PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Isabelle Van Liefde

Publications and source records attributed to Isabelle Van Liefde.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Slow antagonist dissociation and long-lasting in vivo receptor protection.

The ability of antagonists to form slowly dissociating complexes with their cognate receptors has repeatedly been proposed to contribute to their long-lasting clinical actions. Yet specific conditions seem to be necessary for this to take place. The elimination rate of the free antagonist and the variation of agonist concentration with time have important roles. Slowly dissociating antagonists are likely to exert longer efficient receptor protection in vivo than are fast-dissociating antagonists when the half-life of the antagonist-receptor complex exceeds that of the free antagonist. However, when the half-life of the free antagonist prevails, longer effective protection by slowly dissociating antagonists occurs only if the receptor is exposed to rapid fluctuations in free agonist concentration.

Animals↗

Long-lasting angiotensin type 1 receptor binding and protection by candesartan: comparison with other biphenyl-tetrazole sartans.

BACKGROUND: The ability of biphenyl-tetrazole angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists (BTsartans) to block angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated responses has been extensively investigated in vascular tissues and, more recently, in cell lines expressing the human AT1-receptor. When pre-incubated, BTsartans acted surmountably (shifting the Ang II concentration-response curve to the right) or insurmountably (also decreasing the maximal response). It was shown that their insurmountable behaviour is due to the formation of tight, long-lasting complexes with the receptor. Partial insurmountable antagonism is due to the co-existence of tight and loose complexes. The proportion of insurmountable antagonism, the potency and the dissociation rate of the BTsartans decreases in the order: candesartan > EXP3174 (losartan's active metabolite) > valsartan > irbesartan >> losartan. OBJECTIVE: It is of interest to explore how tight AT1-receptor binding of BTsartans such as candesartan might contribute to their long-lasting clinical effect. METHODS: Computer-assisted simulations (COPASI program) were performed to follow the receptor-occupation and protection by different antagonists as a function of time. Free antagonist concentrations were allowed to decrease exponentially with time. RESULTS: The simulations suggest that slow dissociation does not tangibly prolong receptor occupancy if the free antagonist is eliminated at a slower pace (as is the case for BTsartans). Yet when surmountable and insurmountable antagonists occupy the same amount of receptors, insurmountable antagonists offer appreciably better protection against fluctuations in natural messenger concentration. CONCLUSION: Slow receptor dissociation and slow antagonist elimination are likely to act in synergy to produce long-lasting receptor protection.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

Models and methods for studying insurmountable antagonism.

Insurmountable antagonists depress the concentration-response curves of subsequently added agonists. The longevity of the antagonist-receptor complex and the existence of allosteric binding sites are the most frequent explanations for this phenomenon. Yet, observed antagonist behaviour often depends on the tissue, the animal species, the duration of the measured response and the study design. Intact cell studies allow greater flexibility and tighter control of the experimental conditions and therefore have the potential to offer a better insight into the molecular basis of insurmountable antagonism.

Animals↗