Religious perspectives on access to health care: a protestant perspective.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bible↗
Biomedical subjects
J A Forbes
Publications and source records attributed to J A Forbes.
Analgesic efficacy of bromfenac, ibuprofen, and aspirin in postoperative oral surgery pain.
We recently demonstrated that 25 mg of bromfenac, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, is at least as effective as 400 mg of ibuprofen in relieving postoperative oral surgery pain. Our objective in this study was to determine whether higher doses were significantly more effective. Two hundred eighty (280) outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, a single oral dose of 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg bromfenac; 650 mg aspirin; 400 mg ibuprofen; or placebo. Subjects rated their pain and its relief for 8 hours. All active treatments were significantly superior to placebo, and bromfenac and ibuprofen were significantly superior to aspirin. The slope of the dose-response curve of bromfenac was significant. The 100 mg bromfenac dose was significantly more effective than the 400 mg ibuprofen dose and had a significantly longer duration of analgesic action.
Aspirin↗
Effect of caffeine on ibuprofen analgesia in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Recent studies have demonstrated that caffeine acts as an analgesic adjuvant when combined with acetaminophen, aspirin, or their mixture. Our objective was to determine whether similar enhancement of analgesia could be demonstrated when caffeine is combined with ibuprofen. On a double-blind basis, a single oral dose of ibuprofen (50, 100, or 200 mg), a combination of ibuprofen, 100 mg, with caffeine, 100 mg, a combination of ibuprofen, 200 mg, with caffeine, 100 mg, or placebo was randomly assigned to 298 outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. With a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 8 hours. All active treatments were significantly superior to placebo, and the caffeine effect was significant for every measure of analgesia. Relative potency estimates indicated that the combination was 2.4 to 2.8 times as potent as ibuprofen alone. The combination also had a more rapid onset and longer duration of analgesic action. The analgesic adjuvancy of caffeine clearly extends to combinations with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs other than acetaminophen or aspirin.
Adolescent↗
Evaluation of an ibuprofen controlled-release tablet and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Seventy-four outpatients with postoperative pain after oral surgery were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single oral dose of a controlled-release tablet (CRT) containing 600 mg ibuprofen, two 600-mg ibuprofen CRTs, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medicating. Estimates of total and peak analgesia were derived from these subjective reports. The ibuprofen CRTs (600 and 1200 mg) had manifested an analgesic effect by hour 1 and their efficacy persisted for 12 hours. Comparable effect for the two ibuprofen CRT dosages could suggest a plateau in analgesia at the 600-mg level or a lack of upside assay sensitivity. Duration of effect was longer for the CRTs than we have previously observed with conventional ibuprofen tablets. Adverse effects were transitory and consistent with the known pharmacologic profile of the medication evaluated.
Administration, Oral↗
Evaluation of bromfenac, aspirin, and ibuprofen in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Two hundred forty-one outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single oral dose of bromfenac 5, 10, or 25 mg, aspirin 650 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief for 8 hours after medicating. Estimates of summed pain intensity difference, peak pain intensity difference, total relief, peak relief, and hours of 50% relief were derived from these subjective reports. All active treatments were significantly superior to placebo, and the slope of the dose-response curve for bromfenac was significant. Bromfenac 5 mg and aspirin 650 mg were equianalgesic; bromfenac 25 mg was slightly more efficacious than ibuprofen 400 mg. Bromfenac 25 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were significantly superior to the other active treatments. Adverse effects were transient and consistent with the pharmacologic profiles of the medications evaluated.
Administration, Oral↗
Evaluation of ketorolac, aspirin, and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.
One-hundred twenty-eight outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 mg, aspirin 650 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. The acetaminophen-codeine combination was significantly superior to aspirin for peak analgesia. Ketorolac was significantly superior to aspirin for every measure of total and peak analgesia, and significantly superior to acetaminophen-codeine for measures of total effect. The analgesic effect of ketorolac was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 6 hours. Repeat-dose data also suggested that ketorolac 10 mg was superior to aspirin 650 mg and acetaminophen-codeine on the day of surgery. Differences among the active medications were trivial for the postoperative days 1-6 analyses. The frequency of adverse effects was over 4 times greater for acetaminophen-codeine than for ketorolac or aspirin.
