PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Isabelle Loubinoux

Publications and source records attributed to Isabelle Loubinoux.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Methylphenidate modulates cerebral post-stroke reorganization.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that a single dose of methylphenidate (MP) would modulate cerebral motor activation and behavior in patients having suffered a subcortical stroke. METHODS: Eight men with a single stroke on the corticospinal tract resulting in a pure motor hemiparesia were included in a randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were first evaluated 17 days after stroke onset by validated neurological scales, motor tests and fMRI (flexion/extension of the digits) after 20 mg MP or placebo. Seven days later, the patients underwent the same protocol and received the drug they had not taken at the first evaluation. Each patient was his own control. RESULTS: Placebo intake did not change performance. MP compared to placebo elicited a significant improvement in motor performance of the affected hand at the finger tapping test. MP induced: (1) a hyperactivation of the ipsilesional primary sensorimotor cortex including the motor hand and face areas and of the contralesional premotor cortex; (2) a hypoactivation of the ipsilesional anterior cingulum. Hyperactivation in the face motor area correlated positively with the improvement in performance. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the reorganized network may efficiently be targeted by the drug and that the effect of MP might partly rely on an improvement in attention/effort through cingulum modulation.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Modulation of behavior and cortical motor activity in healthy subjects by a chronic administration of a serotonin enhancer.

UNLABELLED: SSRIs are postulated to modulate motor behavior. A single dose of selective serotoninergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like fluoxetine, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine, has been shown to improve motor performance and efficiency of information processing for simple sensorimotor tasks in healthy subjects. At a cortical level, a single dose of SSRI was shown to induce a hyperactivation of the primary sensorimotor cortex (S1M1) involved in the movement (Loubinoux, I., Boulanouar, K., Ranjeva, J. P., Carel, C., Berry, I., Rascol, O., Celsis, P., and Chollet, F., 1999. Cerebral functional magnetic resonance imaging activation modulated by a single dose of the monoamine neurotransmission enhancers fluoxetine and fenozolone during hand sensorimotor tasks. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 19 1365--1375, Loubinoux, I., Pariente, J., Boulanouar, K., Carel, C., Manelfe, C., Rascol, O., Celsis, P., and Chollet, F., 2002. A Single Dose of Serotonin Neurotransmission Agonist Paroxetine Enhances Motor Output. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, fMRI study in healthy subjects. NeuroImage 15 26--36). Since SSRIs are usually given for several weeks, we assessed the behavioral and cerebral effects of a one-month chronic administration of paroxetine on a larger group. In a double-blind, placebo controlled and crossover study, 19 subjects received daily 20 mg paroxetine or placebo, respectively, over a period of 30 days separated by a wash-out period of 3 months. After each period, the subjects underwent an fMRI (active or passive movement, dexterity task, sensory discrimination task) and a behavioral evaluation. Concurrently, a TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) study was conducted (Gerdelat-Mas, A., Loubinoux, I., Tombari, D., Rascol, O., Chollet, F., Simonetta-Moreau, M., 2005. Chronic administration of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) paroxetine modulates human motor cortex excitability in healthy subjects. NeuroImage 27,314--322). RESULTS: On the one hand, paroxetine improved motor performances at the finger tapping test (P=0.02) without affecting choice reaction time, strength and dexterity significantly. Subjects were also faster in processing the spatial incongruency between a stimulus and the motor response (P=0.04). In order to differentiate behavioral components, a principal component analysis was performed on all motor tests, and several characteristics were differentiated: strength, speed, skill, attention, and motor response coding. Paroxetine would improve the efficiency of motor response coding (MANOVA on the factors; factor 3, P=0.01). On the other hand, the chronic administration induced a significant hypoactivation of S1M1 whatever the task: motor or sensory, simple or complex (random effect analysis, P<0.05). The hypoactivation correlated with the improvement of performances at the finger tapping test (P<0.05) suggesting more efficiency in cerebral motor processing. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed a clear modulation of sensory and motor cerebral activation after a chronic paroxetine administration. An improvement in both behavior and cerebral efficiency was suggested. It could be hypothesized that monoamines, by an unspecific effect, may tune the response of pyramidal neurons to optimize performances.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reduces abnormal motor cortical overactivity in Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Based on the basal ganglia model, it has been hypothesized that the efficacy of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) against parkinsonian symptoms relies on the activation of cortical premotor regions. In previous positron emission tomography activation studies, STN high-frequency stimulation was associated with selective activation of midline premotor areas during hand movements but mainly reduced the regional cerebral blood flow in movement-related areas, peculiarly at rest. OBJECTIVE: To investigate with positron emission tomography the role of regional cerebral blood flow reduction in the clinical improvement provided by STN high-frequency stimulation. METHODS: Seven patients with advanced Parkinson disease, who were markedly improved by bilateral STN high-frequency stimulation, underwent positron emission tomography with H2(15)O while the right STN electrode was turned off. The patients were studied at rest and during right-hand movements in 3 electrode conditions: no stimulation, inefficient low-frequency stimulation, and efficient high-frequency stimulation. RESULTS: The main effect of high-frequency stimulation was to reduce regional cerebral blood flow in the left primary sensorimotor cortex, the lateral premotor cortex, the right cerebellum, and the midline premotor areas. The selective activation of the anterior cingulate cortex and the left primary sensorimotor cortex during hand movement under STN high-frequency stimulation was attributed to decreased regional cerebral blood flow at rest, rather than increased activation induced by STN high-frequency stimulation. Akinesia was correlated with the abnormal overactivity in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex and the ipsilateral cerebellum. CONCLUSION: High-frequency stimulation of the STN acts through the reduction of abnormal resting overactivity in the motor system, allowing selective cortical activation during movement.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A longitudinal fMRI study: in recovering and then in clinically stable sub-cortical stroke patients.

