PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J B Dubois

Publications and source records attributed to J B Dubois.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Concomitant use of tamoxifen with radiotherapy enhances subcutaneous breast fibrosis in hypersensitive patients.

Concomitant use of adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) and radiation therapy (RT) is not widely accepted. We aim to assess whether this treatment is associated with an increased risk of developing subcutaneous fibrosis after conservative or radical surgery in breast cancer patients. We analysed 147 women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant RT, and who were included in the KFS 00539-9-1997/SKL 00778-2-1999 prospective study aimed at evaluating the predictive value of CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis for the development of radiation-induced late effects. TAM (20 mg day(-1)) with concomitant RT was prescribed in 90 hormone receptor-positive patients. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of complication-relapse-free survival (CRFS) rates at 3 years, 48% (95% CI 37.2-57.6%) vs 66% (95% CI 49.9-78.6%) and complication-free survival (CFS) rates at 2 years, 51% (95% CI 40-61%) vs 80% (95% CI 67-89%) in the TAM and no-TAM groups, respectively. In each of these groups, the CRFS rates were significantly lower for patients with low levels of CD8 radiation-induced apoptosis, 20% (95% CI 10-31.9%), 66% (95% CI 51.1-77.6%), and 79% (95% CI 55-90.9%) for CD8 </=16, 16-24, and >24%, respectively. Similar results were observed for the CFS rates. The concomitant use of TAM with RT is significantly associated with an increased incidence of grade 2 or greater subcutaneous fibrosis; therefore, caution is needed for radiosensitive patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Pilot study of conformal intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer].

PURPOSE: - To report our experience on treatment planning and acute toxicity in 16 patients suffering from clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: - Between March 2001 and October 2002, 16 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment planning included an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. All patients received the entire treatment course with IMRT to a prescribed dose of 78 Gy. All IMRT treatment plans were compared with a theoretical conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Acute lower gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) toxicity was evaluated in all patients and graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE v. 3.0). A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. RESULTS: - Ninety-five percent of the PTV2 received more than 76 Gy using IMRT or 3D-CRT with no difference between both methods. The dose-volume histogram mean obtained for the PTV2 was not different between IMRT and 3D-CRT. IMRT improved homogeneity of the delivered dose to the PTV2 as compared with 3D-CRT (7.5 vs 9%, respectively). Ninety-five percent of the PTV1 received 5 Gy more using IMRT with protection of the bladder and the rectum walls. The benefit was considered below 75 and 70 Gy for the wall of the bladder and the rectum, respectively. Grade 2 GI and GU toxicity was observed in four (25%) and five (31%) patients, respectively. No grade 3 toxicity was observed. There was a trend towards a relationship between the mean rectal dose and acute rectal toxicity but without statistical significant difference (P =0.09). CONCLUSION: - Dose escalation with IMRT is feasible with no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Examination of a larger cohort and longer-term follow-up are warranted in the future.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

[Adjuvant treatment of breast cancer by concomitant hormonotherapy and radiotherapy: state of the art].

Combining radiation and hormone therapy has become common clinical practice in recent years for locally advanced prostate cancer. The use of such concomitant therapy in the treatment of breast disease has been very infrequently reported in the literature, but such an application seems justified given the common hormonal dependence of breast cancer and the potential synergetic effect of these two treatment modalities. As adjuvant therapy, tamoxifen is the key drug in the hormonal treatment arsenal, providing a significant improvement in both local control and global survival rates. Aromatase inhibitors are currently being evaluated in this setting, and initial results are promising. In vitro, tamoxifen does not seem to offer a protective effect against radiation. In clinical use, the few available published studies confirm the superiority of the association of radiation with tamoxifen as opposed to radiation therapy alone in decreasing local recurrences of surgically removed breast tumors. Toxicity associated with such concomitant therapy includes mainly subcutaneous and pulmonary fibroses. However, subcutaneous fibrosis and its cosmetic impact on the treated breast are frequently described side effects of radiation therapy, and their incidence may actually be reduced when tamoxifen is associated. The evidence is less controversial for pulmonary fibrosis, which is more common with the concomitant therapy. The association of radiation and aromatase inhibitors has as of yet rarely been reported. Letrozole (Femara) has a radiosensitizing effect on breast-cancer cell lines transfected with the aromatase gene. Clinical data assessing this effect in vivo are not available. The FEMTABIG study (letrozole vs. tamoxifen vs. sequential treatment) did not specify the sequence of radiation and hormonal therapy. The ATAC study comparing the adjuvant use of anastrozole (Arimidex) and tamoxifen does not provide any information on the number of patients receiving radiation concomitant with the hormonal treatment, and in addition also does not specify the sequence of radiation and hormonal treatment. The TEAM study compared exemestane (Aromasine) and tamoxifen, but specified that hormonal treatment follow the completion of radiation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

