PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Allik

Publications and source records attributed to J Allik.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Contrast response of a movement-encoding system.

The ability to identify the direction of apparent motion in a sequence of two short light pulses of different amplitudes at separate spatial locations was studied. The product of pulse amplitudes is a very poor predictor of such performance when one of the two signals is much higher in amplitude than the other: above a certain amplitude the probability of correct identification becomes virtually independent of the amplitude of the larger pulse. There was no noticeable difference in performance between low-high and high-low contrast sequences. Both the direction identification and the simple contrast-detection probabilities can be represented by the same psychometric function of the luminance increment delta L, provided that delta L is normalized by the nth power of the background luminance level, Lb. These results suggest that the general Reichardt-type scheme of movement encoding should be modified in the manner proposed for the fly's visual system [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 116 (1989)]: (1) the mean luminance is subtracted from the input signal before the signal is subjected to a nonlinear compression and (2) saturation characteristics are inserted into both branches of the two mirror-symmetric motion-detection subunits before multiplication of the input signals. The identical metric of the contrast response suggests that movement discrimination and luminance detection are two different special-purpose computations performed on the output of the same encoding network.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1995

Magnitude of luminance modulation specifies amplitude of perceived movement.

A compelling impression of movement, which is perceptually indistinguishable from a real displacement, can be elicited by patterns containing no spatially displaced elements. An apparent oscillation, w-movement, was generated by a stationary pattern containing a large number of horizontal pairs of spatially adjacent dots modulated in brightness. The observer's task was to adjust the perceived amplitude of the w-motion to match the amplitude of a real oscillation. All of the data can be accounted for by a simple rule: If the relative change in the luminance, W = delta L/L, between two adjacent stationary dots is kept constant, the distance over which these dots appeared to travel in space comprises a fixed fraction of the total distance by which they are separated. The apparent amplitude of the w-motion increases strictly in proportion with luminance contrast, provided that the contrast is represented in the motion-encoding system by a rapidly saturating compressive Weibull transformation. These findings can be explained in terms of bilocal motion encoders comparing two luminance modulations occurring at two different locations.

Attention↗
PubMed1994

Timing of visual events for motion discrimination.

The observer's task was to identify the temporal order of the two adjacent luminance excursions one of which was a step-function and the other a linear increase in luminance starting from zero and reaching various final amplitude A after some period of time D. The interstimulus delay, delta t, between these two transitions was determined at which they appeared isochronous. The point of the subjective equality (PSE) depended on both ramp parameters, the rise-time duration D and its amplitude A. All of the data can be accounted for by supposing that judgements about the temporal order are based on the comparison of a simple attribute of these luminance excursions, the time moments when the luminous energy concentrated on low temporal frequencies exceeds some level. The perceived temporal order, which was experienced as a leftward or rightward displacement of the whole pattern, was determined by the sequence in which low-frequency portion of these two luminance excursions reached the threshold value. The implications of this simple contrast detection explanation for theories of motion analysis are discussed.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1993

Perceived numerosity of spatiotemporal events.

Numerosity discrimination was examined when items were varied in space-time position rather than in space only. Observers were instructed to indicate which of two adjacent streams of visual events contained more items. The precision of numerosity discrimination of dynamic events was not remarkably different from that of static patterns. Two basic numerosity biases previously found for static dot patterns--inhibitory overestimation and satellite underestimation--were demonstrated for items distributed randomly over a spatiotemporal interval. It was also demonstrated that two streams, equated in the number and luminous energy of items, are not judged equal in their visible number if items in one of these two streams have longer duration than items in the second stream. These findings can be accounted for by the occupancy model of perceived numerosity (Allik & Tuulmets, 1991a) if it is supposed that the impact that each element has on its neighborhood is spread along both spatial and temporal coordinates. Perceived numerosity decreases with both spatial and temporal proximity between the visual items. Space and time have interchangeable effects on perceived numerosity: the amount of numerosity bias caused by the spatial proximity of items can also be produced by the properly chosen temporal proximity of items.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Detection of changes in speed and direction of motion: reaction time analysis.

