Biomedical subjects

J Akeson

Publications and source records attributed to J Akeson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Less local pain on intravenous infusion of a new propofol emulsion.

BACKGROUND: Local pain at the site of intravenous (iv) injection of propofol remains a considerable problem in clinical anaesthesiology, and particularly so in infants. The aim of the present study was to compare the influence of two different emulsions of propofol on local pain following iv administration. METHODS: Eighty adult patients (ASA I-II) scheduled for ear-nose-throat or plastic surgery were randomly allocated into two study groups: A and B. A 1.0-mm teflon cannula (BD, Helsingborg, Sweden) was inserted into a dorsal vein on each hand. Each patient was given two 3.0-ml iv bolus injections of two different propofol emulsions of 10 mg ml(-1) over 2 s, one in each cannula, at 5-min intervals. The first study drug administered was Diprivan (AstraZeneca, Södertälie, Sweden) in group A (n = 34) and Propofol-Lipuro (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) in group B (n = 39). Each patient was then asked by a blinded investigator to score maximal pain intensity on a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The maximal intensity of propofol-induced local pain was significantly (P < 0.0001) lower after Propofol-Lipuro than after Diprivan--median 1 (25th percentile: 0; 75th percentile: 2) range 0-6 vs. 3 (0; 5) 0-9 VAS units. CONCLUSION: The considerably lower intensity of local pain found to be associated with iv administration of the new drug formula Propofol-Lipuro indicates that emulsions of propofol based on medium- and long-chain triglycerides have a clinical advantage over traditional ones for induction of anaesthesia.

Anesthetics, Intravenous↗

PubMed2005

Sevoflurane induces less cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane at the same A-line autoregressive index level.

BACKGROUND: The use of sevoflurane in neuroanesthesia is still under debate. Comparison of dose-dependent vasodilatory properties between sevoflurane and isoflurane, the more traditional neuroanesthetic agent, requires comparable dosing of the agents. A-line autoregressive index (AAI) provides reproducible individual measurement of anesthetic depth. METHODS: Sevoflurane and isoflurane, in randomized order, were titrated to a stable AAI of 15-20 in each of 18 ASA I or II patients. The mean flow velocity (Vmca) and pulsatility index (PI) in the middle cerebral artery were measured with transcranial Doppler at an end-tidal CO2 of 4.5%. RESULTS: For sevoflurane Vmca was 18% lower [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-22%; P < 0.00001] and PI was 23% higher (95% CI 12-33%; P = 0.0013) than for isoflurane. Mean arterial blood pressure did not differ between the two agents. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) fraction necessary to reach the intended AAI level was 13% higher (95% CI 5-20%; P = 0.0079) with sevoflurane than with isoflurane. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane induced less cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane at the same depth of anesthesia, measured by AAI, and hence seems more favorable for clinical neuroanesthesia. In our opinion the difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane in the MAC fraction required to attain the same AAI level demonstrates the limitations of MAC in defining the level of anesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Intensive care treatment of severe mixed metabolic acidosis.

We report a case of severe metabolic acidosis associated with acute renal failure and septicaemia following treatment with maximal therapeutic doses of metformin and diclofenac. On the second day of intensive care the patient deteriorated with respiratory insufficiency and abdominal pain during continuous renal replacement therapy. A laparoscopy revealed a perforated cholecystitis with abscess formation. The patient regained renal function and recovered. Intake of diclofenac 5 days before this episode could have been the main cause of renal insufficiency and metabolic acidosis in this patient and could also have delayed surgical treatment by masking early clinical signs of perforated cholecystitis. The renal failure may also have caused metformin and lactate to accumulate, contributing to the mixed pattern of metabolic acidosis. This case report describes a mixed organic and non-organic metabolic acidosis associated with acute renal failure, presumably resulting from a combination of drugs and diseases often found in the elderly - metformin for diabetes mellitus and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug for cholecystolithiasis. Acid-base balance and electrolyte changes were rapidly normalized by continuous renal replacement therapy.

Abdominal Abscess↗

PubMed2005

Desflurane induces more cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane at the same A-line autoregressive index level.

