PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ian Eardley

Publications and source records attributed to Ian Eardley.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Urinary biomarker profiling in transitional cell carcinoma.

Urinary biomarkers or profiles that allow noninvasive detection of recurrent transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder are urgently needed. We obtained duplicate proteomic (SELDI) profiles from 227 subjects (118 TCC, 77 healthy controls and 32 controls with benign urological conditions) and used linear mixed effects models to identify peaks that are differentially expressed between TCC and controls and within TCC subgroups. A Random Forest classifier was trained on 130 profiles to develop an algorithm to predict the presence of TCC in a randomly selected initial test set (n = 54) and an independent validation set (n = 43) several months later. Twenty two peaks were differentially expressed between all TCC and controls (p < 10(-7)). However potential confounding effects of age, sex and analytical run were identified. In an age-matched sub-set, 23 peaks were differentially expressed between TCC and combined benign and healthy controls at the 0.005 significance level. Using the Random Forest classifier, TCC was predicted with 71.7% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity in the initial set and with 78.3% sensitivity and 65.0% specificity in the validation set after 6 months, compared with controls. Several peaks of importance were also identified in the linear mixed effects model. We conclude that SELDI profiling of urine samples can identify patients with TCC with comparable sensitivities and specificities to current tumor marker tests. This is the first time that reproducibility has been demonstrated on an independent test set analyzed several months later. Identification of the relevant peaks may facilitate multiplex marker assay development for detection of recurrent disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Proteomic analysis of primary cell lines identifies protein changes present in renal cell carcinoma.

New markers/targets for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are needed to enable earlier detection and monitoring of disease and therapeutic targeting. To identify such molecules, normal and RCC-derived primary cell lines have been used as a simplified model system for studying changes that accompany tumorigenesis. Short-term cultures allow enrichment of relevant cell types from tissue samples, which is balanced against the potential for in vitro changes. Examination of 3 proteins with altered expression in RCC tissue showed the maintenance of normal-tumour differences in culture, although some changes were apparent, including alteration in the isoform of aldolase. Comparative analysis of primary cell lines by 2-DE found 43 proteins up-regulated and 29 down-regulated in at least three out of five tumour cell lines. Many of the observed changes have been previously reported in RCC, including up-regulation of several glycolytic enzymes, vimentin and heat shock protein 27, validating the approach. Additionally, several novel changes in protein expression were found, including up-regulation of several proteins involved in actin cytoskeleton organisation such as radixin and moesin, two members of the septin family, and the actin bundling protein, fascin. Validation studies using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry indicate that several of these molecules may be useful as markers for RCC.

Blotting, Western↗
PubMed2006

Comparing vardenafil and sildenafil in the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction and risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a randomized, double-blind, pooled crossover study.

INTRODUCTION: Data from head-to-head clinical trials of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are scarce, making it difficult for clinicians to differentiate among these agents to select the most appropriate treatment for their patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: This randomized, double-blind, crossover head-to-head clinical trial compared patient preference, efficacy, and safety of vardenafil and sildenafil in men with ED and diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. METHODS: Prospective analysis was performed on two studies in which 1,057 men were randomized to vardenafil 20 mg (N = 530) or sildenafil 100 mg (2 x 50 mg encapsulated tablets) (N = 527) for 4 weeks. Following a 1-week washout, patients switched treatment for 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were asked about overall preference: "Overall, which medication do you prefer?", plus 11 other preference questions relating to their ED treatment. Efficacy assessments after each treatment period included the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF); Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary questions SEP2 and SEP3; Global Assessment Question (GAQ); and Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS). Data regarding adverse events were collected throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 931 men (mean age 57.9 years) were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Non-inferiority of vardenafil over sildenafil was achieved for overall preference (vardenafil 38.9%; sildenafil 34.5%; and no preference 26.6%). Additionally, the change from baseline in the EF domain score of the IIEF achieved nominal significance for vardenafil over sildenafil (10.00 vs. 9.40; P = 0.0052). Patients also had a higher percentage of positive responses for vardenafil for SEP2, SEP3, GAQ, and 12 of 19 questions on the TSS. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, double-blind, head-to-head trial in ED patients with cardiovascular risk factors demonstrated noninferiority of vardenafil for overall preference. Vardenafil achieved nominal statistical superiority over sildenafil for several frequently used efficacy measures. Both drugs were well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Urothelial differentiation in vesicoureteric reflux and other urological disorders of childhood: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The strong familial basis of vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) is well recognised, however little progress has been made in identifying the causative genes. In this study we have investigated whether human vesicoureteric reflux (VUR) is associated with the aberrant expression of urothelial differentiation-associated antigens in view of the VUR phenotype of the Uroplakin IIIa (UPIIIa) "knockout" mouse. METHODS: Samples of urothelium were collected from 13 children with primary VUR, four children with secondary VUR and from seven children with non-refluxing disorders of the urinary tract. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of five uroplakin (UP) and cytokeratin (CK) differentiation-restricted antigens, UPIa, UPIb, UPIIIa, CK13 and CK20. Samples were ranked blind according to immunohistochemical patterns relating to the differentiation-associated distributions of the five antigens and the results were analysed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: No objective differences in urothelial morphology or the expression of the five differentiation antigens were discernable in the urothelium of children with primary VUR, when compared with urothelium of children with a range of other pathology including VUR associated with duplication or pelvic renal ectopia, VUR secondary to outflow obstruction and non-refluxing upper tract obstruction. The p-values ranged from 0.168-0.651 and were not considered statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that primary VUR is not associated with any major, collective abnormality of urothelial differentiation in man. In particular our findings provide no support for the suggestion that abnormalities of UPIIIa expression are implicated in the aetiology of human primary VUR.

