PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Hartmann

Publications and source records attributed to J A Hartmann.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

[Histological studies of retinal degeneration and biocompatibility of subretinal implants].

Two basic biological premises determine the success of replacement of degenerated photoreceptors by a technical implant. First, the neuronal network in the residual retina of patients selected for implantation must still be capable of processing technically generated signals. Secondly, the implant itself must be biocompatible with tissue, i.e. it may not itself induce further degeneration. Our studies in animal models with advanced retinal degeneration and with donor retinas of retinitis pigmentosa patients have shown that even after complete destruction of the photoreceptors and long periods of blindness, the inner retina in the macular area remains for the most part histologically intact, and that all neurons are demonstrably still present and capable of successfully transmitting and processing signals. Biocompatibility of subretinal implants was studied in pigs. After 14 months of implantation, histological examination of tissue covering the implant showed that the inner retina was completely intact. There were no signs of histopathologic changes.

Animals↗

Denial of visual perception.

An adult with the diagnosis of cortical blindness, complaining of a complete visual loss of 2 years in duration, was found to have a small preserved visual field and remarkably preserved visual abilities. Although denying visual perception, he correctly named objects, colors, and famous faces, recognized facial emotions, and read various types of single words with greater than 50% accuracy when presented in the upper right visual field. Upon confrontation regarding his apparent visual abilities, the patient continued to deny visual perceptual awareness, typically stating "I feel it." CT indicated bioccipital lesions sparing the left inferior occipital area but involving the left parietal lobe. The denial of visual perception evidenced by this patient may be explained by a disconnection of parietal lobe attentional systems from visual perception. The clinical presentation is described as representing "inverse Anton's syndrome."

Blindness↗