The aim of this 1-year longitudinal fMRI study was to compare hand motor activation patterns between cerebrovascular paretic patients with a subcortical infarction and healthy elderly subjects and to evaluate the changes between the subacute phase and the chronic phase of recovery. We studied eight right-handed patients with pure motor hemiparesis due to a single ischemic infarct of the corticospinal tract. Each patient underwent a first fMRI (E1) 20 +/- 9 days after stroke, a second (E2) after 4 months and a third (E3) 12 months after stroke. During each fMRI session, the patients performed an active motor task consisting of audio-paced (1 Hz) finger flexion-extension of the paretic hand and underwent a passive motor task consisting of flexion-extension of the paretic hand performed by an examiner. Data were analyzed with SPM99 (random effect analyses). Patients had recovered at E2, were stable between E2 and E3, but still experienced a hand weakness. Displacement of activation maxima coordinates in patients compared to healthy subjects suggested an early reorganization within the SMA and a secondary reorganization within the ipsilesional S1M1 at E2. The main differences between patients and healthy subjects were (1) recruitment of the posterior part of the cingulate cortex and SMA, (2) a general hyperactivation (except in the deefferented primary motor cortex) and (3) an evolution in the S1M1 activation from an early (20 days after stroke) contralesional hyperactivation to a later (4 months after stroke) ipsilesional hyperactivation concomitant to recovery. Changes in activation were confirmed by the passive task that involved no effort and little attention. Despite clinical stability, changes in brain processing seemed to occur between E2 and E3 corresponding to a normalization of ipsilesional S1M1 activation, a decrease of bilateral cerebellar activation, and a progressive increase in SII-BA 40 activity suggesting evolving compensatory networks to sustain recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts.

Our objective was to investigate correlations between clinical motor scores and cerebral sensorimotor activation to demonstrate that this reorganization is the neural substratum of motor recovery. Correlation analyses identified reorganization processes shared by all patients. Nine patients with first-time corticospinal tract lacuna were clinically evaluated using the NIH stroke scale, the motricity index, and the Barthel index. Patients were strictly selected for pure motor deficits. They underwent a first fMRI session (E1) 11 days after stroke, and then a second (E2) 4 weeks later. The task used was a calibrated repetitive passive flexion/extension of the paretic wrist. The control task was rest. Six healthy subjects followed the same protocol. Patients were also clinically evaluated 4 and 12 months after stroke. All patients improved significantly between E1 and E2. For E1 and E2, the ipsilesional primary sensorimotor and premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), and bilateral Broadmann area (BA) 40 were activated. Activation intensity was greater at the second examination except in the ipsilesional superior BA 40. Magnitude of activation was lower than that of controls except for well-recovered patients. E1 clinical hand motor score and E1 cerebral activation correlated in the SMA proper and inferior ipsilesional BA 40. Thus, we demonstrated early functionality of the sensorimotor system. The whole sensorimotor network activation correlated with motor status at E2, indicating a recovery of its function when activated. Moreover, the activation pattern in the acute phase (E1) had a predictive value: early recruitment and high activation of the SMA and inferior BA 40 were correlated with a faster or better motor recovery. On the contrary, activation of the contralesional hemisphere (prefrontal cortex and BA 39-40) and of the posterior cingulate/precuneus (BA 7-31) predicted a slower recovery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A single dose of the serotonin neurotransmission agonist paroxetine enhances motor output: double-blind, placebo-controlled, fMRI study in healthy subjects.

