PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Iván Izquierdo

Publications and source records attributed to Iván Izquierdo.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Persistence of long-term memory storage requires a late protein synthesis- and BDNF- dependent phase in the hippocampus.

Persistence is the most characteristic attribute of long-term memory (LTM). To understand LTM, we must understand how memory traces persist over time despite the short-lived nature and rapid turnover of their molecular substrates. It is widely accepted that LTM formation is dependent upon hippocampal de novo protein synthesis and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) signaling during or early after acquisition. Here we show that 12 hr after acquisition of a one-trial associative learning task, there is a novel protein synthesis and BDNF-dependent phase in the rat hippocampus that is critical for the persistence of LTM storage. Our findings indicate that a delayed stabilization phase is specifically required for maintenance, but not formation, of the memory trace. We propose that memory formation and memory persistence share some of the same molecular mechanisms and that recurrent rounds of consolidation-like events take place in the hippocampus for maintenance of the memory trace.

Animals↗

Habituation to an open field alters ecto-nucleotidase activities in rat hippocampal synaptosomes.

ATP and adenosine may play a role in the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Previous studies have shown that ecto-nucleotidase activities are altered during memory consolidation of an aversive task named step-down inhibitory avoidance. Here we investigate ecto-nucleotidase activities in hippocampal synaptosomes of rats submitted to training and test sessions of habituation to open field, which is one of the most elementary forms of learning. There were no significant alterations on ATP, ADP and AMP hydrolysis immediately after the training session. However, immediately after the test session (0min), there was a significant increase of ATP hydrolysis (61%), but not of ADP and AMP hydrolysis. Sixty minutes after the test session, a significant increase of NTPDase (75% and 60.5% for ATP and ADP hydrolysis, respectively) and ecto-5'-nucleotidase (40%) activities was observed. This study reveals the involvement of ecto-nucleotidase activities in different learning paradigms during memory processing.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

mTOR signaling in the hippocampus is necessary for memory formation.

It is widely accepted that the formation of long-term memory (LTM) requires mRNA translation, but little is known about the cellular mechanisms in the brain that regulate this process. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key regulator of translational efficacy and capacity. Here, we show that LTM formation of one-trial inhibitory avoidance (IA) in rats, a hippocampus-dependent fear-motivated learning task, requires mTOR activation. IA training is specifically associated with a rapid increase in the phosphorylation state of mTOR and its substrate ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K). Bilateral intra-CA1 infusion of rapamycin, a selective mTOR inhibitor, 15 min before, but not immediately after training completely hinders IA LTM without affecting short-term memory (STM) retention. Therefore, our findings indicate that the regulation of hippocampal mRNA translation is a major control step in memory consolidation.

Analysis of Variance↗

Different molecular cascades in different sites of the brain control memory consolidation.

To understand cognition, it is important to understand how a learned response becomes a long-lasting memory. This process of memory consolidation has been modeled extensively using one-trial avoidance learning, in which animals (or humans) establish a conditioned response by learning to avoid danger in just one trial. This relies on molecular events in the CA1 region of the hippocampus that resemble those involved in CA1 long-term potentiation (LTP), and it also requires equivalent events to occur with different timings in the basolateral amygdala and the entorhinal, parietal and cingulate cortex. Many of these steps are modulated by monoaminergic pathways related to the perception of and reaction to emotion, which at least partly explains why strong and resistant consolidation is typical of emotion-laden memories. Thus memory consolidation involves a complex network of brain systems and serial and parallel molecular events, even for a task as deceptively simple as one-trial avoidance. We propose that these molecular events might also be involved in many other memory types in animals and humans.

Animals↗

Role of cellular prion protein on LTP expression in aged mice.

Cellular prion protein (PrP(c)) has been associated with some physiological functions in the last few years. In a previous paper, we have demonstrated an increased hippocampal synaptic transmission in adult mice lacking this protein. In the present study, we investigate the impact of aging on the generation and maintenance of hippocampal long-term Potentiation (LTP) in 9-month-old mice devoid of PrP(c) protein (Prnp(0/0)). We observed a lower threshold for inducing LTP in 9-month-old Prnp(0/0) mice compared to wild-type ones at the same age. The maintenance of dentate gyrus LTP was more persistent in hippocampal slices from Prnp(0/0) mice. Furthermore, the expression of mRNA for NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA glutamatergic receptor in hippocampus of aged Prnp(0/0) animals showed an increase compared to the wild type. We propose that increased hippocampal glutamatergic transmission in Prnp(0/0) mice is related to the enhanced plasticity and persistence of the dentate LTP.