BACKGROUND: Clinical use of desflurane in neuroanesthesia remains under debate. Comparison of dose-dependent vasodilatory properties between desflurane and isoflurane, the more traditional volatile agent for clinical neuroanesthesia, requires equianesthetic dosing of the agents. Reproducible neurophysiological measurements of the level of anesthesia in an individual, e.g. the A-line autoregressive index (AAI), can be used for an equipotent dosage of two volatile agents in the same individual. METHODS: Desflurane and isoflurane, in randomized order, were titrated to a stable AAI level of 15-20 in 18 ASA I or II patients. The mean flow velocity (Vmca) and pulsatility index (PI) in the middle cerebral artery were then measured with transcranial Doppler at an end-tidal CO(2) concentration of 4.4%. RESULTS: For desflurane Vmca was 11% higher [95% confidence interval (CI), 5-18%; P = 0.0020] and PI was 13% lower (95% CI, 3-23%; P = 0.0083) than for isoflurane. The mean arterial blood pressure did not differ between the agents. The fraction of MAC necessary for the intended AAI level was 35% lower (95% CI, 20-49%; P = 0.00016) with desflurane than with isoflurane. CONCLUSION: Desflurane was associated with more cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane at the same depth of anesthesia, as indicated by the AAI. This attributes further reason for caution in the use of desflurane in clinical neuroanesthesia. The difference between desflurane and isoflurane in the MAC fractions required for the same AAI level confirms the limitations of MAC in defining the level of anesthesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Cerebral physiological responses to bolus injection of racemic, S(+)- or R(-)-ketamine in the pig.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the influence of ketamine and its enantiomers on cerebral haemodynamics, and there are no direct comparison reports. This study was designed to evaluate cerebrovascular responses to bolus injections of racemic, S(+)- and R(-)-ketamine in an established experimental model. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol in 14 pigs and maintained with fentanyl and vecuronium. The intra-arterial xenon clearance technique was used to calculate the cerebral blood flow (CBF). Eight pigs (part I) were given three consecutive 60-s intravenous (i.v.) bolus injections of 10 mg/kg of racemic ketamine (Ketalar, Pfizer), and cerebral and systemic physiological responses were studied for 30 min after each injection. Following the determination of equipotent doses of the racemate and its enantiomers by recumbency tests, bolus injections of racemic ketamine (10 mg/kg), S-ketamine (5 mg/kg) and R-ketamine (20 mg/kg) were given in randomized sequence to another six pigs (part II) and evaluated at 1, 5, 10, 15, 25 and 40 min. RESULTS: No statistically significant acute tolerance in the CBF response to racemic ketamine was found in part I of the study. In part II, the decreases in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CBF by S-ketamine were significantly smaller than those by racemic and R-ketamine (both P < 0.001). No study drug had any significant effect on the cerebral arteriovenous oxygen content difference (C(av)O(2)) over time, but S-ketamine was associated with lower C(av)O(2) than racemic ketamine (P = 0.008) and R-ketamine (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Bolus injection of S-ketamine was associated with less cerebral and systemic haemodynamic depression than racemic or R-ketamine in equipotent doses in this experimental model. These findings indicate possible advantages of S-ketamine over racemic ketamine.

Anesthetics, Dissociative↗

PubMed2004

Desflurane increases intracranial pressure more and sevoflurane less than isoflurane in pigs subjected to intracranial hypertension.

Desflurane and sevoflurane may have advantages over isoflurane in neuroanesthesia, but this is still under debate. A porcine model with experimental intracranial hypertension was used for paired comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and isoflurane with respect to the effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebrovascular resistance (CVR), and intracranial pressure (ICP). The agents, given in sequence to each of six pigs, were compared at 0.5 and 1.0 minimal alveolar concentrations (MAC) and three mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) levels (50, 70, and 90 mm Hg) at normocapnia and one MAP level (70 mm Hg) at hypocapnia. MAC for each agent had been previously determined in a standardized manner for comparison reliability. CBF was measured with Xe. MAP was lowered by inflation of a balloon catheter in the inferior caval vein and raised by inflation of a balloon catheter in the descending aorta. ICP was measured intraparenchymally. Two Fogarty catheters positioned extradurally were inflated to a baseline ICP of 20 to 22 mm Hg at 0.2 MAC of each agent. CBF and ICP with the three agents at normocapnia and MAP 70 and 90 mm Hg at both 0.5 and 1.0 MAC were as follows (P < 0.05): desflurane > isoflurane > sevoflurane. None of the agents abolished CO2 reactivity. High-dose desflurane resulted in a higher CBF at hypocapnia than corresponding doses of sevoflurane or isoflurane, but there were no significant differences between the agents in ICP at hypocapnia. The present study showed that desflurane increased ICP more and sevoflurane less than isoflurane during normoventilation, but the differences disappeared with hyperventilation.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

PubMed2004

Desflurane results in higher cerebral blood flow than sevoflurane or isoflurane at hypocapnia in pigs.

