Biomedical subjects

Ignace T C Hooge

Publications and source records attributed to Ignace T C Hooge.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Disengaging attention sets the temporal limit of attentive tracking.

At first sight, recent studies investigating the temporal limits of attentive tracking show contradictory outcomes. Attentively tracking an object in an ambiguous apparent motion display can have an upper limit of around 0.4 revolutions per second (rps) [Horowitz, T. S., Holcombe, A. O., Wolfe, J. M., Arsenio, H. C., & DiMase, J. S. (2004). Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade. Journal of Vision, 4, 585-603] or 1rps [Verstraten, F. A., Cavanagh, P., & Labianca, A. T. (2000). Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention. Vision Research, 40, 3651-3664.]. Here, we demonstrate that this difference depends on presentation conditions: an important determinant for the temporal limit of attentive tracking appears to be the duty cycle. Tracking performance at high(er) rates decreases to chance with increasing duty cycle, while at low rates duty cycle hardly has an effect on performance. Results are discussed in terms of (dis)engagement of attention.

Attention↗

PubMed2006

A quantitative measure for the uniformity of fixation density: The Voronoi method.

In order to characterize the uniformity of fixation density, we propose aquantitative measure based on Voronoi diagrams, in which cells are defined around fixation locations. We examined how normalized cell size distributions are related to homogeneous and inhomogeneous fixation densities. Two possible measures for use with the Voronoi method are discussed. Both show good correlation with subjective visual evaluations of the uniformity of fixation densities. Not only are these measures objective and quantitative, they also have a simple intuitive meaning: They may be thought of as reflecting the clustering of fixations.

Eye Movements↗

PubMed2005

Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink.

Observers often miss the 2nd of 2 visual targets (first target [T1] and second target [T2]) when these targets are presented closely in time; the attentional blink (AB). The authors hypothesized that the AB occurs because the attentional response to T2 is delayed by T1 processing, causing T2 to lose a competition for attention to the item that follows it. The authors investigated this hypothesis by determining whether the AB is attenuated when T2 is precued. The results from 4 experiments showed that the duration and magnitude of the AB were substantially reduced when T2 was precued. The observed improvement in T2 report did not occur at the expense of T1 report, suggesting that processing of T1 was already completed or was at least protected when the cue was presented. The authors conclude that, during the AB, there is a delay between detection and the selection of target candidates for consolidation in short-term memory.

Attention↗

PubMed2005

Faces retain attention.

In the present study, we investigated whether faces have an advantage in retaining attention over other stimulus categories. In three experiments, subjects were asked to focus on a central go/no-go signal before classifying a concurrently presented peripheral line target. In Experiment 1, the go/no-go signal could be superimposed on photographs of upright famous faces, matching inverted faces, or meaningful objects. Experiments 2 and 3 tested upright and inverted unfamiliar faces, printed names, and another class of meaningful objects in an identical design. A fourth experiment provided a replication of Experiment 1, but with a 1,000-msec stimulus onset asynchrony between the onset of the central face/nonface stimuli and the peripheral targets. In all the experiments, the presence of an upright face significantly delayed target response times, in comparison with each of the other stimulus categories. These results suggest a general attentional bias, so that it is particularly difficult to disengage processing resources from faces.

Attention↗

PubMed2003

Nature of variability in saccades.

We studied the variability in saccades by comparing the peak velocities of saccades with the same target amplitude made with different actual amplitudes. We tested three hypotheses: the pulse-height noise hypothesis (peak velocity and amplitude vary proportionally), the localization noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity lie along the main sequence), and the independent noise hypothesis (variability in amplitude and peak velocity are independent). We measured eye orientation in two experiments by a scleral coil and a video system. Surprisingly, the main source of variability of saccades depended on the measurement system used. A combination of localization noise and independent noise best describes the data obtained by the video system. The independent noise (e.g., measurement inaccuracy) was the main source of variability. For the scleral coils, the variability was considerably larger than for the less accurate video system. The pulse-height noise hypothesis best describes this additional variability. Therefore we conclude that pulse-height noise is the main source of variability in saccades measured with scleral coils. We discuss the influence of scleral coils on saccade generation and suggest that a change in motor strategy due to the discomfort of wearing the coils might be the cause of the increased variability.

Humans↗