PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Iona Alexander

Publications and source records attributed to Iona Alexander.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Auditory evoked visual awareness following sudden ocular blindness: an EEG and TMS investigation.

Neurophysiological and neuroanatomical studies have provoked controversy about whether the visual cortex may be more modifiable than previously believed. Auditory processing is enhanced in blind compared to sighted people, and the enhancement might reflect encroachment of auditory transmission onto visual cortex. To address this issue, we recorded the auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) correlated with auditory related paradoxical visual awareness in a subject with traumatic total late-onset blindness. We found that (1) there was auditory related brain activity over the occipital visual scalp regions starting from a very early stage (< 80 ms) and (2) this occipital activity was significantly different between "visually aware" and "visually unaware" responses in the P1 (40-80 ms) component following meaningful stimuli. There was also a significant difference between responses with and without visual awareness in the N1 (100-120 ms) component following either tones or meaningful stimuli. The phosphenes accompanying auditory stimuli in the ERP experiment were always perceived to be directly in front of the subject and this was reproduced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the blind primary visual cortex and by sudden sounds delivered to the side or behind the subject. The TMS induced phosphenes were restricted to the central part of the space and were, at least qualitatively, the same as those induced by sounds. The results are clear evidence that human perceptual functions can be reorganized after sudden, late-onset, total ocular blindness.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

Chronostasis without voluntary action.

In a previous study we explored auditory chronostasis and suggested an arousal account of this temporal illusion rather than one dependent on backdating actions to the onset of a motor event. Here we present three experiments designed to distinguish between two competing accounts of the mechanisms underlying the illusion. Experiment 1 investigated whether voluntary movements are necessary for the illusion to occur. Experiment 2 sought to clarify whether auditory chronostasis occurs when the intervals to be judged are continuous (temporally contiguous) rather than separate events. Experiment 3 was designed to establish whether increased task demands account for the illusion. Together the results from these experiments show that chronostasis is an illusion that is not dependent on voluntary action, can occur without a change in the spatial location of the stimulus (thus precluding an account based on spatial attention), occurs with discrete as well as continuous events, and is affected by the salience of the termination of the event to be timed rather than the onset. Collectively these findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying chronostasis are best explained by an arousal hypothesis since neither attention nor backdating to action can account for the commonalities between chronostasis in the auditory, visual and tactile domains.

Acoustic Stimulation↗