BACKGROUND: In clinical neuroanaesthesia, the increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and intracranial pressure caused by the cerebral vasodilative effects of an inhalational anaesthetic agent is counteracted by the cerebral vasoconstriction induced by hypocapnia. Desflurane and sevoflurane may have advantages over the more traditionally used isoflurane in neuroanaesthesia but their dose-dependent vasodilative effects at hypocapnia have not been compared in the same model using truly equipotent minimal alveolar concentrations (MACs). METHOD: Desflurane, sevoflurane and isoflurane were administered in a randomized order to six pigs at 0.5 and 1.0 MAC. The intra-arterial xenon clearance technique was used to calculate CBF. Blood pressure was invasively monitored. Cerebral and systemic physiological variables were recorded first at normocapnia (PaCO2 5.6 kPa) and then at hypocapnia (PaCO2 3.5 kPa). Electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was continuously recorded. RESULTS: None of the three agents abolished cerebrovascular reactivity to hyperventilation, and at 0.5 MAC all had similar effects on CBF at hypocapnia. Desflurane at 1.0 MAC was associated with 16% higher CBF (P = 0.027) at hypocapnia than isoflurane, and with 24% higher CBF (P = 0.020) than sevoflurane. There was no seizure activity in the EEG. CONCLUSION: More cerebral vasodilation at hypocapnia with high doses of desflurane than with sevoflurane or isoflurane indicates that desflurane might be less suitable for neuroanaesthesia than sevoflurane and isoflurane.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

PubMed2004

Convulsions on anaesthetic induction with sevoflurane in young children.

Increased worldwide use for paediatric anaesthesia of the volatile anaesthetic agent sevoflurane has mainly resulted from its low blood-gas partition coefficient and low airway irritability, providing smooth conditions for rapid induction of anaesthesia. Nevertheless, there are several clinical and experimental reports suggesting a correlation between exposure to sevoflurane and generalized clonic or tonic seizure activity. We report two clinical episodes of convulsions associated with the induction of sevoflurane anaesthesia in young children. CASE 1: during induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane by facemask in a 3-year-old healthy boy, there were symmetrical clonic seizure-like movements of the upper extremities for 60 s. CASE 2: on re-induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane because of profuse bleeding following nasal adenoidectomy in a 4-year-old healthy girl with a family history of epilepsy, there were symmetrical tonic and clonic seizure-like movements for 30-40 s in the upper and lower extremities. Both episodes ceased spontaneously. Although no EEG was recorded, it cannot be excluded that both episodes resulted from seizure activity within the CNS. Based on our observations and reports by others we suggest that, until further notice, sevoflurane should be avoided or at least used cautiously in patients where clinical epileptic activity has been verified or is strongly suspected.

Adenoidectomy↗

PubMed2004

Similar excitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia in young children given rectal morphine or midazolam as premedication.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a rapid-acting volatile anaesthetic agent frequently used in paediatric anaesthesia despite transient postoperative symptoms of cerebral excitation, particularly in preschool children. This randomised and investigator-blinded study was designed to evaluate whether premedication with an opioid might reduce non-divertible postoperative excitation more than premedication with a benzodiazepine in preschool children anaesthetized with sevoflurane. METHODS: Ninety-two healthy two to six year-old children scheduled for nasal adenoidectomy were randomised to be given rectal atropine 0.02 mg kg(-1) together with either morphine 0.15 mg kg(-1) or midazolam 0.30 mg kg(-1) approximately 30 min before induction and maintenance of sevoflurane anaesthesia. The patient groups were compared pre- and postoperatively by repeated clinical assessments of cerebral excitation according to a modified Objective Pain Discomfort Scale, OPDS. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant postoperative differences in incidence, extent or duration of excitation between children given morphine or midazolam for premedication, whereas morphine was associated with more preoperative excitation than was midazolam. The study groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, weight, duration of surgery and anaesthesia, and time from tracheal extubation to arrival in and discharge from the postoperative ward. CONCLUSION: In this study morphine for premedication in young children anaesthetized with sevoflurane was associated with similar postoperative and higher preoperative OPDS scores compared with midazolam. These findings indicate that substitution of morphine for midazolam is no useful way of reducing clinical excitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia.