Observers reacted to the change in the movement of a random-dot field whose initial velocity, V0, was constant for a random period and then switched abruptly to another value, V1. The two movements, both horizontally oriented, were either in the same direction (speed increments or decrements), or in the opposite direction but equal in speed (direction reversals). One of the two velocities, V0 or V1, could be zero (motion onset and offset, respectively). In the range of speeds used, 0-16 deg/sec (dps), the mean reaction time (MRT) for a given value of V0 depended on magnitude of V1-V0 only: MRT approximately r+c(V0)/magnitude of V1-V0 beta, where beta = 2/3, r is a velocity-independent component of MRT, and c(V0) is a parameter whose value is constant for low values of V0 (0-4 dps), and increases beginning with some value of V0 between 4 and 8 dps. These and other data reviewed in the paper are accounted for by a model in which the time-position function of a moving target is encoded by mass activation of a network of Reichardt-type encoders. Motion-onset detection (V0 = 0) is achieved by weighted temporal summation of the outputs of this network, the weights assigned to activated encoders being proportional to their squared spatial spans. By means of a "subtractive normalization," the visual system effectively reduces the detection of velocity changes (a change from V0 to V1) to the detection of motion onset (a change from 0 to V1-V0). Subtractive normalization operates by readjustment of weights: the weights of all encoders are amplified or attenuated depending on their spatial spans, temporal spans, and the initial velocity V0. Assignment of weights and weighted temporal summation are thought of as special-purpose computations performed on the dynamic array of activations in the motion-encoding network, without affecting the activations themselves.

Female↗
PubMed1992

Competing motion paths in sequence of random dot patterns.

Global motion perception from a sequence of random dot patterns has been studied by means of the competition technique which consists of making a normally less salient motion path in a superimposed multiple-path stimulus more powerful by adding luminous energy to elements forming this path. The perceived motion direction of a sequence of random dot patterns can be dramatically changed by increasing luminance of some fraction of dots leaving all spatial and temporal intervals between dots unchanged. The threshold luminance increment delta I that is required in order to change the perceived motion direction indicates that differently oriented local motion vectors are resolved into a single common motion vector along which the whole pattern appears to move. An inverse spatial proximity rule was discovered: within a certain spatial limit the motion strength of a particular motion path is proportional to the distance between stimulus elements forming this path.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Resolving ambiguities in orientation, motion, and depth domains.

Three different perceptual systems--orientation, motion, and depth--can recover a global perceptual organization from spatially correlated random multielement patterns. In all three cases the global structure composed of random elements is evaluated by mechanisms performing measurements in the energy domain within appropriately defined local space-time areas. The selective increase in energy of one fraction of the elements may dramatically change the whole perceptual organization of the stimulus. In specially devised patterns one and the same element can belong to two or more separate perceptual organizations, the perceptual salience of one of which can be reinforced by a luminance increment of the elements comprising it. If a stimulus provides two different perceptual organizations to which each element could potentially belong, one of four possible solutions of the existing ambiguity will occur: suppression, rivalry, mixture, or parity. Two superimposed global orientation patterns either suppress or dominate over each other but cannot be seen simultaneously or in a mixed form. Characteristic of the depth system is that it allows multiple binocular matchings and parity of possible perceptual solutions. Finally, if a stimulus provides two or more paths along which each element may appear to move, the perceived global motion direction is determined by a mixture of directions of these competing motion paths. Dissimilarities in these ways of resolving ambiguities may be based on different principles defining regularity and coherence of an object in the orientation, motion, and depth domains.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1991

Size invariance in visual number discrimination.

This study deals with the observer's ability to discriminate the numerosity of two random dot-patterns irrespective of their relative size. One of these two patterns was a reference one that was always composed of 32 dots randomly distributed within a K x K invisible square window (K = 1.92 degrees). The second one was the test pattern with one of the five magnifications (K = 0.64 degrees, 1.28 degrees, 1.92 degrees, 2.56 degrees, 3.20 degrees) and the relative number of dots varied on 11 levels (N = -15, -12, -9, -6, -3, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 dots). The observer's task was to indicate which of the two patterns contained more dots. The results show that the stimulus size, as an irrelevant stimulus attribute, can be ignored in the judgements about relative numerosity. This means that the perceived numerosity is size invariant, at least for a 1.6-times magnification and a 3-times reduction of the test pattern. The size invariance observed constrains the range of potential models, since the perceived numerosity can be identified only by means of a feature of the stimulus that will remain invariant after any change in the absolute stimulus size.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Occupancy model of perceived numerosity.