[Concomitant use of radiotherapy and gemcitabine: preclinical findings and clinical practice].

Gemcitabine is pyrimidine analog which has demonstrated antitumoral activity in a variety of solid tumors. Laboratory studies demonstrating that gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer led to a variety of trials combining radiation and gemcitabine. In the clinic, phase I-II studies are still trying to determine the optimal dose and schedule which could be use in daily clinical practice. This review summarizes the mechanisms of interaction between radiotherapy and gemcitabine and presents several therapeutic schemes for each tumor location.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

[Preliminary results of the assessment of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostatic and head and neck tumors (STIC 2001)].

INTRODUCTION: Between May 2002 and May 2004, eight French comprehensive cancer centres did a prospective nonrandomized study including 200 patients, 100 with cancer of the prostate and 100 with head and neck cancers. Half of each patient group was treated by IMRT and the others by RTC 3D. This clinical study was associated with an economic study and a physics study. We report here the first results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For the clinical study, the analysis of the data of the first 88 patients irradiated for a prostatic cancer shows that 39 received RTC and 49 IMRT with a mean dose of 78 Gy at the ICRU point at 2 Gy per fraction. For H&N tumours, the preliminary analysis was done on the 87 first patients with a mean follow-up of 11.5 months (2 to 25 months) and a median of 8.4 months for the IMRT groups and 13.2 months for the RTC group. The economic study was done on the first 157 patients included during the first 18 months: 71 treated by RTC (35 for H&N and 36 for prostate) and 86 treated by IMRT (38 for H&N and 48 for prostate). The assessment of the direct costs was realized by a micro-costing technique. The physical study compared dose distributions for both techniques and has created quality control recommendations. RESULTS: Clinical studies of the acute reactions do not show any difference between groups, but we want to point out the short follow-up and the relatively high dose delivered to cancers of the prostate. The physics study demonstrates that IMRT is technically feasible in good clinical conditions with high quality assurance, a good reproducibility and precision. Dosimetric data show that IMRT could certainly spare organs at risk more than RTC for H&N tumours. The direct costs of "routine" treatments for H&N tumours were 4922 euros for IMRT versus 1899 euros for RTC and for the prostatic cancers 4911 euros for IMRT versus 2357 for RTC.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Potentiation of ionising radiation by targeting tumour necrosis factor alpha using a bispecific antibody in human pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this study was to treat carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-expressing pancreatic carcinoma cells with tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and simultaneous radiation therapy (RT), using a bispecific antibody (BAb) anti-TNFalpha/anti-CEA. TNFalpha used alone produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the clonogenic capacity of the cultured cells. Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle progression confirmed the accumulation of cells in G(1) phase after exposure to TNFalpha. When TNFalpha was added 12 h before RT, the surviving fraction at 2 Gy was 60% lower than that obtained with irradiation alone (0.29 vs 0.73, respectively, P<0.00001). In combination treatment, cell cycle analysis demonstrated that TNFalpha reduced the number of cells in radiation-induced G(2) arrest, blocked irreversibly the cells in G(1) phase, and showed an additive decrease of the number of cells in S phase. In mice, RT as a single agent slowed tumour progression as compared with the control group (P<0.00001). BAb+TNFalpha+RT combination enhanced the delay for the tumour to reach 1500 mm(3) as compared with RT alone or with RT+TNFalpha (P=0.0011). Median delays were 90, 93, and 142 days for RT alone, RT+TNFalpha, and RT+BAb+TNFalpha groups, respectively. These results suggest that TNFalpha in combination with BAb and RT may be beneficial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in locally advanced or adjuvant settings.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Docetaxel and radiotherapy and pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase 1 trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly docetaxel delivered concurrently with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with histologically proven locally non-resectable advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled in this study. Patients received 4 weekly doses of docetaxel by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion with 40 Gy of external beam radiation therapy during 4 weeks. Patients who were stabilized or in response, received 2 additional cycles of docetaxel with a 10 Gy boost of radiotherapy. Doses were escalated at 10 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of 3 new patients until MTD was observed. RESULTS: Four patients received docetaxel at 20 mg/m2/week, 3 at 25 mg/m2/week, 3 at 30 mg/m2/week, and 3 at 35 mg/m2/week. All patients, except 2, were given the treatment in its integrity. The most common toxicities were nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and abdominal pains. Except for 1 patient, all toxicity was reversible and did not exceed grade 3. Hematologic toxicity was mild and has not required treatment interruption. 28% of the patients had to be rehospitalized. A total of 73 cycles was administered with a mean of 4 cycles per patient (2-6). CONCLUSION: Even the MTD was not reached, dose escalation was stopped at 35 mg/m2/week. This dose is comparable to the ones previously published using docetaxel in combination with radiotherapy in other tumors. Three patients achieved stable disease and 1 patient an objective response. This combination of weekly docetaxel and radiotherapy shows a feasible and well-tolerated regimen, with, nonetheless, a significant rate of rehospitalization, for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2001

