103.9 on omeprazole 20 mg, from 98.4 to 106.0 on omeprazole 10 mg, and from 98.0 to 100.6 on placebo. All dimensions of the PGWB index improved on treatment with omeprazole, but the improvements were most pronounced in the dimensions depicting anxiety, depressed mood, and self-control. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that treatment with omeprazole 20 mg and omeprazole 10 mg restores QoL to a level comparable with that observed in a healthy population.

Adolescent↗

Determinants of an impaired quality of life five years after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of an inferior quality of life (QoL) five years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients from western Sweden who underwent CABG between 1988 and 1991. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaires for evaluating QoL before CABG and five years after operation. Three different instruments were used: the Nottingham health profile (NHP), the psychological general wellbeing index (PGWI), and the physical activity score (PAS). RESULTS: 2121 patients underwent CABG, of whom 310 died during five years' follow up. Information on QoL after five years was available in 1431 survivors (79%). There were three independent predictors for an inferior QoL with all three instruments: female sex, a history of diabetes mellitus, and a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Multivariate analysis showed that a poor preoperative QoL was a strong independent predictor for an impaired QoL five years after CABG. An impaired QoL was also predicted by previous disease. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, an impaired QoL before surgery, and other diseases such as diabetes mellitus are independent predictors for an impaired QoL after CABG in survivors five years after operation.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Quality of life in arthritis patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Arthritis is a painful and disabling condition. To suppress the pain and the inflammatory process, patients are often chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Chronic use of NSAIDs may induce peptic ulcer, dyspeptic problems and heartburn. Therefore, these patients are often provided with treatment to relieve and/or protect against gastrointestinal problems. Rheumatic disorders also affect a range of health-related quality of life domains. In one study, patients with NSAID-associated gastroduodenal lesions complained about lack of energy, sleep disturbances, emotional distress and social isolation in addition to pain and mobility limitations. The degree of distress and dysfunction differed markedly from scores in an unselected population. Clinical trial data suggest that acid-suppressing therapy with omeprazole is superior to therapy with misoprostol and ranitidine in healing gastroduodenal lesions and preventing abdominal pain, heartburn and indigestion symptoms during continued NSAID treatment. Because arthritic patients are severely incapacitated by their condition regarding most aspects of health-related quality of life, it is important to offer a treatment that is effective in healing and preventing NSAID-induced ulcers and gastrointestinal symptoms during continued NSAID treatment without further compromising the patients' quality of life. Treatment with omeprazole once daily has been shown to be superior to that with ranitidine and misoprostol in this respect.

Aged↗

[What is the effect of lowering the arterial blood pressure on the quality of life? An auxiliary study to the HOT (Hypertension Optimal Treatment) trial].

Nine hundred and twenty-two hypertensive patients were included in a substudy to the hypertension optimal (HOT) study which aimed to investigate the impact on quality of life of lowering the pressure and of intensified therapy. Patients were randomised to three diastolic BPs (DBPs) levels, i.e. < or = 90 mmHg, < or = 85 mmHg and < or = 80 mmHg. Seven hundred and eighty one patients completed both baseline and follow-up questionnaires after 6 months (intention to treat, ITT, population), while 610 patients were included in a per protocol (PP) analysis. The lower the DBP achieved, the greater the improvement in well-being (p < 0.05). The increase in well-being from baseline to 6 months was significant in target groups < or = 80 mmHg (p < 0.01) and < or = 85 mmHg (p < 0.05). Cardiac symptoms and dizziness improved in all groups but the sex life score deteriorated in the < or = 80 and < or = 85 mmHg groups in male patients. Headaches were reduced in all groups (p < 0.001), while swollen ankles (p < 0.001), and dry cough in the < or = 80 mmHg group (p < 0.001) increased. Despite a slight increase in subjective symptoms, more intensive antihypertensive therapy was still associated with improvements in patients' well-being.

Blood Pressure↗

Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index.

