PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Kobashigawa

Publications and source records attributed to J A Kobashigawa.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus vs. cyclosporine with MMF in cardiac transplant patients: 1-year report.

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces intimal thickness by intravascular ultrasound after heart transplant: reanalysis of the multicenter trial.

UNLABELLED: The mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) trial involved 650 heart transplant patients from 28 centers who received MMF or azathioprine (AZA), both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Baseline and 1-year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were performed in 196 patients (102 MMF and 94 AZA) with no differences between groups in IVUS results analyzed by morphometric analysis (average of 10 evenly spaced sites, without matching sites between studies). Baseline to first-year IVUS data can also be analyzed by site-to-site analysis (matching sites between studies), which has been reported to be more clinically relevant. Therefore, we used site-to-site analysis to reanalyze the multicenter MMF IVUS data. RESULTS: IVUS images were reviewed and interpretable in 190 patients (99 MMF and 91 AZA) from the multicenter randomized trial. The AZA group compared to the MMF group had a larger number of patients with first-year maximal intimal thickness (MIT)>or=0.3 mm (43% vs. 23%, p=0.005), a greater decrease in the mean lumen area (p=0.02) and a decrease in the mean vessel area (the area actually increased in the MMF group, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: MMF-treated heart transplant patients compared to AZA-treated patients, both concurrently on cyclosporine and corticosteroids, in this study have significantly less progression of first-year intimal thickening.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗
PubMed2006

Phosphorylated S6 ribosomal protein: a novel biomarker of antibody-mediated rejection in heart allografts.

We tested the hypothesis that phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein (S6RP), a downstream target of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, is a biomarker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart allografts. Primary cultures of human aortic and microvascular endothelial cells (EC) were treated with anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies (Ab) and cell lysates were studied for phosphorylation of S6 ribosmal protein at Serine235/236 (p-S6RP). Treatment of cultured EC with anti-class I and class II Ab stimulated S6RP phosphorylation. Immunohistochemical techniques were used to detect the level of p-S6RP in endomyocardial biopsies (n = 131) from 46 heart transplant recipients and the results were correlated with histopathological diagnosis of rejection, C4d staining, production of posttransplant anti-HLA Ab and clinical outcome. Increased phosphorylation of S6RP in endomyocardial biopsies was significantly associated with the diagnosis of AMR (p < 0.0001). No significant association between acute cellular rejection (ACR) and p-S6RP was observed. C4d staining was positively associated with both AMR and p-S6RP. Posttransplant anti-HLA class II Ab production was also significantly associated with a positive p-S6RP status in cardiac biopsies. These results indicate that p-S6RP is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of AMR.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Cardiac transplant experience with cyclosporine.

The advent of cyclosporine 20 years ago was a major advance in the field of solid organ transplantation. Its use enabled directed immunosuppression with a consequent decrease in the incidence of graft failure, acute rejection, and systemic infection. The early oil-based preparation, however, was difficult to administer and had limited bioavailability and unpredictable pharmacokinetics. The drug also has a fairly narrow therapeutic window with major long-term side effects, which include nephrotoxicity, malignancy, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. The introduction of a microemulsion preparation (Neoral) with improved bioavailability has been associated with lower rates of rejection and comparable tolerability, therefore allowing the use of lower doses. Traditionally cyclosporine toxicity has been minimized by monitoring trough levels. Monitoring of levels 2 hours after dosing may provide a more accurate determination of cyclosporine exposure. The next phase in cardiac transplantation immunosuppression will most likely see a significantly diminished role for cyclosporine with the introduction of newer, more potent immunosuppressive agents with more favorable side-effect profiles. These agents, which include mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, and everolimus, also hold the promise of having a major impact on the development of transplant vasculopathy, which up to now has been an important determinant of limiting long-term allograft survival.

Cyclosporine↗
PubMed2004

Incidence of acute cellular rejection and non-cellular rejection in cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Rejection continues to be one of the leading causes of death during the first year after cardiac transplantation. With the advent of more potent immunosuppressive therapies, the incidence of graft rejection has been reported to be decreasing. Yet, this trend has not been well established due to differences in the interpretation of and the protocols for endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Additionally, the incidence of humoral (noncellular) rejection has not been adequately addressed. METHODS: Six thousand one hundred thirty endomyocardial biopsy specimens in 487 cardiac transplant recipients during the first year posttransplantation from 1990 to 2000 were reviewed to assess the incidences of acute cellular and treated noncellular rejection episodes. Cellular rejection was defined as ISHLT grades 3-4; noncellular rejection as a 20% decrease in echo LVEF, cardiac index <2.0, and/or inotropic support associated with ISHLT grades 0-2 necessitating treatment. RESULTS: The incidence of noncellular rejection has remained relatively unchanged at approximately 20% (P=nonsignificant for all years); in contrast, there has been a significant decrease (P <.001) in the incidence of cellular rejection from 54% to 5%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of noncellular rejection in cardiac transplant recipients has remained unchanged through the 1990s despite improved immunosuppressive therapies, which have significantly decreased the incidence of acute cellular rejection. There appears to be a need for newer immunosuppressive agents to effectively treat noncellular rejection. Clinical trials using allograft rejection as a major endpoint will need to increase the enrollment of patients to achieve adequate power to demonstrate differences between study groups.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed2001