Aging↗

Angiotensin II disrupts inhibitory avoidance memory retrieval.

The brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in learning and memory, but the actual role of angiotensin II (A(II)) and its metabolites in this process has been difficult to comprehend. This has been so mainly due to procedural issues, especially the use of multi-trial learning paradigms and the utilization of pre-training intracerebroventricular infusion of RAS-acting compounds. Here, we specifically analyzed the action of A(II) in aversive memory retrieval using a hippocampal-dependent, one-trial, step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) in combination with stereotaxically localized intrahippocampal infusion of drugs. Rats bilaterally implanted with infusion cannulae aimed to the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus were trained in IA and tested for memory retention 24 h later. We found that when given into CA1 15 min before IA memory retention test, A(II), but not angiotensin IV or angiotensin(1-7) induced a dose-dependent and reversible amnesia without altering locomotor activity, exploratory behavior or anxiety state. The effect of A(II) was blocked in a dose-dependent manner by the A(II)-type 2 receptor (AT(2)) antagonist PD123319 but not by the A(II)-type 1 receptor (AT(1)) antagonist losartan. By themselves, neither PD123319 nor losartan had any effect on memory expression. Our data indicate that intra-CA1 A(II) hinders retrieval of avoidance memory through a process that involves activation of AT(2) receptors.

Angiotensin II↗

Acute treatment with the antidepressants bupropion and sertraline do not influence memory retrieval in man.

OBJECTIVE: Several evidences implicate that monoamines play a modulatory role in the brain mechanisms underlying encoding and retrieval of emotional memories. Recent experiments demonstrate that acute monoaminergic potentiation with the antidepressants bupropion or sertraline enhance the retrieval of longterm emotional memory in rodents. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that acute monoaminergic re-uptake inhibition with these antidepressants might enhance retrieval of emotional memory in man. METHODS: The central monoaminergic system was stimulated with either bupropion or sertraline in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design with 105 healthy adult subjects divided in three groups (placebo, 150 mg-bupropion and 50 mg-sertraline). Memory was evaluated with a 'surprise' memory test 7 days after the presentation of an emotional story and with a word-cued autobiographical memory test. RESULTS: A total of 99 volunteers completed the experimental procedures. Contrasting to our prediction, we found no memory enhancing effect for either drug in both memory tests. All groups showed the expected heightened memory performance to the middle 'emotive' phase of the story. CONCLUSION: Stimulation of the central monoaminergic system with the antidepressants bupropion and sertraline did not enhance the retrieval of long-term emotional memories in man.

Adolescent↗

Retinol induces the ERK1/2-dependent phosphorylation of CREB through a pathway involving the generation of reactive oxygen species in cultured Sertoli cells.

The ability to regulate cell cycle progression and apoptosis through the activation of nuclear receptors and gene transcription has been generally accepted as a potential chemopreventive and therapeutic property of retinoids. However, recent studies suggest that retinol and related compounds can exert rapid and non-genomic effects, which may increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lead to cell cycle disruption and malignant transformation. In this work, we report that, in Sertoli cells, retinol (7 microM) induces the Src-dependent activation of ERK1/2 MAPK and the ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB. We found that these retinol-induced effects were completely blocked by the antioxidant Trolox 100 microM (a hydrophilic analogue of alpha-tocopherol), the hydroxyl radical scavenger mannitol (1 mM) and the addition of native superoxide dismutase (200 U/ml), and also that retinol increased the production of ROS and several other parameters indicative of oxidative stress during the same incubation periods in which ERK1/2 and CREB were phosphorylated. The activation of the ERK1/2-CREB pathway appears to be involved in the onset of some of the malignant effects caused by retinol in Sertoli cells since inhibition of ERK1/2 activation blocked the retinol-induced cell transformation and proliferation.

Animals↗

Histamine enhances inhibitory avoidance memory consolidation through a H2 receptor-dependent mechanism.

Several evidences suggest that brain histamine is involved in memory consolidation but the actual contribution of the hippocampal histaminergic system to this process remains controversial. Here, we show that when infused into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus immediately after training in an inhibitory avoidance task, but not later, histamine induced a dose-dependent promnesic effect without altering locomotor activity, exploratory behavior, anxiety state or retrieval of the avoidance response. The facilitatory effect of intra-CA1 histamine was mimicked by the histamine N-methyltransferase inhibitor SKF-91844 as well as by the H2 receptor agonist dimaprit and it was blocked completely by the H2 receptor antagonist ranitidine. Conversely, the promnesic action of histamine was unaffected by the H1 receptor antagonist pyrilamine, the H3 receptor antagonist, thioperamide, and the NMDAr polyamine-binding site antagonist ifenprodil. By themselves, ranitidine, pyrilamine, thioperamide, and ifenprodil did not affect IA memory consolidation. Our data indicate that, when given into CA1, histamine enhances memory consolidation through a mechanism that involves activation of H2 receptors; however, endogenous CA1 histamine does not seem to participate in the consolidation of IA memory at least at the post-training times analyzed.