Antigens, Differentiation↗
PubMed2005

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer after curative resection represents a difficult clinical problem and a surgical challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a series of patients who underwent resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 64 patients who underwent surgical exploration with a view to cure for locally recurrent rectal cancer under the care of one surgeon between April 1997 and April 2004. Details were obtained on the primary tumor and the operation, the indication for investigation of recurrence, preoperative imaging, operative findings, morbidity and mortality, and histopathology. RESULTS: The median time interval between resection of primary tumor and surgery for locally recurrent disease was 31 (interquartile range, 21 to 48) months. Twenty-three patients had central disease, 10 patients had sacral involvement, 21 patients had pelvic sidewall involvement, and 10 patients had both sacral and sidewall involvement. Fifty-seven patients underwent resection of the tumor. Thirty-nine of the 57 patients underwent wide resection (abdominoperineal excision of rectum, anterior resection, or Hartmann's procedure) whereas 18 patients (31.6 percent) required radical resection (pelvic exenteration or sacrectomy). Curative, negative resection margins were obtained in 21 of 57 patients who had tumor excision (36.8 percent). Perioperative mortality was 1.6 percent. Significant postoperative morbidity occurred in 40 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that a significant proportion of patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer can undergo resection with negative margins.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Vardenafil is effective and well-tolerated for treating erectile dysfunction in a broad population of men, irrespective of age.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men of different age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective pooled subgroup analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, men from the general population with ED received either placebo or vardenafil 5, 10 or 20 mg over 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included the erectile function (EF) domain score from The International Index of Erectile Function, diary response rates to questions on vaginal penetration and maintenance of erection, and positive responses to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ) "Has the treatment you have been taking over the past 4 weeks improved your erections?'. The 1385 men were grouped by age (< 45, 45-64 and > or =65 years). RESULTS: At 12 weeks the EF domain scores approached 20 with vardenafil and 14 with placebo in men aged > or = 65 years (P < 0.03 vardenafil 5 mg vs placebo, P < 0.001 vardenafil 10 and 20 mg vs placebo). The corresponding scores were 22 and 14 in men aged 45-64 years and up to 24 and 16 in those aged <45 years (P < 0.03 vardenafil 5 mg vs placebo, P < 0.001 vardenafil 10 and 20 mg vs placebo). Vardenafil generated positive GAQ responses in approximately 71%, 76% and 85% of men aged <45, 45-64 and > or = 65 years (P < or = 0.001 vardenafil vs placebo). The corresponding placebo rates were 23%, 25% and 34%. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, rhinitis, flushing and dyspepsia, which were mild to moderate, transient and unrelated to age. CONCLUSION: Vardenafil is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for ED, irrespective of age.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Time from dosing to sexual intercourse attempts in men taking tadalafil in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and treated with tadalafil use the 36-h duration of effect of the drug, and to discern if the timing of intercourse attempts is influenced by patient age, baseline severity of ED, or previous experience with sildenafil citrate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 11 multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, 2102 patients with ED were randomized to a maximum of one dose per day of tadalafil 10 or 20 mg (1464 men), or placebo (638 men) with no time restrictions before attempting sexual activity after the dose. A post hoc analysis was used to determine the proportion of men with ED who attempted sexual intercourse during various intervals (>0 to < or = 1, >1 to < or = 4, and >4 to < or = 36, including >12 to < or = 36 h) after dosing with tadalafil or placebo over a 12-week period. Patients were stratified by age, baseline severity of ED, and previous history of sildenafil use. RESULTS: Of patients in different age groups and various ED severity, > or = 79% and > or = 53% chose to attempt sexual intercourse at least once during the 12-week treatment period at 4-36 and 12-36 h, respectively, after taking tadalafil. Regardless of previous experience with sildenafil, about a third of patients using tadalafil attempted intercourse a mean of at least once per week at 4-36 h after the dose over 12 weeks. Furthermore, 58% of patients attempted intercourse at least once during two intervals (>1 to < or = 4 h and >12 to < or = 36 h) after separate doses of tadalafil. CONCLUSION: Regardless of age, ED severity, or previous experience with sildenafil, most patients attempted sexual intercourse at least once at 12-36 h after one dose of tadalafil over a 12-week treatment period. Furthermore, by engaging in sexual intercourse at both earlier and later intervals after separate doses, most patients on treatment did not adhere to a fixed schedule of intimacy and thus took advantage of the 36-h duration.