PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J A Rollins

Publications and source records attributed to J A Rollins.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Cyclosporine-induced sympathetic activation and hypertension after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a frequent complication of cyclosporine-induced immunosuppression, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. In anesthetized animals, the administration of cyclosporine increases sympathetic-nerve discharge, which may contribute to hypertension. METHODS: To determine whether cyclosporine-induced hypertension is accompanied by sustained sympathetic neural activation in patients, we recorded sympathetic action potentials using intraneural microelectrodes (in the peroneal nerve) in heart-transplant recipients receiving azathioprine and prednisone alone (n = 5) or in combination with cyclosporine (n = 14). We performed the same studies in eight patients with myasthenia gravis who were receiving cyclosporine and eight who were not, in five patients with essential hypertension, and in nine normal controls. RESULTS: Heart-transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine had higher mean arterial blood pressure (+/- SE) than those not receiving cyclosporine (112 +/- 3 vs. 96 +/- 4 mm Hg; P less than 0.05) and a 2.7-fold higher rate of sympathetic-nerve firing (80 +/- 3 vs. 30 +/- 4 bursts per minute; P less than 0.05). For patients with myasthenia gravis, similar doses of cyclosporine were associated with smaller elevations in mean arterial blood pressure (100 +/- 2 mm Hg, as compared with 91 +/- 4 mm Hg in those not receiving cyclosporine; P less than 0.05) and in the rate of sympathetic-nerve firing (46 +/- 3 bursts per minute, as compared with 25 +/- 4 bursts per minute; P less than 0.05). Sympathetic activity in patients with heart transplants or myasthenia gravis who were not being treated with cyclosporine was no different from that in patients with essential hypertension or in normal controls. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine-induced hypertension is associated with sympathetic neural activation, which may be accentuated by the cardiac denervation that results from heart transplantation.

Action Potentials

Preliminary results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine in myasthenia gravis.

We randomly assigned 20 patients with progressively worsening generalized myasthenia gravis of recent onset whose illness was not controlled by anticholinesterase therapy to treatment with either cyclosporine (6 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or placebo. Patients who had been treated with thymectomy, steroids, or other immunosuppressive agents were excluded. The duration of treatment was 12 months. Disease activity was assessed by quantified strength testing and by measurements of antihuman acetylcholine-receptor antibody. Patients were assessed at 6 months and 12 months, or at the following early end points: drug failure (doubling of creatinine), treatment failure (respiratory or swallowing difficulty), or protocol violation (stopping medication for more than five days). At six months, patients in the cyclosporine group had had significantly more objective improvement in strength; one early end point had been reached (drug failure; no treatment failures). In the placebo group, three early end points had been reached (all treatment failures). The decline in titers of acetylcholine-receptor antibody was larger in the treated group, although the difference was not statistically significant. At the end of the study (after 12 months of treatment or arrival at an earlier end point), improvement in strength and reduction in titers of anti-receptor antibody continued to be greater in the cyclosporine group. Nephrotoxicity occurred in three patients receiving cyclosporine but was nonprogressive with a reduction in dosage and reversible with discontinuation of the drug. These results are preliminary and need confirmation, but we conclude that cyclosporine is probably an effective therapy in some patients with myasthenia gravis.

Adult

Assessment of therapeutic plasmapheresis in demyelinating neurologic disorders.

Considerable controversy exists with regard to therapeutic efficacy of plasmapheresis in the immune-mediated demyelinating disorders of the peripheral and central nervous system: acute inflammatory polyneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and multiple sclerosis. In an effort to establish specific situations where plasmapheresis was of therapeutic value, we reviewed the experience at Southwestern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, and that published in the literature. In acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome), plasmapheresis may prevent progression of the illness, and it significantly increases the rate of recovery. For patients with chronic inflammatory polyneuropathy, plasmapheresis has produced clinical improvement in 50% of corticosteroid-refractory patients. The use of plasmapheresis in patients with acute or chronic progressive multiple sclerosis still remains controversial.

Adolescent

Childhood cancer: siblings draw and tell.

There is a growing awareness among health care professionals that the psychosocial needs of siblings of children with cancer are less adequately met than those of other family members. As part of a larger research study of 17 families of children with cancer, 20 healthy siblings, ages 3-11 years (7 males, 13 females), were tested using the Kinetic Family Drawing-Revised (Spinetta, McLaren, Fox, & Sparta, 1981) in one of two oncology clinics in a Southwestern state. Nine of the subjects participated in a sibling day. Data from the drawings and discussions with siblings confirm previous sibling research findings and reflect current social changes.

Art