Statins as immunosuppressive agents.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease in the transplanted heart, also known as cardiac allograft vasculopathy, is one of the major causes of mortality late after heart transplantation. This accelerated form of atherosclerosis also affects the donor organs of other transplant recipients including that of liver, kidney and lung. There are multiple immune and non-immune risk factors associated with this disease process, one of which is hyperlipidemia. Use of lipid lowering agents, specifically HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) was initially reported to have outcomes benefit and possibly immunosuppressive effects in a single center study of heart transplant recipients. Other subsequent studies have supported this beneficial effect. METHOD AND RESULTS: In a recent paper by Kwak and colleagues, the specific mechanism for this immunosuppressive effect has been elucidated through the use of experiments monitoring cell surface expression assayed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and by immunofluorescence as well as mRNA levels of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II). They report that statins repress induction of MHC-II by interferon-gamma and that this in turn represses activation of T-lymphocytes and other cell types including primary human smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, as well as in established cell lines such as ThP1, melanomas, and HeLa cells. CONCLUSION: In addition to previous clinical and laboratory publications this work by Kwak and colleagues has provided a firm scientific rationale to support the use of statins as adjunct immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Flow cytometric detection of HLA-specific antibodies as a predictor of heart allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Historically, panel reactive antibody (PRA) analysis to detect HLA antibodies has been performed using cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) techniques. Recently, a flow cytometric procedure (FlowPRA) was introduced as an alternative approach to detect HLA antibodies. The flow methodology, using a solid phase matrix to which soluble HLA class I or class II antigens are attached is significantly more sensitive than CDC assays. However, the clinical relevance of antibodies detected exclusively by FlowPRAhas not been established. In this study of cardiac allograft recipients, FlowPRA was performed on pretransplant sera with no detectable PRA activity as assessed by CDC assays. FlowPRA antibody activity was then correlated with clinical outcome. METHODS: PRA analysis by anti-human globulin enhanced (AHG) CDC and FlowPRA was performed on sera corresponding to final cross-match specimens from 219 cardiac allograft recipients. In addition, sera collected 3-6 months posttransplant from 91 patients were evaluated. The presence or absence of antibodies was correlated with episodes of rejection and patient survival. A rejection episode was considered to have occurred based on treatment with antirejection medication and/or histology. RESULTS: By CDC, 12 patients (5.5%) had pretransplant PRA >10%. In contrast, 72 patients (32.9%) had pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA (34 patients with only class I antibodies; 7 patients with only class II antibodies; 31 patients with both class I and class II antibodies). A highly significant association (P<0.001) was observed between pretransplant HLA antibodies detected by FlowPRA and episodes of rejection that occurred during the first posttransplant year. Fifteen patients died within the first year posttransplant. Of nine retrospective flow cytometric cross-matches that were performed, two were in recipients who had no pretransplant antibodies detectable by FlowPRA. Both of these cross-matches were negative. In contrast, five of seven cross-matches were positive among recipients who had FlowPRA detectable pretransplant antibodies. Posttransplant serum specimens from 91 patients were also assessed for antibodies by FlowPRA. Among this group, 58 patients had FlowPRA antibodies and there was a trend (although not statistically significant) for a biopsy documented episode of rejection to have occurred among patients with these antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data suggest that pre- and posttransplant HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA and not AHG-CDC identify cardiac allograft recipients at risk for rejection. Furthermore, a positive donor reactive flow cytometric cross-match is significantly associated with graft loss. Thus, we believe that detection and identification of HLA-specific antibodies can be used to stratify patients into high and low risk categories. An important observation of this study is that in the majority of donor:recipient pairs, pretransplant HLA antibodies were not directed against donor antigens. We speculate that these non-donor-directed antibodies are surrogate markers that correspond to previous T cell activation. Thus, the rejection episodes that occur in these patients are in response to donor-derived MHC peptides that share cryptic determinants with the HLA antigens that initially sensitized the patient.

