Lack of a pre-emptive effect of low-dose ketamine on postoperative pain following oral surgery.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pre- vs postincisional low-dose iv ketamine on postoperative pain in outpatients scheduled for oral surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously saline before and after surgery in Group 1, ketamine 300 microg x kg(-1) iv before and saline after surgery in Group 2, saline before and ketamine 300 microg x kg(-1) iv after surgery in Group 3. Postoperative analgesia consisted of iv proparacetamol and ketoprofen. Rescue analgesia consisted of nalbuphine 200 microg x kg(-1) iv. Analgesia at home consisted of oral ketoprofen, and acetaminophen with codeine as rescue analgesia. A telephone interview was conducted on the first and second postoperative days. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups with respect to pain scores, the number of patients requiring nalbuphine in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), (36.7%, 38.7%, and 39.5% for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively), or nalbuphine consumption in the PACU (66.5 microg x kg(-1) +/- 16.8, 75.9 microg x kg(-1) +/- 17.5, 66.7 microg x kg(-1) +/- 21.6 for Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively). The number of rescue analgesic tablets taken at home, and time to first request for rescue analgesia, sedation scores, or side-effects were similar amongst groups. No patient required nalbuphine in the ambulatory care unit. CONCLUSIONS: There was no benefit to pre-emptive administration of ketamine 300 microg x kg(-1) iv whether administered pre- or postoperatively.