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil and tadalafil (taken as needed). After a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED (mean age 54 years) were randomized to receive sildenafil for 12 weeks followed by tadalafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started taking 25- or 50-mg sildenafil or 10-mg tadalafil and could titrate to find their optimum dose (25-, 50- or 100-mg sildenafil; 10- or 20-mg tadalafil). After completing both 12-week periods, patients chose which treatment to continue during an 8-week extension. Efficacy was measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. RESULTS: Of the 291 men who completed both treatments, 85 (29%) chose sildenafil and 206 (71%) chose tadalafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. The IIEF erectile function domain scores were 14.2 at baseline, 23.9 at endpoint on sildenafil, and 24.3 at endpoint on tadalafil (P = 0.08, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The mean per patient percentage success scores for SEP2 (penetration) were: baseline (46%), sildenafil (post-baseline 82%) and tadalafil (post-baseline 85%; P = 0.06, sildenafil vs tadalafil), and for SEP3 (successful intercourse) were: baseline (19%), sildenafil (post-baseline 72%), and tadalafil (post-baseline 77%; P = 0.003, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The only treatment-emergent adverse events that were reported by >5% of men were headache and flushing. CONCLUSIONS: In men with ED who were naïve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy, sildenafil and tadalafil were both effective and well tolerated. After treatment with sildenafil and tadalafil, 29% of men chose sildenafil and 71% chose tadalafil for ED therapy during an 8-week extension.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The efficacy of tadalafil in clinical populations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tadalafil in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) by demographic and ED characteristics, in patients having various comorbid medical conditions, and in patients receiving drug treatment for other medical conditions. METHODS: This is an analysis of 11 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with 2,102 men with a broad spectrum of ED etiology and various comorbid medical conditions as participants. The variables analyzed in this report included race, age, body mass index (BMI), ED etiology, ED severity, ED duration, smoking, prior sildenafil use, presence of comorbid conditions (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia), and treatment with antihypertensives or antidepressants. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tadalafil 10 mg (N=321), tadalafil 20 mg (N=1,143), or placebo (N=638). The primary efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in the erectile function (EF) domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and the mean per-patient percentage of "yes" responses to the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary question 3 (SEP3--successful intercourse). The Global Assessment Question 1 (GAQ) was evaluated, as was the percentage of men attaining a normal IIEF EF domain score at end point. RESULTS: Patients taking tadalafil 10 mg or 20 mg demonstrated significant improvement (P<0.005) from baseline to end point on the IIEF EF domain score in all subpopulations analyzed compared with patients receiving placebo. The mean-per-patient percentage of "yes" responses to SEP3 increased significantly in all subpopulations taking tadalafil compared with placebo (P<0.05). Tadalafil-treated patients had a significantly greater positive response rate on the GAQ in all subpopulations analyzed compared with placebo-treated patients (P<0.03) except for the tadalafil 10 mg cardiovascular subpopulation (placebo, 46.8%; tadalafil 10 mg, 71.0%; P=0.127). The percentage of positive responses ranged from 72% to 91% for patients on tadalafil 20 mg and from 52% to 94% for tadalafil 10 mg compared with a range of 20% to 47% for placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil was effective in improving erectile function across a wide spectrum of ED patients including patients with various comorbid conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: the female experience of men's attitudes to life events and sexuality (FEMALES) study.