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index in a sample of 131 men and women with newly diagnosed cancer. The Quality of Life Index was translated into Norwegian using a standardized international approach, including back-translation. The findings showed high internal consistency reliability for the global score (alpha = 0.93 (test)) as well as for the following domains: health and functioning (alpha = 0.88), socio-economic (alpha = 0.82), psychological/spiritual (alpha = 0.82) and family (alpha = 0.79). The test-retest reliability after 3-4 weeks was 0.78 for the global score. A factor analysis partially confirmed the different subscales. In conclusion, the Quality of Life Index was found to be reliable and had sufficient validity to be used for measuring quality of life in Norwegian cancer patients.

Adult↗

Methods of assessing the impact of climacteric complaints on quality of life.

Quality of life is an important outcome that reflects the way patients feel and function. Assessing the impact of a condition on quality of life is particularly relevant in symptomatic conditions such as the menopause. A range of measurement tools are available for monitoring how symptoms, typical of the climacteric period, affect patients with regard to their well-being, sleep disturbance, other somatic symptoms, cognitive function and sexual functioning. However, to gain a valid assessment of quality of life and the effects of treatment in the menopause, only standard and well-validated measurement tools should be used. The appropriateness of relying on the use of psychiatric rating scales to assess mood is questionable. Results obtained from an increasing number of controlled clinical studies indicate that treatment with oestrogen, in addition to alleviating vasomotor symptoms, can substantially improve patients' quality of life.

Female↗

Does endoscopy have a positive impact on quality of life in dyspepsia?

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether normal endoscopy results in patients investigated for dyspepsia has therapeutic value. Therefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the endoscopy on quality of life and dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: One hundred ninety-six symptomatic patients (85 men and 111 women, mean age 42.9 years), who were receiving no treatment, were investigated before and 1 week after endoscopy with the use of a battery of validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Before endoscopy the health-related quality of life was compromised in comparison with a normal population, but 1 week after a negative endoscopy it is increased to a level which was close to the normal range despite no major change in symptoms. Physical activity and sleep scores improved significantly after endoscopy. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that a negative endoscopy improves quality of life in the short-term in patients with dyspepsia, even though symptoms may persist.

Abdominal Pain↗

The feeling of loneliness prior to coronary artery bypass grafting might be a predictor of short-and long-term postoperative mortality.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of different aspects of quality of life (QL) upon mortality during short-and long-term follow-up after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Prospective evaluation. MATERIALS: Consecutive patients from western Sweden who during 3 years underwent CABG. METHODS: They answered a questionnaire at the time of coronary angiography prior to CABG. Quality of life was measured with questions from the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) part I. RESULTS: In all, 1290 patients were included in the analyses. When accounting for various preoperative factors known to be independently associated with morality the NHP question "I feel lonely" was found to be associated with mortality, both at 30 days (RR 2.61; 95% CI 1.15-5.95; p = 0.02) and at 5 years (RR 1.78; 95% CI 1.17-2.71; p = 0.007) after the operation. Thirteen per cent reported they felt lonely. At 5 years was, in addition, the statement "I have difficulty climbing stairs" also independently associated with mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 1.02-2.22; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Among the 38 statements in NHP as a judgment of QL prior to CABG, one of them, "I feel lonely" was independently associated with survival both at 30 days and 5 years after CABG.

Adult↗

Reliability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) in US patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Five hundred and sixteen adults with predominant heartburn symptoms of GERD were recruited from gastroenterologist and family physician practices and treated with 6 weeks of 150 mg ranitidine twice daily to identify poorly responsive symptomatic GERD. The GSRS, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey and the Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) scale were administered at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Reported ratings of GERD-related symptoms from physician and patient diaries were measured. The GSRS contains five scales: reflux syndrome, abdominal pain, constipation syndrome, diarrhoea syndrome and indigestion syndrome. The internal consistency reliabilities for the GSRS scales ranged from 0.61 to 0.83 and the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.60. The GSRS scale scores were correlated with the SF-36 and PGWB scales and with the number and severity of heartburn symptoms. Patients with two or three clinician-rated GERD-related symptoms reported worse GSRS scale scores compared with patients with fewer symptoms (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in the mean GSRS scale scores were observed between treatment responders and non-responders (p < 0.0001) and patients showing a response to treatment had larger mean changes in their GSRS scales than patients not showing a response to treatment (p < 0.0001). The standardized response means ranged from 0.42 to 1.43 for the GSRS scale scores. It was concluded that the GSRS is a brief, fairly comprehensive assessment of common gastrointestinal symptoms. The GSRS has good reliability and construct validity and the GSRS scales discriminate by GERD symptom severity and are responsive to treatment. The GSRS is a useful patient-rated symptom scale for evaluating the outcomes of treatment for GERD.

