PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Isabelle Gasquet

Publications and source records attributed to Isabelle Gasquet.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

The Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS): a validation study.

BACKGROUND: To examine the psychometric properties of the Adolescent Depression Rating Scale (ADRS), a new measure was specifically designed to evaluate adolescent depression. METHODS: The 11-item clinician-report and 44-item self-report versions of the ADRS were developed from a qualitative phase involving interviews of experts and adolescents. These two instruments were then administered to 402 French speaking adolescents with and without depressive disorders. Item distribution, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity and factorial structure were assessed. RESULTS: After reduction procedures, a 10-item clinician version and a 10-item self-report version were obtained. The ADRS demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha Cronbach coefficient >.70). It also discriminated better between adolescents with and without depression than the Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13). CONCLUSION: The ADRS is a useful, short, clinician-report and self-report scale to evaluate adolescent depression. Further studies to replicate our findings and evaluate ADRS sensitivity to effects of treatment and psychometric properties in populations of adolescents with several psychiatric disorders are warranted.

Adolescent↗

Prevalence and factors associated with alcohol and drug-related disorders in prison: a French national study.

BACKGROUND: Most studies measuring substance-use disorders in prisons focus on incoming or on remand prisoners and are generally restricted to drugs. However, there is evidence that substance use initiation or continuation occurs in prison, and that alcohol use is common. The aim of this study is 1) to assess prevalence of both drug and alcohol abuse and dependence (DAD/AAD) in a national randomised cohort of French prisoners, short or long-term sentence 2) to assess the risk factors associated with DAD/AAD in prison. a stratified random strategy was used to select 1) 23 prisons among the different types of prison 2) 998 prisoners. Diagnoses were assessed according to a standardized procedure, each prisoner being assessed by two psychiatrists, one junior, using a structured interview (MINI 5 plus), and one senior, completing the procedure with an open clinical interview. At the end of the interview the clinicians met and agreed on a list of diagnoses. Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) was also used. RESULTS: More than a third of prisoners presented either AAD or DAD in the last 12 months. Cannabis was the most frequent drug and just under a fifth of prisoners had AAD. AAD and DAD were clearly different for the following: socio-demographic variables, childhood history, imprisonment characteristics, psychiatric comorbidity and Cloninger's TCI. Profiles of AAD in prison are similar to type II alcoholism. CONCLUSION: Regular screening of AAD/DAD in prison, and specific treatment programmes taking into account differences between prisoners with an AAD and prisoners with a DAD should be a public health priority in prison.

Adolescent↗

Prevalence of mental disorders in French prisons for men.

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric surveys conducted in prison populations find high prevalence rates, but diagnoses may be difficult in this particular context. None of these surveys have been conducted in France. METHODS: 800 incarcerated male were sampled at random. Each prisoner was interviewed by a group of 2 clinicians, at least one of them being a senior psychiatrist. One of the clinicians used a structured clinical interview which generated DSM IV diagnosis (MINI plus); the second completed the procedure with an open clinical interview. RESULTS: Prevalence rates for a diagnosis given independently by both clinicians and for a consensual diagnosis were respectively: 3.8% (6.2%) for schizophrenia, 17.9% (24%) for major depressive disorder, 12.0% (17.7%) for generalized anxiety and 10.8% (14.6%) for drug dependence. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric diagnosis can be difficult to interpret in prison, especially using traditional standardized interviews. The approach proposed here, with good reliability and closer to a day-to-day clinical practice, yields high prevalence rates.

Adult↗

Influence of the severity of stress urinary incontinence on quality of life, health care seeking, and treatment: A national cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms in women and to evaluate the severity of these symptoms and resulting functional impairment with regard to urinary symptoms, quality of life (QoL) impairment, medical care seeking, and care facilities. METHODS: A national population based, cross-sectional study in France was conducted through an anonymous questionnaire that was completed by telephone. A randomized sample was extracted from the French telephone directory, December 2002 to March 2003. The main outcome measures were symptom severity, functional impairment, non SUI-related urinary symptoms, Contilife QoL scale, medical care seeking, and treatment. In total, 6,675 women aged 18-70 were selected and 5,160 questionnaires were completed and analyzed. RESULTS: The point-prevalence of SUI symptoms was 19.5% (1.1% for individuals with severe symptoms; 2.8% for those with severe functional impairment). Symptom severity and functional impairment were associated with older age, longer duration of symptoms, higher frequency of comorbid urinary symptoms, and altered QoL (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SUI symptoms are frequent in French women, causing embarrassment and negatively affecting their QoL. Though some could benefit from an effective therapy, only the most severely affected women who report SUI symptoms seek help and receive treatment.