Acetaminophen↗
Evaluation of ketorolac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Two-hundred six outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 and 20 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. Analgesia was similar for ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg; however, these treatments were superior to acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination. The analgesic effect of each active medication was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 5-6 hours. The data suggest a plateau in ketorolac's analgesic efficacy at the 10-mg level. Repeat-dose data indicated that on the day of surgery ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were superior to acetaminophen 600 mg; ketorolac 20 mg was also superior to acetaminophen-codeine. Differences among active medications were not significant when data for the entire postoperative period (days 0-6) were evaluated. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications.
Acetaminophen↗
Evaluation of aspirin, caffeine, and their combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Three hundred fifty outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single oral dose of aspirin 650 or 1000 mg, caffeine 65 mg, a combination of aspirin 650 mg with caffeine 65 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. Estimates of summed pain intensity difference, peak pain intensity difference, total relief, peak relief, and hours of 50% relief were derived from these subjective reports. All active treatments except caffeine were significantly superior to placebo. Pairwise comparisons indicated the aspirin-caffeine combination was statistically superior to aspirin 650 mg alone for hours of 50% relief among patients who had severe baseline pain. Adverse effects were transitory and none were serious.
Administration, Oral↗
Empowerment in general practice. The trilogies of caring.
The authors examine the way in which the doctor-patient interaction often varies between an oppressive caring mode and an oppressed caring mode, both of which apply pressures to the participants and prevent good quality care. A model for the trilogy of oppressive, oppressed, and empowerment caring is examined and it is explained how the process of empowerment caring can enhance the general practitioners' quality of care and improve their practice, their home life and their personal wellbeing.
Adaptation, Psychological↗
An evaluation of flurbiprofen, aspirin, and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.
One hundred sixty-four outpatients with postoperative pain after the removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned on a double-blind basis, to receive oral doses of flurbiprofen 25, 50, or 100 mg; aspirin 600 mg; or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 8 hours after medicating. Estimates of sum of pain differences (SPID), peak pain intensity difference (PID), total relief, peak relief, and hours of 50% relief were derived from these subjective reports. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. Analgesia was similar for flurbiprofen 25 mg and aspirin 600 mg. Flurbiprofen 50 and 100 mg were significantly superior to aspirin for every measure of analgesia except peak PID. There was a significant dose-response regression between flurbiprofen 25 mg and both of the higher dosages. Flurbiprofen 50 and 100 mg did not differ significantly, suggesting a plateau in flurbiprofen's analgesia. The analgesic effect of flurbiprofen was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 8 hours. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications.
Adolescent↗
Evaluation of flurbiprofen, acetaminophen, an acetaminophen-codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.
Eighty-eight outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single, oral dose of flurbiprofen 100 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg with codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medicating. Estimates of sum of pain intensity differences, peak pain intensity differences, total relief, peak relief, and hours of 50% relief were derived from these subjective reports. Flurbiprofen and the acetaminophen-codeine combination were significantly superior to placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia and significantly superior to acetaminophen alone for most measures of efficacy. Based on the 12-hour data, acetaminophen alone did not differ significantly from placebo; however, it was superior to placebo for measures of total effect based on the 4-hour data. Flurbiprofen was significantly superior to the acetaminophen codeine combination with respect to the number of hours until remedication. All medications had manifested an effect by hour 1; analgesia persisted for 12 hours for flurbiprofen, 6 hours for acetaminophen-codeine, and 3 hours for acetaminophen alone. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications.
Acetaminophen↗
Nalbuphine, acetaminophen, and their combination in postoperative pain.
In a double-blind study with the use of subjective reports of patients as indices of analgesia, we compared the analgesic effect of oral nalbuphine and acetaminophen and determined the contribution of each to the efficacy of their combination. In this parallel 2 X 2 factorial study, 129 inpatients after surgery were randomly assigned to treatment with a single oral dose of nalbuphine hydrochloride (30 mg), acetaminophen (650 mg), the combination of nalbuphine (30 mg) and acetaminophen (650 mg), or placebo. In the factorial analysis, both the nalbuphine and acetaminophen effects were significant for virtually every measure of total and peak analgesia, whereas the interaction contrast was not significant for any measure of analgesic effect. This indicates that the analgesic effect of the combination represents the additive effect of its constituents and is consistent with the results of studies of combinations of codeine and other opioids with aspirin or acetaminophen. There were few adverse effects other than sedation, which occurred twice as frequently in patients treated with nalbuphine as in those receiving acetaminophen or placebo. Our data suggest that this combination should prove at least as effective as any currently marketed narcotic-containing combination. Since nalbuphine has less dependence liability than narcotics and exhibits a ceiling on respiratory depression, its combination with acetaminophen should also be safer than comparable narcotic combinations.
