Biomedical subjects

Ian J Cook

Publications and source records attributed to Ian J Cook.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Functional esophageal disorders.

Functional esophageal disorders represent processes accompanied by typical esophageal symptoms (heartburn, chest pain, dysphagia, globus) that are not explained by structural disorders, histopathology-based motor disturbances, or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is the preferred diagnosis when reflux esophagitis or excessive esophageal acid exposure is present or when symptoms are closely related to acid reflux events or respond to antireflux therapy. A singular, well-defined pathogenetic mechanism is unavailable for any of these disorders; combinations of sensory and motor abnormalities involving both central and peripheral neural dysfunction have been invoked for some. Treatments remain empirical, although the efficacy of several interventions has been established in the case of functional chest pain. Management approaches that modulate central symptom perception or amplification often are required once local provoking factors (eg, noxious esophageal stimuli) have been eliminated. Future research directions include further determination of fundamental mechanisms responsible for symptoms, development of novel management strategies, and definition of the most cost-effective diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Assessment of intraluminal impedance for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing in healthy adults.

Intraluminal impedance, a nonradiological method for assessing bolus flow within the gut, may be suitable for investigating pharyngeal disorders. This study evaluated an impedance technique for the detection of pharyngeal bolus flow during swallowing. Patterns of pharyngoesophageal pressure and impedance were simultaneously recorded with videofluoroscopy in 10 healthy volunteers during swallowing of liquid, semisolid, and solid boluses. The timing of bolus head and tail passage recorded by fluoroscopy was correlated with the timing of impedance drop and recovery at each recording site. Bolus swallowing produced a drop in impedance from baseline followed by a recovery to at least 50% of baseline. The timing of the pharyngeal and esophageal impedance drop correlated with the timing of the arrival of the bolus head. In the pharynx, the timing of impedance recovery was delayed relative to the timing of clearance of the bolus tail. In contrast, in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and proximal esophagus, the timing of impedance recovery correlated well with the timing of clearance of the bolus tail. Impedance-based estimates of pharyngoesophageal bolus clearance time correlated with true pharyngoesophageal bolus clearance time. Patterns of intraluminal impedance recorded in the pharynx during bolus swallowing are therefore more complex than those in the esophagus. During swallowing, mucosal contact between the tongue base and posterior pharyngeal wall prolongs the duration of pharyngeal impedance drop, leading to overestimation of bolus tail timing. Therefore, we conclude that intraluminal impedance measurement does not accurately reflect the bolus transit in the pharynx but does accurately reflect bolus transit across the UES and below.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Impaired proximal colonic motor response to rectal mechanical and chemical stimulation in obstructed defecation.

PURPOSE: Both motor and sensory dysfunction have been implicated in the pathogenesis of obstructed defecation. We have found that despite preservation of a defecatory urge, patients with obstructed defecation have lost the normal predefecatory augmentation in frequency and amplitude of colonic propagating pressure waves. This observation might be explainable by either altered rectal sensory thresholds or by dysfunction in the colonic motor apparatus. By measuring rectal sensory thresholds and proximal colonic motor responses to rectal mechanical and chemical stimuli, we tested the hypotheses that central perception of rectal stimuli is enhanced and that the proximal colonic motor response to rectal stimulation is attenuated. METHODS: In seven patients with obstructed defecation and ten healthy volunteers we measured proximal colonic motor responses and sensory thresholds in response to both rectal balloon distention and rectal instillation of chenodeoxycholic acid. RESULTS: In controls, but not in patients, rectal mechanical distention significantly reduced and chemical stimulation significantly increased the frequency of proximal colonic propagating sequences (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in rectal sensory thresholds between patients and controls. Prior instillation of chenodeoxycholic acid significantly reduced (P < 0.03) maximum tolerated balloon volume and defecatory urge volume to comparable degree in both patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: In obstructed defecation, 1) the normal rectocolonic pathways mediating stimulation-induced proximal colonic propagating pressure waves are nonfunctioning, and. 2) central perception of these rectal stimuli is normal.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The pathophysiology of constipation in the syndrome of obstructed defecation is unknown. Using 24-hour pancolonic manometric recordings of the unprepared colon to record basal pressures and spontaneous defecation episodes, we tested the hypothesis that the frequency, timing, or spatial distribution of propagating colonic pressure waves is abnormal in patients with obstructed defecation. METHODS: In 11 patients with obstructed defecation and 16 healthy controls, pressures were recorded using a nasocolonic catheter that was positioned such that 16 recording sites spanned the unprepared colon at 7.5-cm intervals. RESULTS: The overall frequency of propagating sequences (PS) in the colon did not differ between patients and controls. When compared with controls, patients had a significant increase in the frequency of retrograde and antegrade PS (P < 0.05) in the left colon and a significant reduction in the amplitude of propagating pressure waves throughout the entire colon (P < 0.03). Defecation occurred in 6 of 11 patients and 9 of 16 controls. In the 15 minutes before defecation, controls showed a highly significant increase in frequency (P = 0.001) and amplitude (P = 0.01) of PS. In contrast, patients did not demonstrate this or the typical spatiotemporal organization of PS normally observed before expulsion of stool. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with obstructed defecation lack the normal predefecatory augmentation in frequency and amplitude of propagating pressure waves and lack the normal stereotypic spatiotemporal patterning of colonic pressure waves that would normally culminate in effective expulsion of stool.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Intrabolus pressure gradient identifies pathological constriction in the upper esophageal sphincter during flow.