Adolescent↗

Roles and practices of general practitioners and psychiatrists in management of depression in the community.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about depressed patients' profiles and how they are managed. The aim of the study is to compare GPs and psychiatrists for 1 degrees) sociodemographic and clinical profile of their patients considered as depressed 2 degrees) patterns of care provision. METHODS: The study design is an observational cross-sectional study on a random sample of GPs and psychiatrists working in France. Consecutive inclusion of patients seen in consultation considered as depressed by the physician. GPs enrolled 6,104 and psychiatrists 1,433 patients. DATA COLLECTED: sociodemographics, psychiatric profile, environmental risk factors of depression and treatment. All clinical data were collected by participating physicians; there was no direct independent clinical assessment of patients to check the diagnosis of depressive disorder. RESULTS: Compared to patients identified as depressed by GPs, those identified by psychiatrists were younger, more often urban (10.5% v 5.4% - OR = 2.4), educated (42.4% v 25.4% - OR = 3.9), met DSM-IV criteria for depression (94.6% v 85.6% - OR = 2.9), had been hospitalized for depression (26.1% v 15.6% - OR = 2.0) and were younger at onset of depressive problems (all adjusted p < .001). No difference was found for psychiatric and somatic comorbidity, suicide attempt and severity of current depression. Compared to GPs, psychiatrists more often prescribed tricyclics and very novel antidepressants (7.8% v 2.3% OR = 5.0 and 6.8% v 3.0% OR = 3.8) with longer duration of antidepressant treatment. GPs' patients received more "non-conventional" treatment (8.8% v 2.4% OR = 0.3) and less psychotherapy (72.2% v 89.1% OR = 3.1) (all adjusted p < .001). CONCLUSION: Differences between patients mainly concerned educational level and area of residence with few differences regarding clinical profile. Differences between practices of GPs and psychiatrists appear to reflect more the organization of the French care system than the competence of providers.

Adult↗

Patient satisfaction with psychotropic drugs: sensitivity to change and relationship to clinical status, quality-of-life, compliance and effectiveness of treatment. Results from a nation-wide 6-month prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To see if patient satisfaction with psychotropics (PSP) could be used as a patient-oriented outcome variable in the evaluation of PSP drugs in clinical epidemiological studies, relationships between PSP, clinical status, QoL, compliance and the type of antipsychotic were analyzed. Elements of validation of PSP were also assessed. METHOD: In a 6-month prospective study, 933 schizophrenic outpatients with initiation or change to their antipsychotic treatment were enrolled. Psychiatrists completed five CGI-SCH scales (positive, negative, cognitive, depressive and global), hospitalization, compliance, and prescription variables. Patients completed PSP, EuroQoL scales, sexual function and compliance variables. RESULTS: A satisfactory structural equation model was obtained showing significant relationships PSP/compliance (coef.=0.16), QoL/PSP (coef.=0.37), clinical status/QoL (coef.=0.61), clinical status/compliance (coef.=0.09). Patients receiving olanzapine were more satisfied than patients receiving other atypicals (coef.=012) and had better clinical status than patients treated with typicals (coef.=0.08). Evolution of PSP was related to clinical status, QoL, and continuation of treatment (all P<001). Sensitivity to change of PSP was moderate (effect size=0.2). CONCLUSION: PSP produced consistent results in relation to validated outcome variables. However, a single-item measure was not sufficiently sensitive to change. Multi-item questionnaires evaluating different dimensions are needed.

Adult↗

Predictive factors of the number and the dose of anti-psychotics in a cohort of schizophrenic patients.

BACKGROUND: Anti-psychotic prescription in schizophrenia is characterised in Europe by frequent associations and high doses. Nevertheless, few longitudinal epidemiological studies have explored anti-psychotic prescriptions. AIM: (1) To describe the evolution of prescription patterns across time; (2) to determine risk factors for prescription of high doses of anti-psychotics and for anti-psychotic combinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three thousand four hundred seventy three subjects were included in 1993. Data collected in 1993 and subsequently in 1996 and 1999, provided information on demographics, clinical status and prescription. In 1996, the response rate was 68.5% and 56.7% in 1999. RESULTS: The number of anti-psychotics prescribed slightly decreased across time, while doses remained high for one-third of the patients. The factors predicting dose were: dose at previous evaluation, class of anti-psychotic and clinical severity. The factors predicting the number of anti-psychotics were: previous number and class of anti-psychotic and clinical severity. CONCLUSION: Higher dosage and combinations were related more to physicians' habits than to patient characteristics, as is frequently observed in chronic disease.