Antibodies↗
PubMed2000

Chronic right-sided myocarditis mimicking arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a cause of right ventricular heart failure and has been implicated in some cases of sudden death in young adults. It is well known that a large majority of patients with ARVD have histological evidence suggestive of inflammation. Here we report a unique case of chronic myocarditis limited to the right ventricle and right side of the interventricular septum which presented clinically as ARVD. The fact that right sided myocarditis can clinically mimic the genetic disease of classic arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia has therapeutic implications for the patient and relatives.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

A controlled trial of exercise rehabilitation after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In patients who have received a cardiac transplant, the denervated donor heart responds abnormally to exercise and exercise tolerance is reduced. The role of physical exercise in the treatment of patients who have undergone cardiac transplantation has not been determined. We assessed the effects of training on the capacity for exercise early after cardiac transplantation. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients who were discharged within two weeks after receiving a heart transplant were randomly assigned to participate in a six-month structured cardiac-rehabilitation program (exercise group, 14 patients) or to undergo unstructured therapy at home (control group, 13 patients). Each patient in the exercise group underwent an individualized program of muscular-strength and aerobic training under the guidance of a physical therapist, whereas control patients received no formal exercise training. Cardiopulmonary stress testing was performed at base line (within one month after heart transplantation) and six months later. RESULTS: As compared with the control group, the exercise group had significantly greater increases in peak oxygen consumption (mean increase, 4.4 ml per kilogram of body weight per minute [49 percent] vs. 1.9 ml per kilogram per minute [18 percent]; P=0.01) and workload (mean increase, 35 W [59 percent] vs. 12 W [18 percent]; P=0.01) and a greater reduction in the ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (mean decrease, 13 [20 percent] vs. 6 [11 percent]; P=0.02). The mean dose of prednisone, the number of patients taking antihypertensive medications, the average number of episodes of rejection and of infection during the study period, and weight gain did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: When initiated early after cardiac transplantation, exercise training increases the capacity for physical work.

Blood Pressure↗
PubMed1999

Does use of intravascular ultrasound accelerate arteriopathy in heart transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a sensitive method for assessing allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients, but it is not known whether this instrumentation traumatizes the transplanted arteries and affects progression of arteriopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Yearly coronary angiograms were obtained in 86 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 1991 and May 1995. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) no IVUS performed after transplantation (group 1, n = 47); (2) IVUS of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) performed only at year 1 (group 2, n = 13); and (3) IVUS of the LAD performed at both baseline (within 2 months after transplantation) and year 1 after transplantation (group 3, n = 26). Coronary angiography measurements of lumen diameter were performed at 5 segments along the length of the LAD and left circumflex artery (LCX) from baseline through the second-year studies except in group 2, which did not receive a baseline angiogram; IVUS measurements were obtained at 10 cross sections from each artery. At baseline, there was no significant difference in vessel diameter for either the LAD or the LCX artery between the IVUS (group 3) and no IVUS (group 1) groups. Within each group, the lumen of both the LAD and LCX narrowed from baseline to year 1 (group 1: 3.3 +/- 0.6 mm to 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm in LAD, P =.001; 3. 3 +/- 0.6 mm to 3.0 +/- 0.5 mm in LCX, P =.006; group 3: 3.5 +/- 0.7 mm to 3.1 +/- 0.6 mm in LAD, P =.01; 3.1 +/- 0.6 mm to 2.8 +/- 0.5 mm in LCX, P = 0.07), but there were no significant differences between the instrumented artery (LAD) and control artery (LCX) or further changes observed at year 2. There were also no significant differences in the percent reductions at year 1 and year 2 between arteries or between groups. By IVUS, from baseline to year 1 in group 3, the plaque cross-sectional area (CSA) increased (1.6 +/- 1. 9 to 2.3 +/- 1.7 mm(2), P <.0001), the lumen CSA decreased (12.7 +/- 3.7 to 11.7 +/- 3.3 mm(2), P =.04), and the maximum lumen diameter decreased (4.2 +/- 0.6 to 4.0 +/- 0.6 mm, P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVUS is not associated with acceleration of arteriopathy in heart transplantation recipients. Luminal narrowing occurs predominantly during the first year after transplantation. There was no significant change in lumen dimensions during the second year.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Postoperative management following heart transplantation.

Advances in surgical techniques, postoperative care, and experience have led to improved outcome in heart transplant patients. Specifically, the use of corticosteroid-free immunosuppression has reduced the risk of infection. The use of pravastatin early after transplantation has led to a decrease in clinically severe rejection episodes, improvement in survival, and reduction in transplant coronary artery disease. Reduction in natural-killer-cell cytotoxicity in the pravastatin-treated patients suggests an adjunct immunosuppressive effect of pravastatin in those patients on CyA-based immunosuppression. Quality of life has also improved in the heart transplant recipient with cardiac rehabilitation demonstrating a beneficial role in the improvement of exercise capacity. Newer immunosuppressive agents and strategies continue to demonstrate benefit in improving survival and the quality of life of the heart transplant recipient.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1999

