PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Dilger

Publications and source records attributed to J A Dilger.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Lower extremity nerve blocks.

Lower extremity nerve blocks have not become as popular as upper extremity blocks for anesthesia; however, the use of lower extremity nerve blocks will become more widespread, as teaching programs are now providing more regional anesthesia experiences for their trainees so that the anesthesia provider will have the familiarity to use these blocks. To increase the enthusiasm among our surgical colleagues, we must begin to use these blocks for surgery, and if the block must be supplemented with local anesthetic or a light general anesthetic, we must educate them that the block is not a failure but a success, as it will provide analgesia after surgery in a method of multimodal pain control. Lower extremity nerve blocks will become more popular when it is realized that they are an effective way of increasing operating room efficiency. Because the block may be placed in an induction room, there is no induction or emergence in the operating room. Patients may be discharged without the need for pain medications, thus lowering the incidence of nausea postoperatively and decreasing PACU and discharge times.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Use of preoperative autologous blood donation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the appropriateness of autologous blood (AB) transfusion during radical retropubic prostatectomy in relation to the cardiopulmonary risk of the patient. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 100 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists status I, II, or III who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy under general or combined general and epidural anesthesia. All patients had donated 2 units (U) of autologous blood, received 0, 1, or 2 U of autologous blood perioperatively, and received no allogeneic blood. Patients were placed in three cardiopulmonary risk groups on the basis of risk factors or documented cardiopulmonary disease. The low-risk group was assigned a target discharge hematocrit of 24% or less; moderate-risk, 25% to 28%; and high-risk, 29% or greater. The appropriateness of transfusion was determined by whether patients' hematocrit was in their group's preassigned range at discharge. RESULTS: On the basis of discharge hematocrit, significantly more low-risk patients underwent inappropriate transfusion than moderate-risk (64% versus 26%, P = 0.006) or high-risk (64% versus 13%, P = 0.001) patients. Seventy-five AB units were discarded and at least 53 U were inappropriately transfused. We found an increase in the number of units of autologous blood transfused when a larger estimated blood loss was reported (P < 0.001). The estimated charge for the units discarded and inappropriately transfused exceeded $12,000. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four percent of autologous blood units were discarded or inappropriately transfused during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Transfusion of autologous blood was not governed by cardiopulmonary risk stratification. If the decision to transfuse had been based on cardiopulmonary risk factors instead of estimated blood loss, fewer patients would have received autologous blood.

Blood Transfusion, Autologous↗
PubMed1998

Ischaemic optic neuropathy after spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: We report a case of ischaemic optic neuropathy which occurred after prolonged spine surgery in the prone position in an obese, diabetic patient. CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient was a 44-yr-old, 123 kg, 183 cm man for decompressive laminectomy and instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone, fentanyl and succinylcholine and maintained with nitrous oxide, oxygen, isoflurane and a fentanyl infusion. He was positioned prone on the Relton-Hall frame and had an uneventful intraoperative course. Estimated blood loss was 3,000 ml. He was taken to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and the trachea was extubated 3.5 hr later. He had no pulmonary or haemodynamic problems and went to a regular nursing floor in the morning. He was discharged home on postoperative day #5. He telephoned his surgeon on postoperative day #7 to say that his vision had been blurry since surgery. His visual acuity was decreased, and on examination, he had a bilateral papillary defect, optic swelling and a splinter haemorrhage in the right eye. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the head and orbits detected no other abnormality. Based on this examination, he was felt to have bilateral ischaemic optic neuropathy and treated conservatively. By postoperative day #47, his visual acuity was greatly improved and near normal. Careful review of possible contributing factors suggests that the cause of the ischaemic optic neuropathy was venous engorgement. CONCLUSION: This patient developed ischaemic optic neuropathy from a prolonged interval in the prone position of the Relton-Hall frame, which may be related to venous engorgement.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Spinal anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a large series of elective lumbar spine surgical procedures by a single surgeon whose patients were all offered spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The records of all elective lumbar spine procedures between 1984 and 1995 performed by one surgeon (GRB) were obtained, and 803 were identified. Of those 803 patients, 611 accepted spinal anesthesia. Data collected included patient demographics, details of the spinal and general anesthesia, perioperative complications, and impact of the spinal anesthetic options on the outcome of spinal anesthesia. General and spinal anesthesia patients were comparable for age, gender, height, and ASA physical status. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly heavier than the general anesthesia patients. Among perioperative complications, nausea and deep venous thrombosis occurred significantly more often in the general than spinal anesthesia patients. Mild hypotension and decreased heart rate (HR) were the most common hemodynamic changes with spinal anesthesia, whereas hypertension and increased HR were the result of general anesthesia. Among spinal anesthetic drugs, plain bupivacaine was associated with the lowest incidence of supplemental local anesthetic use intraoperatively compared to hyperbaric bupivacaine or hyperbaric tetracaine. CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia is an effective alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery and has a reduced rate of minor complications.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of lumbar spine pathology on the incidence of paresthesia during spinal anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paresthesia occasionally occurs during dural puncture or injection of local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia. Although the incidence of neurologic complications after spinal anesthesia is extremely low, the significance of paresthesia is unknown. The influence of known lumbar spine pathology on the incidence of paresthesia during spinal anesthesia is studied. METHODS: Incidence of paresthesia with dural puncture (PP) or injection (PI) was studied in two groups of patients. Group 1 included patients for elective total joint replacement without known spine pathology or complaints. Group 2 included patients for elective lumbar spine surgery who received spinal anesthesia. RESULTS: Significantly more PP (20% vs 9%) and PI (16% vs 6%) occurred in the spine surgery group. There were no neurologic sequelae of spinal anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: This information suggests that the incidence of paresthesia during the conduct of spinal anesthesia is higher in patients with lumbar spine pathology. Although there were no neurologic complications, the sample size is too small to exclude an increase in the neurologic risk of spinal anesthesia in patients with known intraspinal pathology.

Adrenergic Agonists↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Preoperative intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine for pain control after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, morphine, or a combination prior to surgery provided pain control after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: These data were collected as a two-stage prospective, randomized, blinded observer study. All patients received a standard general anesthetic, which included an intra-articular injection 20 minutes prior to incision. In phase I, three solutions were assigned randomly in a 60-mL volume. Group 1 was saline, group 2 was 0.25% bupivacaine, and group 3 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg morphine sulfate (MS). Phase II was identical to phase I in technique and had four groups. Group 1 was 0.25% bupivacaine, group 2 was 1 mg MS in saline, group 3 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg MS, and group 4 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 3 mg MS. All groups in phases I and II contained 1:200,000 epinephrine, freshly added. Pain scores were evaluated at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 minutes postoperative using a visual analog scale. For pain scores of 5 or greater, 50 microg fentanyl was administered at 5-minute intervals until pain was controlled. After transition from phase I to phase II of the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), hydrocodone/acetaminophen tablets were used. RESULTS: Thirty patients were entered into phase I of the study. Both treatment groups (2 and 3) had significant (P < .05) pain reduction on arrival to the PACU. Group 3 had significantly (P < .05) reduced need for fentanyl during the PACU stay. Forty-nine patients entered phase II of the study. In phase II, group 3 had the lowest pain scores on arrival to the PACU. At 120 and 240 minutes, pain scores were lower in groups 3 and 4. Fentanyl and hydrocodone uses were significantly lower during the PACU stay in groups 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical injection of a solution of 0.25 % bupivacaine, morphine, and epinephrine provided pain control and decreased opioid use in the PACU. Increasing the morphine dose did not improve the clinical result.

Acetaminophen↗