Adult↗

[Psychotropic drug use in France: changes over time and comparison with other European countries].

Over the past 20 years, hypnotic drug use has diminished in France, while consumption of anxiolytics and neuroleptics has remained stable and antidepressant use has risen. Data from the ESEMeD survey (European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders) conducted in 2002 in Germany, Belgium, Spain, France, Netherlands and Italy showed that use of anxiolytics during the previous year (including recurrent use) was less frequent in Germany than elsewhere. Belgium and France had a higher prevalence of antidepressant consumption. Among depressed patients, fewer than one-third reported antidepressant use (no difference among the countries), while one-third said they used anxiolytics (higher rate in France). One-quarter of patients with anxiety stated they used a benzodiazepine (lower rate in Germany). Age, psychiatric disorders and neurological disorders were strongly associated with benzodiazepine use. Factors strongly associated with antidepressant use were age (bell-shaped curve), female sex, and psychiatric disorders.

Adult↗

General Practitioners' opinions on their practice in mental health and their collaboration with mental health professionals.

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems are mainly treated in primary care settings and collaboration with mental health services is needed. Prior to re-organisation of the mental health care offer in a geographical area, a study was organized: 1) to evaluate GPs' opinions on their day-to-day practice with Patients with Mental Health Problems (PMHP) and on relationships with Mental Health Professionals (MHPro); 2) to identify factors associated with perceived need for collaboration with MHPro and with actual collaboration. METHODS: All GPs in the South Yvelines area in France (n = 492) were informed of the implementation of a local mental health program. GPs interested in taking part (n = 180) were invited to complete a satisfaction questionnaire on their practice in the field of Mental Health and to include prospectively all PMHP consultants over an 8-day period (n = 1519). For each PMHP, data was collected on demographic and clinical profile, and on needs (met v. unmet) for collaboration with MHPro. RESULTS: A majority of GPs rated PMHP as requiring more care (83.4%), more time (92.3%), more frequent consultations (64.0%) and as being more difficult to refer (87.7%) than other patients. A minority of GPs had a satisfactory relationship with private psychiatrists (49.5%), public psychiatrists (35%) and social workers (27.8%). 53.9% had a less satisfactory relationship with MHPro than with other physicians. Needs for collaboration with a MHPro were more often felt in caring for PMHP who were young, not in employment, with mental health problems lasting for more than one year, with a history of psychiatric hospitalization, and showing reluctance to talk of psychological problems and to consult a MHPro. Needs for collaboration were more often met among PMHP with past psychiatric consultation or hospitalization and when the patient was not reluctant to consult a MHPro. Where needs were not met, GP would opt for the classic procedure of mental health referral for only 31.3% of their PMHP. CONCLUSION: GPs need targeted collaboration with MHPro to support their management of PMHP, whom they are willing to care for without systematic referral to specialists as the major therapeutic option.

Adult↗

Pharmacological treatment and other predictors of treatment outcomes in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia: results from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study.

The present study aimed to compare health outcomes and tolerability according to antipsychotic medication (olanzapine, risperidone or an oral typical antipsychotic) after 6 months of treatment in a group of 919 schizophrenic patients who had never previously been treated with antipsychotics. Demographic and clinical predictors of outcome were also identified. Data were extracted from the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study, a prospective, observational study of schizophrenia treatment in 10 European countries. Patients who initiated olanzapine were more likely to have a clinical response than those in the risperidone cohort, and had a greater improvement in quality of life than patients in the risperidone or typical antipsychotic cohorts. High negative and depression symptom scores at baseline and the presence of extrapyramidal symptoms at baseline predicted a worse clinical response, whereas hostile behaviour, paid employment and substance abuse predicted a better clinical outcome. The olanzapine cohort gained more weight than patients in the risperidone cohort, but no significant difference in weight gain was observed between olanzapine and the oral typical antipsychotic cohort. The results should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational study design.

Administration, Oral↗

Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.