Propulsion of a bolus through the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is driven by a pressure drop in the direction of flow against frictional resisting force. Basic mechanics suggest that the axial rate of drop in intrabolus pressure (IBP), i.e., the intrabolus pressure gradient (IBPG), should be locally sensitive to abnormal constriction. We sought to quantify space-time patterns of IBP and IBPG that correlate with pathological disruption to transsphincteric bolus transport. High-resolution high-fidelity perfused manometry was applied concurrent with videofluoroscopy in 6 healthy controls and 10 patients with restricted UES opening and 4 bolus volumes. Pressures were interpolated spatially and displayed as space-time isocontours with bolus head and tail trajectories superimposed to identify the IBP domain. IBP and IBPG were averaged over an approximately steady period of transsphincteric flow. The axial location and magnitude of maximum IBPG were quantified for each swallow relative to the location of the abnormal restriction. We found that average hypopharyngeal IBP and locally maximal IBPG were significantly higher in the patient group (P < 0.001), whereas the maximum IBPG was insensitive to bolus volume, and the locations of maximum IBPG in the patient group were well correlated with axial locations of maximal UES constriction (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). Space-time structure of IBP and IBPG correlated qualitatively with swallow dysfunction. Because IBPG reflects pressure force driving the bolus against frictional force in the UES, IBPG reflects local changes in frictional resistance from pathological constriction during bolus flow. Consequently, the location and magnitude of IBPG reflect the existence and location of abnormal constriction, and IBP and IBPG structure reflect decompensation of the pharyngeal swallow.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Biomechanics of failed deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation in neurogenic dysphagia.

Our aims were to examine the etiology and biomechanical properties of the nonrelaxing upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the relationship between UES opening and failed relaxation. We examined the relationships among swallowed bolus volume, intrabolus pressure, sagittal UES diameter, the pharyngeal swallow response, and geniohyoid shortening in 18 patients with failed UES relaxation, 23 healthy aged controls, and 15 with Zenker's diverticulum. Etiology of failed UES relaxation was 56% medullary disease, 33% Parkinson's or extrapyramidal disease; and 11% idiopathic. Extent of UES opening ranged from absent to normal and correlated with preservation of the pharyngeal swallow response (P = 0.012) and geniohyoid shortening (P = 0.046). Intrabolus pressure was significantly greater compared with aged controls (P < 0.001) or Zenker's diverticulum (P < 0.001). The bolus volume-dependent increase in intrabolus pressure evident in controls was not observed in failed UES relaxation. The nonrelaxing UES therefore displays a constant loss of sphincter compliance throughout the full, and potentially normal, range of expansion during opening. Adequacy of UES opening is influenced by the degree of preservation of the pharyngeal swallow response and hyolaryngeal traction. In contrast, the stenotic UES displays a static loss of compliance, only apparent once the limit of sphincter expansion is reached.

Adult↗