INTRODUCTION: Much research has explored the experience of erectile dysfunction (ED) among men with ED, but far less attention has been paid to the perceptions and sexual experiences of the female partners of men with ED. AIM: The objective of this study was to characterize the attitudes, beliefs, and sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile difficulties. METHODS: Female partners of men with ED who had participated in the Men's Attitudes to Life Events and Sexuality (MALES) study were recruited for this research via mail or Internet, after their male partners consented to this contact. Female partners of men with ED (N = 293) responded to questionnaire measures assessing their frequency of sexual activity and the nature of their sexual experience, both before and after the development of their partner's ED, and in relation to their partner's use of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors. RESULTS: Women reported engaging in sexual activity significantly less frequently after their partner developed ED in comparison with before (P < 0.001). Moreover, significantly fewer women experienced sexual desire, arousal, or orgasm "almost always" or "most times," and significantly fewer women reported satisfaction with their sexual relationship after their partner developed ED, compared with before (P < 0.001). Decreases in female sexual satisfaction and frequency of orgasm were significantly related to the male partner's self-reported severity of ED (P < 0.01). The proportion of women who experienced sexual desire, arousal, and orgasm "almost always" or "most times" was significantly higher in the group whose partners were currently using a PDE5 inhibitor (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Erectile dysfunction has significant adverse effects on the female partner's sexual experience. Women with partners who were currently using PDE5 inhibitors had a more satisfying sexual experience than those whose partners did not use a PDE5 inhibitor.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Penetration and maintenance of erection with vardenafil: a time-from-dosing analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess success rates in ability to penetrate (Sexual Encounter Profile question 2 [SEP2]) and maintain erections to completion of intercourse (SEP3) from time of dosing to start of sexual activity in a retrospective analysis of two pivotal trials. METHODS: In two randomized, double-blind studies, men with ED for > 6 months received vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg or placebo for 12-26 weeks. Patients were instructed to start sexual activity 1 hour after dosing. In this retrospective pooled analysis, patient diary questions through week 12 were analyzed, providing attempt data was recorded 0-12 hours post-dose. Mean per-patient SEP2 and SEP3 success rates (intent-to-treat population) were calculated by time between dosing and start of sexual activity, from 0-12 hours through week 12. Least-square means and nominal p-values for differences versus placebo were derived by analysis of covariance with terms for baseline, study and treatment. RESULTS: Most attempts at sexual intercourse occurred 30-90 minutes after dosing: 88%-93% of attempts occurred within 120 minutes. SEP2 success rates in patients choosing to attempt sexual activity in each interval from < or = 15 minutes through the 4-8-hour interval were higher with vardenafil compared with placebo, while SEP3 success rates were greater with vardenafil for patients choosing to initiate sexual activity from < or = 15 min through the 8-12-hour interval. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events in patients receiving vardenafil included headache (11%-22%), flushing (6%-13%), rhinitis (5%-13%), and dyspepsia (2%-7%). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of two pivotal trials, vardenafil improved success rates compared with placebo in ED patients who attempted intercourse from as early as 15 minutes or less and through 4-8 hours after dosing in ability to penetrate (SEP2) and from as early as 15 minutes or less and through 8-12 hours after dosing in maintenance of erection (SEP3).

Coitus↗
PubMed2004

Vardenafil provides reliable efficacy over time in men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability of vardenafil efficacy and tolerability within 12 weeks in a broad population of men with erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of two pivotal, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted in 107 centers, 1650 men aged 18 years or older with ED received vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg on demand for 12 to 26 weeks. Outcome measures included the first-time and subsequent overall success rate until week 12 for diary entries regarding vaginal penetration (Sexual Encounter Profile [SEP]-2), erection maintenance (SEP-3), satisfaction with erection hardness, and overall satisfaction with the sexual experience. Mean efficacy was calculated for each patient during 12 weeks and then averaged for all patients within each treatment group. RESULTS: At baseline, the intention-to-treat population had moderate ED (International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score of 13). For SEP-2 (penetration), the first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 44% and 74% for placebo, 71% and 81% for vardenafil 5 mg, 76% and 86% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 76% and 91% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. For SEP-3 (maintenance), first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 25% and 56% for placebo, 51% and 76% for vardenafil 5 mg, 65% and 76% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 59% and 84% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. For overall satisfaction with the sexual experience, the first-attempt and subsequent success rate was 19% and 48% for placebo, 48% and 68% for vardenafil 5 mg, 57% and 72% for vardenafil 10 mg, and 56% and 79% for vardenafil 20 mg, respectively. The reliability of vardenafil was similar or slightly greater in sildenafil-naive subjects compared with prior sildenafil responders. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate headache, flushing, and rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil provides reliable efficacy for key erectile function parameters important to patients when continuing oral treatment for ED.

Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic↗
PubMed2004

In vitro assessment of decellularized porcine dermis as a matrix for urinary tract reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential of Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Swillington, UK), a natural matrix derived from decellularized porcine dermis, as a matrix for urological tissue engineering, and thus to develop an in vitro regimen for assessing the biocompatibility of potential biomaterials before experimentation in animal models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urinary tract-derived normal human urothelial (NHU) and smooth muscle (SM) cells were grown in monoculture as autologous cell lines. Permacol was assessed for its ability to support colonization by NHU and SM cells. The failure of the Permacol matrix to be infiltrated by SM cells was further investigated using the highly invasive EJ bladder cancer cell line. RESULTS: NHU cells readily attached and grew as a monolayer on the surface of Permacol. Cells stratified when the culture medium was supplemented with 2 mmol/L calcium. EJ cells initially grew on the surface and subsequently invaded the matrix, while SM cells only colonized the surface of Permacol when cocultured with NHU cells. Cytoxicity, evaluated by contact inhibition and conditioned-medium assays, excluded the presence of soluble toxins in the biomaterial. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a simple, reproducible and rigorous regimen for assessing potential biomaterials in vitro. Applying this system might reduce the use of animals and help to identify causes of potential bio-incompatibility. The inability of SM cells to penetrate the Permacol matrix suggests that required matrix-bound signalling factors are absent, possibly as a result of the procedures used for processing Permacol. Identifying the key regulatory factors that regulate SM cell growth and orchestrate regenerative processes in the urinary tract will be important for developing suitable biomaterials for the bladder.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of on-demand tadalafil (an oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor approved in many countries for treating erectile dysfunction, ED) in a Western European population of men with mild-to-severe ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized according to baseline severity of ED in a ratio of 3 : 1 to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and percentages of 'Yes' responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary Question 2 ('Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?') and Question 3 ('Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?'). Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction domains, selected questions of the IIEF, and the percentage of 'Yes' responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) at the last visit. Other analyses included the percentage of patients in each treatment group at endpoint with IIEF EF domain scores in the normal range (>26), the frequency of intercourse attempts and mean per-patient intercourse success rate at various times after dosing. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53 years and 80% had a history of ED of > or = 1 year. The mean baseline EF domain score was 13.5, with 40.5% of patients in the severe category. Tadalafil improved mean EF domain scores by 11.1, vs 0.4 for placebo (P < 0.001). In addition, 73.9% of sexual intercourse attempts were successful (SEP-Q3) in tadalafil-treated patients, compared with 29.9% in placebo-treated patients during the period after baseline (P < 0.001). Tadalafil significantly improved the mean IIEF intercourse satisfaction (5.1, tadalafil; 1.1, placebo) and overall satisfaction domain scores (3.9, tadalafil; 0.5, placebo), P < 0.001. GAQs used to assess the overall effect of the treatment indicated that tadalafil was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) in improving erections (82.1%, tadalafil; 23.1%, placebo) and sexual activity (78.6% and 17.3%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia. These adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil improved erectile function and was well tolerated when taken by men from Western Europe with mild-to-severe ED.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2004

Vardenafil improves erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction irrespective of disease severity and disease classification.

BACKGROUND: Vardenafil (Levitra) is a potent and selective phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor used in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED). This retrospective subgroup analysis assessed the effectiveness of vardenafil treatment in men with ED of different baseline severity and disease classification. METHODS: Data from two pivotal, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials enrolling men from the general ED population who received placebo or vardenafil 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg during a 12-week treatment period were retrospectively analysed, stratifying by psychogenic, organic, and mixed ED disease classification as determined by the investigator. Efficacy endpoints included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-Erectile Function (EF) domain score, per-patient diary response rates to questions on penile insertion [Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP-2)] and maintenance of erection (SEP-3) and rates of positive response to the Global Assessment Question (GAQ). RESULTS: Data from 1,385 men who received at least one dose of study medication and had pre- and post-baseline measures of efficacy available (intent-to-treat population) are presented. At baseline 37-41% of patients had severe ED, 30-34% moderate, 22% mild-to-moderate and 6-8% mild ED. At baseline, 46-51% of patients were considered to have an organic cause for ED, 13-16% psychogenic ED, and 36-38% mixed classification of ED. For all classifications and for mild-to-moderate to severe ED, men treated with 10 or 20 mg of vardenafil showed statistically and clinically significant improvements (P < 0.001) in IIEF-EF scores, diary response rates to the SEP-2 and SEP-3 questions, and GAQ as compared with those given placebo. The greatest improvements relative to placebo were noted in patients with more severe ED. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, flushing, rhinitis, dyspepsia, and were dose-related, mostly mild to moderate in intensity and consistent with the class. CONCLUSIONS: Vardenafil improves EF in men with ED irrespective of investigator-determined classification and baseline ED severity.

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