Acetaminophen↗
Diflunisal. A new oral analgesic with an unusually long duration of action.
The analgesic efficacy of single 500- and 1,000-mg doses of diflunisal (Dolobid), a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with that of acetaminophen, 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen, 600 mg, with codeine phosphate, 60 mg, and placebo in 159 oral surgery outpatients. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Both doses of diflunisal were significantly more effective than acetaminophen alone and produced peak analgesia comparable to that of the acetaminophen-codeine combination. Diflunisal proved to have an unusually long duration of analgesic action. Acetaminophen and the combination were significantly superior to placebo through hours 2 and 5, respectively; both doses of diflunisal were significantly superior through the end of the 12-hour observation period. None of the active treatments produced more side effects than the placebo.
Acetaminophen↗
An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of three opioid-analgesic combinations in postoperative oral surgery pain.
The analgesic efficacy of a hydrocodone-acetaminophen combination, a codeine-acetaminophen combination, a codeine-APC (aspirin, phenacetin, and caffeine) combination, and a placebo was evaluated in outpatients who had moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Each of the active medications had a significant effect on essentially all measures of total and peak analgesia; they did not differ significantly on any measure of analgesia. Adverse effects were transitory and, in general, appear to have been related to the centrally acting component of each combination analgesic.
Acetaminophen↗
An evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of proquazone and aspirin in postoperative dental pain.
The analgesic efficacy of 75, 150, and 300 mg proquazone, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, was compared to that of 650 mg aspirin and a placebo in outpatients who had moderate or severe pain following the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Estimates of the relative potency of proquazone to aspirin ranged from 4.9 to 6.2 for total analgesic effect and from 7.7 to 8.4 for peak analgesic effect. Each dosage level of proquazone and aspirin provided significant analgesia compared to placebo and was well tolerated. Adverse effects were transitory and did not appear to be dose related for proquazone.
Adolescent↗
Effect of nighttime anisotropine methyl bromide of duodenal ulcer healing and pain: a double-blind controlled trial.
Anisotropine methyl bromide, an anticholinergic, 80 mg given orally at 8 P.M., suppresses gastric acid secretion through the night without significant side effects. Thirty patients with endoscopy-proved symptomatic duodenal ulcer disease completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nighttime anisotropine methyl bromide therapy. Eleven (69 per cent) of 16 anisotropine methyl bromide-treated and six (43 per cent) of 14 placebo-treated subjects healed their ulcers within two weeks of starting treatment. The anisotropine methyl bromide-treated subjects averaged 0.63 +/- 0.27 (mean +/- S.E.) episodes of nocturnal pain during the treatment period versus 2.71 +/- 1.08 episodes in the placebo group (P = 0.06). This is the first reported study of this type designed to evaluate the efficacy of an anticholinergic agent in the healing of duodenal ulcers. Although not conclusive, the results suggest nighttime anisotropine methyl bromide therapy may be useful in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease. Further studies seem warranted.
Adult↗
A double-blind evaluation of the nocturnal antisecretory effects of anisotropine methylbromide in man. Dose response and duration of action studies.
The effects of graded doses of anisotropine methylbromide on nocturanl gastric secretion were investigated in a double-blind crossover study in man. Single doses considerably higher than those usually employed for daytime use in adjunctive therapy of peptic ulcer disease significantly reduced acid secretion without significantly influencing heart rate, blood pressure, visual acuity, or visual accommodation. The duration of action of large doses was then evaluated in fasted and nonfasted subjects. A single dose reduced acid secretion for up to 8 hours, eliminating the nocturnal elevation of acid secretion characteristic of the normal circadian pattern. Near visual acuity and accommodation decreased, an effect more pronounced in fasted subjects, but the magnitude of visual impairment was small. These findings provide the basis for a controlled trial of high-dose nighttime therapy in peptic ulcer disease.
Adult↗
Southampton: the first years. V--Primary medical care in Southampton.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Education, Medical, Undergraduate↗