PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Rohn

Publications and source records attributed to J A Rohn.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Graphical access to medical expert systems: IV. Experiments to determine the role of spoken input.

The goal of our research is to design improved interfaces for medical expert systems. Previously, the use of graphical techniques was explored to improve the acceptance by clinicians of the user interface. Now that devices that accept spoken input are available, we wish to design interfaces that take advantage of this potentially more natural modality for interaction. To understand how clinicians might want to speak to a medical decision-support system, we carried out an experiment that simulated the availability of a spoken interface to the ONCOCIN medical expert system. ONCOCIN provides therapy advice for patients on complex cancer therapy protocols based on a description of the patient's current medical status and laboratory-test values. In the experiment, we had oncologists present a clinical case while observing the ONCOCIN flowsheet display. A project member listened to the presentation and filled in values for the flowsheet, as well as introducing purposeful misunderstandings of the input. The results suggest that each individual developed a stereotypical grammar for communicating with the program. Our experience with the purposeful miscommunications suggests particular ways to tailor requests for repetition based on the part of the utterance that was not understood.

Decision Making, Computer-Assisted↗

Knowledge engineering for a clinical trial advice system: uncovering errors in protocol specification.

ONCOCIN is an expert system that provides advice to physicians who are treating cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials. The process of encoding oncology protocol knowledge for the system has revealed serious omissions and unintentional ambiguities in the protocol documents. We have also discovered that many protocols allow for significant latitude in treating patients and that even when protocol guidelines are explicit, physicians often choose to apply their own judgment on the assumption that the specifications are incomplete. Computer-based tools offer the possibility of insuring completeness and reproducibility in the definition of new protocols. One goal of our automated protocol authoring environment, called OPAL, is to help physicians develop protocols that are free of ambiguity and thus to assure better compliance and standardization of care.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