[Intra-operative radiation therapy in tumors of the digestive tract].

All the retrospective and prospective studies concerning IORT in tumors of the digestive tract tend to substantiate a significant improvement in local control without a significant increase in survival. Improvements in the results of IORT can be expected in the near future, and may occur on several fronts: - Technological improvements: advances in the development of IORT machines, with the construction of electron accelerators specifically designed for IORT; greater precision in the systems of collimation (asymmetric collimator, multiple leaves, computerization of the control of collimation); and increased adaptability of the localizers to each clinical situation and to each patients. - Increase in the biological effects of IORT: determination of the exact role of IORT in relation to other therapeutic methods, its integration into the global therapeutic strategy for cancer, and the optimization of IORT doses should all be studied in phase II and III trials. Interesting results are expected from the combination of different methods of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy; the cumulative effect of radiosensitization and cytotoxicity can bring about both local control and treatment of the general disease. In addition, the combination of hypoxic cell radiosensitizers and IORT, a source of important cellular hypoxia as a result of single doses, appears promising. - Lastly, randomized studies in a larger number of patients with objectives and methodologies to be perfected will document the actual contribution of IORT to an increase in survival as part of an overall treatment strategy for digestive tumors. At present, the prognosis remains significantly related to systemic metastatic evolution; this can only be influenced by chemotherapy, whose efficacy remains to be demonstrated. As means for better control of systemic disease are discovered, the clear benefits of local control via IORT will assume increased importance.

Biliary Tract Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

[Contribution of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative evaluation for very low rectal cancer].

UNLABELLED: Abdominoperineal resection is the standard treatment of very low rectal carcinoma. Pretherapeutic evaluation of locoregional extension relies mainly on digital rectal examination. The interest of endorectal ultrasonography to assess lateral and inferior margins is still to be determined. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the ability of endorectal ultrasonography to evaluate the possibility of conservative anal sphincter surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1996 and June 1998, 34 patients (20 men, 14 women, mean age: 61 years, range: 43-80) have been treated for rectal adenocarcinoma. Endorectal ultrasonography was made with a linear probe (EUP-U33). Before treatment, the mean distance between the lower pole of the tumor and the anal verge was 3.9 cm (range: 2-5), and between the lower pole and the puborectalis sling 2.3 mm (range: 0-7). A uTN classification was made. Preoperative treatment was radiotherapy (40 Gy in 4 patients, 60 Gy in 24 patients), or radiochemotherapy (6 patients). Pre- and post-radiotherapy endorectal ultrasonography results were compared to the patholocical analysis of operative specimen. RESULTS: Wall infiltration was correctly evaluated in 57% of patients after radiotherapy. In 26/34 cases, a safe plane existed before and after radiotherapy, and correlation of endorectal ultrasonography with histology was 96%. For patients without safe plane, correlation with histology was 75%. CONCLUSION: For very low rectal tumors, with an aggressive sphincter conservation approach, endorectal ultrasonography allows to assess sphincter invasion with 96% fiability when safe plane exists.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

2-Mercapto-propylamine: radiopharmacology in mice, pharmacokinetic studies in mice and in rats, mutagenicity and differential distribution between tissues and EMT6 tumour in mice.