BACKGROUND: Few questionnaires on outpatients' satisfaction with hospital exist. All have been constructed without giving enough room for the patient's point of view in the validation procedure. The main objective was to develop, according to psychometric standards, a self-administered generic outpatient questionnaire exploring opinion on quality of hospital care. METHOD: First, a qualitative phase was conducted to generate items and identify domains using critical analysis incident technique and literature review. A list of easily comprehensible non-redundant items was defined using Delphi technique and a pilot study on outpatients. This phase involved outpatients, patient association representatives and experts. The second step was a quantitative validation phase comprised a multicenter study in 3 hospitals, 10 departments and 1007 outpatients. It was designed to select items, identify dimensions, measure reliability, internal and concurrent validity. Patients were randomized according to the place of questionnaire completion (hospital v. home) (participation rate = 65%). Third, a mail-back study on 2 departments and 248 outpatients was conducted to replicate the validation (participation rate = 57%). RESULTS: A 27-item questionnaire comprising 4 subscales (appointment making, reception facilities, waiting time and consultation with the doctor). The factorial structure was satisfactory (loading >0.50 on each subscale for all items, except one item). Interscale correlations ranged from 0.42 to 0.59, Cronbach alpha coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.94. All Item-scale correlations were higher than 0.40. Test-retest intraclass coefficients ranged from 0.69 to 0.85. A unidimensional 9-item version was produced by selection of one third of the items within each subscale with the strongest loading on the principal component and the best item-scale correlation corrected for overlap. Factors related to satisfaction level independent from departments were age, previous consultations in the department and satisfaction with life. Completion at hospital immediately after consultation led to an overestimation of satisfaction. No satisfaction score differences existed between spontaneous respondents and patients responding after reminder(s). CONCLUSION: Good estimation of patient opinion on hospital consultation performance was obtained with these questionnaires. When comparing performances between departments or the same department over time scores need to be adjusted on 3 variables that influence satisfaction independently from department. Completion of the questionnaire at home is preferable to completion in the consultation facility and reminders are not necessary to produce non-biased data.

Adolescent↗

Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

CONTEXT: Little is known about the extent or severity of untreated mental disorders, especially in less-developed countries. OBJECTIVE: To estimate prevalence, severity, and treatment of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) mental disorders in 14 countries (6 less developed, 8 developed) in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Face-to-face household surveys of 60 463 community adults conducted from 2001-2003 in 14 countries in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The DSM-IV disorders, severity, and treatment were assessed with the WMH version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI), a fully structured, lay-administered psychiatric diagnostic interview. RESULTS: The prevalence of having any WMH-CIDI/DSM-IV disorder in the prior year varied widely, from 4.3% in Shanghai to 26.4% in the United States, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 9.1%-16.9%. Between 33.1% (Colombia) and 80.9% (Nigeria) of 12-month cases were mild (IQR, 40.2%-53.3%). Serious disorders were associated with substantial role disability. Although disorder severity was correlated with probability of treatment in almost all countries, 35.5% to 50.3% of serious cases in developed countries and 76.3% to 85.4% in less-developed countries received no treatment in the 12 months before the interview. Due to the high prevalence of mild and subthreshold cases, the number of those who received treatment far exceeds the number of untreated serious cases in every country. CONCLUSIONS: Reallocation of treatment resources could substantially decrease the problem of unmet need for treatment of mental disorders among serious cases. Structural barriers exist to this reallocation. Careful consideration needs to be given to the value of treating some mild cases, especially those at risk for progressing to more serious disorders.

Adult↗

Quality of life after complicated elective surgery requiring intensive care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU for complications after elective surgery and to assess perceived quality of life (pQOL) in survivors. DESIGN: Two-year prospective case-control study. SETTING: Twelve-bed ICU in a university-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the ICU for a complication following elective surgery were included. Six months after discharge, pQOL was assessed using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Results were compared to those of matched controls without complications. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Of the 182 patients, 124 were alive after 6 months, among whom 116 had 6-month data and 104 of these had matched controls. Overall pQOL as assessed by the global NHP score was similar in both groups (median, 0.82 and 0.87 in cases and controls; P=0.24). NHP subscores showed significantly worse pain ( P=0.03) and physical impairment ( P=0.02) in the ICU patients. In the multivariate analysis, pQOL was better in patients with cancer as the reason for surgery ( P=0.05). Severity of illness at inclusion had no influence on subsequent pQOL, but cardiovascular dysfunction was associated with decreased energy ( P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although overall pQOL was satisfactory after 6 months, patients admitted to the ICU for postoperative complications had worse pain and physical impairment than controls. Whether these outcomes could be improved by early physiotherapy and aggressive pain management deserves investigation.

