PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Mendelson

Publications and source records attributed to J A Mendelson.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

The relationship between mechanisms of wounding and principles of treatment of missile wounds.

Determinants of the wounding effects of a metallic projectile include the velocity, mass, shape, and stability of the missile, and whether it tumbles, deforms, or fragments within the body. The velocity, mass, shape, and stability influence its capability to penetrate through the skin, and the other factors influence the depth and volume of the wound. The energy lost into the tissues (kinetic energy deposition) is a greater determinant of potential wound volume than is the striking velocity, even though, because K.E. = 1/2 MV2, the potential striking K.E. is more strongly influenced by velocity than mass. The actual size and shape of the wound is influenced by tumbling, deformation, and fragmentation of the projectile and by the characteristics of the tissues and organs contacted. The pulsating temporary cavitation resulting from the passage of a high-velocity projectile produces blunt trauma that extends beyond the tissue actually contacted by the missile. The pulsation of the temporary cavitation with resulting strong negative pressure components permits contamination of the entire wound track of a perforating wound, with entrance of external contaminants from both the exit and the entrance sites. The extent and type of treatment required is determined more by the tissues and organs injured than by the characteristics of the wounding agent. Although extremity wounds from high-velocity projectiles may heal uneventfully, surgical exploration is indicated whenever there is a possibility of subfascial penetration, and obviously devascularized tissue should be excised. In circumstances in which contaminated devascularized tissue cannot be excised promptly or adequately, prophylactic topical antibacterial therapy (such as mafenide aqueous spray, which can penetrate through devascularized tissue) may prevent otherwise lethal infection.

Animals↗

Topical mafenide hydrochloride aqueous spray in initial management of massive contaminated wounds with devitalized tissue.

Since at least WWII, some open, contaminated wounds involving massive soft tissue injury and vascular damage have resulted in "irreversible shock," despite prompt rescue, hemorrhage control, and blood and fluid replacement, without signs of clinical infection. In animal studies, survival time was related statistically to the dosage of Clostridium perfringens in multicontaminated explosive wounds. Survival time was lengthened by the application of some topical antibacterial agents, but actual recovery was achieved only with topical mafenide hydrochloride solution aqueous spray, which resulted in negative clostridium. perfringens cultures. Although not related statistically to survival time, the mafenide hydrochloride spray also controlled the Pseudomonas aeruginosa in these wounds. Mafenide hydrochloride had the American trade name of Sulfamylon from about 1942 until 1998, when another pharmaceutical company patented Sulfamylon as the trade name for mafenide acetate, a weaker antibacterial agent. However, mafenide hydrochloride still is available from chemical companies. Mafenide hydrochloride solution spray has been used successfully in treatment of patients with severe by contaminated wounds and deep burns, and its use in initial care should be revisited.

Administration, Topical↗

The management of burns under conditions of limited resources using topical aqueous sulfamylon (mafenide) hydrochloride spray.

The burn unit establishment in a Vietnamese military hospital (1970 to 1971) is an example of the management of burns under conditions of limited resources. The problems encountered and methods used in their solution are still relevant. This is the first (and possibly still the only) instance of such clinical use of topical Sulfamylon (mafenide) aqueous spray as the sole pregraft antibacterial agent for patients with deep partial-thickness and full-thickness burns (and associated injuries). The mafenide spray open treatment resulted in a bacteriostatic film permitting eschars to remain uninfected while more superficial burns healed and general status improved, enabling delayed grafting to be effective. Use of operating rooms, supplies, and personnel was minimized. The study group contained 211 patients; 86 (approximately 40%) had burns that exceeded 20% body surface area, and 26 (approximately 12%) had burns that exceeded 40% body surface area. As the procedures became fully established, all of the last 110 patients of this series survived. Only 17 deaths occurred in the total series; none were attributed to infection.

Adolescent↗