PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Aurand

Publications and source records attributed to J Aurand.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Retraining physicians for primary care. A study of physician perspectives and program development.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the number and kinds of programs that medical schools and managed care organizations offer or plan to offer to retrain physician specialists to practice primary care medicine and to discover physicians' attitudes toward such retraining. DESIGN: A survey was mailed in 1994 to all 126 medical schools and the 19 largest US managed care organizations to collect detailed information about existing and potential retraining programs. Physicians' attitudes toward retraining were elicited from participants in 3 geographically diverse focus groups. Selected specialists were polled through the national survey of the American Medical Association's Socioeconomic Monitoring System to ascertain the demand for retraining. RESULTS: The majority of institutions contacted perceived a need for retraining, but few programs had been established. Programs being "considered" varied widely in duration, class size, target audience, accreditation, and projected training settings. Although unenthusiastic about retraining, physicians preferred programs that would expand their patient base, maintain the practice population, be inexpensive and close to home, and provide hands-on training in the eventual practice environment. Physicians also preferred a goal-oriented, part-time retraining program in a large group practice or managed care setting that would allow them to practice their specialty while retraining. Few planned or existing programs incorporate many of these features. The most likely candidates for retraining are subspecialty physicians who currently provide some primary care and are employed by a medical plan. CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts by those who perceive that a need for more generalist physicians is stimulating interest in retraining specialists and subspecialists to provide primary medical care, physician interest and program availability remain low, and programs under development are not being designed to attract those who may seek retraining. This situation is probably fortuitous, because changed perceptions about the adequacy of the generalist physician workforce since the beginning of this study have diminished the call for retraining.

Adult↗

Gastroenterology workforce modeling.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the current supply and distribution of gastroenterologists and project future supply under various scenarios to provide a paradigm for workforce reform. DESIGN: An analysis of current practices and distribution of gastroenterologists and a demographic model, using the 1992 gastroenterology workforce as a baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of current supply, distribution, and practice profiles with past data and future projections, using analyses of data from the 1993 Area Resource File, 1992 Medicare Part B file, age- and sex-specific death and retirement rates from the Bureau of Health Professions, managed care staffing patterns, the National Survey of Internal Medicine Manpower, and the Bureau of the Census. RESULTS: Rapid growth in the number of US gastroenterologists has resulted in a gastroenterologist-to-population ratio double that used on average by health maintenance organizations. In addition, the work profile of gastroenterologists is shared significantly by primary care physicians and other specialists, with the exception of a few specific and uncommon procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Empirical evidence suggests that, even in the absence of detailed models to describe the desired supply/need balance for gastroenterology, the US health care system and clinicians may benefit from a reduction in gastroenterology training programs. The Gastroenterology Leadership Council endorsed a goal of 25% to 50% reduction in trainee numbers over 5 years, and recent National Resident Matching Program data indicate that a voluntary downsizing process is in full force. This study illustrates a paradigm for workforce planning that could be useful for other medical specialties.

Demography↗

Protein A as an immunoadsorbent in radioimmunoassay: usefulness in a rapid assay for urinary luteinizing hormone.

A staphylococcal cell wall protein, designated protein A, is known specifically and rapidly to bind to immunoglobulin G. We have utilized this protein as an immunoadsorbent to separate antigen-antibody complexes from free antigen in a rapid 6-hour radioimmunoassay for urinary human luteinizing hormone (hLH). We have further documented the efficacy of this system and the optimal conditions for this assay. The ability of this assay to provide rapid and reliable measurements of hLH in timed urinary specimens provides a useful tool for determination of the preovulatory LH surge and prediction of the time of ovulation in women.

Antigen-Antibody Complex↗