PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Alpern

Publications and source records attributed to J Alpern.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1993

Aortic dissection in cardiac allograft recipients. A report of two cases.

Aortic dissection in cardiac allograft recipients has not been reported previously, to our knowledge. We have observed two fatal aortic dissections in heart transplant recipients: one in the immediate postoperative period and one occurring 5 years after transplantation. We discuss the clinical presentations, pathologic findings, possible pathogenetic mechanisms, and risk factors. Because the frequency of aortic dissection after heart transplantation appears to be relatively low (< 1%), such disease may be clinically unsuspected. Given the uniformly poor outcome observed in our two patients, we suggest that increased awareness of the possible development of aortic dissection after heart transplantation may result in improved survival of affected patients.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1991

Isradipine for treatment of acute hypertension after myocardial revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and duration of action of iv isradipine in the control of postoperative hypertension immediately after myocardial revascularization. DESIGN: Prospective, phase 2 trial. SETTING: Surgical ICU, university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-one (15 male, six female) patients, ages 49 to 75 yr (mean 65 +/- 5), undergoing elective myocardial revascularization. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-one patients with postoperative hypertension after coronary artery bypass graft surgery received iv isradipine, a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist. Mean duration of the isradipine infusion was 96.9 +/- 29 min. Mean dose of isradipine, indexed to weight, was 16.63 +/- 6.66 micrograms/kg (n = 20). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty of the 21 patients achieved satisfactory BP control. The reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP), first noted at the 15-min point, was maximal at 1 hr when MAP decreased from 102 +/- 9 mm Hg baseline to 81 +/- 5 mm Hg (p less than .01), accompanied by a significant (p less than .01) decrease in systemic vascular resistance from 1753 +/- 339 baseline to 1180 +/- 229 dyne.sec/cm5. The CVP, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure did not change significantly. Heart rate and cardiac index increased; however, stroke volume index did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Isradipine is an acceptable agent for the treatment of hypertension in this setting.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Posttransplantation hemodynamics and exercise function are not affected by body-size matching of donor and recipient.

Because the number of heart transplantations performed is limited by the number of available donor hearts, many centers have expanded the acceptable criteria for donor hearts in an attempt to provide a sufficient number of donors for the number of patients awaiting heart transplantation. Traditionally, body-size matching has been an important criteria for matching donors with potential heart transplant recipients. Although initially thought to be detrimental, studies have shown no difference in survival of patients who receive hearts from smaller donors, but heart performance in this subset of patients who receive undersized hearts has not been extensively examined. We assessed exercise capacity and 1-year posttransplantation hemodynamics in 72 consecutive adult orthotopic heart transplant recipients, grouped according to donor-recipient weight ratio and the ratio of donor to recipient body surface area. Total exercise time and relative oxygen consumption were not significantly different among three groups of patients grouped according to donor-recipient body weight ratio as follows: low, 0.60 to 0.79; mid, 0.80 to 1.0; high, more than 1.0. No difference was noted among the three donor-recipient weight ratio groups with respect to 1-year posttransplantation hemodynamics. Similarly, 1-year posttransplantation hemodynamics were not different between patients with a body surface area ratio of less than 1.0 versus those with a body surface area ratio of 1.0 or more. Differences in pretransplantation hemodynamics or graft preservation did not affect our results. Neither donor-recipient weight ratio nor body surface area ratio correlated with any posttransplantation hemodynamic measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