Biomedical subjects

Ivan Roitt

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Roitt.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Comparison of image analysis software packages in the assessment of adhesion of microorganisms to mucosal epithelium using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

We have compared current image analysis software packages in order to find the most useful one for assessing microbial adhesion and inhibition of adhesion to tissue sections. We have used organisms of different sizes, the bacterium Helicobacter pylori and the yeast Candida albicans. Adhesion of FITC-labelled H. pylori and C. albicans was assessed by confocal microscopy. Four different Image analysis software packages, NIH-Image, IP Lab, Image Pro+, and Metamorph, were compared for their ability to quantify adhesion of the two organisms and several quantification methods were devised for each package. For both organisms, the dynamic range that could be detected by the software packages was 1x10(6)-1x10(9) cells/ml. Of the four software packages tested, our results showed that Metamorph software, using our 'Region of Interest' method, with the software's 'Standard Area Method' of counting, was the most suitable for quantifying adhesion of both organisms because of its unique ability to separate clumps of microbial cells. Moreover, fewer steps were required. By pre-incubating H. pylori with the glycoconjugate Lewis b-HSA, an inhibition of binding of 48.8% was achieved using 250 mug/ml Lewis b-HSA. The method we have devised using Metamorph software, provides a simple, quick and accurate way of quantifying adhesion and inhibition of adhesion of microbial cells to the epithelial surface of tissue sections. The method can be applied to organisms ranging in size from small bacteria to larger yeast cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Tumour burden and interleukin-2 dose affect the interaction between low-dose total body irradiation and interleukin 2.

Low-dose total body irradiation (LTBI) has a synergistic immune-mediated antitumour effect when used in combination with interleukin 2 (IL-2) in a murine metastatic malignant melanoma model. To optimise the use of this combination treatment this study was performed to test the effect of tumour burden and dose of both LTBI and IL-2 on the therapeutic potential of this treatment strategy. Ten-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were inoculated intravenously (day 0) with 1 million B16F1 malignant melanoma cells. Groups of mice received no treatment, a single fraction of LTBI alone, IL-2 treatment alone, or a combination of LTBI and IL-2. Two doses of LTBI and IL-2 were tested. LTBI was given on day +10 and IL-2 treatment started on day +11. On day +18 the mice were killed. The lungs were removed and analysed for tumour burden. Lung sections were also tested for infiltrating leucocytes using immunohistochemical staining. In one experiment, mice were treated at day +7 with low-dose IL-2 with and without LTBI. LTBI (in the two tested doses) showed no independent therapeutic effects. An IL-2 dose of 300,000 Cetus units (CU) that was effective and showed synergism with LTBI when mice were treated on day +7 failed to show a therapeutic effect when mice were treated on day +10, at which time the initial tumour burden had doubled. High-dose IL-2 (600,000 CU), in contrast, led to a significant reduction in metastatic burden compared to the control group. Combining high-dose IL-2 with LTBI led to a further significant reduction in tumour burden. Moreover, this combination was associated with a less severe vascular leakage syndrome compared to IL-2 alone. IL-2 and combination treatment was associated with an increase in the number of tumour-infiltrating immune cells, but only the number of tumour-infiltrating natural killer cells reflected therapeutic efficacy. It was concluded that tumour burden at the time of treatment and IL-2 dose are two crucial factors affecting the synergism between LTBI and IL-2. The combination may not only be more effective than IL-2 alone but also less toxic.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Innate immunity and pathogen-host interaction.

The skin and contiguous mucosal surfaces define the primary locus of interaction between host and micro-organisms. In this review, we focus on the innate immune system in the mucosa, which manages to deal with invading pathogens, the mechanisms that organisms have evolved in order to circumvent this primary defensive barrier and, finally, potential therapeutic manipulation of the innate immune system that was the focus of meeting at a Euroconference/Workshop on "Novel Strategies of Mucosal Immunisation through Exploitation of Mechanisms of Innate Immunity in Pathogen-Host Interaction", which was held in Siena, Italy, November 2002.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Low-dose total body irradiation augments the therapeutic effect of interleukin-2 in a mouse model for metastatic malignant melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose total body irradiation (LTBI) is known for its antitumor immune modulatory effects. Moreover, there is theoretical ground suggesting that combining LTBI with interleukin-2 (IL-2) will have a synergistic immune-mediated antitumor effect. However, the use of LTBI in combination with IL-2 or other forms of immunotherapy has not been tested before. AIM OF THE WORK: To test the efficacy of combining LTBI and IL-2 in controlling lung metastases in a murine model for malignant melanoma compared to IL-2 alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were inoculated intravenously (on day 0) with 1 million B16F1 malignant melanoma cells. The mice received either no treatment (control group), LTBI alone (single fraction of 0.75 Gy), IL-2 treatment alone (30,000 CU x 2 daily for 5 consecutive days), or a combination of LTBI and IL-2. LTBI was given on day +7 and IL-2 treatment started day +8. On day +14, the mice were sacrificed and the lungs were removed and analyzed for tumor burden. Lung sections were also tested for tumor-infiltrating cells using immunohistochemical staining. Peripheral blood and splenic cells were collected and tested for the percentage of the various lymphocytic subsets using immunostaining and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Tumor burden expressed as the percentage of lung area occupied with metastases (+/- 1 SD), was the same in the control group (8.1 +/- 4.9%), and in the group receiving LTBI alone (8.3 +/- 4.5%). Tumor burden was reduced to 6.4% (+/- 3.4%) in the IL-2 alone group (P = 0.3) and further reduced to 3% (+/- 1%) in the combined treatment group (P = 0.004). The difference in tumor burden between the IL-2 alone group and the combined treatment group was statistically significant (P = 0.006). The combined treatment caused a significant increase in the number of natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages infiltrating the metastatic sites. This was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of CD122+ (IL-2R beta) cells and NK cells in both peripheral blood and spleens. CONCLUSION: We conclude that combining LTBI and IL-2 treatment is synergistic and therapeutically more effective than IL-2 alone. The data points to NK cells and macrophages as likely major effectors of the synergistic outcome of the combined treatment. This observation may have important clinical implications in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

Animals↗