Psychiatric disorders and outcome following cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors are frequently included in determining candidacy for cardiac transplantation. Although there are some data demonstrating a link between preoperative psychosocial status and postoperative outcome, a definitive answer has yet to be reached. METHODS: We studied 107 consecutive patients, transplanted from January 1990 to September 1991, with a retrospective review of pretransplant psychiatric evaluations to define a DSM III-R Axis I diagnosis. The medical outcome data included 1-year survival, rehospitalizations, infections, and rejection episodes, gathered from the transplant database. RESULTS: There were no discernable differences between the groups with (n = 25) and without (n = 82) a DSM III-R Axis I psychiatric disorder prior to transplant in the evaluation of demographic data and medical outcome variables. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that individuals with a history of psychiatric disorder who are carefully selected for compliance with medical care display no inherent difference from individuals without psychiatric disorder in medical outcome and survival at 1 year after cardiac transplantation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Mycophenolate mofetil in cardiac transplantation.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immunosuppressive agent with proven efficacy in the prevention of rejection in renal transplant recipients. Clinical studies in heart transplantation have suggested efficacy in patients with refractory and persistent rejection. A large multicenter randomized primary prevention trial in heart transplant patients has just been completed and suggests benefits of MMF in survival and treated rejection episodes. This drug appears to be well tolerated without significant increase in infection or other complications. MMF appears to be an important immunosuppressive agent in cardiac transplant recipients.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

High density associated enzymes: their role in vascular biology.

Enzymes associated with circulating HDL include lecithin: cholesterol acyl transferase, phospholipid transfer protein, cholesterol ester transfer protein, paraoxonase 1 and platelet activating factor acetylhydrolase. Together with lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase these enzymes produce important lipoprotein remodeling and modulate their structure and function and therefore their role in artery wall metabolism.

1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine Esterase↗
PubMed1998

The University of California at Los Angeles experience in heart transplantation.

In the last decade, the number of patients undergoing heart transplant has steadily increased as a result of expanding indications for this procedure. The limitation on the number of transplants performed has been the number of donor organs available. At UCLA, 900 heart transplant procedures have been performed from 1984-1998. Since 1991, the percent of patients free from rejection and infection in the first year after transplant was 70% and 73%, respectively. Actuarial one-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 84%, 76%, and 72%, respectively. Survival of patients aged 60 years and over (n = 105) was comparable to that of patients under age 60. We have been pursuing corticosteroid-free immunosuppression, which has led to a decrease in infection complications. Our work with pravastatin early after transplantation has led to a decrease in clinically severe rejection episodes, which has translated into improved survival. Pravastatin also appears to decrease the development of transplant coronary artery disease and appears to have an adjunct immunosuppressive effect in our heart transplant patients on CsA-based immunosuppression. We have also demonstrated benefit of cardiac rehabilitation early after transplant which should therefore be considered as standard postoperative care. Finally, we have participated and led the multicenter mycophenolate study in demonstrating this drug's effectiveness in improved outcomes in primary heart transplant recipients. Future studies include the use of Rapamycin and interleukin-2 receptor blockers which have been demonstrated in kidney transplantation to significantly reduce rejection. Our program is committed to seek better ways to improve outcome and the quality of life of our heart transplant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The inhibitory effects of pravastatin on natural killer cell activity in vivo and on cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity in vitro.

BACKGROUND: We have reported that heart transplant recipients treated with pravastatin demonstrate decreases in the incidence of clinically severe acute rejection episodes, the incidence and progression of transplant coronary vasculopathy, and natural killer cytotoxicity. These patients also exhibited a significant improvement in 1-year allograft survival. Because of these clinical findings suggesting an immunosuppressive effect of pravastatin unique to transplant recipients and the unclear role of natural killer cells in allograft rejection, we postulated that pravastatin may exert its immunomodulatory effect by acting with cyclosporine to alter T lymphocyte function. METHODS: Twenty patients randomized into an ongoing trial of pravastatin after heart transplantation were monitored serially for natural killer cell cytotoxicity. In a separate experiment, lymphocytes isolated from normal volunteers were treated with various combinations of pravastatin and cyclosporine and tested for cytotoxic T lymphocyte toxicity in a one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction. RESULTS: Pravastatin-treated heart transplant recipients exhibited a decrease in natural killer cell cytotoxicity (9.8% mean natural killer cell cytotoxicity vs 22.1% in the control group, p < 0.01). In the one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction with blood obtained from control subjects, there was a synergistic inhibition of cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity when the cells were cultured in a combination of pravastatin and cyclosporine (20.3% mean cytotoxicity of target cells vs 41.4% in the control group, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Pravastatin exerts an immunosuppressive effect in heart transplant recipients as expressed by a reduction in rejection and natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Pravastatin and cyclosporine act synergistically to reduce cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity. This synergistic effect of pravastatin and cyclosporine may explain why this immunosuppressive effect is unique to transplant recipients.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