Aged↗

Quality of life in adult survivors beyond 10 years after liver, kidney, and heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The yearly increasing survival rates testify to the success of transplantation, but questions remain relating to the quality of life (QOL) associated with long-term survival. METHODS: A sample of 126 liver recipients (Liver-R), 229 kidney recipients (Kidney-R), and 113 heart recipients (Heart-R) with more than 10 years posttransplant follow-up were included in the study with a response rate of 86%. Respondents were matched with healthy subjects recruited from general population (GP). The three groups of recipients and GP subjects completed a French version of the questionnaire used by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease, Pittsburgh, PA, and were compared for each score, with adjustments for age and sex. RESULTS: Personal function and measures of disease by the transplant recipients were significantly worse than in the GP (P<0.0001), with the worst score in Kidney-R. No difference, either between organs or between organs and GP, was found regarding the perceived social and role function. However, for psychologic status and general health perception, Kidney-R had the least favorable performance when compared with GP (P<0.01) and also when compared with Liver-R (P<0.05). With the exception of Kidney-R, the well-being index of Liver-R and Heart-R was significantly better than the GP (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The QOL beyond 10 years after liver, heart, and kidney transplantation is quite similar to the GP, with Kidney-R starting out as the worst, Heart-R as intermediate, and Liver-R the best.

Adolescent↗

Longitudinal prospective evaluation of quality of life in adult patients before and one year after liver transplantation.

We assessed the impact of liver transplantation (LT) on the quality of life (QOL) of French recipients 1 year after surgery. A French version of the questionnaire used by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease-Pittsburg, USA (NIDDK), was validated by the back-translation method. Five QOL domains were evaluated: measures of disease, psychological distress, personal function, social function, and general health perception. Patients enrolled onto the waiting list completed the questionnaire before and 1 year after LT. Respondents were age- and gender-matched with healthy subjects recruited from the general population (GP). One year after LT, the analysis of data from 67 consecutive patients showed dramatic improvement in the five domains. Compared with baseline, patients noted fewer disease-related symptoms (P <.0001) and lower level of distress overall (P <.001). However, levels of distress caused by excess appetite (P <.01), trembling (P <.05), and headaches (P =.06) were more likely to increase than decrease. Twenty-five percent of patients prevented by their disease from going to work before LT were no longer so limited at 1-year follow-up. General health perception improved remarkably, with seven times as many recipients reporting improved health as reporting worse health. A correlation was found between the pretransplantation severity of cirrhosis and the social and role function after LT (P <.05). In summary, the French version of the NIDDK questionnaire seems to be reliable. The results of transplant recipients were generally close to those of the general population. Although it is not a true return to normal status, it approaches it.

Adolescent↗

Regular visitors are not good substitutes for assessment of elderly patient satisfaction with nursing home care and services.

BACKGROUND: Due to physical and psychological impairments, elderly patients residing in homes are often unable to participate in studies on satisfaction with care services. While their regular visitors provide interesting information, patient-visitor response concordance requires study. Our objective was to measure patient-visitor agreement on quality of care and accommodation. METHODS: A survey was conducted on elderly people in 13 nursing homes and their visitors. The 125 patient-visitor pairs completed the same Nursing Home Satisfaction Questionnaire (NHSQ) independently, for which reliability and internal validity have previously been explored. Satisfaction scores for room comfort, meal provision, information, and medical/nursing care were calculated. To estimate patient-visitor concordance, intraclass coefficients, a bias index, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction scores ranged from 57.8 (information) to 78.6 (room comfort), and visitor satisfaction from 67.9 (meal provision) to 85.9 (medical/nursing care). Mean visitor scores were higher for all scales, with a small-to-moderate index bias statistically significant for medical/nursing care (p <.001), information (p <.001), and meal provision (p =.006). Intraclass correlation coefficients were low for room comfort, information, and medical/nursing care scales (0.08 to 0.18), and nearly acceptable for the meal provision scale (0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Visitors were not able to provide information on elderly patients' satisfaction with nursing home. Their assessments were milder than patient assessments. The NHSQ is reliable for use in either population, but patient and visitor assessments should not be merged in satisfaction studies.

Access to Information↗

Psychotropic prescription in non-psychiatric hospital settings.

A study was conducted to assess differences in psychotropic prescription (PP) in various non-psychiatric hospital settings. After adjustment for demographic, medical and psychological status, rates of PP were significantly lower for surgical, intensive care and outpatients and higher for geriatric patients than for patients in other settings, suggesting inadequate consideration of psychiatric problems in certain contexts, in particular intensive care units.

Aged↗