Observers saw 234 different pairs of stochastically organized dot patterns and indicated which of the two patterns appeared to be more numerous. All of the data can be accounted for by supposing that the choice of the more numerous pattern is based on the determination of the occupancy indices of both patterns. Each dot is posited to have an impact upon its neighborhood in a constant occupancy radius R. The area of the stimulus plane occupied collectively by all dots provides a basis for judging relative numerosity; the pattern with the larger occupancy value is chosen as more numerous. The occupancy model, besides providing a general explanation of known numerosity illusions in strictly quantitative terms, can explain some puzzling aspects of numerosity perception.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1989

Pitch motion with random chord sequences.

Perception of global pitch motion was studied through psychoacoustic experiments with random chord sequences. Chords contained either six or eight (fixed) tone elements, being sinusoidal, sawtooth-like, or Shepard tones, which were either on or off according to a probability controlled by the experimenter. Sequences of 2, 4, 5, or 8 chords were used. Identification by subjects of the perceived direction of overall pitch motion (up or down) was found to be well accounted for by a model in which the ultimate pitch motion percept is given by a sum of contributions from selected element transitions--that is, transitions between adjoining tone elements in successive time frames only. In its simplest form, this dipole contribution model has only one free parameter, the perceptual noise for an element transition, which was estimated for various acoustic tone representations and chord arrangements. Results of two experiments, which were carried out independently in two different laboratories, are reported.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Reaction time to motion onset: local dispersion model analysis.

Data on the simple reaction time to motion onset presented in Ball and Sekuler [Psychol. Rev. 87, 435-469 (1980)] and Tynan and Sekuler [Vision Res. 20, 709-715 (1982)] are re-analysed on the basis of local dispersion model of motion detectability. According to this model the detectability at the moment t is determined by the mean value of the local dispersion function LD (t) within the interval (t-T, t), LD(t) being some measure of scattering (namely, running variance) of spatial positions passed through during the period (t-tau, t). Reaction time is assumed to be equal to the time that takes the detectability to reach some critical level plus constant execution time. Theoretical predictions fit the experimental data perfectly when two main parameters of the model, T/tau and tau are the same as were found appropriate in other, independent experiments on motion detection.

Humans↗
PubMed1984

Motion direction identification in random cinematograms: a general model.

The cinematograms of 12 two-state elements arranged in the clock positions in space and in a sequence of adjacent 100-ms frames in time were used as stimuli. Some positions in each frame (or all 12 of them) could be labeled as "domain" ones, and every element that was T frames and S positions (clockwise or counterclockwise) apart from a domain element could repeat the latter's state with probability P. The probability of the rotation direction identification was obtained as a function of T, S, P, number of frames, and the domain positions selection scheme. A generalized version of the reversed phi phenomenon was obtained: if P less than .5, then the psychometric value lies below .5 level. All the data can be accounted for by a simple model according to which the choice of direction is based on the counts of the different types of dipoles, each type being characterized by the probability and the weight of its count: In most situations all dipoles but the shortest ones (connecting the neighboring elements of successive frames) can be ignored.

Humans↗
PubMed1981

Control and sense of eye movement behind closed eyelids.

To investigate the question of what happens with regard to position sense and control of the human eyes when the eyelids are closed, the contact-wire-free electromagnetic eye movement recording method was developed. It was shown that after the start of blinking of eyelid closure, the eyeball moves up as the upper eyelids come down. Experimental data show human inability to maintain a given position of the eyes in the head under the closed lids. When the subject was asked to follow a simple geometrical path, a very weak metrical and topological correspondence between desired and actual paths occurred with closed eyes. It is proposed that the poor control of eye movements behind closed eyelids is due to the lack of available information about the eye position in the head. The assumption was confirmed by providing artificial auditory feedback about the eyeball position to the subject, which can be effectively used for gaze stabilization by the subject. It is suggested that visual information is the only useful basis for eye movement regulation under normal conditions.

Blinking↗
PubMed1976

Intergration and interruption in the masking of form by form.

Paris of geometric forms of equal area were presented, one form after another, with interstimulus intervals t ranging from 0 to 250 ms. The subject's task in experiment 1 was to recognise both stimuli. Identification of the form presented first (backward masking) across all values of t was of a nonmonotonic nature, with greatest impairment at values of t from 30 to 60 ms. Identification of the second form presented (forward masking) increased monotonically with increasing t. Different forms were recognised with different effectiveness across all values of t where masking took place. The results are interpreted on the basis of a multiple-stage processing model which assumes interaction between stimuli at different levels at different values of t. In experiment 2 the subject's task was to detect the presence or absence of a predesignated form. This condition yielded monotonic functions for both backward and forward masking. An explanation in terms of attention-dependent masking is given.

Attention↗