Animals↗

A link between the hippocampal and the striatal memory systems of the brain.

Two major memory systems have been recognized over the years (Squire 1987): the declarative memory system, which is under the control of the hippocampus and related temporal lobe structures, and the procedural or habit memory system, which is under the control of the striatum and its connections. Most if not all learning tasks studied in animals, however, involve either the performance or the suppression of movement; this, if learned well, may be viewed as having become a habit. It is agreed that memory rules change from their first association to those that take place when the task is mastered. Does this change of rules involve a switch from one memory system to another? Here we will comment on: 1) reversal learning in the Morris water maze (MWM), in which the declarative or spatial component of a task is changed but the procedural component (to swim to safety) persists and needs to be re-linked with a different set of spatial cues; and 2) a series of observations on an inhibitory avoidance task that indicate that the brain systems involved change with further learning.

Animals↗

The entorhinal cortex plays a role in extinction.

In this study, we analyzed the participation of the entorhinal cortex in extinction of a learned aversive response. Rats with infusion cannulae aimed to the entorhinal cortex were trained in a one-trial step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) and submitted to four consecutive daily test sessions without the footshock, a procedure that induced extinction of the conditioned response in control animals. When infused into the entorhinal cortex immediately after the first extinction session at doses able to block consolidation of IA memory, the NMDA receptor antagonist, AP5 (25 nmol/side), the inhibitor of protein synthesis anisomycin (300 nmol/side) and the inhibitor of CaMKII, KN-93 (10 nmol/side), but not the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD-98059 (5 nmol/side) hindered extinction of the IA response. The same results were obtained when the interval between the first and second test session was 48 instead of 24h. The data indicate that normal functionality of the NMDA receptors, together with CaMKII activity and protein synthesis are necessary in the entorhinal cortex at the time of the first test session to generate extinction. Our results also suggest that the ERK1/2 pathway does not play a role in this process.

Amygdala↗

Extinction and reacquisition of a fear-motivated memory require activity of the Src family of tyrosine kinases in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

Evidences indicate that extinction represents a NMDA receptor (NMDAr)-dependent learning rather than erasure of previously stored information. Several members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases are activated by stimulation of the NMDAr and are involved in both induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation and consolidation of hippocampal-dependent, NMDAr-sensitive, memories. Here we analyzed the role of the Src family within the CA1 region of the hippocampus in extinction and reacquisition of the memory for step-down, inhibitory avoidance learning task (IA). Rats trained in IA were submitted to 5 daily extinction sessions during which the avoidance response was elicited in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus. Immediately or 180 min after each extinction session animals received intra-CA1 infusions of either 0.1% DMSO, the Src-family inhibitor PP2 or its inactive analog, PP3. PP2 blocked extinction of the IA response which was otherwise evident in DMSO and PP3-treated animals. After being submitted to a new training session the animals reacquired the avoidance response; however, they failed to do so if they received intra-CA1 infusions of PP2 immediately following retraining. Our results indicate that, like the original learning, extinction and reacquisition of the IA response require activity of the Src family in the CA1 region of the hippocampus.

Animals↗

Retrieval and the extinction of memory.

1. Memory is assessed by measuring retrieval which is often elicited by the solely presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS). However, as known since Pavlov, presentation of the CS alone generates extinction. 2. One-trial avoidance (IA) is a much used conditioned fear paradigm in which the CS is the safe part of a training apparatus, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is a footshock and the conditioned response (CR) is to stay in the safe area. Retrieval of the memory for the step-down version of this task is measured in the absence of the US, as latency to step-down from the safe area (i.e., a platform). 3. Extinction of the IA response is installed at the moment of the first non-reinforced test session, as clearly shown by the fact that many drugs, including PKA, ERK and protein synthesis inhibitors as well as NMDA receptor antagonists, hinder extinction when infused into the hippocampus or the basolateral amygdala at the moment of the first test session but not later. 4. Some, but not all the molecular systems required for extinction are also activated by retrieval, further endorsing the hypothesis that although retrieval is necessary for the generation of extinction this last process constitutes a new learning secondary to the non-reinforced expression of the original trace.

Animals↗

Learning twice is different from learning once and from learning more.

