PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ivar A Mjor

Publications and source records attributed to Ivar A Mjor.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a universal resin-based restorative material (Beautifil) in combination with a self-etching primer (Fluorobond) for posterior restorations. METHODS: 61 restorations, 26 Class I and 35 Class II, were placed by two clinicians in 31 patients under rubber dam isolation. Two other calibrated clinicians evaluated the restorations using USPHS/Ryge criteria observing the following characteristics: color match, marginal adaptation, anatomy, roughness, marginal staining, interfacial staining, contact, secondary caries, and luster. Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Test were used for statistical analysis (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: All the restorations were assessed at baseline and alpha scores predominated for all criteria. All restorations were examined at the 1-year recall examination. 58 restorations were examined at the 2-year recall (23 Class I and 35 Class II), 47 (16 Class I and 31 Class II) at the 3-year recall. The present 4-year report covers 39 restorations (12 Class I and 27 Class II). Marginal adaptation, staining, anatomy, and color matching constitute the majority of the recorded changes. Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Test of the frequency of clinical rating of each characteristic showed that there were no statistically significant differences at each recall with respect to the baseline observations (P> 0.05), except for occlusal marginal stain. Statistical significance was detected for the occlusal marginal stain at 1-year (P= 0.06), 2-year (P= 0.01) and 4-year (P= 0.002) when compared to baseline data.

Adult↗

Marginal gap repair with flowable resin-based composites.

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the flowable/dentin interface has the weakest bond and highest frequency of failure when a resin-based composite is repaired using a flowable composite. Comparing three specific groups--dentin, flowable composite, and hybrid composite-under the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the mean bond strength values at the flowable/dentin interface and within the dentin were significantly lower than those at the hybrid/flowable interface and within the flowable resin. Dentin near the pulp chamber yielded consistently lower bond strength values than dentin located at the dentino-enamel junction. Bonding at the flowable resin/dentin interface showed the weakest bond and highest frequency of failure.

Analysis of Variance↗

Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial.

This clinical trial sought to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative treatment for replacing amalgam and resin-based composite restorations with marginal defects. The study recruited 66 patients with 271 restorations. Each restoration was assigned randomly to one of five groups: Sealant, Refurbishing, Repair, Replacement, and Untreated. Two clinicians evaluated the restorations according to USPHS/Ryge criteria at baseline (Kappa 0.74) and one year after the treatment (Kappa 0.81). The scoring of the margins improved (from bravo to alfa) after the experimental treatments. None of the treatments showed significant degradation of the margins during the 12-month observation period.

Adolescent↗