Radiopharmacological studies conducted with 2-mercapto-propylamine (2MPA), a methylated derivative of cysteamine, indicated a good efficiency in whole body irradiated mice as observed over a period of 9 months. Its efficacy was also checked for supralethal irradiations of restricted body parts: in the brain and the rectum. The diffusion of 14C-labelled 2MPA was assessed by an autoradiographic study and measurement of its distribution in the main organs in mice. 2MPA penetrated the blood brain barrier but concentrated preferentially in the liver, kidney and skin. Fixation on plasmatic proteins was much lower in rats than in mice but urinary and faecal eliminations were of the same order for the two species. An important biliary excretion of 2MPA or its metabolites in rats combined with their lack in the faeces underlies an entero-hepatic cycle. A differential diffusion of 2MPA between normal tissues in mice and EMT6 tumours was clearly revealed by autoradiographic observations. The ability of 2MPA to trap 2,2'-diphenyl 1-picryl hydrazyl, an organic free radical, was checked by in vitro studies. Its performance indicated that 2MPA acted at least as a free radical scavenger. Ames test demonstrated that 2MPA whatever the dose employed was not a mutagenic agent. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetical observations provided a better understanding of the activity of this drug.

Animals↗
PubMed1998

[Carcinoma of unknown primary site. Apropos of 100 patients treated at the Montpellier regional center of cancer prevention].

PURPOSE: Carcinomas of unknown primary site are frequent neoplasms which raise diagnostic and therapeutic problems in clinical practice. METHODS: Clinical records of 100 patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site whose clinical management took place at the Centre Regional de Lutte Contre le Cancer de Montpellier were retrospectively reviewed. Initial clinical and biological characteristics, pre-treatment evaluation, therapies and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Three main histological types were observed: adenocarcinoma (66 patients), poorly differentiated carcinoma (19 patients), epidermoid carcinoma (11 patients). Bone, lung, lymph nodes and liver were the most frequently involved metastatic sites. Analysis of the investigations aimed at identifying the primary site (none of which being positive) showed 68 different combinations in 100 patients. Anemia (< 100 g/L) was observed in 10 patients, while serum alkaline phosphatase was increased in 42 patients. Seven patients died before any therapy. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy was advocated in 70 and 59 patients, respectively. Thirty-six patients had concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy included a platinum derivative in 53 patients. The median number of cycles was four. Nine objective responses were observed, six of which occurred in patients who were receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Ninety-six deaths were encountered, 95 due to the disease progress and one due to an intercurrent cause. The median survival was 9 months. Univariate analysis identified two prognostic factors: the number of metastatic sites and the serum alkaline phosphatase. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms the difficulties in the management of patients with carcinomas of unknown primary site. A literature review suggests limited diagnostic investigations in clinical practice with the aim of identifying tumors of potential prognostic (breast and ovary) or therapeutic (prostate) value. Apart from specific subgroups of patients for whom specific therapy is recommended, there is no current standard chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1998

[Cancer of the breast: the return of lymphoscintigraphy?].