Adult↗

Preoperative left-ventricular ejection fraction does not influence the improvement in quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an established treatment for angina pectoris which conveys relief of chest pain and improved physical performance. However, increased survival has only been observed in selected subgroups of patients with advanced coronary artery disease, particularly in the presence of depressed left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). It is therefore of interest to study whether the outcome in terms of quality of life (QoL) is also more favorable in candidates with depressed LVEF. All patients who underwent CABG without concomitant valve surgery in western Sweden between 6.1988 and 6.1991 (n = 2121) were sent questionnaires on QoL involving 3 different instruments, the Physical Activity Score, the Nottingham Health Profile, and the Psychological General Well-being Index. They were submitted before surgery and 3 times in the 2 years thereafter. QoL was improved on all postoperative occasions. The degree of improvement was not associated with preoperative LVEF for any of the instruments. The postoperative Physical Activity Score was associated with preoperative LVEF. The other instruments showed no such association with LVEF. The improvement in QoL during 2 years after CABG is not dependent on the LVEF determined prior to operation. Self-estimated physical abilities are postoperatively associated with preoperative LVEF whereas health-related QoL and general well-being are not.

Aged↗

Burden of illness in functional gastrointestinal disorder--the consequences for the individual and society.

OBJECTIVE: To review the consequences of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGD), i.e. heartburn without esophagitis, dyspepsia and IBS for the individual and society. RESULTS: Current publications indicate that functional gastrointestinal disorders are more prevalent than organic gastrointestinal disorders in the population. Symptoms, not the organic finding per se, are most important to the individual. Functional disorders are furthermore linked to somatic symptoms, from other parts of the body, as well as to mental health. Together they constitute a large medical burden on society in terms of consultations, drug consumption and surgery. Social costs are further increased by problems at work and a considerable increase in absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: Functional gastrointestinal disorders should be taken more seriously by the medical community and society, since the burden of illness seems much larger than earlier anticipated.

Absenteeism↗

Nursing intervention to increase hope and quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nursing intervention on hope and quality of life in cancer patients. The sample consisted of 96 newly diagnosed Norwegian cancer patients ages 26 to 78 years, the majority of them women (71%). Breast cancer was the predominant type of cancer in this sample. The study used an experimental design in which patients were randomly allocated to three different groups. The first group was the experimental group, for which the intervention was designed to increase hope. The second group (attention control group) participated in the "Learning to Live with Cancer" program. The last group was a control group. The Nowotny Hope Scale was used to measure hope, and the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index and the Cancer Rehabilitation and Evaluation Systems, short form, were used to measure quality of life. The questionnaires were completed four times: twice before, then 2 weeks and finally 6 months after the intervention. The level of hope was significantly increased (p = 0.020) for the members of the hope group just after the intervention, but not after 6 months. Despite the patients' positive evaluation of the intervention, there was no impact on quality of life.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Improvement in quality of life during 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the changes in various aspects of quality of life (QOL) from before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to 5 years after the procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent CABG in the western region of Sweden in 1988-1991 were approached with questionnaires evaluating their QOL prior to and 3 months and 1, 2, and 5 years after the operation. Three different instruments were used: the Nottingham Health Profile, the Psychological General Well-Being Index, and the Physical Activity Score. RESULTS: In all 2121 patients underwent CABG, of whom 310 died during 5 years of follow-up. With all three instruments QOL had improved 5 years after CABG compared with prior to the operation. However, all three instruments revealed a slight but significant deterioration in estimated QOL between 2 and 5 years after CABG. CONCLUSIONS: QOL 5 years after CABG is better than that prior to the operation, but between 2 and 5 years after the operation a slight deterioration in QOL is observed.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

The Norwegian version of the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS-N). A validation and reliability study in patients suffering from psoriasis.