The rat hippocampus plays a crucial role in the consolidation of a variety of memories, including that for a one trial inhibitory avoidance learning task in which stepping down from a platform is associated with a footshock. Here we show that this is the case regardless of the intensity of the footshock used and hence, of the strength of the learned response. However, additional learning produced by a second training session in this task does not involve the hippocampus but, instead, the striatum. Memory consolidation of the second trial requires glutamate alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate, N-methyl-D-aspartate and metabotropic receptors, activation of signaling pathways, gene expression and protein synthesis in the striatum, as are required in the hippocampus during memory consolidation of the first trial.

Animals↗

Activation of adenosine receptors in the posterior cingulate cortex impairs memory retrieval in the rat.

Adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonists and antagonists have been reported to alter learning and memory. The aim of our study was to investigate the involvement of adenosinergic system in memory retrieval into posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) of Wistar rats. To clarify this question, we tested specifics agonist and antagonists of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in rats submitted to a one-trial inhibitory avoidance task. The stimulation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors by CPA and CGS21680, respectively, impaired memory retrieval for inhibitory avoidance task, into PCC. These findings provide behavioral evidence for the role of adenosinergic system in the memory retrieval into PCC.

Adenosine↗

Relationship between short- and long-term memory and short- and long-term extinction.

Both the acquisition and the extinction of memories leave short- and long-term mnemonic traces. Here, we show that in male Wistar rats, the short-term memory for a step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) is resistant to extinction, and that its expression does not influence retrieval or extinction of long-term memory. It has been known for some time that short- and long-term inhibitory avoidance memory involve separate and parallel processes. Here we show that, instead, short-term extinction of IA long-term memory is the first step towards its long-term extinction, and that this link requires functional NMDA receptors and protein synthesis in the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus at the time of the first CS-no US presentation.

Animals↗

One-trial aversive learning induces late changes in hippocampal CaMKIIalpha, Homer 1a, Syntaxin 1a and ERK2 protein levels.

Most studies regarding altered gene expression after learning are performed using multi-trial tasks, which do not allow a clear discrimination of memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval. We screened for candidate memory-modulated genes in the hippocampus at 3 and 24 h after one-trial inhibitory avoidance (IA) training, using a cDNA array containing 1176 genes. While 33 genes were modulated by training (respect to shocked-only animals), most of them were upregulated (27 genes) and only 6 were downregulated. To confirm and extend these findings, we performed RT-PCRs and analyzed differences in protein levels in rat hippocampus using immunoblot assays. We found several proteins upregulated 24 h after training: extracellular signal-regulated kinase ERK2, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha (CaMKIIalpha), Syntaxin 1a, c-fos and Homer 1a. The total level of none of these proteins were found to be altered when measured 3-h post-training. Several of the mRNAs corresponding to the upregulated proteins were changed at 3 h but not 24 h. Additionally, a number of other candidates were identified for the first time as modulated by learning. The results presented here suggest that single-trial tasks can expose previously unseen differences in dynamic regulation of gene expression after behavioral manipulations, both at the transcriptional and translational levels, and reveal a diversity of gene products modulated by this task, allowing deeper understanding of the molecular basis of memory formation.

Animals↗

Angiotensin II blocks memory consolidation through an AT2 receptor-dependent mechanism.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Several studies suggest that the brain renin-angiotensin system is involved in memory consolidation. However, the participation of angiotensin II (AII) in this process is controversial. This is probably due to the fact that many of the studies carried out to elucidate this matter employed multitrial learning paradigms together with pretraining intracerebroventricular infusions, and therefore were unable to distinguish between consolidation and retrieval related events and lacked anatomical specificity. To circumvent this problem, we analyzed the role played in memory consolidation by AII using the hippocampal-dependent, one-trial, step-down inhibitory avoidance task (IA) in combination with stereotaxically localized intrahippocampal infusion of drugs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats bilaterally implanted with infusion cannulae into the CA1 region of the dorsal hippocampus (CA1) were trained in IA and tested for memory retention 24 h later. We found that when infused into CA1 immediately or 30 min after training but not later, AII produced a dose-dependent amnesic effect without altering locomotor activity, exploratory behavior or anxiety state. The amnesic effect of AII was not mimicked by angiotensin IV (AIV) and was totally blocked by the AII-type 2 receptor (AT2) antagonist, PD123319, but not by the AII-type 1 receptor (AT1) antagonist, losartan. Importantly, when infused alone, neither PD123319 nor losartan produced any effect on memory retention. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that, when given into CA1, AII blocks memory formation through a mechanism involving activation of AT2 receptors; however, endogenous AII does not seem to participate in the consolidation of IA long-term memory.

Amnesia↗