PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Forbes

Publications and source records attributed to J A Forbes.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

A 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, aspirin, and placebo in postoperative dental pain.

Two-hundred and one outpatients with postoperative pain following oral surgery were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, a single oral dose of diflunisal (250, 500, or 1000 mg), aspirin (650 mg), or placebo. Using a self-rating record, the subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Measures of peak and total analgesia were derived from the patients' subjective reports. Diflunisal 250 and 1000 mg were significantly superior to aspirin for every measure of total and peak analgesia; the 500-mg diflunisal dose was significantly superior to aspirin for measures of total analgesia only. All doses of diflunisal were significantly superior to aspirin and placebo at each hour from hour 3 through hour 12. Approximately 60 per cent of the patients treated with diflunisal completed the 12-hour observation period without the need for additional analgesic therapy. Adverse effects were mild and transitory and occurred in less than 10 per cent of the patients.

Adult↗

Analgesic effect of acetaminophen, phenyltoloxamine and their combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.

In this factorial study, 148 outpatients with pain after oral surgery were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, a single oral dose of acetaminophen 650 mg, phenyltoloxamine 60 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 650 mg with phenyltoloxamine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medication. Measures of total and peak analgesia were derived from these subjective reports. The acetaminophen effect was significant for every measure of total and peak analgesia. The phenyltoloxamine effect was not significant for any measure of analgesia. Although efficacy was lower for the acetaminophen-phenyltoloxamine combination than for acetaminophen alone, for every variable, the contrast for interaction was not statistically significant. The results of this study differ from those of previous studies in patients with headache and musculoskeletal pain. All adverse effects were transitory and consistent with the known pharmacologic profiles of the study medications or the backup analgesic.

Acetaminophen↗

Analgesic effect of fendosal, ibuprofen and aspirin in postoperative oral surgery pain.

The analgesic efficacy of a single 200-mg dose of fendosal, a nonnarcotic, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, was compared, in a double-blind study, with aspirin 650 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg and placebo in outpatients who had moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for up to 12 hours after medicating. Each active medication was significantly superior to placebo. The peak analgesic effect of fendosal 200 mg was similar to that of the aspirin 650-mg standard. Although fendosal's onset of action was slow (3 hours), its effect persisted for 8 hours, substantially longer than that of aspirin. Ibuprofen 400 mg was statistically significantly superior to aspirin 650 mg and fendosal 200 mg for most measures of peak and total analgesia, and its effect persisted for 8 hours. The results of this study raise some questions concerning the comparability of data from studies that employ different criteria for remedication and/or different criteria for the inclusion of data in the analyses of efficacy.

Adolescent↗

Analgesic effect of naproxen sodium, codeine, a naproxen-codeine combination and aspirin on the postoperative pain of oral surgery.

In a double-blind study, 198 outpatients with pain after oral surgery were randomly assigned to treatment with a single oral dose of naproxen sodium 550 mg, codeine sulfate 60 mg, a combination of naproxen sodium 550 mg with codeine sulfate 60 mg, aspirin 650 mg or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Orthogonal contrasts for the four treatments making up the factorial component showed that the naproxen effect was significant for every measurement of total and peak analgesia; the codeine effect was significant for total and peak pain relief and patients' overall evaluation. The naproxen-codeine interaction was not statistically significant for any measure, which suggests that the analgesic effect of the combination represents the additive effect of its constituents. Based on pairwise comparisons, aspirin was significantly superior to placebo for most measures of effect, naproxen was significantly superior to both aspirin and codeine for all measures and the combination was significantly superior to naproxen for patients' overall evaluation. No more patients experienced adverse effects with aspirin or naproxen than with placebo, but significantly more patients receiving the codeine-containing treatments experienced adverse effects than those receiving aspirin and naproxen.

Adolescent↗

Analgesic effect of an aspirin-codeine-butalbital-caffeine combination and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain.

The efficacy of an aspirin-caffeine-codeine-butalbital combination was compared to an acetaminophen-codeine combination and placebo in outpatients who had moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain, relief, anxiety and relaxation hourly for up to 6 hours after medicating. Each active medication was significantly superior to placebo for measures of analgesia and relaxation. Although the butalbital-containing combination provided consistently greater analgesia, the differences between active medications were not statistically significant. The acetaminophen-codeine combination significantly reduced anxiety; however, the butalbital containing combination did not. The results of this study suggest that female patients may have greater efficacy than male patients. All adverse effects were transitory and consistent with the known pharmacologic profiles of the study medications or the backup analgesic.

Acetaminophen↗

A 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, zomepirac sodium, aspirin, and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.

One hundred ninety-nine outpatients with pain following oral surgery were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, a single oral dose of diflunisal (500 or 1,000 mg), zomepirac sodium 100 mg, aspirin 650 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Measures of total and peak analgesia were derived from these patients' subjective reports. Diflunisal (500 and 1,000 mg) and zomepirac were significantly superior to aspirin and placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia. Based upon the first 4 hours of observation, aspirin was superior to placebo for every measure of analgesia. Diflunisal 500 and 1,000 mg were comparable to zomepirac in peak analgesia and significantly superior to zomepirac for all measures of total analgesia. The onset of analgesia was comparable for 1,000 mg diflunisal, zomepirac, and aspirin, but more rapid for these treatments than for 500 mg diflunisal. The duration of analgesia was 12 hours for diflunisal, 9 hours for zomepirac, and 3 hours for aspirin.

