Biomedical subjects

Inger Sandanger

Publications and source records attributed to Inger Sandanger.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Emotional distress as a predictor for low back disability: a prospective 12-year population-based study.

STUDY DESIGN: A population-based, prospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: To study associations between emotional distress and long-term low back disability in a general population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In primary and hospital care studies, emotional, cognitive, and personality factors have been associated with low back disability, while the association between distress and novel back pain episodes has been uncertain. METHODS: A randomly drawn cohort of 1152 occupationally active persons aged 20-55 years was interviewed with a comprehensive psychosocial questionnaire in 1990, and was followed for 12 years in national registers over sickness, rehabilitation, and disability benefits. Data on emotional distress, earlier low back pain (LBP), education, life style, psychosocial, and work-related factors were collected at baseline. RESULTS: Long-term benefits due to low back disability were granted to 131 persons (11.4%) in the follow-up period. In multivariate analysis, earlier LBP, emotional distress, low grade of education, and high physical job stress were associated with low back disability. Persons with both emotional distress and earlier back pain were most at risk for disability (hazard ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.60-5.29). Persons with emotional distress but no earlier episodes of LBP had no increased risk for low back disability (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.34-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: Emotional distress is a predictor for low back disability in persons with earlier LBP, but not in persons without. To prevent low back disability, emotional distress should be considered and treated in persons with LBP.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Return of depressed men: changes in distribution of depression and symptom cases in Norway between 1990 and 2001.

BACKGROUND: Women's elevated risk of depression compared to men is a common finding in psychiatric epidemiology. Studies conducted in the 1950s and 1970s, however, documented approximately equal prevalence of sex rates. AIM: This study investigated changes in depression rates between 1990 and 2001 in Norway. Further, differences in severity were examined between men and women. METHOD: A study population (later to be called OsLof) was established in 1990, supplemented in 2001, and analysed as two cross-sectional datasets to compare sex and age differences in ICD-10 diagnoses and HSCL-25> or =1.75 caseness. Organic depression and the DSM-IV Major Depressive Episode were also examined in 2001. RESULTS: There was no significant change in the prevalence of depression or HSCL-25 caseness from 1990 to 2001. However, a major shift in prevalence occurred over time within the 18-34 year old age category with significantly higher rates among younger men (1% to 10%) and lowered rates among younger women (10% to 4%). Among persons depressed, no significant differences were found for severity between the sexes. LIMITATIONS: A selection of healthier participants than found in the source population might have resulted in lower prevalence than real. CONCLUSION: There was no indication of an overall increase in depression from 1990 to 2001, neither by diagnosis nor by symptom checklist scores. However, a major shift in prevalence occurred within the 18-34 year old age category with significantly higher rates among younger men and lowered rates among younger women. No sex differences existed in terms of severity of depression.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

The impact of psychosocial and organizational working conditions on the mental health of female cleaning personnel in Norway.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the association between psychosocial and organizational work conditions and mental health among women employed in the cleaning profession in Norway. METHODS: Self-report questionnaires were mailed to 661 cleaning staff personnel from seven cleaning organizations in seven different cities across Norway. The response rate was 64%, of which 374 (88%) respondents were women. The questionnaires assessed socio-demographic information and employment history, work organization, and psychosocial working conditions. The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL-25) was included to assess mental health. RESULTS: On average, respondents were 43 years old and reported 10.8 years of experience working in the cleaning industry. The proportion of women scoring a HSCL-25 equal to or above 1.75 was 17.5%, which was higher than the average prevalence of mental health problems among working Norwegian women (8.4%). A factor analysis of the questions specific to the psychosocial work environment identified the following four underlying dimensions: leadership, co-workers, time pressure/control, and information/knowledge. Two of these, poor satisfaction with leadership (OR = 3.6) and poor satisfaction with co-workers (OR = 2.3), were significantly related to mental health. In addition, having contact with colleagues less than once a day (OR = 2.4) and not being ethnically Norwegian (OR = 3.0) increased the risk for mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Mental health problems are frequent among female cleaning professionals in Norway. Our results indicate that quality of leadership, collaboration with co-workers, and ethnicity were significantly associated with mental health.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Cigarette smoking and incidence of first depressive episode: an 11-year, population-based follow-up study.