Adenoidectomy↗

PubMed2003

Racemic ketamine does not abolish cerebrovascular autoregulation in the pig.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the influence of racemic ketamine on autoregulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF), and available reports regarding its influence on cerebral hemodynamics are contradictory. This study was designed to evaluate cerebrovascular responses to changes in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during ketamine anesthesia. METHODS: In eight normoventilated pigs anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained by i.v. infusion of ketamine (15.0 mg kg(-1) x h(-1)) during measurements. The intra-arterial xenon clearance technique was used to calculate CBF. Balloon-tipped catheters were introduced in the inferior caval vein and mid-aorta, and increases or decreases by up to 40% in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in random order were achieved by titrated inflation of these balloon catheters. Cerebral blood flow was determined at each MAP level. Regression coefficients of linear pressure-flow curves were calculated in all animals. RESULTS: From the mean baseline level (101 mmHg) MAP was reduced by 20% and 40%, and increased by 26% and 43%. The maximal mean increase and decrease in MAP induced a 12% increase and a 15% decrease, respectively, of CBF from the mean baseline level (52.6 ml.100 g(-1) x min1). The 95% confidence interval (-0.02; 0.38) of the mean regression coefficient of individual pressure-flow curves does not include the regression coefficient (0.64) of a linear correlation between MAP and CBF including origo (correlation coefficient 0.99), which indicates complete lack of cerebrovascular autoregulation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that autoregulation of CBF is not abolished during continuous ketamine infusion in normoventilated pigs and that previous divergent conclusions are unlikely to be associated with severe impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2003

Acupuncture fails to reduce but increases anaesthetic gas required to prevent movement in response to surgical incision.

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is used for clinical pain relief but has not been evaluated under clinical anaesthesia. This study was designed to compare movement in response to surgical incision in anaesthetized patients subjected to electro-acupuncture (EA) or sham procedures. Our hypothesis was that EA stimulation would reduce the requirements for anaesthetic gas. METHODS: Forty-six healthy women, scheduled for laparoscopic sterilization at a Swedish county hospital, were randomized to have either the electro-acupuncture (n = 23) or sham (n = 23) procedure between the induction of general anaesthesia and the start of surgery. The minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane required to prevent neck or major limb movements in response to surgical incision was determined in each group of patients. RESULTS: The MAC for sevoflurane was found to be higher in the group given acupuncture than in the control group (2.1 +/- 0.3% vs. 1.8 +/- 0.4%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Electro-acupuncture given during general anaesthesia with sevoflurane failed to reduce but instead increased the clinical need for anaesthetic gas, possibly by reducing the anaesthetic effect of sevoflurane and/or by facilitating nociceptive transmission and/or reflex activity.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Acupuncture facilitates neuromuscular and oculomotor responses to skin incision with no influence on auditory evoked potentials under sevoflurane anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: More sevoflurane was recently found to be required to prevent movement in response to surgical incision in anaesthetized patients subjected to electro-acupuncture (EA) than to sham procedures. The present study was designed to compare differences in movement, dilatation of the pupils, divergence of the eye axes and activity of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) between patients given and those not given EA under standardized sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS: Neuromuscular, oculomotor and AEP responses to skin incision were assessed with and without a bilateral 2-Hz burst EA in patients under steady-state anaesthesia maintained with 1.8% of sevoflurane. Forty-five healthy patients, scheduled for laparoscopic sterilization, were randomized for EA (n = 22) or sham (n = 23) procedures between induction of anaesthesia and start of surgery. Middle latency AEP activity was recorded and interpreted by the A-line ARX (autoregression with exogenous input) index (AAI). RESULTS: More acupuncture than sham patients were found to respond to skin incision with movement of the neck or limbs (77% vs. 43%; P = 0.021), dilatation of the pupils (77% vs. 39%; P = 0.001) and divergence of the eye axes (72% vs. 39%; P = 0.023), whereas there was no difference in AAI response. CONCLUSION: Electro-acupuncture facilitates physiological responses to nociceptive stimulation under sevoflurane anaesthesia. Differences in neuromuscular and oculomotor responses between acupuncture and sham patients under general anaesthesia are probably not associated with interaction between EA and the depth of anaesthesia, as AEP activity was similar in the two groups.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Cerebral blood flow at 0.5 and 1.0 minimal alveolar concentrations of desflurane or sevoflurane compared with isoflurane in normoventilated pigs.