Since serotonin (5-HT) stimulates motor function, pharmacological potentiation of 5-HT neurotransmission may improve motor function in healthy subjects and, possibly, recovery in post-stroke patients. Indeed, fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), increased activation in executive motor areas of healthy subjects as fenozolone, a releaser of monoamines (including noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin) from intracellular stores. This study is intended to test the hypothesis that paroxetine can likewise modulate brain motor activity in a dose-dependent manner in healthy subjects. In a double-blind counterbalanced study, six subjects underwent functional MRI examinations on three sessions 1 week apart (E1, E2, and E3) at the time of peak plasma concentrations (5 h after drug intake, i.e., either 20 or 60 mg of paroxetine or placebo) with a complex sequential opposition task. Rest and activation alternated in a block design. During activation, subjects performed, with the right hand, a 1-Hz-paced task that alternated two fist closings with a sequential opposition task. Paroxetine elicited effects similar to those reported for fluoxetine; notable changes were hyperactivation in the contralateral S1/M1, and posterior SMA and widespread hypoactivation of basal ganglia and cerebellum. There was an inverse correlation between dose and effect: significantly greater effects were observed with the 20-mg dose compared with 60 mg. Paroxetine dose-dependently modulates activation of the entire motor pathway in a way that favors motor output. Thus, a single dose of the SSRI paroxetine reorganized motor processing.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine modulates motor behavior through practice. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-dose study in healthy subjects.

We hypothesized that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could modulate motor activity in healthy subjects in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of a single dose of paroxetine were tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Six randomized and counterbalanced subjects performed behavioral tests in three sessions 1 week apart (E1, E2 and E3) at peak plasma concentration (5 h after drug intake). Each subject was given 20 mg or 60 mg of the drug, or a placebo. Tasks were the Nine Peg Hole test (three trials), Moede dexteritymeter (two trials), and compatible and incompatible reaction time tasks. The results show that at the first trials, performance did not differ after placebo or paroxetine intake. However, 20 and 60 mg of paroxetine improved performance significantly at the third trial of the Nine Peg Hole test and subjects receiving the drug performed 7% faster than those under placebo. An amount of 20 mg, but not 60 mg, of paroxetine improved dexterity significantly at the second trial of the Moede test and subjects performed 30% faster. Conversely, the drug did not affect reaction time for the compatible task and subjects were 11% slower under 20 mg with the incompatible task. Thus, paroxetine decreased the ability to inhibit automatism. Thus, it was concluded that a single dose of paroxetine improved motor performance through practice. But negative effects occurred on tasks including the inhibition of an automatism. Paroxetine enhanced brain motor output (motor activity in S1M1) [NeuroImage, 15 (2002) 26]. This S1M1 hyperactivation is likely to be responsible for the better performance. The brain effect and motor improvement were dose dependent. For both, 20 mg was the optimal dose.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Post-ischemia neurologic recovery].

Stroke is one of the most common affliction of patients with neurological symptoms. Rehabilitation of stroke patients is a difficult task. Our knowledge on rehabilitation has recently improved with the emergence of data from new neuroimaging techniques. A prospective, double blind, cross over, placebo, controlled study on 8 patients with pure motor hemiparesia, is conducted to determine the influence of a single dose of fluoxetine on motor performance and cerebral activation of patients recovering from stroke. Each patient undergoes two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) examinations, one under fluoxetine and one under placebo. A single dose of fluoxetine is enough to modulate cerebral sensori-motor activation and significantly improves motor skills of the affected side. Further studies are required to investigate the effect of chronic administration of fluoxetine on motor function.

Cross-Over Studies↗