Smoking has been found to be associated with depression. Biologic hypotheses support causation in both directions. This study examined the association between cigarette smoking and a subsequent first depression. In 1990, 2,014 adults in Norway were interviewed about their lifestyle and mental health. A 2001 reinterview by trained interviewers defined the study cohort of 1,190 participants. The cases were those who experienced a first depression whose onset was estimated to occur during the follow-up period, based on retrospective assessment by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision). Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard rate of depression during follow-up. Alternative explanations for a direct causal influence from smoking on subsequent depression were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The risk of depression was four times as high for heavy smokers compared with never smokers. A dose-response relation with an increasing hazard for past smokers and for an increasing number of cigarettes smoked per day for current smokers was found. Similarly, increasing smoking time was associated with increasing risk. Failure of other plausible alternatives to explain the observed association between smoking and depression might reflect a direct causal influence of smoking on depression.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Methodological issues concerning lifetime medically unexplained and medically explained symptoms of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview: a prospective 11-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (a) to elucidate the methodological problems arising when examining lifetime symptom data by exploring the accuracy of recall of medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) and medically explained symptoms (MES) in the general population, based on interviews using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) Somatoform Section C, in 1990 and 2001, and (b) to find predictors for failure at follow-up to recall symptoms reported previously at baseline (i.e., symptoms "lost"). METHODS: Four hundred twenty-one persons (response rate, 69.6%; 242 women and 179 men) were reinterviewed in 2001 from a baseline population of 605. Thirty-eight clinically significant MUS and MES were assessed. Linear multiple regression analyses with the numbers of MUS-lost (medically unexplained symptoms lost to recall) and MES-lost (medically explained symptoms lost to recall) as dependent variables were undertaken to find factors affecting symptom loss. RESULTS: A wide range of individual symptoms (22-100%) were lost to recall at follow-up, indicating a large degree of measurement error, mainly due to faulty recall. The number of symptoms recalled when they were grouped was better (approximately 50% for "1-3" symptoms). Recall variability and MUS/MES transition over time undermined the credibility of this distinction. Gender and age emerged as significant (P<.01) predictors for MUS-lost, and a decrease in physical morbidity for MES-lost. Men tended to forget more symptoms than women, and younger respondents with high levels of baseline MUS remembered slightly better at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lifetime symptom data elicited in community surveys by such instruments as the CIDI should be viewed with caution. Methodological errors weakening data credibility could lead to false impressions of true change over time. A MUS/MES distinction is difficult to maintain.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Is women's mental health more susceptible than men's to the influence of surrounding stress?

BACKGROUND: Most epidemiological population studies have demonstrated that women suffer more anxiety and depression than men. A higher level of stress, greater vulnerability to stress, and a non-additive effect of private/domestic and occupational obligations on women have been suggested as an explanation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine if women's mental health is more susceptible than men's to the influence of surrounding stress. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional, random sample of the population resulted in 651 men and 626 women, all of whom were employed, participating in the study. Participants were interviewed using face-to-face standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: Younger women experienced more stressful relationship events, illness events and network events than men of the same age. Relationship events were more important for men as they grew older, and interacted with other stress to increase anxiety and depression symptoms. Stressful illness events were more strongly related to anxiety/depression symptoms in women over 40 than in men of the same age, and interacted with work stress to increase symptom scores. CONCLUSION: Stress was more strongly related to symptoms in women, suggesting that they may have a greater susceptibility to surrounding stress, and to somatic illness stress. This might contribute to the sex difference in psychiatric illness.

Adult↗