Analgesics↗

A 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen-codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative pain.

The analgesic efficacy of single 500 and 1,000 mg doses of diflunisal, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with acetaminophen 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen 600 mg with codeine 60 mg, and placebo in 132 inpatients with postoperative pain. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for up to 12 hours after medication. Diflunisal 500 and 1,000 mg were significantly superior to placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia, and a significant analgesic effect persisted for 8 hours. Acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination were significantly superior to placebo for most measures of analgesia, and their effects were significant for 4 and 5 hours respectively. Differences among the active medications were not statistically significant for measures of total or peak analgesia.

Acetaminophen↗

A method for the 12-hour evaluation of analgesic efficacy in outpatients with postoperative oral surgery pain. Three studies of diflunisal.

We have developed a method for measuring the efficacy of a single dose of an analgesic for 12 hours after administration of outpatients with postoperative oral surgery pain. Using a self-rating record, patients evaluate their pain and its relief for 12 hours after medication. We have used this method successfully in a series of three studies to compare diflunisal, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, with placebo and aspirin 650 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, propoxyphene napsylate 100 mg, or a combination of acetaminophen with either codeine 60 mg or propoxyphene 100 mg. Diflunisal evinced an unusually long duration of analgesic effect. In each study, all doses of diflunisal were significantly superior to placebo through the end of the 12-hour observation period, while the standards were superior for periods ranging from 2 to 7 hours. In terms of peak analgesia, diflunisal 1,000 mg was comparable to the acetaminophen-codeine combination and was significantly superior to all the other analgesic standards.

Acetaminophen↗

Evaluation of bromfenac and ibuprofen for pain after orthopedic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative analgesic potency and adverse effect liability of bromfenac 25, 50, and 100 mg, and ibuprofen 200 and 400 mg in the treatment of postoperative pain after orthopedic surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group relative potency assay with evaluations at 30 minutes and then at hourly intervals for up to 6 hours. SETTING: Two wards of the orthopedic surgery department at the Centralsjukhuset (Central Hospital) in Karlstad, Sweden. PATIENTS: Two hundred inpatients with steady, moderate or severe pain within 72 hours after orthopedic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a single oral dose of bromfenac 25, 50, or 100 mg, or ibuprofen 200 or 400 mg, when they experienced steady, moderate or severe pain that, in their opinion, required an analgesic. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief for 6 hours after medicating. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study was a valid relative potency assay with estimates of bromfenac's potency relative to ibuprofen ranging from 10.9 (nurse's global evaluation) to 16.7 (sum of hourly analog pain intensity difference scores). That is, 11-16 times the dose of ibuprofen must be administered to equal the analgesic effect of bromfenac. Patients who had eaten breakfast or lunch within 60 minutes before or 30 minutes after receiving the study medication ("fed" patients) had lower efficacy scores than those who had not ingested food within these time constraints before or after receiving the study medication ("fasted" patients). Furthermore, patients who had eaten before receiving the study medication had significantly lower efficacy scores than those who had eaten after receiving the study medication. CONCLUSIONS: The relative potency of the analgesic effect of bromfenac to ibuprofen is 11-16.7 in patients with pain after orthopedic surgery. Fed patients may have lower analgesic efficacy than fasted patients. Adverse effects for both bromfenac and ibuprofen were transient and consistent with the pharmacologic profiles of the drugs.

Analgesics↗

Evaluation of two opioid-acetaminophen combinations and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative analgesic potency and adverse effect liability of hydrocodone bitartrate 7.5 mg with acetaminophen 500 mg, codeine phosphate 30 mg with acetaminophen 300 mg, and placebo in the treatment of pain following oral surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with self-ratings at 30 minutes and then at hourly intervals from hour 1 to hour 6. SETTING: Private, oral surgery practice sites. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-four outpatients with moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were selected. One was lost to follow-up and 32 did not need an analgesic; 232 patients had valid efficacy data. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were treated with a single oral dose of hydrocodone bitartrate 7.5 mg with acetaminophen 500 mg, codeine phosphate 30 mg with acetaminophen 300 mg, or placebo when they experienced steady, moderate or severe pain that, in their opinion, required an analgesic. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief for 6 hours after medicating; estimates of peak and total analgesia were derived from these subjective reports. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This study was a valid analgesic assay. Both active treatments were significantly superior to placebo for all measures of analgesic efficacy. The hydrocodone-acetaminophen combination was significantly superior to the codeine-acetaminophen combination for total pain relief and the number of evaluations with 50% relief. Both active treatments manifested an analgesic effect within 30 minutes; the effect persisted for 5 hours for the codeine combination and 6 hours for the hydrocodone combination. Adverse effects were transient, consistent with the pharmacologic profiles of opioids, and none required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A slight advantage in analgesic efficacy was demonstrated in this single-dose study for the hydrocodone-acetaminophen combination. Repeat-dose studies, however, should be conducted to determine the clinical significance of the difference in analgesic effect of these opioid combinations.

Acetaminophen↗