The aim of this study was to adapt, validate, and test for reliability the Quality of Life Scale in Norwegian (QOLS-N) for patients suffering from psoriasis. Two hundred and eighty-two patients with psoriasis were included in the study. Self-reported health was measured using the SF-36. Disease severity was also measured in 95 patients using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). The reliability of the QOLS-N was computed using the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and the test-retest reliability test. Face and content validity and construct discriminant ability of the QOLS-N were assessed. The results indicated that the QOLS-N has highly satisfactory rates of test-retest reliability (r = 0.83) and internal consistency reliability (alpha 0.86). As expected, the QOLS-N had a lower correlation with physical health (r = 0.24, p < 0.000) and self-reported symptoms (r = -0.20, p < 0.001), and a higher correlation with mental health (r = 0.52, p < 0.000). The correlation with disease severity was not significant (-0.06). The results reported in the present paper are in accordance with those derived in other validation studies. The QOLS-N seems to be a reliable and valid measure of global quality of life in patients suffering from psoriasis.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. International GORD Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of omeprazole in patients presenting with troublesome reflux symptoms. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled comparison. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: Patients were recruited using a symptom-based questionnaire for diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. INTERVENTIONS: After endoscopy, patients without endoscopic oesophagitis were randomized to omeprazole 20 mg (Ome20), omeprazole 10 mg (Ome10) or placebo once daily for 4 weeks (n = 261) and those with oesophagitis (except circumferential/ulcerative) were randomized to receive either Ome20 or Ome10 once daily for 4 weeks (n = 277). Patients not symptom-free at 4 weeks received open treatment with Ome20 once daily for a further 4 weeks. Those symptom-free at 4-8 weeks were followed up for 6 months off treatment, to see whether their symptoms recurred. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Complete upper GI symptom relief during week 4 on Ome20 or Ome10 in patients with or without endoscopic oesophagitis. RESULTS: Forty one percent of all patients on Ome20 and 35% on Ome10 reported complete relief from upper GI symptoms during week 4, whilst 73% of the patients on Ome20 and 62% on Ome10 obtained sufficient control. Complete relief during week 4 was reported by 19% of endoscopy-negative patients on placebo, and sufficient control by 35%. Endoscopic healing at 4 weeks occurred in 76% of oesophagitis patients on Ome20 and in 56% on Ome10. After 6 months off treatment, 90% of patients with oesophagitis and 75% of endoscopy-negative patients reported symptomatic relapse. CONCLUSION: Both 10 mg and 20 mg of omeprazole gave effective relief of symptoms, although 20 mg gave superior healing in patients with oesophagitis. After cessation of treatment, symptomatic relapse was rapid and frequent in both endoscopy-positive and endoscopy-negative patients.

Adolescent↗

Quality of life during acute and intermittent treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with omeprazole compared with ranitidine. Results from a multicentre clinical trial. The European Study Group.

AIMS: To investigate quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. PATIENTS: A series of 704 patients were randomised to treatment with ranitidine 150 mg bd, omeprazole 10 mg om or omeprazole 20 mg om for 2 weeks. Asymptomatic/mildly symptomatic patients were followed for 12 months. METHODS: The Psychological General Well-Being index and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale were completed before and during short-term and intermittent treatment. RESULTS: The quality of life response rate was > 80%. The majority of the patients receiving omeprazole 20 mg om (55%) had symptom relief after 2 weeks despite the fact that more patients on ranitidine required 4 weeks' treatment and an increased dose. There was no difference in the reflux dimension of Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale between treatments in the initial treatment phase, but the total Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale score improved significantly more on omeprazole 10 mg om than on ranitidine 150 mg bd (p = 0.006). Both doses of omeprazole improved the total Psychological General Well-Being score more than ranitidine (omeprazole 10 mg om versus ranitidine 150 mg bd, p = 0.005, omeprazole 20 mg om versus ranitidine 150 mg bd, p = 0.031). During follow-up, relapsing patients returned to pre-treatment symptom and well-being scores, but these dimensions were restored after treatment. CONCLUSION: The quality of life is impaired in patients presenting with reflux symptoms. Irrespective of whether the patients presented with endoscopy positive or endoscopy negative reflux disease, treatment on demand improved the quality of life.

Adolescent↗