Whether desflurane and sevoflurane have clinical advantages over isoflurane in neuroanesthesia is much debated. A porcine model was used for comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane with isoflurane with respect to their cerebrovascular effects. The minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) of each of the three agents was first determined in a standardized manner in six domestic juvenile pigs to enhance comparison reliability. Six other pigs were then anesthetized with isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane, given in sequence to each pig in an even crosswise order with the first agent also used to maintain anesthesia during surgical preparation. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was calculated from the clearance curve of intraarterially injected 133Xe. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was invasively monitored. The estimated cerebrovascular resistance (CVRe) was calculated by dividing MAP with CBF, thereby approximating the cerebral perfusion pressure with MAP. For both MAC levels, the trend for CBF was desflurane > isoflurane > sevoflurane, and the trend for MAP and CVRe was sevoflurane > isoflurane > desflurane. Statistical comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane with isoflurane with respect to CBF and MAP revealed two statistically significant differences-namely, that CBF at 1.0 MAC desflurane was 17% higher than CBF at 1.0 MAC isoflurane (P =.0025) and that MAP at 1.0 MAC sevoflurane was 16% higher than MAP at 1.0 MAC isoflurane (P =.011). Consequently, in this study at normocapnia, these agents did not seem to differ much in their cerebral vasodilating effects at lower doses. At higher doses, however, desflurane, in contrast to sevoflurane, was found to induce more cerebral vasodilation than isoflurane.

Anesthetics, Inhalation↗

PubMed2002

Propofol infusion rate does not affect local pain on injection.

BACKGROUND: Local pain at the site of an i.v. injection of propofol is a well-known problem, particularly in infants. This randomised investigator-blinded crossover study was designed to assess the effect of the i.v. bolus infusion rate on propofol-induced pain at the site of injection. METHODS: Thirty unpremedicated patients scheduled for ear-nose-throat or plastic surgery at Malmö University Hospital, Sweden, were given two consecutive 2.0 ml injections of propofol 10 mg/ml (Diprivan, AstraZeneca, Sweden/UK), at different infusion rates (0.2 or 1.0 ml/s), immediately before induction of general anesthesia. Half of the patients (n=15) received the first bolus of propofol over 2 s and the second bolus over 10 s, and the other half (n=15) had their injections in reversed order. After each injection, the patient was asked by an investigator to indicate pain intensity on a visual analog scale (VAS) and to report the times of the appearance, maximum point and disappearance of pain. The injections were given approximately 2 min apart. The investigators scoring pain intensity, as indicated by the patients on a 10-point numerical rate scale, were blinded to the order in which the injections were given, as were the patients themselves. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence (both 86%) of intensity (median; 25th; 75th percentiles, in VAS units: 3.1; 1.0; 5.3 and 3.3; 1.4; 5.0, respectively) or duration (66+/-31 and 73+/-26 s, respectively) of pain between the faster (1.0 ml/s) and slower (0.2 ml/s) bolus infusion rates of propofol studied. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the i.v. bolus infusion rate of propofol does not influence drug-induced local pain on injection, at least not within the infusion rate interval studied. Therefore, adjusting i.v. injection speed does not seem to be a clinically useful tool for reducing the intensity or duration of propofol-induced pain at the site of administration.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Pain on injection of propofol with or without infusion of carrier fluid.

BACKGROUND: Propofol, a popular intravenous (iv) anaesthetic induction agent for brief cases or day surgery, is associated with smooth induction, pleasant sleep, rapid recovery and little postoperative nausea. A major disadvantage is pain at the site of injection. The aim of the present study was to examine the influence of simultaneous iv infusion of carrier fluid on propofol-induced local pain. METHODS: Thirty patients, scheduled for ear-nose-throat or plastic surgery under general anaesthesia, were randomly allocated into two groups. Each patient had two 2 ml iv bolus injections of propofol given at two minutes' interval. In group I (n=15) the first bolus injection was given with no iv carrier fluid and the second one given with a 10 ml iv carrier fluid infused over 10 s. Correspondingly, the patients in group II (n=15) had their first injection with and their second one without the iv carrier fluid. Following each injection of propofol the patients were asked by a blinded investigator to score their pain on a 10-point visual analogue scale, and to report the appearance, maximum and disappearance of pain. After the second assessment of pain, general anaesthesia was induced with more propofol. RESULTS: Pain intensity at the site of propofol injection was found not to be influenced by simultaneous iv infusion of carrier fluid. CONCLUSION: It seems, from the results obtained here, that simultaneous iv infusion of carrier fluid has no particular effect on local pain following iv administration of propofol.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Preoperative rectal diclofenac versus paracetamol for tonsillectomy: effects on pain and blood loss.

