PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Aucott

Publications and source records attributed to J Aucott.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

When doctors marry doctors: a survey exploring the professional and family lives of young physicians.

BACKGROUND: Soon, half of all physicians may be married to other physicians (that is, in dual-doctor families). Little is known about how marriage to another physician affects physicians themselves. OBJECTIVE: To learn how physicians in dual-doctor families differ from other physicians in their professional and family lives and in their perceptions of career and family. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two medical schools in Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of physicians from the classes of 1980 to 1990. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to a questionnaire on hours worked, income, number of children, child-rearing arrangements, and perceptions about work and family. RESULTS: Of 2000 eligible physicians, 1208 responded (752 men and 456 women). Twenty-two percent of male physicians and 44% of female physicians were married to physicians (P < 0.001). Men and women in dual-doctor families differed (P < 0.001) from other married physicians in key aspects of their professional and family lives: They earned less money, less often felt that their career took precedence over their spouse's career, and more often played a major role in child-rearing. These differences were greater for female physicians than for male physicians. Men and women in dual-doctor families were similar to other physicians in the frequency with which they achieved career goals and goals for their children and with which they felt conflict between professional and family roles. Marriage to another physician had distinct benefits (P < 0.001) for both men and women, including more frequent enjoyment from shared work interests and higher family incomes. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women in dual-doctor families differed from other physicians in many aspects of their professional and family lives, but they achieved their career and family goals as frequently. These differences reflect personal choices that will increasingly affect the profession as more physicians marry physicians.

Child↗
PubMed1999

Attitudes of faculty, housestaff, and medical students toward clinical practice guidelines.

PURPOSE: To examine attitudes of faculty, housestaff, and medical students toward clinical practice guidelines. METHOD: In a 1997 cross-sectional survey, a two-part, 26-item, self-administered questionnaire was mailed to all faculty, housestaff, and medical students in the department of internal medicine at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. The questionnaire asked for demographic information and attitudes toward clinical guidelines. RESULTS: Of 379 persons surveyed, 254 (67%) returned usable questionnaires: 56% of the medical students, 70% of the housestaff, and 73% of the full-time faculty. Medical students reported learning about guidelines predominantly during clerkships in internal medicine (71%) and pediatrics (68%). Overall, the respondents agreed most strongly that guidelines are "useful for the care of common problems," and least strongly that guidelines are "difficult to apply to individual patients" and "reduce physician options in patient care." Faculty were more likely to consider guidelines a "good educational tool" and less likely than were medical students and housestaff to agree that they promote "cookbook medicine." Of 11 influences on clinical decision making, the three groups together rated practice guidelines eighth or ninth. The use of guidelines for academic investigations was rated most appropriate, overall. In terms of their appropriateness, faculty consistently rated the use of guidelines more favorably except for use in malpractice suits. CONCLUSION: Faculty, housestaff, and medical students have significantly different perceptions of and attitudes toward clinical practice guidelines. Further studies are needed to explain the reasons for these differences. Considerable education and involvement must occur at all levels for practice guidelines to be successfully implemented and understood.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Oral antibiotics in the nineties: new drugs and new challenges in primary care.

The primary care physician is faced with a bewildering array of new oral antimicrobials to treat common infections. These agents promise to be extremely effective as replacements for time-honored drugs, as prophylaxis, and for the treatment of infections previously requiring prolonged intravenous therapy. The overuse of the newer macrolides, quinolones, and beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors may prove to be ecologically and economically costly. It is feared that the selective pressure from these broad spectrum agents may burden society with an even greater problem of multiply resistant community-acquired pathogens. The specific therapeutic and economic advantages and disadvantages of each class should be considered and the decision to employ these agents should be highly individualized.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

The Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center firm system.

Hospital-based "firms" provide a means for combatting the fragmentation experienced by both patients and caregivers in the modern teaching hospital environment. A "firm" is an academic group practice that includes attending physicians, physician trainees, nurses, other staff, and patients. Each person's relationship with a firm lasts throughout his or her association with a particular institution. This article describes the firm system that was recently implemented on the Medical Service of the Cleveland VAMC. This system incorporates both inpatient and outpatient general medical services and provides for unbiased assignment of patients, physicians, and nurses.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Lymphocytes of persons with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and related conditions express reactivity with the monoclonal antibody 4D12 reflective of in vivo lymphocyte activation.

We observed that lymphocytes obtained from healthy persons generally expressed infrequent reactivity with the monoclonal antibody 4D12, an antibody raised against a cell line infected by the human T-lymphotropic virus type I. As had been observed previously, persons bearing HLA-B5 cross-reactive antigens and certain other allotypes had frequent lymphocyte reactivity with 4D12. Lymphocytes obtained from persons infected by the human immunodeficiency virus were highly reactive with 4D12 as were lymphocytes obtained from persons with other viral or bacterial infections. Flow cytometric studies revealed greater 4D12 reactivity by larger lymphocytes, and in vitro studies demonstrated that lectin-stimulated lymphocytes acquired 4D12-reactive antigens. There was also a significant correlation between expression of 4D12-reactive antigens and the presence of the interleukin-2 receptor as recognized by the monoclonal antibody anti-Tac. Thus, the monoclonal antibody 4D12 recognizes a lymphocyte surface antigen frequently expressed among persons with various acute and chronic infections. This antigen is a marker of lymphocyte activation.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