Lymphoscintigraphy, after arousing great hope in the past in the field of breast cancer, has now been abandoned. The inability of this examination to predict the metastatic status of the nodes, and progress in therapeutic concepts have led to abandoning this technique. However, certain problems encountered by regional irradiation programmes and the work concerning sentinel node detection may bring this technique back into the spotlight. Lymphoscintigraphy may make it possible to adopt an individual approach, case by case, of the lymphatic drainage basins in breast tumors, thus enabling certain patients to benefit from regional irradiation when it would not have been traditionally recommended for this irradiation. Another aspect concerns the problem of the volumes irradiated. Work carried out with lymphoscintigraphy has enabled internal mammary chain nodes to be precisely located. Theses studies show the necessity of adapting the irradiation field to each individual case, but the clinical impact is limited, in the end, by the low recurrence rate in the internal mammary chain area. However, the new techniques of computer merging of scintigraphic and scanner images could enable the spatial position of the nodes in the upper axillary and supraclavicular regions to be determined. This would have, a priori, much wider clinical impact. Lymphoscintigraphic detection of the sentinel node is another field of major interest, but this technique is in competition with staining techniques. This procedure leads to a large reduction in morbidity of axillary surgery in 70% of patients. The use of techniques for detecting micrometastases in the sentinel node opens prospects in terms of prognosis. The qualities of differents radiotracers and different injection sites possible are also discussed.

Axilla↗
PubMed1997

Improved survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and goserelin.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized, prospective trial comparing external irradiation with external irradiation plus goserelin (an agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone that reduces testosterone secretion) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: From 1987 to 1995, 415 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy plus immediate treatment with goserelin. The patients had a median age of 71 years (range, 51 to 80). Patients in both groups received 50 Gy of radiation to the pelvis over a period of five weeks and an additional 20 Gy over an additional two weeks as a prostatic boost. Patients in the combined-treatment group received 3.6 mg of goserelin (Zoladex) subcutaneously every four weeks starting on the first day of irradiation and continuing for three years; those patients also received cyproterone acetate (150 mg orally per day) during the first month of treatment to inhibit the transient rise in testosterone associated with the administration of goserelin. RESULTS: Data were available for analysis on 401 patients. The median follow-up was 45 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at five years were 79 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 72 to 86 percent) in the combined-treatment group and 62 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 52 to 72 percent) in the radiotherapy group (P=0.001). The proportion of surviving patients who were free of disease at five years was 85 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 92 percent) in the combined-treatment group and 48 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 58 percent) in the radiotherapy group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant treatment with goserelin, when started simultaneously with external irradiation, improves local control and survival in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

A randomized double blind placebo controlled multicenter study of mesalazine for the prevention of acute radiation enteritis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Symptoms of acute radiation enteritis (ARE), dominated by diarrhea, occur in more than 70% of patients receiving pelvic irradiation. Eicosanoids and free radicals release have been implicated in the pathogenesis. Mesalazine (5-ASA) is a potent inhibitor of their synthesis in the mucosa and could therefore be of some interest in preventing ARE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was performed in six radiotherapy units in France who agreed on standardized irradiation procedures. One hundred and fifty-three patients planned for external beam radiotherapy to the pelvis > or = 45 Gy for prostate (n = 97) or uterus (n = 54) cancer were randomized on a double blind basis to receive prophylactic 5-ASA (4 g/day Pentasa) or placebo. Patients with concomitant chemotherapy were excluded. Prostate and uterus cancers were chosen since these centropelvic tumors require a similar radiotherapy protocol during the first step of treatment and involve a comparable volume of small intestine. The symptoms of ARE and their severity were assessed every week during irradiation, and 1 and 3 months after its end. All patients followed a low fiber and low lactose diet. End points were diarrhea, use of antidiarrheal agents, abdominal pain, and body weight. Effficacy was evaluated using intention to treat. RESULTS: (means +/- SD) Groups did not differ for age (mean 64 +/- 9 years), sex, tumor site, or irradiation procedure. During irradiation, diarrhea occurred in 69% and 66% of the 5-ASA and placebo groups, respectively (chi2, P = 0.22). Curves of survival without diarrhea did not differ between groups (logrank P = 0.09). Severity of diarrhea did not differ between groups except at d15 where it was significantly more severe in the 5-ASA group (ANOVA P = 0.006). Duration of diarrhea did not differ (22 +/- 15 days in both groups, P = 0.88). Abdominal pain was less frequently reported in the 5-ASA group at d28 (34% vs. 51%, P = 0.048). Use of antidiarrheal agents and body weight did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine 4 g/day did not decrease the symptoms of ARE.

Acute Disease↗