BACKGROUND: Diclofenac is widely used for postoperative analgesia but the perioperative safety of this drug is controversial because of its effect on platelet aggregation, which might increase blood loss. In a prospective investigator-blinded study the effects of diclofenac and paracetamol on pain and blood loss were compared in patients undergoing tonsillectomy. METHOD: Ninety patients were randomised to receive rectal diclofenac 0.65-1.0 mg x kg(-1) or paracetamol 13-20 mg x kg(-1) preoperatively. Ten patients were excluded after randomisation. Pain was evaluated postoperatively by means of the visual analogue scale and by recording the use of pethidine for rescue analgesia. Perioperative blood loss was estimated from measured intraoperative blood loss; use of drugs to achieve haemostasis, and the incidence of reoperations. RESULTS: Anaesthetic or surgical managements did not differ between the groups, but a significantly longer period of surgery was found in the diclofenac group, 32+/-16 vs. 25+/-11 min (P = 0.024). Pain scores or pethidine consumption were not significantly different between the groups. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly larger in the diclofenac group, 1.9 (1.1-3.1) vs. 1.1 (0.7-2.0) ml x kg(-1) (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Preoperative rectal diclofenac offers no advantage over paracetamol with respect to postoperative analgesia in tonsillectomy patients but increases intraoperative blood loss.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2001

Practice and knowledge of cricoid pressure in southern Sweden.

BACKGROUND: For 40 years cricoid pressure has been used to prevent regurgitation of gastric contents during induction of anaesthesia. Recent studies have emphasised use of more moderate force so as not to deteriorate ventilation or endotracheal intubation. This study was undertaken to assess the current practice and knowledge of cricoid pressure among anaesthesia personnel in southern Sweden. METHODS: Forty-eight subjects at two anaesthetic departments in southern Sweden were asked to apply and maintain cricoid pressure for 60 s with their dominant and non-dominant hands, respectively, in a laryngotracheal model during simulated intravenous induction of anaesthesia. Where and how pressure was applied as well as the force used by each subject was recorded together with information on individual experience and knowledge of the technique. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in force applied over time, and no significant differences in force between dominant (median 36 N; 25th percentile 26 N; 75th percentile 50 N) and non-dominant (37; 26; 50 N) hand, between female and male subjects or between physicians, nurses and assistant nurses. Force exceeding 60 N was recorded at least once in 21% of subjects. More than two-thirds (69%) had not heard of any recommended level of force to be applied. Forty percent of anaesthesiologists were unaware of any contraindications. CONCLUSION: More specific education and training seems mandatory to improve clinical use of cricoid pressure and possibly increase patient safety. Simulators allowing cricoid pressure to be carried out and evaluated in a standardised manner should therefore be incorporated into future training programmes and airway management courses.

Anesthesia↗

PubMed2001

Acupuncture for lower back and pelvic pain in late pregnancy: a retrospective report on 167 consecutive cases.

Adverse and analgesic effects of acupuncture during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy were studied retrospectively in an observational study including 167 consecutive patients with lower back pain, pelvic pain, or both. In each patient acupuncture was given on at least two different occasions by three manual stimulations of two or more acupuncture or tender points, mainly LR-3 and LI-4 together with local tender points, at 15-min intervals. Possible adverse and analgesic effects were assessed by the midwife responsible for the acupuncture given in each patient. There were no abortions and no influence on the delivery course of the infants, but transient premature labor was observed during the fourth stimulation carried out in the 15th gestational week in one woman. Other possible adverse effects, like transient dizziness or tiredness, were reported in 35 patients (21%). Analgesia, as assessed by midwives involved, was good or excellent in 72% of patients. Acupuncture seems to be safe and effective for pain relief in lower back pain, pelvic pain, or both during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Nevertheless, prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Journal Article↗