PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

J Arriaga

Publications and source records attributed to J Arriaga.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The antihypertensive effect of lisinopril compared to atenolol in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

In a multicenter, parallel, double-blind study, lisinopril was compared with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Four hundred ninety patients were randomized to a once-a-day treatment with lisinopril 20 mg or atenolol 50 mg for 4 weeks, and the doses of lisinopril or atenolol were increased up to 80 mg or 200 mg, respectively, at 4-week intervals if sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was not well controlled. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 or 25 mg was added after 12 weeks, if necessary, and titrated upward after 4 weeks to a maximum dose of 25 or 50 mg/day. Lisinopril and atenolol reduced SDBP to a similar extent. All reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure were significant (less than 0.01). Lisinopril produced a significant (less than 0.01) greater reduction in sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) than atenolol. Addition of HCTZ caused further blood pressure reductions (p less than 0.01). Five patients (1.7%) on lisinopril and four (2.0%) on atenolol developed skin rashes during weeks 1-12. Two patients (0.7%) on lisinopril 80 mg developed proteinuria (greater than 1 g/day). Cough occurred more often with lisinopril (4.5%), and elevated triglycerides occurred more often with atenolol (2.0%).

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Enalapril in essential hypertension.

It is now well recognised that the renin-angiotensin system plays a key role in the control of blood pressure not only through circulating angiotensin II but through its interaction with the autonomic and central nervous systems. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have proved to be effective in lowering blood pressure in different types of hypertension. This study evaluates the antihypertensive effects of enalapril, a new, potent, long acting ACE inhibitor. 50 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were included in 4 groups. Group I was used to compare the effects of enalapril and propranolol on blood pressure, renal function, plasma renin activity, aldosterone excretion and plasma lipids in 24 patients after 23 weeks. Group II was used to evaluate long term effects (48 weeks) of these drugs in 13 patients. Group III included 32 patients that received enalapril as monotherapy for 6 to 12 weeks. Group IV was studied to estimate the antihypertensive effect of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide in 18 patients receiving enalapril. The effect on mean blood pressure was similar with enalapril and propranolol (enalapril 117 versus 103 mm Hg and propranolol 115 versus 104 mm Hg); however, the glomerular filtration rate decreased with propranolol (105 versus 87 ml/min; p less than 0.05) and was unaltered with enalapril (102 versus 98 ml/min). Triglycerides rose with propranolol (179 versus 231 mg/dl; p less than 0.05) and did not change with enalapril (157 versus 121 mg/dl). In the long term, antihypertensive effects were similar and no significant side effects were observed. In 14/32 patients blood pressure became normal with enalapril alone. Low doses of hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg) decreased mean blood pressure by 10mm Hg when added to enalapril. The antihypertensive effect of enalapril was similar to that of propranolol; however, the lowering effect on glomerular filtration rate of propranolol did not occur with enalapril. A slight rise in triglycerides occurred only with propranolol. No significant side effects were observed with either propranolol or enalapril. Used as monotherapy, enalapril normalised blood pressure in 44% of cases. Addition of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide significantly increased the antihypertensive effect of enalapril.

Adult

Echocardiographic changes after successful renal transplantation in young nondiabetic patients.

Eighteen young nondiabetic patients with chronic renal failure were studied by M-mode echocardiography before and three to 67 weeks after a successful renal transplant. Left ventricular mass (LVM), cardiac output (CO), and stroke work, which were increased before the operation, decreased afterward, in some cases to normal values. Both regression of the LVM and normalization of CO were detected as early as three weeks postoperatively and probably resulted from changes in the end-diastolic volume, mean systemic blood pressure, and hematocrit as a consequence of normal renal function. Because all the patients had normal left ventricular function and only moderate dilatation of the left ventricle, it is not known whether these striking beneficial changes after SRT also will occur in patients with significant dilatation or dysfunction of the left ventricle.

Adult

Echocardiographic changes in pheochromocytoma.

M-mode echocardiography proved to be a useful method in the diagnosis of cardiac changes produced by pheochromocytoma. Findings recorded during a hypertensive crisis included systolic anterior movement of the anterior mitral leaflet, paradoxical septal motion, and prominent excursion of the posterior wall. After surgery, early regression of the chronic effects of hypertension was observed.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms

[Enalapril in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension].

This study evaluates the antihypertensive effects of enalapril, a new, potent, long acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. 69 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were included in 5 groups. Group I was used to compare the effects of enalapril and propranolol on blood pressure, renal function, plasma renin activity, aldosterone excretion and plasma lipids in 24 patients after 12 weeks. Group II was used to evaluate long term effects (48 weeks) of these drugs in 13 patients. Group III included 32 patients that received enalapril as monotherapy for 6 to 12 weeks. Group IV was studied to estimate the antihypertensive effect of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide in 18 patients receiving enalapril. Group V was used to compare the antihypertensive effect of hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril or enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in 19 patients. The effect on mean blood pressure was similar with enalapril and propranolol (117 versus 103 mmHg and 115 versus 104 mmHg respectively); however, glomerular filtration rate decreased with propranolol (105 versus 87 ml/min; p less than .05) and was unaltered with enalapril (102 versus 98 ml/min). Triglycerides rose with propranolol (179 versus 231 mg/dl; p less than .05) and did not change with enalapril (157 versus 121 mg/dl). In the long term, antihypertensive effects were similar and no significant side effects were observed. In 14/32 patients blood pressure became normal with enalapril alone. Low doses of hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg) decreased mean blood pressure by 10 mmHg when added to enalapril. The antihypertensive effect of enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide was significant greater than that of enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide alone. Used as monotherapy, enalapril normalised blood pressure in 44% of cases. Addition of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide significantly increased the antihypertensive effect of enalapril. These results show that enalapril is a good antihypertensive agent alone or with low doses of diuretic.

Adult

[Congestive myocardiopathy and early dyastolic closure of the tricuspid valve. Report of a case with acute tricuspidization].

A case with congestive cardiomiopathy and early diastolic closure of the tricuspid valve is presented. This abnormal echocardiographic finding was probably the result of severe tricuspid regurgitation occurring in a restricted right ventricle. The absence of paradoxical septum was determinedly the left ventricular pathology. In this case, echocardiography was more sensitive for the detection of the left sided abnormalities, than the heart cath data.

Cardiac Catheterization